Bug#1064976: Sad user.

2024-05-16 Thread Colm Buckley
I see that this dependency is persisting in the new BPO release of linux-headers 6.7.12, and it still causes significant trouble for me on my build system. I still can't understand what problem it's supposed to be fixing. Was there ever an original bug report indicating the issue? Colm

Bug#1064976: linux-headers-6.6.13 bpo-amd64 incorrectly depends on the corresponding linux-image-amd64 package

2024-04-02 Thread Colm Buckley
e precise meaning of "significant functionality" in the Debian policy. Colm On Tue, 2 Apr 2024 at 17:57, Colm Buckley wrote: > Please explain. I am really sorry to be dragging this discussion out, but > I honestly think there is some information I'm missing. Please tell me what

Bug#1064976: Having headers depend on image - bad idea I think

2024-04-02 Thread Colm Buckley
both image and headers packages. Users who regularly build new modules should be encouraged to install this package and have it pull in suitable versions of both headers and image. Is this correct, Bastian? I'm sorry for taking so long to understand what problem was being addressed here. Colm -- Colm Buckley | c...@tuatha.org

Bug#1064976: Having headers depend on image - bad idea I think

2024-04-02 Thread Colm Buckley
sible duplication of installation trees, and a sudden change in the behavior of existing installations. I welcome the thoughts of the community. Colm [1] If the kernel image file is not present, the legacy mechanism for extracting symbols for BTF builds does not work; this is the same issue which was addressed with vmlinux.h in https://salsa.debian.org/kernel-team/linux/-/merge_requests/1005

Bug#1064976: linux-headers-amd64: linux-headers-* incorrectly depends on linux-image-*

2024-03-19 Thread Colm Buckley
Package: linux-headers-amd64 Version: 6.6.13-1~bpo12+1 Followup-For: Bug #1064976 X-Debbugs-Cc: c...@tuatha.org Can I suggest in the interim that Depends: be replaced with Recommends: or Suggests: given that most installations won't actually need the image package? Colm

Bug#1064976:

2024-03-14 Thread Colm Buckley
should really be addressed using vmlinux.h (the "skipping BTF generation" message should be ignored as all of this information *should* be included in vmlinux.h). Any further thoughts? Colm

Bug#1064976:

2024-03-07 Thread colm
pretty sure that declaring it here is not the right thing. Colm

Bug#1064976: linux-headers-6.6.13+bpo-amd64 incorrectly depends on the corresponding linux-image-amd64 package

2024-03-04 Thread Colm Buckley
ernel build). Am I missing something else? I confess I have only a very small amount of experience with BPF code; I played with building a few modules, but I don't use it regularly. Colm

Bug#1064976: linux-headers-6.6.13+bpo-amd64 incorrectly depends on the corresponding linux-image-amd64 package

2024-02-29 Thread Colm Buckley
s the necessary type definitions for libbpf, for the kernel source version in question - ie: instead of needing to run pahole or bpftool to extract these definitions from a specific vmlinux image, this file is distributed with them already included. Colm

Bug#1064976: linux-headers-6.6.13+bpo-amd64 incorrectly depends on the corresponding linux-image-amd64 package

2024-02-29 Thread Colm Buckley
oblem? My concern is that I have a specific build server which builds kernels and modules for other machines in a farm. It needs to have the header files for specific target kernel versions installed, but it is not sensible to have the corresponding image packages installed (in many cases, those ima

Bug#1064976: linux-headers-6.6.13+bpo-amd64 incorrectly depends on the corresponding linux-image-amd64 package

2024-02-29 Thread Colm Buckley
sponding images. Colm On Thu 29 Feb 2024, 10:31 Bastian Blank, wrote: > Control: tags -1 wontfix > > On Wed, Feb 28, 2024 at 05:19:39PM +, Colm Buckley wrote: > > The linux-headers packages for kernel version 6.6 seem to depend on the > corresponding > > linux-image p

Bug#1064976: linux-headers-6.6.13+bpo-amd64 incorrectly depends on the corresponding linux-image-amd64 package

2024-02-28 Thread Colm Buckley
Some previous versions, for contrast: % apt-cache depends linux-headers-6.5.0-0.deb12.4-amd64 linux-headers-6.5.0-0.deb12.4-amd64 Depends: linux-headers-6.5.0-0.deb12.4-common Depends: linux-kbuild-6.5.0-0.deb12.4 Depends: linux-compiler-gcc-12-x86 % apt-cache depends linux-headers-6.1.0-18

