Le jeudi 08 mars 2007 à 17:36 +0100, Loïc Minier a écrit :
On Thu, Mar 08, 2007, Sven Arvidsson wrote:
When is this a problem? AFAIK the only package depending on gedit-common
is gedit?
While uncommon, it's incorrect on the part of gedit. There are two
approaches to the problem: make
On Fri, Mar 09, 2007, Josselin Mouette wrote:
According to the freedesktop specification, adding a TryExec clause
should be enough to fix the bug.
I don't think upstream would integrate such a change, and we would have
to maintain a patch forever, so I prefer the two other solutions (which
On Thu, 2007-03-08 at 01:20 +, Reuben Thomas wrote:
The problem here being that when gedit-common is installed,
gedit.desktop is present, so applications trying to find a text editor
via the mimeinfo.cache file decide that they can run gedit, but they
can't.
Hi,
When is this a problem?
On Thu, Mar 08, 2007, Sven Arvidsson wrote:
When is this a problem? AFAIK the only package depending on gedit-common
is gedit?
While uncommon, it's incorrect on the part of gedit. There are two
approaches to the problem: make gedit-common pull gedit (since it's
useless without gedit) or
On Thu, 8 Mar 2007, Sven Arvidsson wrote:
On Thu, 2007-03-08 at 01:20 +, Reuben Thomas wrote:
The problem here being that when gedit-common is installed,
gedit.desktop is present, so applications trying to find a text editor
via the mimeinfo.cache file decide that they can run gedit, but
Package: gedit-common
Severity: normal
The problem here being that when gedit-common is installed,
gedit.desktop is present, so applications trying to find a text editor
via the mimeinfo.cache file decide that they can run gedit, but they
can't.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 4.0
APT
6 matches
Mail list logo
