On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 04:16:54PM -0600, Bob Tracy wrote:
> The subject release appeared less than a day ago, so it seemed like a
> good time to try out gcc/g++-4.6. Will try a non-optimized build
> without the "nsThreadUtils*" patches to see how that goes. When I last
&
The subject release appeared less than a day ago, so it seemed like a
good time to try out gcc/g++-4.6. Will try a non-optimized build
without the "nsThreadUtils*" patches to see how that goes. When I last
tried such a build (version 4.0.1), I got segfaults until I put the
"nsThreadUtils*" patche
Our old friend is back:
Assertion 'pthread_mutex_unlock(&m->mutex) == 0' failed at
pulsecore/mutex-posix.c:106, function pa_mutex_unlock(). Aborting.
An easy way to reproduce: run either firefox or iceweasel, then click on
the drop-down menu in the upper-left corner -- the application
immediatel
Source: qt4-x11
Version: 4:4.7.3-8
Severity: important
Tags: patch
Dear Maintainer,
Due to a bug in the g++-4.4 optimizer, the normal "-O2" build of "qt4-x11"
binary packages results in segfaults on the alpha architecture when apps
are run that use the "qt4" libraries. This includes "kdm" and th
On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 11:55:59PM -0600, Bob Tracy wrote:
> (...)
> Separate from the optimizer issue, KMS bugs apparently *not* specific to
> Alpha are being seen by others, and they are seeing black screens, system
> freezes, etc., same as I am.
>
> Bottom line: I have high
On Sun, Nov 13, 2011 at 01:07:13AM -0600, Bob Tracy wrote:
> (...)
> "kdm" currently segfaults during kdm-greeting. To reproduce, enter
> your login name and tab to the password entry field: "kdm" will
> immediately segfault and reinitialize. Using
Source: webkit
Version: 1.6.1-5
Severity: serious
Tags: patch
Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past)
Dear Maintainer,
This actually applies to 1.6.1-4 as well. The Alpha architecture passes
the test mentioned in "webkit-1.6.1/Source/JavaScriptCore/wtf/dtoa
I figured the subject was probably as good a summary of what I'm seeing
as anything else... Here's the observed current state of the major graphical
environments on Alpha:
(1) Gnome-3
"gdm3" works. After login, screen is black except for mouse pointer.
Logging in remotely and looking at
Just an update for those who have been following along and maybe waiting
for news...
Successfully built the subject package over the course of the past two
weeks. Huge amount of disk space required, not to mention RAM + swap.
The process put my poor old 433au to the test in many ways :-(.
The pa
On Mon, Oct 31, 2011 at 11:53:25PM -0500, Bob Tracy wrote:
> Thanks for the additional detail on the webkit build failure. I'll take
> a closer look and see if a likely solution presents itself.
Could the webkit fix *really* be this easy? Here's a modified version
of the curren
On Tue, Nov 01, 2011 at 11:27:59AM +1300, Michael Cree wrote:
> (...)
> epiphany-browser depends on webkit and the new version of webkit FTBFS
> too.
> (...)
#$%@! I guess I'm just about to run into that problem, then. Just got
done upgrading "glib2.0", which was another epiphany-browser depen
(Just a heads-up here because the problem is being worked upstream.)
See http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=643376 for details.
Summary: dpkg upgrades have turned on format string security for some
builds, and the subject version of "epiphany-browser" got speared. This
applies to b
I know this isn't the place to ask, but the amount of dreck returned by
Google on the subject is generally either incomplete or just plain
wrong. I also figure fellow Alpha users have been here :-(.
Recent upgrades to KDE (now KDE4) and Gnome (now Gnome 3) have left me
without a working GUI. I g
On Wed, Oct 26, 2011 at 10:29:36PM +1300, Michael Cree wrote:
> (...) Does anyone object to
> me requesting the gcc maintainers to default gcc to gcc-4.6 on Alpha?