Bug#1064976: linux-headers-6.6.13+bpo-amd64 incorrectly depends on the corresponding linux-image-amd64 package

2024-02-28 Thread Colm Buckley
-kbuild and any necessary glibc headers or other build artifacts, but not on linux-image-* Many thanks, Colm -- System Information: Debian Release: 12.5 APT prefers stable-updates APT policy: (900, 'stable-updates'), (900, 'stable-security'), (900, 'stable'

Bug#1038155: [Pkg-zfsonlinux-devel] Bug#1038155: Bug#1038155: zfs-linux: Provide a package based on OpenZFS master branch (a.k.a. 2.1.99)

2023-08-08 Thread Colm Buckley
x27;t view it as their responsibility to deal with breakages in unstable, unless there's some other compelling reason. My personal preference, assuming maintainer time is available, would be to continue to offer 2.1.X in stable, and 2.2.X in backports when 2.2.0 is released (as opposed to b

Bug#989046: libcurl3-gnutls: Please consider packaging 7.76.1

2021-05-24 Thread Colm Buckley
sider packaging 7.76.1 (which fixes this issue) for buster-bpo. The stable version does not seem to suffer from this problem. Thanks, Colm -- System Information: Debian Release: 10.9 APT prefers stable-updates APT policy: (900, 'stable-updates'), (900, 'stable') Architectur

Bug#983409: raspi-firmware: /etc/kernel/postinst.d/z50-raspi-firmware fails to ignore old-dkms initrds

2021-02-23 Thread Colm Buckley
uspect that the kernel and initrd detection in this script could use a real reworking, see also bug #966503. Thanks, Colm -- System Information: Debian Release: 10.8 APT prefers stable-updates APT policy: (900, 'stable-updates'), (900, 'stable') Architecture: arm64 (aa

Bug#982505: [Pkg-zfsonlinux-devel] Bug#982505: Bug#982505: zfsutils-linux: trim cronjob triggers "cannot trim" e-mails on spinning rust

2021-02-11 Thread Colm Buckley
&& zpool trim "$pool" ... but there might be corner cases which this doesn't catch. Colm On Thu, 11 Feb 2021 at 17:45, Christoph Biedl < debian.a...@manchmal.in-ulm.de> wrote: > Petter Reinholdtsen wrote... > > > Any idea how to figure out if trimming

Bug#982505: [Pkg-zfsonlinux-devel] Bug#982505: Bug#982505: zfsutils-linux: trim cronjob triggers "cannot trim" e-mails on spinning rust

2021-02-11 Thread Colm Buckley
pool' does report whether TRIM is supported for each vdev, but the effort of parsing that in the cron script seems excessive. Grepping out that specific error message would probably be okay as an interim workaround. Colm On Thu, 11 Feb 2021 at 10:03, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote: > [Christoph B

Bug#969599: systemd: Valid IPv6 addresses and routes discarded erroneously under certain conditions.

2020-09-07 Thread Colm Buckley
-bpo source and result in a corrected package. Thanks for your help! Colm

Bug#969599: Info received (Bug#969599: systemd: Valid IPv6 addresses and routes discarded erroneously under certain conditions.)

2020-09-05 Thread Colm Buckley
to migrate this version to stable, until this issue is resolved. Colm

Bug#969599: systemd: Valid IPv6 addresses and routes discarded erroneously under certain conditions.

2020-09-05 Thread Colm Buckley
That PR patches cleanly against the Debian source; so I'm building a local package version now to test. Will follow up here and with upstream. Colm On Sat, 5 Sep 2020 at 20:48, Michael Biebl wrote: > Am 05.09.20 um 21:31 schrieb Colm Buckley: > > Package: systemd > > Vers

Bug#969599: systemd: Valid IPv6 addresses and routes discarded erroneously under certain conditions.

2020-09-05 Thread Colm Buckley
Thanks,

Bug#940646: [Pkg-utopia-maintainers] Bug#940646: Bug#940646: firewalld: Please consider shipping 0.7.1+ in buster-backports.

2020-01-24 Thread Colm Buckley
I see 0.8.1 in buster-bpo now. Thank you!

Bug#940646: [Pkg-utopia-maintainers] Bug#940646: Bug#940646: firewalld: Please consider shipping 0.7.1+ in buster-backports.

