On Mon, Mar 07, 2011 at 04:25:01AM -0500, Morty wrote:
Advantages: shops with a mix of x86 and amd64 systems can have one
master x86 build image that can be automatically upgraded to amd64 as
needed. Shops with existing x86 systems that want to upgrade to amd64
hardware can copy the existing
://www.lindavevision.com/ .
Please take a look at our web-site http://www. lindavevision.com
http://www.%20lindavevision.com/ we have not re-invented the wheel, but have
shopped around to present affordable reading products and aids to help the
visually impaired. These products and combination reading
On Tue, Mar 1, 2011 at 8:34 PM, Matthias Klose d...@debian.org wrote:
I'll make gcc-4.5 the default for (at least some) architectures within the
next
two weeks before more transitions start. GCC-4.5 is already used as the
default
compiler for almost any other distribution, so there
On Wed, 02 Mar 2011 02:34:01 +0100
Matthias Klose d...@debian.org wrote:
I'll make gcc-4.5 the default for (at least some) architectures
within the next two weeks before more transitions start. GCC-4.5 is
already used as the default compiler for almost any other
distribution, so there
On Tue, Mar 1, 2011 at 8:34 PM, Matthias Klose d...@debian.org wrote:
I'll make gcc-4.5 the default for (at least some) architectures within th=
e next
two weeks before more transitions start. =A0GCC-4.5 is already used as th=
e default
compiler for almost any other distribution, so there
make one problem even more overwhelming.We have
published a web-site opening an internet store
http://www.lindavevision.com.
Please take a look at our web-site http://www. lindavevision.com we have
not re-invented the wheel, but have shopped around to present affordable
reading products
On 2 March 2011 02:34, Matthias Klose d...@debian.org wrote:
armel (although optimized for a different processor)
Hi
For which processor (/architecture) is it optimized, and do you mean
optimized-for, or only-runs-on?
I ask in case this would mean dumping all the armv4t systems that are
using
On 02.03.2011 17:54, Martin Guy wrote:
On 2 March 2011 02:34, Matthias Klose d...@debian.org wrote:
armel (although optimized for a different processor)
Hi
For which processor (/architecture) is it optimized, and do you mean
optimized-for, or only-runs-on?
I ask in case this would mean
On 2 March 2011 03:34, Matthias Klose d...@debian.org wrote:
I'll make gcc-4.5 the default for (at least some) architectures within the
next
two weeks before more transitions start. GCC-4.5 is already used as the
default
compiler for almost any other distribution, so there shouldn't be many
Bonjour,
Je cherche à faire une campagne denvoi de-mail pour le compte de ma
société prestataire de services avec une cible effectif et geographique.
Seriez-vous une ste disposant dune base de données fiable ?
Pouvez-vous me communiquer vos coordonnées site internet, voir me
On Saturday 05 February 2011 14:37:02 dage...@free.fr wrote:
Hello,
I don't really know where to ask for it. So I start on this list.
The touchpad of my laptop works well, but I can't make the
click on the touchpad works, meaning I must use the touchpad buttons
to click, double-click and
On Sat, Feb 05, 2011 at 04:04:36PM +0100, Thierry Chatelet wrote:
On Saturday 05 February 2011 14:37:02 dage...@free.fr wrote:
[configuring touchpad to click on tap]
You can set it from either gnome or kde desktop. For kde you need kde-config-
touchpad, for gnome, no idea.
On Sat, Feb 05, 2011 at 02:37:02PM +0100, dage...@free.fr wrote:
Hello,
I don't really know where to ask for it. So I start on this list.
The touchpad of my laptop works well, but I can't make the
click on the touchpad works, meaning I must use the touchpad buttons
to click,
Thanks all for the replies. If I submitted here for a bug, this was
because tools for KDE or gnome didn't make the tap tool to work.
And since now xorg.conf doesn't come by default with xorg, I didn't
thought about it. Thanks ael for pointed it, it did the job !
