Quoting Nagy Gabor ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> > I think he means what's is #228839.
>
> No, actually what I would like, is to have the package debconf installed
> pretty soon, and configured, so later every package will use the output
> and the level, that I am used to.
>
> Usually I use medium
On Wed, Jan 21, 2004 at 01:52:23AM +0100, Jeremie Koenig wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 20, 2004 at 03:58:19PM -0600, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > > I guess it'll be hard to build miBoot with a free toolchain.
> > > Would a contrib package be an acceptable build-dependency for d-i images ?
> > Does any part o
Package: installation-reports
Debian-installer-version: Jan 22, 2004 -- debian website
uname -a: Linux www 2.4.22-1-386 #9 Sat Oct 4 14:30:39 EST 2003 i586
GNU/Linux
Date: Jan 22, 2004
Method: Booted from atapi cdrom. 100 MB Debian base cd image.
Updated and filled out from
ftp.us.debian.org.
Quoting Konstantinos Margaritis ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> http://people.debian.org/~markos/d-i/ddetect2.png
>
> Anyway, any ideas about this?
> Should I file a bug report?
I guess you should, yes. I looked too into your greek translations and
no problem showed up immediately.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> clone 228853 -1 -2 -3 -4
Bug#228853: the command mozilla-firebird file.html should open a new window
Bug 228853 cloned as bugs 229135-229138.
> retitle -1 change "DHCP failure" error template wording for being clearer
Bug#229135: the command mozilla-fi
Hi,
Trying to install Debian using Sarge installer.
Have used both
http://people.debian.org/cdimage/testing/netinst/i386/beta2/sarge-i386-netin
st.iso
and
http://people.debian.org/cdimage/testing/netinst/i386/daily/sarge-i386-netin
st.iso 22-Jan-2004 15:22 108M
Get the message: "Failed to
On Fri, Jan 23, 2004 at 11:06:00AM +1100, Andrew Clausen wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 22, 2004 at 08:16:32PM +0100, Szakacsits Szabolcs wrote:
> > > This is a real problem, but again not one of libparted per see, more one
> > > linked to the fact that there is no open CVS or whatever repository.
> > > This
fre 2004-01-23 klockan 00.23 skrev Joey Hess:
> I noticed a few seemingly old files in your daily build directory,
> amoungst all the up-to-date ones:
>
> [ ] cd_drivers-image.img31-Dec-2003 23:46 1.4M
> [ ] net_drivers-image.img 31-Dec-2003 23:46 1.4M
This would be because they've
On Fri, Jan 23, 2004 at 02:19:02AM +0100, Szakacsits Szabolcs wrote:
> > > - most distros ship parted but I don't know any who ships ocaml
> > Debian :)
>
> Well, in that case Mandrake also :)
All major distros do, i think. After all it is used in software as
mldonkey, coq, and apparently also
Hi, Debian-boot!
I am a frien0d of Simmy. He said thant you need VIAGRqA. On thGis site it cosets $1.08
per pac2k. http://www.pvmsolutions.com/index.php?pid=evaph5545
Best regards, Piet
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PRO
On Fri, Jan 23, 2004 at 02:19:02AM +0100, Szakacsits Szabolcs wrote:
> > This patch only solves half the problem. I guess it's the important
> > half though. (The other half is getting Parted to talk to you in
> > custom units)
>
> Couldn't that part be used/applied until the left is done? I mea
On Fri, Jan 23, 2004 at 09:12:55PM +1100, Andrew Clausen wrote:
> > [ parted in ocaml ]
> > > > I'm afraid it wouldn't be :)
> > > I would like it, if that counts!
> >
> > :))
>
> One thing with O'Caml: would it make it difficult to interface
> libocamlparted with distro installers? I have
On Thu, Jan 22, 2004 at 06:55:16PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
> Instead of grepping Packages files, I figured out how to set up
> cjwatson's madison-lite on gluck to include debian-installer.
