Subject: bash interaction with ssh causes it to read .bashrc despite being
non-interactive
Package: bash
Version: 5.0-4
Severity: normal
When SSHing into a machine using bash as the shell, launching asynchronous
sub-shells in that shell causes the sub-shell to execute /etc/bash.bashrc and
.bashrc
Package: libgtk-3-0
Version: 3.22.11-1
When I start Emacs using an X server which only provides XInputExtension 1.3,
Emacs immediately exits when the mouse enters the Emacs window.
---%<---
> emacs
X protocol error: BadRequest (invalid request code or no such operation) on
protocol request 131
This is fixed in 3.3.6; I have successfully tested it using the
following amanda-client package:
# apt-cache showpkg amanda-client
Package: amanda-client
Versions:
1:3.3.6-4
(/var/lib/apt/lists/ftp.de.debian.org_debian_dists_jessie_main_binary-am
d64_Packages) (/var/lib/dpkg/status)
Description
This is an upstream bug fixed in 3.3.6 (see
http://archives.zmanda.com/amanda-archives/viewtopic.php?t=7322&sid=aa51
6467b5baa942a8b4f34dda49eefd).
According to the author this is fixed by the following commit:
https://github.com/zmanda/amanda/commit/aaae124a5a8819fcdc0136cfb6ad3531
18c2fc4c
--
Short update: it looks as if the server is already decompressing the
dump before sending it to the client.
When replacing the custom compression script on the client by a script
just calling "cat -", the restore works.
Regards,
Markus
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.d
I just ran into the exact same problem using below mentioned versions
for server and client.
I am using a custom compression script, and the client log for the
failed recovery contains the following lines:
Mon Jan 19 11:05:59 2015: thd-0x199da00: amrecover: image is compressed
/etc/amanda/xz-1
M
No further segmentation faults of apt-cacher have been observed up to
now. Looks like the suggested patch does indeed solve the observed
problem.
Markus
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debia
Status update: The system now runs for 9 days with the patched libperl.
No further segmentation faults of apt-cacher have been observed.
Markus
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Niko Tyni wrote:
> Markus, if this is reproducible enough for you would you like to test
> if the fix works? You could rebuild the perl package yourself with the
> patch (it applies cleanly against 5.10.1), or I can provide you the
> .debs if you like.
Meanwhile I have built new perl packages con
Niko Tyni wrote:
>> apt-cacher segfaults at random intervals when clients are accessing
>> the cache.
>
> Is this visible to the clients? I.e. does it cause any actual problem
> like incomplete responses?
Forgot about that one...
No, the downloads in apt seem to work without any apparent probl
Niko Tyni wrote:
[...]
> Markus, if this is reproducible enough for you would you like to test
> if the fix works? You could rebuild the perl package yourself with the
> patch (it applies cleanly against 5.10.1), or I can provide you the
> .debs if you like.
The crash happens about once or twice
Mark Hindley wrote:
[...]
> This must be a problem in the perl engine somewhere rather than
> apt-cacher itself. I notice you are using CGI mode which could also
> point to the apache perl module as well. A perl script, like
> apt-cacher, shouldn't be able to crash the perl engine.
Agreed.
> Ha
Package: apt-cacher
Version: 1.6.12
Severity: normal
apt-cacher segfaults at random intervals when clients are accessing the cache.
From /var/log/messages:
---%<---
Nov 24 15:35:43 camoscm2 kernel: [616289.995097] apt-cacher.pl[9964]: segfault
at a80 ip 7f9ec2485122 sp 7fffc4fdfef0 erro
Package: mailman
Version: 1:2.1.13-4.1
Severity: important
After a fresh install of mailman, permissions on directories are wrong,
bin/check_perms reports 93 problems.
This breaks archiving:
---%<---
Nov 18 10:56:06 2010 (26393) Archive file access failure:
/var/lib/mailman/archives/pri
Ludovic Brenta wrote:
> Thank you for the nice bug report. I've forwarded it upstream to the
> GCC people. I am not in a position to try gnat-4.3 right now; can
> you tell me if the bug is also present there (or in a previous
> version)? If not, it is a regression in gnat-4.4 and therefore the
15 matches
Mail list logo