Sorry for the disturb :)
-
hi... Have you upgraded all firmware via RILO? Try to downoad all
newest firmware for linux, for raid controller, nw stuff, etc, uptade
it via RILO and then reboot. What raid controller are you using? Just
on mobo or some addon? d.
On 1/19/11, kechen zhang zhangkechen2...@gmail.com wrote:
hello
Em Quarta-feira 19 Janeiro 2011, às 13:13:21, kechen zhang escreveu:
hello my friend,
i'm sorry to bother you,but i need your help ,and i don't know who
can help me ...
Our company have bought 3 servers , hp 385 g7 , but there's
something wrong after i have installed
On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 09:55:49PM +0100, Francesco Pietra wrote:
The suite autodock (docking small molecules onto a macromolecule) is a
GNU fast evolving code. In Debian testing we find in fact the latest
version 4.3. In Debian stable the autodock version is at 4.0, which is
no more in use,
On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 09:45:14PM +, brian m. carlson wrote:
I (vaguely) know the reasons for all that, being intrinsic to the
rules of Debian. However, it remains that such deb compilations are a
waste of time from both the side of the maintainers and the users. I
hope a day will
On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 11:48:35AM +, Michael Fothergill wrote:
Windows of course saw the scanner right off the bat and then scanned
some files and rebooted into Debian mounted the Windows disk on the
linux tree and ran gscantopdf on the scanned files and worked round my
scanning problem.
On Friday 10 Dec 2010, Lennart Sorensen wrote:
On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 11:48:35AM +, Michael Fothergill wrote:
Windows of course saw the scanner right off the bat and then scanned
some files and rebooted into Debian mounted the Windows disk on the
linux tree and ran gscantopdf on the
On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 04:45:00PM +, A J Stiles wrote:
Sort of makes you wonder why the EU haven't already made it a legal
requirement for hardware manufacturers to supply driver Source Code, if they
want to sell their products in any European country. How much otherwise
perfectly
LG
Marianne
There's nothing amd64 specific in this question, debian-user would
have been better.
On Qua, 08 Dez 2010, Michael Fothergill wrote:
I bought an extra SATA drive and hooked it up so now I have two one
with Debian on it. My plan is to install Windows on the new
drive.. If you installed
trust grub to boot Windows that trust
Windows to boot anything that is not Windows.
--
I don't get no respect.
Eduardo M KALINOWSKI
(
The crux of the matter -- trust
)
Is debian-lenny open source? Windoze obfuscated? Best to have two
separate boxes interconnected by ether-net.
On Wed, Dec 08, 2010 at 11:43:02AM +, Michael Fothergill wrote:
Dear Debian folks,
I an running Lenny on an AMD64 box. I have 8GB of RAM on the
machine in anticipation of putting Windows 7 on the machine. I know
many Debian folks don't bother with Windows but I need it for certain
Partition magic really isn't worth it anymore. It rarely works with
modern large disks.
I agree. A similar open source solution that works better is
GParted. They have a bootable iso that gives you the same type of
functionality.
http://www.debian.org/MailingLists/#codeofconduct
* Never send your messages in HTML; use plain text instead.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-amd64-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
It is possible I think to modify the bootloader in Windows (without
using e.g. Partition Magic) to sniff out the Linux and allow you to
choice of booting it when you boot up the PC..
Yes, but it's fragile and not worth doing that way.
Depends on the version of grub:
Michael,
I've got a dual boot. Linux on one drive and WXP on another. Very easy
to set up. But as I remember, when I installed Windows, I disconnected
the Linux drive while doing the install, then put the WXP drive on
middle connector of ATA cable when I had that situation. But now I have
Michael, I just re-checked my instructions I had for myself elsewhere
and found I had made a mistake. In the menu.lst file make sure there IS
a space between the (hd0) and (hd1). Sorry about that.
HTH's
Whit
Whit Hansell wrote:
Michael,
I've got a dual boot. Linux on one drive and WXP
On Tue, Dec 07, 2010 at 12:43:42AM -0600, Karl Schmidt wrote:
Not sure how to fix this one. The possible source of the problem is
iceweasel, alsa, java, amd64..
