ant missing

2004-11-16 Thread kristian kvilekval
Hello, I've got a java project to built with ant, but it's not being built correctly >From the build-log: ant depends-on libbsf-java libsf-java needs j2sdk1.3 and libservelet2.3 I am not sure if there is even a j2sdk1.3 for amd64, but I know there are both j2sdk1.4-blackdown and also j2sd

Re: amd64 build necessary to get nvidia nforce3 mobo working?

2004-11-16 Thread Alexandru Cabuz
> Did you try the 2.4 kernel or the 2.6 kernel for i386? I tried both. Hell, I tried everything. The thing is I tried this installation so many times, I forget the details, all I know is that the network didn't work anyway I tried it. ifconfig couldn't see any eth interface. I tried to configure e

Re: amd64 build necessary to get nvidia nforce3 mobo working?

2004-11-16 Thread Alexandru Cabuz
> So which motherboard is this, and which ethernet adapter and sound is it > using? Quoting directly from the manual: K8N Neo (MS 7030) v1.X ATX mainboard based on nVidia nForce 3 250Gb chipset for optimal system efficiency. LAN nVidia nForce 3 250Gb LAN controller Integrated Fast Ether

Re: amd64 build necessary to get nvidia nforce3 mobo working?

2004-11-16 Thread Frederik Schueler
Hello, On Tue, Nov 16, 2004 at 10:41:18PM +0100, Alexandru Cabuz wrote: > My question is this: > "Is there any way to get the ethernet and the sound going on nforce3 > in Sarge 386, that is, without installing the true amd64 port which is > not yet finished, and which therefore might be more troub

vchkpw segfault with smtp auth on amd64 (fwd)

2004-11-16 Thread Martin Kos
hi i have posted that already on the vpopmail mailinglist but as it is an amd64 related problem i'll post it here too... greets KoS -- Forwarded message -- From: Martin Kos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: vchkpw@inter7.com Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2004 23:25:57 +0100 Subject: vchkpw segfault wi

Re: amd64 build necessary to get nvidia nforce3 mobo working?

2004-11-16 Thread Lennart Sorensen
On Tue, Nov 16, 2004 at 10:41:18PM +0100, Alexandru Cabuz wrote: > I know this question is probably better suited for an nividia linux > forum (where I have posted it 2 minutes ago) but I thought I might > check with people on this list too, maybe somebody knows. > > I recently bought an athlon64

amd64 build necessary to get nvidia nforce3 mobo working?

2004-11-16 Thread Alexandru Cabuz
Hello, I know this question is probably better suited for an nividia linux forum (where I have posted it 2 minutes ago) but I thought I might check with people on this list too, maybe somebody knows. I recently bought an athlon64 nvidia nforce3 box, and have not been able to install anything exce

Re: Korganizer

2004-11-16 Thread Félix-Antoine Bourbonnais
I've installed 3.3.1-3 and it's working now... Thanks a lot! Kurt Roeckx a écrit : On Tue, Nov 16, 2004 at 02:27:37PM -0500, Félix-Antoine Bourbonnais wrote: Is it possible to apply the patch on the debian package to solve the problem for this version (3.3.1) ? My bug description: --- Package: korg

Re: Korganizer

2004-11-16 Thread Theodore Kisner
From the bug report, it sounds like this is a general amd64 bug (not just linux) and it has been patched in CVS (but not 3.3.1). So it will be fixed in 3.3.2 -Ted On Tuesday 16 November 2004 11:44, Kurt Roeckx wrote: > On Tue, Nov 16, 2004 at 02:27:37PM -0500, Félix-Antoine Bourbonnais wrote

Re: Korganizer

2004-11-16 Thread Kurt Roeckx
On Tue, Nov 16, 2004 at 02:27:37PM -0500, Félix-Antoine Bourbonnais wrote: > > Is it possible to apply the patch on the debian package to solve the > problem for this version (3.3.1) ? > > My bug description: > --- > Package: korganizer > Version: 4:3.3.0-3 Did you already try the 4:3.3.1-3 vers

Re: Status of debian-amd64 after sarge release

2004-11-16 Thread Andreas Jochens
On 04-Nov-16 18:31, Jan Houstek wrote: > Well, what exactly makes gcc-3.4 such a must? I'm trying to decide which > debian port to use for production (your comming gcc-3.4 sarge or the > already existent gcc-3.3 sarge). gcc-3.4 is definitively not a 'must'. gcc-3.3 will work in most cases and the

Korganizer

2004-11-16 Thread Félix-Antoine Bourbonnais
Hi, I have a problem with korganizer on debian amd64/gcc-3.4. I've submitted a bug report about that to the package maintainer (bug# 281143). But he suggested me to contact the debian-amd64 team. (The bug report follow). This bug seems to be the reported in KDE bug system by a gentoo 64 user: http:

Re: Status of debian-amd64 after sarge release

2004-11-16 Thread Jan Houstek
On Mon, 15 Nov 2004, Andreas Jochens wrote: > For the gcc-3.4 archive, my intention is to freeze sarge when it is > released and to make it available as Well, what exactly makes gcc-3.4 such a must? I'm trying to decide which debian port to use for production (your comming gcc-3.4 sarge or the al