2019-11-20 Thread Colm Buckley
Oh, and to be clear, the process is rarely any more complex than "apt-get source firewalld/testing" and "dpkg-buildpackage". firewalld's dependencies are small and slow-changing, at the moment stable-bpo contains all necessary versions for firewalld/testing. Colm On Wed

Bug#940646: [Pkg-utopia-maintainers] Bug#940646: Bug#940646: firewalld: Please consider shipping 0.7.1+ in buster-backports.

2019-11-20 Thread Colm Buckley
I configure it using the command line; I have found some of the new features and bugfixes in 0.7 to be useful for my setup, so I've been building a samizdat 0.7.2 package myself, which "seems to work". However, I only install firewalld_xxx.deb, not firewall-applet_xxx nor firewall-c

Bug#940646: [Pkg-utopia-maintainers] Bug#940646: Bug#940646: firewalld: Please consider shipping 0.7.1+ in buster-backports.

2019-11-20 Thread Colm Buckley
Hum. I can validate the operations of firewalld itself, but I don't use either the applet or the config package. Colm On Wed, Nov 20, 2019 at 6:55 PM Michael Biebl wrote: > Am 20.11.19 um 19:45 schrieb Colm Buckley: > > I feel that the answer is both yes and no. The *packaging*

Bug#940646: [Pkg-utopia-maintainers] Bug#940646: firewalld: Please consider shipping 0.7.1+ in buster-backports.

2019-11-20 Thread Colm Buckley
details are taken care of. Colm On Wed, Nov 20, 2019 at 6:36 PM Michael Biebl wrote: > Am 20.11.19 um 19:24 schrieb Colm Buckley: > > @biebl - looks as though stable-bpo's nftables package tracks upstream > > pretty closely; if https://github.com/firewalld/firewalld/issues

Bug#940646: firewalld: Please consider shipping 0.7.1+ in buster-backports.

2019-11-20 Thread Colm Buckley
@biebl - looks as though stable-bpo's nftables package tracks upstream pretty closely; if https://github.com/firewalld/firewalld/issues/540 is resolved, would you consider looking at packaging 0.8.0 for backports?

Bug#695885: Fixed in upstream

2019-10-23 Thread Colm Buckley
Gerhard tells me that this is fixed in the latest upstream version - 1.7.3.3. Can this be packaged for Debian shortly? I can look into an NMU if necessary. Colm -- Colm Buckley / c...@tuatha.org / +353 87 2469146

Bug#940646: firewalld: Please consider shipping 0.7.1+ in buster-backports.

2019-09-18 Thread Colm Buckley
Package: firewalld Version: 0.7.1-1 Severity: wishlist Dear Maintainer, firewalld 0.7 introduces sufficient new capabilities that it would be great to see it more widely available in the stable distribution. I would like to suggest that it be added to buster-backports. It does not appear to hav

Bug#939200: linux-image-5.2.0-2-amd64: M.2 I210 Ethernet adapter (igb) suddenly very high latency with kernel 5.2

2019-09-02 Thread Colm Buckley
Package: src:linux Version: 5.2.9-2 Severity: normal Dear Maintainer, This system is an Intel NUC with an onboard Intel I219-LM Ethernet adapter (e1000e) and an additional dual Intel I210 Ethernet adapter (igb) connected via the onboard M.2 interface (M.2 Dual Ethernet supplied by G2 Digital; I s

Bug#914526: linux-image-4.18.0-0.bpo.1-amd64: Invalidating filesystems can corrupt dentry table leading to busy loop in kernel.

2018-11-24 Thread Colm Buckley
Package: src:linux Version: 4.18.6-1~bpo9+1 Severity: important Tags: upstream patch Please see https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/ebiederm/user-namespace.git/commit/?h=for-linus - invalidating filesystems can cause dentry table corruption leading to busy loop in kernel. Easily tri

Bug#910607:

2018-11-24 Thread Colm Buckley
Per upstream; this seems to be a kernel bug which is fixed in 4.18.20. Unclear whether the fix (1e9c75fb9c47a75a9aec0cd17db5f6dc36b58e00) can be cherrypicked back to current stable / bpo kernels; investigating.