Yeah, I just thought of this when Sven mentioned that he didn't see
archdetect and I realized that my configu
partman-ext3_4_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
partman-ext3_4.dsc
partman-ext3_4.tar.gz
partman-ext3_4_i386.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Conta
partman-basicfilesystems_6_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
partman-basicfilesystems_6.dsc
partman-basicfilesystems_6.tar.gz
partman-basicfilesystems_6_all.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, 23 Jan 2004, Andrew Clausen wrote:
> This is one of my favourite stories!
Talking about favourites, here is my "favourite" challange. Since earlier
ntfsresize could resize only if there weren't data after the new size,
many people made the compromise "ok, let's shrink here now and more l
Accepted:
partman-ext3_4.dsc
to pool/main/p/partman-ext3/partman-ext3_4.dsc
partman-ext3_4.tar.gz
to pool/main/p/partman-ext3/partman-ext3_4.tar.gz
partman-ext3_4_i386.udeb
to pool/main/p/partman-ext3/partman-ext3_4_i386.udeb
Announcing to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thank you for your contribution
Accepted:
partman-basicfilesystems_6.dsc
to pool/main/p/partman-basicfilesystems/partman-basicfilesystems_6.dsc
partman-basicfilesystems_6.tar.gz
to pool/main/p/partman-basicfilesystems/partman-basicfilesystems_6.tar.gz
partman-basicfilesystems_6_all.udeb
to pool/main/p/partman-basicfilesyst
* Szakacsits Szabolcs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [040123 12:49]:
> > This is one of my favourite stories!
>
> Talking about favourites, here is my "favourite" challange. Since earlier
> ntfsresize could resize only if there weren't data after the new size,
> many people made the compromise "ok, let's shr
On Thu, 22 Jan 2004, Leigh Brown wrote:
> Sven Luther said:
> > Well, does yaboot work on all chrps ? I have had info from Geert that he
> > had trouble with yaboot on his longtrail.
>
> It should be possible, depends on the problem he encountered of course...
My version of Open Firmware (from Fir
Geert Uytterhoeven said:
> My version of Open Firmware (from Firmworks) didn't like the yaboot loader
> and kept rebooting with the message `rebooting with the correct settings
> for this client program' (or something like that), until I disconnected
> the disk and it couldn't find the boot loader
On Fri, Jan 23, 2004 at 01:23:38AM +0100, Denis Barbier wrote:
> This is an option, but I was referring to this part:
> ] Mandrake folks define an aliased po module containing all po directories
> ]http://cvs.mandrakesoft.com/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/CVSROOT/modules
So, if I understand correctly, t
On Fri, Jan 23, 2004 at 01:28:45PM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> On Thu, 22 Jan 2004, Leigh Brown wrote:
> > Sven Luther said:
> > > Well, does yaboot work on all chrps ? I have had info from Geert that he
> > > had trouble with yaboot on his longtrail.
> >
> > It should be possible, depends o
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 228870 debian-installer
Bug#228870: Can't mount partition on hdb as /
Bug reassigned from package `libparted1.6-udeb' to `debian-installer'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking sys
On Fri, 23 Jan 2004, Leigh Brown wrote:
> Geert Uytterhoeven said:
> > My version of Open Firmware (from Firmworks) didn't like the yaboot loader
> > and kept rebooting with the message `rebooting with the correct settings
> > for this client program' (or something like that), until I disconnected
Geert Uytterhoeven said:
> On Fri, 23 Jan 2004, Leigh Brown wrote:
>> Geert Uytterhoeven said:
>> > My version of Open Firmware (from Firmworks) didn't like the yaboot
>> loader
>> > and kept rebooting with the message `rebooting with the correct
>> settings
>> > for this client program' (or someth
Hello boot-meisters:
This morning I had the following brilliant idea;
Would it be possible to connect two computers, perhaps a (desktop ||
server) system, and a (laptop || portable) with a USB cable, and have
one of the systems act as a USB storage device, and the other boots off
of it,
On Fri, Jan 23, 2004 at 02:24:16PM -, Leigh Brown wrote:
> Geert Uytterhoeven said:
> > On Fri, 23 Jan 2004, Leigh Brown wrote:
> >> Geert Uytterhoeven said:
> >> > My version of Open Firmware (from Firmworks) didn't like the yaboot
> >> loader
> >> > and kept rebooting with the message `reboot
On Fri, Jan 23, 2004 at 12:37:56AM +0100, Jeremie Koenig wrote:
> Hello Rick,
>
> I'm trying to get debian-installer working well on OldWorld systems. In
> order to achieve this, we need to :
> - have miBoot in Debian (for the boot floppy),
> - have a quik-installer udeb, as well as an ope
Hi there,
The last couple of days I have been playing around with getting MD support
into the Debian installer.