I can't find much other than other people saying it didn't work. Flash
works fine - I understand it talks directly to alsa.
On 12/07/2010 12:43 AM, Karl Schmidt wrote:
[snip]
Here is a java sound test - can anyone get this to work via
iceweasel/squeeze on amd64?
Where is the Java sound test?
--
Seek truth from facts.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-amd64-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of
On 12/07/2010 10:40 AM, Lennart Sorensen wrote:
On Tue, Dec 07, 2010 at 12:43:42AM -0600, Karl Schmidt wrote:
Not sure how to fix this one. The possible source of the problem is iceweasel,
alsa, java, amd64..
I can't find much other than other people saying it didn't work. Flash
works fine
On Tue, Dec 07, 2010 at 11:38:12AM -0600, Karl Schmidt wrote:
Interesting - Pulse audio seems to be being pushed as a new sound server
There is this from wikipedia http://www.javasonics.com/support/check_play.html
I'm not understanding the whole of the sound picture in the Linux world -
I
On 11/29/10, Tomasz Nitecki t...@tnnn.pl wrote:
On 29/11/10 17:00, dage...@free.fr wrote:
Anyway, just a remark, I have noticed that just after the installation
of Debian AMD 64, there's no xorg.conf file at all, but X runs well.
Any hints to make me understand ?
It 'just works' due to its
- brian m. carlson sand...@crustytoothpaste.net a écrit :
Is your installation i386 with a 64-bit kernel, or is it amd64?
Right. In fact ,it is i386 with 64-bit kernel.
What it sounds like to me is that you're using a 64-bit kernel on
i386,
which is supported by Debian (and in
On 11/29/2010 04:06 AM, dage...@free.fr wrote:
- brian m. carlsonsand...@crustytoothpaste.net a écrit :
Is your installation i386 with a 64-bit kernel, or is it amd64?
Right. In fact ,it is i386 with 64-bit kernel.
What it sounds like to me is that you're using a 64-bit kernel on
Note that in the NVIDIA world there *is* a way to do this, so you
might want to Google for something like:
Linux fglrx 64-bit kernel 32-bit userland
Thank you.
I installed AMD 64 debian, and the installation of the driver just went
fine ! Sorry to have bother you all with such a
On 29/11/10 17:00, dage...@free.fr wrote:
Anyway, just a remark, I have noticed that just after the installation
of Debian AMD 64, there's no xorg.conf file at all, but X runs well.
Any hints to make me understand ?
It 'just works' due to its ability to auto-configure itself. Take a look
at
On Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 11:14:43PM +0100, dage...@free.fr wrote:
Here is the problem:
I can't install official ATI drivers for my graphic card when using 64 bits
kernels (tested on lenny and squeeze).
Is your installation i386 with a 64-bit kernel, or is it amd64?
At the end, X programs
On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 21:29:07 -0500, Matt Turner wrote:
On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 8:15 PM, Samuel Thibault sthiba...@debian.org wrote:
Matt Turner, le Mon 15 Nov 2010 19:51:10 -0500, a écrit :
On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 7:24 PM, Roger Leigh rle...@codelibre.net wrote:
What's the actual
On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 01:14:09 +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
On 14.11.2010 13:19, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 15:43:57 +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
For wheezy I'm planning to change the linking behaviour for DSOs
(turning on --as-needed and --no-copy-dt-needed-entries.
On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 01:14:09AM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
On 14.11.2010 13:19, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 15:43:57 +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
For wheezy I'm planning to change the linking behaviour for DSOs
(turning on --as-needed and --no-copy-dt-needed-entries.
This change is one I can agree with on technical grounds, though it
will cause a great deal of pain in the short term. Have we got any
estimates on exactly how much breakage will result before the change
gets made?
Fedora already made the change a full release cycles ago, and Fedora
package
* Kurt Roeckx k...@roeckx.be [101114 14:08]:
People have been claiming that constructors or init section are a
possible problem. I have yet to see an example where it breaks.