Might as well increase the number of testers, eh? :-) Go for it.
Besides, I was beginning to wonder when I could safely reduce the nu
Maybe... Might not be "consolekit" at all...
I used "ssh" to login on my alpha this morning, and a simple "ps -ef"
triggered the following (retrieved from the physical console when the
"ps" hung):
Unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address 0010
console-kit-dae(2477): O
On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 12:51:47AM -0500, Bob Tracy wrote:
> Perhaps a stupid question, but does it then follow that the Xserver
> "AutoAddDevices" functionality depends only on things entirely
> within X? That would at least narrow down the target audience for a
> bug re
On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 12:06:23AM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 9, 2011 at 21:08:11 -0500, Bob Tracy wrote:
>
> > Dunno... Something in the hal <--> dbus <--> udev chain might be broken,
> > or maybe the mechanism Xserver uses to access what hal kno
On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 07:57:47AM +1300, Michael Cree wrote:
> On 10/10/11 07:18, Bob Tracy wrote:
> > Looking at /var/log/Xorg.0.log, I see the following I think I remember
> > seeing in older X server releases:
> >
> > [59.191] (II) The server relies on udev t
"XkbRules" "xorg"
Option "XkbModel" "pc104"
Option "XkbLayout" "us"
EndSection
Section "InputDevice"
Identifier "Configured Mouse"
Driver "
On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 09:04:07AM +1300, Michael Cree wrote:
> On 30/09/2011, at 7:47 AM, Bob Tracy wrote:
> >(broken optimizer)
> Which compiler version? The default gcc-4.4? Maybe gcc-4.5 or
> gcc-4.6 would be better? There is a bug report of bad optimisation in
>
On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 01:04:24PM -0400, Matt Turner wrote:
> I presume there are patches to make it all work? Posting those is a
> good place to start.
Need to get in touch with the package maintainer to determine how to
proceed. I fear the odds of a workable solution are slim. Among
other iss
Woo-HOO! I'm pleased to announce a successful Alpha build of
iceweasel 6.0.2-1, xulrunner-6.0 6.0.2-1, and libmozjs6d 6.0.2-1. I
would *like* to make the ".deb" packages available for interested
parties to download and test, but I don't have the bandwidth locally.
Assuming someone offers me an u
On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 12:06:37PM -0500, Bob Tracy wrote:
> On the Alpha platform, the "telepathy-glib" package appears to be
> building correctly, but the tests are time-sensitive and some of them fail
> "randomly" based on whether the package is being built on the c
On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 11:47:21AM -0500, Bob Tracy wrote:
> Gr... The "telepathy-glib" package appears to be building
> correctly, but the tests are time-sensitive and some of them fail
> "randomly" based on whether the package is being built on the console
>
Gr... The "telepathy-glib" package appears to be building
correctly, but the tests are time-sensitive and some of them fail
"randomly" based on whether the package is being built on the console
(relatively fast I/O) or over a remote network connection (somewhat
slower I/O). The problem is tha
On Fri, Sep 09, 2011 at 07:55:04AM +1200, Michael Cree wrote:
> I would check that you have perl version 5.12.x installed.
>
> I still recommend running 'apt-get install build-essential' as that may
> upgrade other stuff such as make, dpkg, etc. Since you are building
> packages yourself you shou
The piecemeal upgrade approach I've tried seems to have paid off, at
least slightly... "apt-get install gcc-4.4 libc6.1 libc6.1-dev"
resulted in only seven package removals: libgnome2-perl,
libgnome2-vfs-perl, libperl5.10, libpurple0, libsvn-perl, pidgin, and
svn-buildpackage. None seem critical.
On Thu, Sep 08, 2011 at 09:55:45AM +1200, Michael Cree wrote:
> It's good to see you giving this all a go! We need more people who
> are prepared to get their hands dirty and start trying out the
> unstable alpha distribution and make reports on how it is going.
Something about fools rushing
On Thu, Sep 08, 2011 at 07:39:47AM +1200, Michael Cree wrote:
> On 08/09/11 04:39, Bob Tracy wrote:
> > (...) "libgcc_s.so --> libgcc_s.so.1" symlink (missing). (...)
>
> Indeed. You need to update libc and gcc.
> (...)
> Make sure that you have libc6.1,
&g
No idea how it got missed, but simple "hello world" C programs wouldn't
compile due to a missing "libgcc_s.so --> libgcc_s.so.1" symlink. If
"ldconfig" is responsible for creating that symlink, then "ldconfig" is
broken. "libc-bin" on my system is version 2.11.2-13. I'm guessing
some kind of mul
On Tue, Sep 06, 2011 at 07:22:27AM +1200, Michael Cree wrote:
> On 06/09/11 04:07, Bob Tracy wrote:
> > On Sun, Sep 04, 2011 at 01:21:52PM +1200, Michael Cree wrote:
> >> (...)
> >> Many have failed because of a broken ghostscript install. Unfortunately
> >> th
On Sun, Sep 04, 2011 at 01:21:52PM +1200, Michael Cree wrote:
> (...)
> Many have failed because of a broken ghostscript install. Unfortunately
> the newest ghostscript failed to build but I plan to have a closer look
> at that in the next couple of days. So ignore any packages with the
> error: "
Started down the rabbit hole that is "gnome" package building :-(.
Eventually ran into a build dependency conflict that required forcing the
configuration of a built and installed-but-unconfigured package (libgtk-3-dev)
to allow one of its dependencies (dconf-gsettings-backend) to be built. Not
su
On Fri, Aug 05, 2011 at 09:26:13AM +1200, Michael Cree wrote:
> You guys may have been able to compile certain packages on your
> systems because you have an old install that is partially upgraded.
Can't speak for anyone else reading this, but my "unstable" setup was
current within a week (mi
(The original subject header was getting old...)
Python 2.6.7-4 built successfully. Here's the resulting package list:
idle-python2.6_2.6.7-4_all.deb
libpython2.6_2.6.7-4_alpha.deb
python2.6_2.6.7-4_alpha.deb
python2.6-dbg_2.6.7-4_alpha.deb
python2.6-dev_2.6.7-4_alpha.deb
python2.6-doc_2.6.7-4_a
On Wed, Aug 03, 2011 at 01:05:02PM -0500, Bob Tracy wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 03, 2011 at 08:32:11AM -0500, Bob Tracy wrote:
> > We'll see how the "ghostscript" build goes today.
>
> Done. I'll give it a cursory going-over this evening, i.e., try to
> print som
On Wed, Aug 03, 2011 at 08:32:11AM -0500, Bob Tracy wrote:
> We'll see how the "ghostscript" build goes today.
Done. I'll give it a cursory going-over this evening, i.e., try to
print something. Here's the list of binary packages:
ghostscript_9.02~dfsg-3_alpha.de
On Mon, Aug 01, 2011 at 12:33:45PM +1200, Michael Cree wrote:
> (...)
> So, I would not be surprised if building ghostscript is still two
> week's away.
ACK. Current backlog of packages on my system that are upgradable but
being kept back (according to apt-get) currently numbers 120. Mostly,
i
So... As it turns out, printing on my alpha has been broken for a
while. Tracing back through the logs, the root cause is a missing
"gs_init.ps" file, which really isn't missing: there's a version
mismatch between the package providing the file, and the package needing
the file. Here are the rel
th a valid workaround rather than risk
modifying and having to debug "libc" :-).
--
Bob Tracy | "Every normal man must be tempted at times to spit
r...@frus.com | upon his hands, hoist
On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 08:49:33AM +1200, Michael Cree wrote:
> On 19/05/2011, at 12:51 AM, Bob Tracy wrote:
> > Has anyone stepped forward to provide
> >alpha build daemons?