Before I spend too much time with, I just want to make sure that noone else is
working on this.
What I have right now is a mdadm-udeb package and a mdcfg udeb package. The
latter con
On Thu, Jan 22, 2004 at 08:47:43PM -0500, Debian Installer wrote:
>
> Rejected: nobootloader_0.0.2_all.udeb: old version (0.0.2) in unstable >= new
> version (0.0.2) targeted at unstable.
> Rejected: nobootloader_0.0.2_all.udeb: can not overwrite existing copy already in
> the archive.
> Rejecte
[Paul Fleischer]
> The only problem i ran into, was that I had to install the mdadm
> package manually before installing the kernel, in order for the
> mkinitrd script to create a proper initrd image. But that's just a
> question of adding mdadm to the default packages to be installed. Is
> there a
On Friday 23 January 2004 16:28, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
[snip]
> > Is
> > there a way to do this "dynamically", depending on wether any MD
> > devices are used?
>
> Yes, just call 'apt-install mdadm' in the postinst script. This will
> queue mdadm for installation at the end of the base-inst
Steve Langasek wrote:
> This works well for aboot-installer, which is alpha-specific and is
> probably ready to move into testing at this time
If it's ready you should make an upload to testing-proposed-updates. Or
if the version currently in unstable is the right one we can copy it
from there.
>
On Fri, Jan 23, 2004 at 12:10:06AM -0500, David Nusinow wrote:
> Awesome! Thanks Joey and aj and anyone else who was involved in this. Would
> someone please sponsor an upload of discover? As I previously posted, this
> includes some major fixes including the module sorting as well as initial 2.6
severity 227691 serious
thanks
#include
* willy [Wed, Jan 14 2004, 12:36:24PM]:
> Package: modconf
> Version: 0.2.45
> Severity: important
>
> If i try to select kernel/drivers/net modules section it return
> to modules section main list.
> I can't choose net modules.
Something that must be fix
* Gaudenz Steinlin ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> This looks like discover is hanging when detecting the hardware not when
> loading modules.
Looks like discover is trying to talk to the modem, and failing. I
finally got the box up on the network (not with wireless,
unfortunately) and did an strace
Package: installation-reports
INSTALL REPORT
Debian-installer-version: From
http://distro.ibiblio.org/pub/Linux/distributions/debian/dists/testing/main/installer-i386/current/images/
on 20 Jan 2004
uname -a: Linux goffman 2.4.22 #1 Fri Jan 23 09:25:48 EST 2004 i686 GNU/Linux
Date: January 21 2
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 229187 lilo-installer
Bug#229187: lilo.conf has no comments anymore in Sarge
Bug reassigned from package `lilo' to `lilo-installer'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system admi
* Steinar H. Gunderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-01-12 02:10]:
> On Mon, Jan 12, 2004 at 01:17:16AM +0200, Konstantinos Margaritis wrote:
> > I don't hold high hopes for this, but just in case... Actually
> > it would be really nice if we got some volume discounts, I'm
> > sure lots of other
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 227691 serious
Bug#227691: modconf: I can't enter in kernel/drivers/net section
Severity set to `serious'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator,
discover_1.5-2_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
discover_1.5-2.dsc
discover_1.5-2.tar.gz
discover-udeb_1.5-2_i386.udeb
discover_1.5-2_i386.deb
libdiscover1_1.5-2_i386.deb
libdiscover-dev_1.5-2_i386.deb
libdiscover1-pic_1.5-2_i386.deb
Greetings,
base-installer_0.050_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
base-installer_0.050.dsc
base-installer_0.050.tar.gz
base-installer_0.050_i386.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsu
* Paul Fleischer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-01-23 16:19]:
> The current mdcfg package only support RAID-1 devices as of now. I
> will release it to the public if it has any interrest (and after I
> have done just a little bit of cleanup).