The following example is a bit constructed, but shows a silent change
of run-time behaviour if --as-needed is passed:
On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 09:49:08AM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 21:29:07 -0500, Matt Turner wrote:
I can't see why you think --as-needed is fundamentally wrong or
unnecessary.
Check out http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/qa/asneeded.xml
--as-needed has saved tons
Steve Langasek, le Tue 16 Nov 2010 09:14:40 -0800, a écrit :
I don't argue that this makes --as-needed *correct* as a default, but I
think it's clear how using --as-needed may benefit a distribution in terms
of reducing churn when library dependencies change.
We agree on the second part, but
On 16.11.2010 10:42, Roger Leigh wrote:
On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 01:14:09AM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
On 14.11.2010 13:19, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 15:43:57 +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
For wheezy I'm planning to change the linking behaviour for DSOs
(turning on
* Roland McGrath:
I can't see why you think --as-needed is fundamentally wrong or unnecessary.
It is fundamentally wrong because -lfoo means I demand that the
initializers of libfoo.so run, whether or not I called anything in it.
So it's more like static linking. 8-)
IMHO, the current
On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 07:04:53PM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
On 16.11.2010 10:42, Roger Leigh wrote:
On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 01:14:09AM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
On 14.11.2010 13:19, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 15:43:57 +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
For wheezy I'm
On Sat, Nov 13, 2010 at 04:58:52PM -0300, Felipe Valverde wrote:
Definitively the culprit is the new driver. I tried the testing and the
unstable driver but they just do not work properly. They will freeze my
laptop as soon as I try to connect to a wireless network. My fix is just a
On 15.11.2010 07:16, Roland McGrath wrote:
mattst88 airlied_, does Fedora use --as-needed by default? Fedora 14 too?
airlied_ mattst88: yes
The naming of the options makes people easily confused.
--no-add-needed is the only option Fedora's gcc passes.
yes, OpenSuse is using --as-needed,
On 14.11.2010 16:06, Roger Leigh wrote:
While I understand the rationale for --no-copy-dt-needed-entries for
preventing encapsulation violations via indirect linking, I don't agree
with the use of --as-needed *at all*. If a library has been explicitly
linked in, it shouldn't be removed. This
On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 11:02:57PM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
maybe, and fix it in N - ~100 packages? Or fix the ~100 packages?
The point of injection is for discussion. I would prefer having
this set in dpkg-buildflags, and then disabled by these ~100
packages. Note that this is probably
On 15.11.2010 07:16, Roland McGrath wrote:
yes, OpenSuse is using --as-needed, but not --no-add-needed.
That is a pretty nutty choice.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-amd64-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 11:02:57PM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
On 14.11.2010 16:06, Roger Leigh wrote:
While I understand the rationale for --no-copy-dt-needed-entries for
preventing encapsulation violations via indirect linking, I don't agree
with the use of --as-needed *at all*. If a
On 14.11.2010 13:19, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 15:43:57 +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
For wheezy I'm planning to change the linking behaviour for DSOs
(turning on --as-needed and --no-copy-dt-needed-entries. The
rationale is summarized in
On 16.11.2010 01:24, Roger Leigh wrote:
On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 11:02:57PM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
On 14.11.2010 16:06, Roger Leigh wrote:
While I understand the rationale for --no-copy-dt-needed-entries for
preventing encapsulation violations via indirect linking, I don't agree
with the
On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 7:24 PM, Roger Leigh rle...@codelibre.net wrote:
What's the actual problem --as-needed is trying to solve?
The answer is mainly unwanted libraries being linked in as a result
of using pkg-config (and various other -config variants), though there
are other, lesser,
I can't see why you think --as-needed is fundamentally wrong or unnecessary.
It is fundamentally wrong because -lfoo means I demand that the
initializers of libfoo.so run, whether or not I called anything in it.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-amd64-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject
Matt Turner, le Mon 15 Nov 2010 19:51:10 -0500, a écrit :
On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 7:24 PM, Roger Leigh rle...@codelibre.net wrote:
What's the actual problem --as-needed is trying to solve?