>
> Yes, Bill and Witold have set up build daemons and we have
> communicated with the debian-po
On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 05:28:42PM +0200, Uwe Schindler wrote:
> > > I had some time today to try again an upgrade of my AlphaStation 500
> > > to "linux-image-2.6.38-2-alpha-generic". I got again an error on
> > > loading the xfs.ko module from initrd (I typed it manually from the
> > > boot scre
On Mon, May 09, 2011 at 04:22:52PM +0200, 'Aurelien Jarno' wrote:
> On Mon, May 09, 2011 at 04:00:55PM +0200, Uwe Schindler wrote:
> > (...)
> > So there seem to be some files/packages missing?
>
> The build daemons on alpha have been shutdown for more than a month, so
> a lot of packages are out
On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 09:36:37AM +0200, Witold Baryluk wrote:
> Good work! Keep testing, run some benchmarks please.
> I im interested about improvements from interpreted JS from 3.6
> to interpreted JS in 4.0 :)
I don't have anything formal in the way of benchmarks. However, a web
site I visit
On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 09:02:06PM +1200, Michael Cree wrote:
> Nice!
Thanks...
> Could you send through those patches to get 4.0.1 working please?
Attached. They're small enough to risk offending the few debian-alpha
subscribers who might not be interested :-).
> (...) But as Witold has point
On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 02:48:05PM -0500, Bob Tracy wrote:
> Build successfully completed. Segfaults immediately on invocation: no
> surprise there. I'll report back when I've got something working, and I
> expect that will be a while: the combination of tool chain updates and
Build successfully completed. Segfaults immediately on invocation: no
surprise there. I'll report back when I've got something working, and I
expect that will be a while: the combination of tool chain updates and
the huge size of the mozilla code base makes for tedious debugging.
--Bob
--
To
On Sun, May 08, 2011 at 08:06:38AM +1200, Michael Cree wrote:
> Could you send through your updated patch for
> xpcom/glue/nsThreadUtils.[cpp,h] that was required on the 3.6. series?
Patches sent in a separate message.
Update: the firefox build documentation at developer.mozilla.org hasn't
been
On Sat, May 07, 2011 at 09:12:36AM +1200, Michael Cree wrote:
> On 07/05/11 07:11, Bob Tracy wrote:
> >Just a quick note to let interested parties know I'm working on a 4.0.1
> >firefox build for alpha.
>
> Cool! Are you working only on upstream firefox or also on ic
tional 788 MB of packages
I would have to download and install, just for the sake of having the
yasm documentation available.
--
--------
Bob Tracy | "Every normal man must be tempted at times to spit
r...@frus.com
than one-off custom stuff
(including the things I'm personally willing to wait on, like glibc
builds when absolutely required :-)). If my 433au can contribute
meaningfully in any way, I'll be glad to make it happen.
--
---------
(Recipient list is getting a bit unwieldy. That's not necessarily a bad
thing :-). Delighted to see all the interest in Alpha, even if it took
"the community" a while to wake up.)
Agreed that Steve Langasek is a logical/necessary person to contact if
this revival has a chance of succeeding.
As
ersion of
"/sbin/udevd" and was finally able to configure the installed package
(as well as the other 49-or-so packages). That's more excitement than I
wanted this evening: local time is now 0424 and I've been up since 0700
yesterday :-(.
--
-
On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 01:02:03AM -0600, Bob Tracy wrote:
> Running "dpkg --configure udev" gives me the following:
>
> udevd[pid]: inotify_init failed: Function not implemented
> udevd[pid]: error initializing inotify
>
> and the post-installation script fails.
&
ev, and I *do*
have network connectivity for transferring stuff in/out as needed.
