If the room is always very bright and you find that 130cd is too low you
can increase it, maybe up to 150cd (ideally you should lower the room
lighting, but that is not always possible or desirable). The most important
point is that you should be reasonably away of the maximum brightness of
the mon
Thank you,
I managed to achieve very close calibration - sRGB 99.89 / Adobe RGB 80.1
I still have to try all the settings below. My brightness is likely too
high. I calibrated at 190 cd (my room is bright) but will try to lower
more - aiming 130 cd.
Regards,
B
On 2017-04-25 08:52 PM, Guil
Great writing, I didn't know about it. It follows the same path I used
(only that I used DisplayCal's GUI), so it saves me from writing it ;)
My config on DisplayCal (and some comments):
--Display & instrument:
In the particular case of the SpyderColor5 you should first use the
menu "Tools/Import
Thank you All!
I was not aware of the article. It is very informative indeed.
@Guillermo - if you create such sane options that you use - it would be
very beneficial too.
I can see there is quite a bit to learn in this area... admittedly I
have been doing a few things the wrong way.
Regard
you've seen pascal's old writeup about display colour profiling, right?
https://encrypted.pcode.nl/blog/2013/11/24/display-color-profiling-on-linux/
-jo
On Wed, Apr 26, 2017 at 5:35 AM, Guillermo Rozas wrote:
>> As per https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/ICC_profiles
>>
>> "Note that the syste
> As per https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/ICC_profiles
>
> "Note that the system on which the profile is generated must host the exact
> same video card and monitor for which the profile is to be used"
>
> And this contradicts to some extend with
>
> http://www.colorwiki.com/wiki/Cross_Platform
Thank you..
I think there are few details that I have been missing.
As per https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/ICC_profiles
"Note that the system on which the profile is generated must host the
exact same video card and monitor for which the profile is to be used"
And this contradicts to so
Another (more complete) link:
https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/ICC_profiles
There is actually a warning along the lines of "it should be
OS-independent, but check that the OS and drivers are not doing funny
things behind your back".
Regards,
Guillermo
On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 9:34 AM, Guille
Quick search: http://www.colorwiki.com/wiki/Cross_Platform_Color
On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 9:30 AM, Guillermo Rozas wrote:
>> 2017-04-25 13:58 GMT+02:00 Guillermo Rozas :
>>>
>>> In the end, the ICC profile should be independent of the operating
>>> system and only depend on the graphic card + moni
> 2017-04-25 13:58 GMT+02:00 Guillermo Rozas :
>>
>> In the end, the ICC profile should be independent of the operating
>> system and only depend on the graphic card + monitor combination.
>
>
> Hum I would have thought that it is also dependent on the actual
> graphic/display driver, no?
If I und
2017-04-25 13:58 GMT+02:00 Guillermo Rozas :
> In the end, the ICC profile should be independent of the operating
> system and only depend on the graphic card + monitor combination.
Hum I would have thought that it is also dependent on the actual
graphic/display driver, no?
--
Pascal Obry /
I'm nowhere near an expert on this (I've only used DisplayCal twice so
far), but:
- Have you checked that the configuration on both cases is exactly the
same, including the (optional) light source corrections? (the latter
come with some vendor specific drivers for some detectors). You can
use the
Hi All,
I know it quite a bit off topic but does anybody have best practices for
calibration with display cal? I am using it on Ubuntu 16.04 and what I
noticed is - if I use it - it only achieved 99.7% sRGB and ~77% Adobe
RGB. If I calibrate the same monitor on windows - it will achieve
100%s
13 matches
Mail list logo