The answer is mainly unwanted libraries being linked in as a result
of using pkg-config (and various
On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 8:15 PM, Samuel Thibault sthiba...@debian.org wrote:
Matt Turner, le Mon 15 Nov 2010 19:51:10 -0500, a écrit :
On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 7:24 PM, Roger Leigh rle...@codelibre.net wrote:
What's the actual problem --as-needed is trying to solve?
The answer is mainly
On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 15:43:57 +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
For wheezy I'm planning to change the linking behaviour for DSOs
(turning on --as-needed and --no-copy-dt-needed-entries. The
rationale is summarized in
http://wiki.debian.org/ToolChain/DSOLinking. I would like to know
about
On Sun, Nov 07, 2010 at 04:19:10PM +, Roger Leigh wrote:
On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 03:43:57PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
For wheezy I'm planning to change the linking behaviour for DSOs (turning
on --as-needed and --no-copy-dt-needed-entries. The rationale is
summarized in
On Sun, Nov 14, 2010 at 01:51:49PM +0100, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
On Sun, Nov 07, 2010 at 04:19:10PM +, Roger Leigh wrote:
On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 03:43:57PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
For wheezy I'm planning to change the linking behaviour for DSOs (turning
on --as-needed and
On Sun, Nov 14, 2010 at 01:19:08PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 15:43:57 +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
For wheezy I'm planning to change the linking behaviour for DSOs
(turning on --as-needed and --no-copy-dt-needed-entries. The
rationale is summarized in
On Sun, Nov 14, 2010 at 10:06 AM, Roger Leigh rle...@codelibre.net wrote:
On Sun, Nov 14, 2010 at 01:51:49PM +0100, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
On Sun, Nov 07, 2010 at 04:19:10PM +, Roger Leigh wrote:
On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 03:43:57PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
For wheezy I'm planning to
On 11/14/2010 12:42 PM, Matt Turner wrote:
Please ignore me if I've misunderstood the situation, firstly.
Both Fedora and Gentoo are using --as-needed by default now. And from
what I've read (google: site:blog.flameeyes.eu as-needed) --as-needed
is certainly useful and prevents lots of
On Sun, Nov 14, 2010 at 8:40 PM, Adam Goode a...@spicenitz.org wrote:
On 11/14/2010 12:42 PM, Matt Turner wrote:
Please ignore me if I've misunderstood the situation, firstly.
Both Fedora and Gentoo are using --as-needed by default now. And from
what I've read (google: site:blog.flameeyes.eu
mattst88 airlied_, does Fedora use --as-needed by default? Fedora 14 too?
airlied_ mattst88: yes
The naming of the options makes people easily confused.
--no-add-needed is the only option Fedora's gcc passes.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-amd64-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of
Hi
Definitively the culprit is the new driver. I tried the testing and the
unstable driver but they just do not work properly. They will freeze my
laptop as soon as I try to connect to a wireless network. My fix is just a
band-aid and it can't be considered a good fix, but it works.
In order
Felipe,
I have my Intel 5100 wireless card working again.
This is what I did:
1. Purged the firmware-iwlwifi 0.27 from my system.
2. Installed this one instead:
firmware-iwlwi 0.24~bpo50+1 Binary firmware for Intel Wireless 3945, 496
I've downloaded this .deb from the lenny backports:
On 11/9/2010 1:33 PM, Hans-J. Ullrich wrote:
Hi all,
I am running debian-amd64/testing. When I start orphaner there are two
packages, which are marked as essentials. These packages are diff and
mktemp, but they are below oldlibs. Can they safely to be removed, as they
are meanwhile old? Or
some packages has been grouped...