--
----
Bob Tracy | "Every normal man must be tempted at times to spit
r...@frus.com | upon his hands, hoist the
On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 02:25:00PM -0500, Bob Tracy wrote:
> Some "impactful" (yet minor looking) changes were made to
> "xpcom/glue/nsThreadUtils.[cpp,h]". Replacing the 3.5.5 versions of
> these two files with their 3.5.4 counterparts and rebuilding yielded a
On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 10:22:41AM -0500, Bob Tracy wrote:
> The "few intermediate functions" (in case they're significant in this
> context) are:
>
> CallGetService()
> nsGetServiceByCIDWithError::operator()()
> nsCOMPtr_base::assign_from_gs_cid_
On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 09:08:32AM -0500, Bob Tracy wrote:
> Well, 3.5.5 is where the problem seems to have been introduced.
> Regardless of the toolchain and firefox version, the stack backtrace
> looks something like this (for the illegal instruction fault in
&g
On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 09:44:10PM +1200, Michael Cree wrote:
> On 12/08/10 07:14, Bob Tracy wrote:
> >firefox-3.5.4 build with gcc/g++-4.2.4 completed moments ago, and it works.
> >On to 3.5.5: not going to mess with gcc/g++-4.4.5 for the time being --
> >each build is ta
On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 01:57:37PM +0800, James Andrewartha wrote:
> There's icedtea6-plugin, but it looks like it's not available for alpha at
> the moment.
Thanks for the pointer: I'll look into it.
firefox-3.5.4 build with gcc/g++-4.2.4 completed moments ago, and it works.
On to 3.5.5: not go
Tried a 3.5.3 build to rule out source tree changes as a possible cause
of the illegal instruction faults and segfaults. The build with gcc/g++
4.2.4 and the latest unstable binutils (as of yesterday evening) works.
Time to retry 3.5.11 with gcc/g++ 4.4.5 since binutils has changed. If
that fail
On Sun, Aug 08, 2010 at 10:28:58PM +1200, Michael Cree wrote:
> And another to add to the list discovered while trying to send emails to
> the Debian bug tracker (how ironic):
>
> 9) Icedove regularly crashes while composing emails.
>
> On a positive note I see that OpenOffice.org is now in the
Having successfully upgraded to sid, I'm in the process of trying a
firefox-3.6.8 build from the mozilla source tree (modulo the usual small
patches for alpha). I was pleased to find that a 3.5.3 build I made
before my primary hard disk died works with an up-to-date sid: symbol
reference errors ke
On Wed, Aug 04, 2010 at 10:14:02PM +1200, Michael Cree wrote:
> On 04/08/10 01:48, Bob Tracy wrote:
> >So... What's the current state of unstable on Alpha? I've been told
> >the following so far:
>
> Thinking about that list further we should add:
>
> 8)
Long time, no involvement :-(. A primary hard disk failure a number of
months ago took the wind out of my sails, and I wasn't sure I wanted to
reengage on this particular battlefield. In the final analysis, I don't
have the time I once did, but in a perverse kind of way, it's kinda fun.
So... W
ce
the default depth down to 16 bpp. Alternatively, I could have gone with
1024x768x24 if I really needed to run at that depth.
--
--------
Bob Tracy | "Every normal man must be tempted at times to s
ponse as to whether it should
proceed.
So, I switched to one of the interactive session virtual consoles, did a
"ps" to get the process ID of "aptitude", and did the following:
# cd /proc//fd
# echo "Yes" > 0
Lo and behold, that did the trick. I *do* love "
27;ll consider the
possibility)?
--
--------
Bob Tracy | "Every normal man must be tempted at times to spit
r...@frus.com | upon his hands, hoist the black flag, and begin
| slitt
On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 09:22:28PM +0100, Hartwig Atrops wrote:
>
> I installed Lenny on my PWS500au a while agao - without CD drive trouble.
>
> On Thursday 25 February 2010 20:46, Bob Tracy wrote:
> > (...)
> >
> > Found a Toshiba IDE CD-RW drive for $9 that I&#x
messages from "syslog" if the problem persists with the new drive.)