Bug#887743:

2018-11-02 Thread Colm Buckley
This is fixed by https://github.com/att/ast/pull/63/ - should be ok to pull from upstream. Colm -- Colm Buckley / c...@tuatha.org / +353 87 2469146

Bug#826994: [Pkg-zfsonlinux-devel] Bug#826994: #826994: Bug#826994: Missing init-script(s)?

2018-10-19 Thread Colm Buckley
... which is exactly what the patch does. On Fri 19 Oct 2018, 18:45 Petter Reinholdtsen > > [Richard Laager] > > The sysvinit scripts are already in the upstream tree and the released > > tarballs. You can see them in the package's .orig.tar.gz in the > > etc/init.d directory. The patch simply ca

Bug#910607: zfs-linux: 'zfs receive' can apparently corrupt system mount table.

2018-10-08 Thread Colm Buckley
Source: zfs-linux Version: v0.7.11-1 Severity: important Tags: upstream Descendent filesystems which have out-of-tree mount points are not correctly recovered on 'zfs send | zfs receive', leading to apparent corruption of the mount table. With kernel 4.18, processes accessing problematic parts of

Bug#897568: Stretch with backports kernel is also affected

2018-05-09 Thread Colm Buckley
with both new and existing kernels (on all supported architectures) before a release can be made, and the BPO kernel maintainers occasionally include forward patches from other kernel trees. It's not impossible to make this work, but it is labor-intensive and has an unpredictable schedule. Colm

Bug#893578: [zfs-linux] Please package 0.7.8

2018-05-09 Thread Colm Buckley
I don't wish to be rude - but there has been an unusually long period with no developer activity regarding this package; and the developers' mailing list seems to have been removed or reconfigured. Is everything in order? Are more maintainers needed? Colm

Bug#880647: Suggest symlinks to binaries from /usr/bin

2017-11-03 Thread Colm Buckley
Package: zfsutils-linux Version: 0.7.3-1 As 'zfs allow' now allows certain functions to be executed by any user, I suggest a symbolic link from /usr/bin/zfs to /usr/sbin/{zfs, zpool} be included.

Bug#822431: Set PYTHONHASHSEED=0 when calling systemd-crontab-generator

2016-06-07 Thread Colm Buckley
ch in turn calls the current crontab generator, but it strikes me that there might be a more elegant way. Any takers? Colm -- Colm Buckley / c...@tuatha.org / +353 87 2469146

Bug#462543: samba: No more CUPS printing any more

2008-02-13 Thread Colm G. Connolly
The samba team are already aware of the problem. https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5080 It appears to have been a change in cups which caused the problem. http://www.cups.org/str.php?L2537 -- Dr Colm G. Connolly School of Psychology and Institute of Neuroscience The Lloyd Building

Bug#210490: Heres good creating

2007-04-03 Thread Colm masters
help maintain health security freeing focus http://img444.imageshack.us/img444/6348/lq2qnd1.jpg nowKnow which of is -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#325860: one thing makes them

2007-04-03 Thread Colm Longman
usethis so use sounds http://img444.imageshack.us/img444/3067/bn74np6.png takecare problem offer resources careof -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#379709: python-docutils: problems with the postinst script

2006-07-31 Thread Colm Connolly
ollowed by # aptitude install python-docutils yields a complete install with no configuration errors. I had previously purged python-docutils to eliminate errors on every aptitude upgrade On 29/07/06, Simon McVittie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Tue, 25 Jul 2006 at 09:17:58 +0100, Colm G

Bug#379709: python-docutils: problems with the postinst script

2006-07-25 Thread Colm G. Connolly
Package: python-docutils Version: 0.4-3 Severity: normal -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers testing APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (101, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.15-1-686-s

Bug#362966: more occurences of nscd assert() failure

2006-06-14 Thread Colm MacCarthaigh
cane. But I'll try to pick more up when I get time. -- Colm MacCárthaighPublic Key: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#325394: apticron: should mention aptitude instead of apt-get

2005-08-28 Thread Colm MacCarthaigh
i mailx1:8.1.2-0.20050715cvs-1 A simple mail user agent > > apticron recommends no packages. > > -- debconf information: > * apticron/notification: root > > -- Colm MacCárthaigh / HEAnet, Teach Brooklawn, / Innealtóir Líonra +353 1 6609040/ Bótha

Bug#316101: add random wait to prevent mirror overload

2005-06-28 Thread Colm MacCarthaigh
pt has a feature which delays the check a random > amount of seconds, but limits this to an hour. I run ftp.ie.debian.org, I know all about the peaks from such things :) It's not a huge problem (we certainly don't have any issues from it) - but it is still worth fixing and to be hone

Bug#314646: apticron: Report on packages being kept back

2005-06-17 Thread Colm MacCarthaigh
ation management > sy > ii iproute 20041019-3 Professional tools to control > the > ii mailx1:8.1.2-0.20040524cvs-4 A simple mail user agent > > -- debconf information excluded > > -- Colm MacCárthaigh / HEAnet, Teach Brooklawn,

Bug#310080: udev: maybe include rules for use with logcheck?