diff in diffutils
mktemp in coreutils
both in squeeze
On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 6:58 AM, Mark Allums m...@allums.com wrote:
On 11/9/2010 1:33 PM, Hans-J. Ullrich wrote:
Hi all,
I am running debian-amd64/testing. When I start orphaner there are two
On 11/10/2010 6:58 AM, Mark Allums wrote:
On 11/9/2010 1:33 PM, Hans-J. Ullrich wrote:
Hi all,
I am running debian-amd64/testing. When I start orphaner there are two
packages, which are marked as essentials. These packages are diff and
mktemp, but they are below oldlibs. Can they safely to be
Am Mittwoch, 10. November 2010 schrieb Jaime Ochoa Malagón:
some packages has been grouped...
diff in diffutils
mktemp in coreutils
both in squeeze
On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 6:58 AM, Mark Allums m...@allums.com wrote:
On 11/9/2010 1:33 PM, Hans-J. Ullrich wrote:
Hi all,
I am
I was WRONG. As soon as I rebooted and attempted to connect to my wireless
network the system hangs.
1. I've purged firmware-iwlwifi firmware-linux-nonfree from the system.
2. Rebooted.
3. With the system online I've installed firmware-iwlwifi.
4. Unplugged the network cable and enables the
On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 03:43:57PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
For wheezy I'm planning to change the linking behaviour for DSOs (turning
on --as-needed and --no-copy-dt-needed-entries. The rationale is
summarized in http://wiki.debian.org/ToolChain/DSOLinking. I would like
to know about
Thanks Brian. Info much appreciated.
Whit
brian m. carlson wrote:
On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 07:39:52PM +0200, sigi wrote:
last time I tried to dist-upgrade to squeeze, I got stuck in an
(for me) unresolvable loop:
The system wanted to upgrade the kernel-image and udev in one run -
which
Hi Whit,
last time I tried to dist-upgrade to squeeze, I got stuck in an
(for me) unresolvable loop:
The system wanted to upgrade the kernel-image and udev in one run -
which failed. apt-get always complained, that the kernel-image needs the
new udev-package to upgrade - and udev itself
On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 07:39:52PM +0200, sigi wrote:
last time I tried to dist-upgrade to squeeze, I got stuck in an
(for me) unresolvable loop:
The system wanted to upgrade the kernel-image and udev in one run -
which failed. apt-get always complained, that the kernel-image needs the
On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 07:39:52PM +0200, sigi wrote:
Hi Whit,
last time I tried to dist-upgrade to squeeze, I got stuck in an
(for me) unresolvable loop:
The system wanted to upgrade the kernel-image and udev in one run -
which failed. apt-get always complained, that the kernel-image
On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 02:42:54PM -0400, Lennart Sorensen wrote:
On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 07:39:52PM +0200, sigi wrote:
Hi Whit,
last time I tried to dist-upgrade to squeeze, I got stuck in an
(for me) unresolvable loop:
The system wanted to upgrade the kernel-image and udev in one
On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 09:10:09PM -0500, Karl Schmidt wrote:
I did the upgrade from lenny to squeeze without any problems - if you
read the wiki, you are supposed to upgrade apt dpkg and aptitude first -
then the kernel - then distupgrade.
And was your system up and usable during pretty
I did the upgrade from lenny to squeeze without any problems - if you read the wiki, you are
supposed to upgrade apt dpkg and aptitude first - then the kernel - then distupgrade.
It worked - but - there is always some cruft that accumulates - so if you have time, you might want
to bkup your
On 10/25/2010 09:24 PM, Hendrik Boom wrote:
On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 09:10:09PM -0500, Karl Schmidt wrote:
I did the upgrade from lenny to squeeze without any problems - if you
read the wiki, you are supposed to upgrade apt dpkg and aptitude first -
then the kernel - then distupgrade.