Sounds good, thanks. Ideally, you'd also look at the new pa
I don't have a devfs system handy, so I'm hoping someone can answer
my question. Please keep in mind that I'm trying to emulate devfs on
a 2.2.25 kernel. Maybe I'm missing some devices or links?
What does /dev/discs/disc0 look like?
I've got the following.
/dev/discs/disc0/disc
Package: installation-reports
INSTALL REPORT
Debian-installer-version: 2004-01-03 beta 2
uname -a: Linux ratbert 2.6.0-1-386 #2 Sun Jan 11 16:54:21 EST 2004 i686 GNU/Linux
Date: 2004-01-25
Method: installed cdrom drive to boot debian-installer
Machine: CV860A motherboard, BooksizePC
Prosessor
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> clone 228553 -1 -2 -3 -4
Bug#228553: installation-reports: Installation report sarge businesscard i386, new
Debian user
Bug 228553 cloned as bugs 229209-229212.
> retitle -1 change "DHCP failure" error template wording for being clearer
Bug#229209: in
Accepted:
base-installer_0.050.dsc
to pool/main/b/base-installer/base-installer_0.050.dsc
base-installer_0.050.tar.gz
to pool/main/b/base-installer/base-installer_0.050.tar.gz
base-installer_0.050_i386.udeb
to pool/main/b/base-installer/base-installer_0.050_i386.udeb
Announcing to [EMAIL PRO
Your message dated Fri, 23 Jan 2004 17:57:18 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Close bugs opened by wrong clone command...:-(
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
Your message dated Fri, 23 Jan 2004 17:57:18 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Close bugs opened by wrong clone command...:-(
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
Your message dated Fri, 23 Jan 2004 17:57:18 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Close bugs opened by wrong clone command...:-(
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
Your message dated Fri, 23 Jan 2004 17:57:18 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Close bugs opened by wrong clone command...:-(
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
tag 225858 + fixed
quit
This message was generated automatically in response to a
non-maintainer upload. The .changes file follows.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2004 13:01:51 -0500
Source: base-installer
Binary: base-installer
Architecture: source
Accepted:
discover-udeb_1.5-2_i386.udeb
to pool/main/d/discover/discover-udeb_1.5-2_i386.udeb
discover_1.5-2.dsc
to pool/main/d/discover/discover_1.5-2.dsc
discover_1.5-2.tar.gz
to pool/main/d/discover/discover_1.5-2.tar.gz
discover_1.5-2_i386.deb
to pool/main/d/discover/discover_1.5-2_i38
There are disparities between your recently accepted upload and the
override file for the following file(s):
discover-udeb_1.5-2_i386.udeb: package says priority is standard, override says extra.
libdiscover-dev_1.5-2_i386.deb: package says section is devel, override says libdevel.
Either the pac
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 225858 + fixed
Bug#225858: "Validating %s" message untranslated from debootrstrap
Tags were: pending d-i
Tags added: fixed
> quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(admini
* Gaudenz Steinlin ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> This looks like discover is hanging when detecting the hardware not when
> loading modules.
Playing with it some more I discovered that if I attach an strace to an
already running discover that's hung trying to close (or talk to, or
something) the se
Your message dated Fri, 23 Jan 2004 14:06:02 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line FWD: Fixed in NMU of base-installer 0.050
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is n
Package: partman
Version: 6
Severity: serious
Justification: fails to build on release candidate arch.
Tags: sid
partman fails to build from source.
Here are selected excerpts from the buildd log.
| Automatic build of partman_6 on poseidon by sbuild/m68k 1.170.4
| Build started at 20040121-163
Probably you are the uploader of the following file(s) in
the Debian upload queue directory:
linux-kernel-di_0.27.dsc
linux-kernel-di_0.27.tar.gz
This looks like an upload, but a .changes file is missing, so the job
cannot be processed.
