Am 15.09.18 um 10:30 schrieb Matthias Andree:
> Are you looking at stripped files, or what does "size" print? Are
Here is what "size" is saying:
clang binaries:
4# size *
textdata bss dec hex filename
2233 672 82913 b61 darktable
975972400 48 1
Am 15.09.18 um 10:30 schrieb Matthias Andree:
> Are you looking at stripped files, or what does "size" print? Are
> optimization options similar?
The only changes I made are these in build.sh:
export CC=/usr/bin/clang
export CXX=/usr/bin/clang++
INSTALL_PREFIX_DEFAULT="/opt/darktable-clang"
I do
Am 15.09.18 um 09:40 schrieb Matthias Bodenbinder:
> Am 13.09.18 um 07:38 schrieb Matthias Bodenbinder:
>> export CC=/usr/bin/clang
>> export CXX=/usr/bin/clang++
>> INSTALL_PREFIX_DEFAULT="/opt/darktable-clang"
>>
> This is working now. I had to remove the build directory after editing
> build.sh
Am 13.09.18 um 07:38 schrieb Matthias Bodenbinder:
> export CC=/usr/bin/clang
> export CXX=/usr/bin/clang++
> INSTALL_PREFIX_DEFAULT="/opt/darktable-clang"
>
This is working now. I had to remove the build directory after editing build.sh
I have the following packages installed on Manjaro:
clang
Am 14.09.18 um 10:15 schrieb johannes hanika:
> hi,
>
> clang needs libomp-dev, not libgomp which gcc uses. i assume you have
> that installed?
There is no such package in manjaro. I have openmp 6.0.1-1 with these files
install
/usr/include/omp.h
/usr/include/ompt.h
/usr/lib/libiomp5.so
/usr/
hi,
clang needs libomp-dev, not libgomp which gcc uses. i assume you have
that installed?
cheers,
jo
On Fri, Sep 14, 2018 at 5:45 AM Matthias Bodenbinder
wrote:
>
> Am 13.09.18 um 15:58 schrieb sturmflut:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > IIRC this has something to do with clang not linking against libatomic
Am 13.09.18 um 15:58 schrieb sturmflut:
> Hi all,
>
> IIRC this has something to do with clang not linking against libatomic
> by default, but GCC doing so.
>
> regards,
> Simon
And how to I make this happen with clang?
_
Hi all,
IIRC this has something to do with clang not linking against libatomic
by default, but GCC doing so.
regards,
Simon
On 9/13/18 7:49 AM, Matthias Bodenbinder wrote:
> Am 13.09.18 um 07:38 schrieb Matthias Bodenbinder:
>> I assume I am missing some significant compiler options for clang.
Am 13.09.18 um 07:38 schrieb Matthias Bodenbinder:
> I assume I am missing some significant compiler options for clang. But dont
> know what that is.
> Can somebody help me with that and tell me what I need to do to make the
> clang binary faster?
I found these messages with clang enabled:
-- C