--
----
Bob Tracy | "Every normal man must be tempted at times to spit
r...@frus.com | upon his hands, hoist the black flag, and begin
| slitting throats." -- H.L. Menc
erein).
--
----
Bob Tracy | "Every normal man must be tempted at times to spit
r...@frus.com | upon his hands, hoist the black flag, and begin
| slitting throats."
stribution.
--
--------
Bob Tracy | "Every normal man must be tempted at times to spit
r...@frus.com | upon his hands, hoist the black flag, and begin
| slitting throats."
On Sat, Oct 31, 2009 at 10:04:38AM +1300, Michael Cree wrote:
> (...) But I really don't have the time to become a Debian Alpha
> porter which is what I think is really needed if we are to score another
> official Alpha release. (...)
Such is the lot of many of us, I'm afraid :-(. I don't mind
On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 04:50:29PM +0100, Uwe Schindler wrote:
> But unstable should still work? Or is it even broken therefore? :/
"Unstable" still works: thanks for the reminder. However, Alpha users
will, of necessity, have to get a bit more involved in troubleshooting
and/or fixing problems.
Has "testing" officially gone bye-bye for Alpha? Or is the
unavailability of the index files a temporary glitch?
Thanks...
--Bob
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-alpha-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 10:53:05PM -0500, Bob Tracy wrote:
> Mainline 2.6.32-rc5 kernel build failure. The last few lines of the kernel
> build output are:
>
> LD vmlinux.o
> MODPOST vmlinux.o
> WARNING: "saved_config" [vmlinux] is COMMON symbol
> GEN
On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 10:53:05PM -0500, Bob Tracy wrote:
> Mainline 2.6.32-rc5 kernel build failure. The last few lines of the kernel
> build output are:
>
> LD vmlinux.o
> MODPOST vmlinux.o
> WARNING: "saved_config" [vmlinux] is COMMON symbol
> GEN
/version.o
LD init/built-in.o
LD .tmp_vmlinux1
arch/alpha/kernel/vmlinux.lds:241: undefined symbol `THREAD_SIZE' referenced in
expression
make: *** [.tmp_vmlinux1] Error 1
--
--------
Bob Tracy | "E
(Thought it was time for a new subject...)
Brief synopsis of story thus far... Upgraded X11 infrastructure in the
hope of fixing whatever the updates to "Testing" broke several months
ago. The new server and radeon driver almost worked: mouse cursor was
normal brightness, but the rest of the dis
On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 09:23:25AM +1300, Michael Cree wrote:
> (...) There is an x86 emulator in the Xserver and it can read
> and use the video BIOS. On my Radeon 9200 the int10 code loads fine
> and I get the message:
>
> (II) RADEON(0): Legacy BIOS detected
>
> The Xserver can now POST v
On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 08:18:05AM -0500, Bob Tracy wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 10:05:10PM +1300, Michael Cree wrote:
> > Bob Tracy wrote:
> > >Long story short: 1.7.0.902 fixed the problems with modules not loading
> > >because of undefined symbols, but the end re
On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 10:05:10PM +1300, Michael Cree wrote:
> Bob Tracy wrote:
> >Long story short: 1.7.0.902 fixed the problems with modules not loading
> >because of undefined symbols, but the end result is no better than what
> >I reported for the earlier 1.7.0 version.
Long story short: 1.7.0.902 fixed the problems with modules not loading
because of undefined symbols, but the end result is no better than what
I reported for the earlier 1.7.0 version. The mouse cursor is normal
brightness, but the display is otherwise extremely dim: it's so dim it
appears to be
wo are just
> tidying up the code to reduce the number of compiler warnings.
In that spirit, 1.7.0.902 (which includes your patch) was announced hot
on the heels of your posting. I'll give it a spin later today when I've
got time to build it.