2005-05-21 Thread Colm G. Connolly
Package: udev Version: 0.056-2 Severity: wishlist It might be useful to include some rules for the logcheck package so certain messages from udev can ge ignored. Something like the attached file might do the trick.  -- Package-specific info: -- /etc/udev/rules.d/: /etc/udev/rules.d/: total 0 l

Bug#306208: apticron: erroneous update notification for uninstalled packages

2005-04-25 Thread Colm MacCarthaigh
; > Package Details: > > Reading changelogs... > apt-listchanges: didn't find any valid .deb archives > = > > -- Colm MacCárthaigh / HEAnet, Teach Brooklawn, / Innealtóir Líonra +353 1 6609040/ Bóthar Shelbourne, BÁC, IE / http://www.hea.net/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#304724: apticron: Typo in long description (en)

2005-04-19 Thread Colm MacCarthaigh
e script to mail about impending apt updates such > + as security updates. -- Colm MacCárthaigh / HEAnet, Teach Brooklawn, / Innealtóir Líonra +353 1 6609040/ Bóthar Shelbourne, BÁC, IE / http://www.hea.net/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#302418: apticron: French debconf templates translation

2005-03-31 Thread Colm MacCarthaigh
;E-Mail address(es) to notify" > msgstr "Adresse(s) électronique(s) des personnes à prévenir :" > > #. Type: string > #. Description > #: ../templates:4 > msgid "" > "Specify e-mail addresses, space seperated, that should be notified of " >

Bug#301395: apticron: apt-listchanges invocation does not work

2005-03-25 Thread Colm MacCarthaigh
history from .deb > a > ii debconf 1.4.45 Debian configuration management > sy > ii mailx1:8.1.2-0.20040524cvs-4 A simple mail user agent > > -- debconf information excluded > 43c43 > < VER=`apt-cache policy $PKG

Bug#301027: apticron: running apt-get -qq autoclean without mentioning it

2005-03-23 Thread Colm MacCarthaigh
You are running 'apt-get -qq autoclean' without even *mentioning* > this. If you think you want to delete people's .debs then please > mention it in the manpage and/or create a commandline switch. > > -- Colm MacCárthaigh / HEAnet, Teach Brooklawn, / Innealtóir

Bug#300919: apticron: Command line switches for apt-listchanges

2005-03-22 Thread Colm MacCarthaigh
On Tue, Mar 22, 2005 at 01:18:41PM -0500, Marc Sherman wrote: > Colm MacCarthaigh wrote: > >On this front, I've been thinking it would be better to use > >apt-listchanges --profile option, ie use --profile=apticron and allow > >end-users to pick the output they desi

Bug#300919: apticron: Command line switches for apt-listchanges

2005-03-22 Thread Colm MacCarthaigh
gt; ii debconf 1.4.30.11 Debian configuration management > sy > ii mailx1:8.1.2-0.20040524cvs-4 A simple mail user agent > > -- debconf information: > * apticron/notification: root > > -- Colm MacCárthaigh / HEAnet, Teach Brooklawn,

Bug#292932: openssh-server: The high-performance patch from PSC should be included as standard.

2005-01-31 Thread Colm Buckley
Package: openssh-server Version: 1:3.9p1-2 Severity: wishlist The high-performance patches from PSC (http://www.psc.edu/networking/projects/hpn-ssh/) should be included as part of standard SSH; these patches make an *enormous* difference when transferring large quantities of data over a high-band

Bug#289842: procmail: Procmail escapes "^From" when using Maildir

2005-01-11 Thread Colm
Package: procmail Version: 3.22-5 Severity: normal If a mail contains a line starting with the word "From" in the body, procmail escapes this to become ">From", this is correct bevaviour when using a convoluted mailbox storage scheme such as mbox (the default) but is incorrect and very annoying