If no .changes file arrives within 23:23:44, the files wi
linux-kernel-di_0.27_source+i386+alpha+ia64+m68k+mips+mipsel+powerpc.changes uploaded
successfully to localhost
along with the files:
linux-kernel-di_0.27.dsc
linux-kernel-di_0.27.tar.gz
kernel-image-2.4.22-1-386-di_0.27_i386.udeb
nic-modules-2.4.22-1-386-di_0.27_i386.udeb
nic-extra-modu
affs-modules-2.4.22-powerpc-di_0.27_powerpc.udeb
to pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di/affs-modules-2.4.22-powerpc-di_0.27_powerpc.udeb
(new) affs-modules-2.4.22-powerpc-small-di_0.27_powerpc.udeb extra debian-installer
Amiga filesystem support
This package contains the Amiga filesystem module for the
* tbm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-01-20 11:42]:
> * Thorsten Sauter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-01-20 10:37]:
> > 00:0a.0 Class 0200: 1011:0009 (rev 20)
> >
> > The emulated network is not detected during the installation process.
> > I must select the module manually in the network card modules list.
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 224494 kernel
Bug#224494: installation-reports: Gateway E-6100 ide-detect lockup
Bug reassigned from package `installation-reports' to `kernel'.
> retitle 224494 lockup with ide-detect
Bug#224494: installation-reports: Gateway E-6100 ide-detec
Package: installation-reports
INSTALL REPORT
Debian-installer-version: Beta 2
uname -a: Linux nasse 2.4.23-1-686 #1 Sun Nov 30 20:51:10 EST 2003 i686 GNU/Linux
Date: 2004-01-23 20:00
Method: Booted from USB memory stick with business card
ISO. Downloaded packages from http://ftp.se.debian
Stephen Frost wrote:
> Couple of other points:
All known:
> No progress meter on mke2fs/mounting of filesystems, it just goes to a
> blank screen until that's all done.
Bug in partconf, fixed by the new partman in unstable.
> When installing the 'base packages' it stops at '75%' and then waits
Martin Sjögren wrote:
> This would be because they've failed to build. Damn. The build script
> copies the previous day's files and then rsyncs the new files. Looking
> at floppy.log, I see:
>
> cp: cannot stat `extraudebs/isa-pnp-modules-2.4.22-1-386*': No such file
> or directory
> make: *** [ne
Package: installation-reports
INSTALL REPORT
Debian-installer-version: daily from 2004-01-09
http://gluck.debian.org/~manty/testing/netinst/i386/20040109/sarge-i386-netinst.iso
uname -a: 2.4.23-1-386
Method: booted off daily CD image
Machine: Standard PC
Processor: Pentium II
Memory: 384 MB
Root
Hi again,
I have put both the mdcfg and my modified mdadm package (modified to create
the udeb) up on http://proguy.dk/d-i/ for those who want to try them out.
Only the source packages are currently available, but I can supply i386 if
needed.
Currently, the process will fail when trying to con
On Fri, Jan 23, 2004 at 06:48:42PM +0100, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote:
> OK, I'm doing the upload now. The 2.6 problems are still not fixed, though
> (still USB problems), and it still loads duplicate modules, but it fixes
> quite a few problems already, and doesn't really break anything. :-)
Fanta
i will test plip so i change pkg_lists/net_drivers/i386 and add
plip-modules but is it possible to cvs it, there is enough space in
net_drivers-image.img
sylvain
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
sylvain ferriol wrote:
> i will test plip so i change pkg_lists/net_drivers/i386 and add
> plip-modules but is it possible to cvs it, there is enough space in
> net_drivers-image.img
Sure, if that's all you need for plip, it should not be a problem to add
it.
--
see shy jo
signature.asc
Desc
http://www.tatlin.net/
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
This graphical artist have made some free and redistributable graphical
works for opensource software (included Debian-med log and debian-junior logo).
He could be very very useful for some installer artwork concept :))
Friendly
--
To UNSUBSCRIB
73 matches
Mail list logo