--
--------
On Sun, Oct 18, 2009 at 02:56:49PM +1300, Michael Cree wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 01:38:11AM -0500, Bob Tracy wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 10:38:33PM +1300, Michael Cree wrote:
> > > Unfortunately Alpha disappears from Debian testing just before we get
>
On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 10:38:33PM +1300, Michael Cree wrote:
> Unfortunately Alpha disappears from Debian testing just before we get
> a working Xserver...
That has been the most frustrating aspect of this whole journey.
Xserver has been broken in "testing" for over a month and a half.
I assure
t particular failure made me
blink a bit :-).
--
--------
Bob Tracy | "Every normal man must be tempted at times to spit
r...@frus.com | upon his hands, hoist the black flag, and begin
ger available :-(. If "testing" is the
only thing that's disappearing, I can live with continued availability
of "unstable" and "experimental" packages.
--
Bob Tracy | "Every normal man
.
--
Bob Tracy | "Every normal man must be tempted at times to spit
r...@frus.com | upon his hands, hoist the black flag, and begin
| slitting throats." -- H.
On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 11:38:27AM -0400, Matt Turner wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 11:34 AM, Julien Cristau wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 11:27:28 -0400, Matt Turner wrote:
> >
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> Thanks for the report. I was getting the exact same failure as you.
> >>
> >> The crash happe
ies
of this adapter, please see http://gatos.sf.net.
(!!) RADEON(0): MergedFB support has been removed and replaced with xrandr 1.2
support
(II) do I need RAC? No, I don't.
(II) resource ranges after preInit:
(II) RADEON(0): RADEONScreenInit 1000 0 0
Backtrace:
0: /usr/bin/X(xorg_backtrace+0x4c) [0x120131d9c]
1: /usr/bin/X(xf86SigHandler+0x60) [0x1200a9850]
2:
On Fri, Sep 04, 2009 at 09:02:57AM +0100, Alan Hourihane wrote:
> On Thu, 2009-09-03 at 21:50 -0500, Bob Tracy wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 03, 2009 at 05:25:29PM -0400, Lennart Sorensen wrote:
> > > On Thu, Sep 03, 2009 at 05:08:00PM -0400, Matt Turner wrote:
> > > > I&
e change. Anyone else out there?
Got a PWS 433au: EV56. Proposed change would have no impact here.
--
Bob Tracy | "Every normal man must be tempted at times to spit
r...@frus.com | upon h
ACK on the below indicated packages. I won't have any free time to
devote to this until this coming Thursday, but I *will* do what I can to
help. Thanks!
--Bob
On Mon, Aug 31, 2009 at 12:55:35AM +0200, Sune Vuorela wrote:
> tag 541402 +help
> thanks
>
> On Thursday 13 August
on the Alpha, and I don't mean to imply otherwise.
--
--------
Bob Tracy | "Talk is cheap because supply exceeds demand."
r...@frus.com | -- Bill Kennedy
-
-k and the X people. If nothing else, I would
think the kernel people could provide a clue as to what got stomped on
and how.
--
Bob Tracy | "Talk is cheap because supply exceeds demand."
r...@frus.com
nother improvement is, the terminal window in
the hung gnome session continues to function when the window manager
dies.
--
--------
Bob Tracy | "Talk is cheap because supply exceeds demand."
r...@fru
orry for the non-specific bug report, but I personally haven't seen
things this badly broken in userland for a long time...
--
Bob Tracy | "Talk is cheap because supply exceeds demand."
r...@frus.com
m there, you *should* be able to do an upgrade to 5.0 ("lenny").
Good luck! Let us know how it goes...
--
Bob Tracy | "Talk is cheap because supply exceeds demand."
r...@frus.com |
On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 05:36:44PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> I think you mean 'squeeze' here. :) You reported that this was a problem
> with 2.5.4-1, not 2.5.2-4; 2.5.4-1 is not in lenny.
I'm an idiot... I'll go away now :-). When lenny went live, I stayed
with "testing" and a dist-upgrade
201 - 300 of 402 matches
Mail list logo
