Bug#341140: Bug#400952: rc order of portmap,nis,autofs

2007-01-24 Thread Stephen Gran
This one time, at band camp, AnĂ­bal Monsalve Salazar said: > On Fri, Jan 05, 2007 at 02:27:35AM +0100, Jan Christoph Nordholz wrote: > > >The present situation forces all users of nis&autofs to manually > >shuffle their init scripts around, and this is a very common > >setup... Moving autofs to st

Bug#341140: Bug#400952: rc order of portmap,nis,autofs

2007-01-24 Thread Steinar H. Gunderson
On Thu, Jan 25, 2007 at 01:17:18AM +0100, Jan Christoph Nordholz wrote: > But IMO this solution is an ugly hack and highly counterintuitive - init > scripts are config files after all, and if I wanted to adapt a package's > initscript to my needs, I'd expect to find it at /etc/init.d/${package}, >

Bug#341140: Bug#400952: rc order of portmap,nis,autofs

2007-01-24 Thread Mark Brown
On Wed, Jan 24, 2007 at 06:28:01PM +0100, Luk Claes wrote: > What's wrong with Steinar's suggestion to change the name of the autofs > script to be something between 19nis and 20apache? It's gross but it should work. At this late stage in the release cycle it looks like the best option. -- "Yo

Bug#341140: Bug#400952: rc order of portmap,nis,autofs

2007-01-24 Thread Luk Claes
On Fri, Jan 05, 2007 at 01:28:46PM +1100, An?bal Monsalve Salazar wrote: > On Fri, Jan 05, 2007 at 02:27:35AM +0100, Jan Christoph Nordholz wrote: > >block 341140 by 400952 > >thankyou > > > >Hi Anibal and Javier, > > > >I (as the new maintainer of autofs) would like to have the issue > >settled be