And was
On Sat, Oct 23, 2010 at 10:35:31PM -0400 Whit Hansell said:
Just thinking that since Squeeze is coming up to be the new stable
and have been running Lenny since March of 2009, I was wondering
about how difficult it would be to change from Lenny(stable) to
Squeeze(testing) now.
big snip
I
Hey Sam,
Thanks for the reply. It's helpful. Gracias
Whit
Sam Varghese wrote:
On Sat, Oct 23, 2010 at 10:35:31PM -0400 Whit Hansell said:
Just thinking that since Squeeze is coming up to be the new stable
and have been running Lenny since March of 2009, I was wondering
about how
On Sat, 16 Oct 2010 16:52:26 -0500,
Seb splu...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi, On Debian sid system, I successfully created a LVM logical volume
in a volume group in a USB external hard drive using
system-config-lvm. The logical volume was designated as ext3, created
a mount point for it under /media,
Alasdair ali...@btinternet.com writes:
On Sat, 2010-10-02 at 16:17 +0200, Francesco Pietra wrote:
While gcc compiling a complex program (AmberTools of Amber suite, a
molecular dynamics package) on amd64 lenny (in the past it compiled
smoothly on this system):
./configure_at gcc
make -f
On 09/20/2010 10:49 AM, d...@nc.rr.com wrote:
[snip]
That said, I found this while looking for links to info on how to do
the above and decided to stop looking, and recommend a total boycott.
After years of experience. your choice.
http://homepage.mac.com/bradster/iarchitect/lotus.htm
I'm afraid it's not possible, as Lotus Notes is a non-free
email/collaboration suite from IBM:
http://www-01.ibm.com/software/lotus
If the Source Code is not available then that is surely, in and of itself, a
good enough reason to run it inside a chroot -- that way, it can't get at
On Thursday 16 Sep 2010, Christopher Judd wrote:
Hi,
I have to install lotus notes here. Our IT guys have provided me with
the file ibm_lotus_notes-8.5.i586.deb (linux support here is minimal).
[stuff deleted]
Does anyone have any idea how to fix this? I'd prefer not to have to set
ia32-apt-get :-P jajajja
On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 8:54 AM, Christopher Judd j...@wadsworth.org wrote:
Hi,
I have to install lotus notes here. Our IT guys have provided me with
the file ibm_lotus_notes-8.5.i586.deb (linux support here is minimal).
Following
instructions from
On Thursday 16 September 2010 11:30:15 A J Stiles wrote:
On Thursday 16 Sep 2010, Christopher Judd wrote:
Hi,
I have to install lotus notes here. Our IT guys have provided me with
the file ibm_lotus_notes-8.5.i586.deb (linux support here is minimal).
[stuff deleted]
Did
On Thursday 16 Sep 2010, Fabricio Cannini wrote:
On Thursday 16 September 2010 12:30:15 A J Stiles wrote:
In general, it is best not to try to run anything that was not compiled
by either yourself or your own distro's package maintainers. Try
grabbing the other distro (i.e., Source Code)
On Thursday 16 September 2010 13:02:11 Fabricio Cannini wrote:
On Thursday 16 September 2010 12:30:15 A J Stiles wrote:
On Thursday 16 Sep 2010, Christopher Judd wrote:
Hi,
I have to install lotus notes here. Our IT guys have provided me
with
the file
On Mon, 16 Aug 2010 16:02:31 +0100, Matthew Vernon wrote:
[I'm not on this mailing list - it'd be kindness if you CCd any replies]
Hi,
What's the status of Intel Mac support in Squeeze? I have managed to
install lenny on an intel mac pro, but it was a bit of a faff (and
involved
On Sat, Sep 11, 2010 at 12:10:30PM +, Hendrik Boom wrote:
I've been IP masquerading for years. But now my Pentium front-end machine
has bit the dust, and I'm setting up my server to do the masquerading
itself.
It's and AMD65 running Debian lenny:
hend...@lovesong:~$ uname -a
Linux
On 9/12/10, Hendrik Boom hend...@topoi.pooq.com wrote:
On Mon, 16 Aug 2010 16:02:31 +0100, Matthew Vernon wrote:
[I'm not on this mailing list - it'd be kindness if you CCd any replies]
Hi,
What's the status of Intel Mac support in Squeeze?
I had it going for the 1st half of the year on my
1001 - 1100 of 18075 matches
Mail list logo