Re: console-tool-libs (pure64) is missing from alioth during debootstrap :(

2004-11-16 Thread Kurt Roeckx
On Tue, Nov 16, 2004 at 05:19:30PM +, Colin Yates wrote: > Downloaded from (can't remember exact path) but > people.debian//debootstrap from a couple of days ago. > > Unfortunately debootstrap --version doesn't work :( Did you install it as a debian package? Then what does dpkg -l debootstr

Re: console-tool-libs (pure64) is missing from alioth during debootstrap :(

2004-11-16 Thread Colin Yates
Thank goodness for Nautilus waste bin :) It is version 0.1.16.4 Kurt Roeckx wrote: On Mon, Nov 15, 2004 at 03:23:43PM +, Colin Yates wrote: Hi, I am trying to debootstrap debian from alioth pure64 but it is moaning that it cannot download console-tool-libs. I have also tried ftp.de.debian.or

Re: console-tool-libs (pure64) is missing from alioth during debootstrap :(

2004-11-16 Thread Colin Yates
Downloaded from (can't remember exact path) but people.debian//debootstrap from a couple of days ago. Unfortunately debootstrap --version doesn't work :( Kurt Roeckx wrote: On Mon, Nov 15, 2004 at 03:23:43PM +, Colin Yates wrote: Hi, I am trying to debootstrap debian from alioth pure64 but it

Re: console-tool-libs (pure64) is missing from alioth during debootstrap :(

2004-11-16 Thread Kurt Roeckx
On Mon, Nov 15, 2004 at 03:23:43PM +, Colin Yates wrote: > Hi, > > I am trying to debootstrap debian from alioth pure64 but it is moaning > that it cannot download console-tool-libs. I have also tried > ftp.de.debian.org with the same result. There doesn't seem to exist anything like a con

Re: Status of debian-amd64 after sarge release

2004-11-16 Thread Alex Perry
However I am sticking with "pure" Debian for the moment. I have not yet given up on it. I am using everyone's work hosted on Alioth. I will probably deploy an unofficial 'Sarge' on amd64 in a production environment. Eventually an official Debian 'Etch' will replace it. That will probably

Re: Status of debian-amd64 after sarge release

2004-11-16 Thread Johan Groth
Bob Proulx wrote: [snip] Because Ubuntu is based on Debian all of this work is directly benefiting that project. And they have released amd64 and are supporting it. Therefore if you need a released and supported environment for amd64 then Ubuntu is probably the answer. Not if you wish to have a g

gpm sometimes does not start?

2004-11-16 Thread Bob Proulx
'gpm' is the general purpose mouse that provides a mouse on the text consoles. I find that useful and so I usually install and run it. I find that sometimes after a system boot that gpm is not running when I log into X11 on amd64. To restart it I CTRL-ALT-F1 to a text console, login as root, ver

Re: Status of debian-amd64 after sarge release

2004-11-16 Thread Bob Proulx
Johan Groth wrote: > Kurt Roeckx wrote: > >Jan Houstek wrote: > >>Kurt Roeckx wrote: > >>>We will atleast have a released version of the sarge repository, with > >>>updates if there are, and security updates. > >> > >>That's good news. Any chance this port will become a part of the official > >>sta

Re: console-tool-libs (pure64) is missing from alioth during debootstrap :(

2004-11-16 Thread Colin Yates
Still not available? Is the Packages file corrupt? Anyone :) Colin Yates wrote: Hi, I am trying to debootstrap debian from alioth pure64 but it is moaning that it cannot download console-tool-libs. I have also tried ftp.de.debian.org with the same result. Any ideas? Cheers, Colin

Re: Status of debian-amd64 after sarge release

2004-11-16 Thread Nils Valentin
On Tuesday 16 November 2004 20:24, Soenke von Stamm wrote: > Am Dienstag, 16. November 2004 10:38 schrieb Johan Groth: > > Kurt Roeckx wrote: > > > On Mon, Nov 15, 2004 at 08:04:31PM +0100, Jan Houstek wrote: > > >>On Mon, 15 Nov 2004, Kurt Roeckx wrote: > > >>>We will atleast have a released versi

Re: Status of debian-amd64 after sarge release

2004-11-16 Thread Soenke von Stamm
Am Dienstag, 16. November 2004 10:38 schrieb Johan Groth: > Kurt Roeckx wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 15, 2004 at 08:04:31PM +0100, Jan Houstek wrote: > >>On Mon, 15 Nov 2004, Kurt Roeckx wrote: > >>>We will atleast have a released version of the sarge repository, with > >>>updates if there are, and secur

Re: Status of debian-amd64 after sarge release

2004-11-16 Thread Johan Groth
Kurt Roeckx wrote: On Mon, Nov 15, 2004 at 08:04:31PM +0100, Jan Houstek wrote: On Mon, 15 Nov 2004, Kurt Roeckx wrote: We will atleast have a released version of the sarge repository, with updates if there are, and security updates. That's good news. Any chance this port will become a part of the

RE: problems with nautilus

2004-11-16 Thread Johan Groth
Title: RE: problems with nautilus It was the noauto devices. I would like to mention however that nautilus works well in Debian i386 with all devices in the fstab. So I assume that this bug is AMD64 specific. Any plans when this bug will be fixed? /Johan -Original Message- From: