On Fri, Apr 27, 2007 at 11:34:02PM +0200, Loïc Minier wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 27, 2007, Ming Hua wrote:
> > I've fixed the hardcoding GTK IM module path bug in scim, based on the
> > patch you sent. I used @GTK_BINARY_VERSION@ instead of
> > $(GTK_BINARY_VERSION) as your patch did. From my understan
On Fri, Apr 27, 2007, Ming Hua wrote:
> I've fixed the hardcoding GTK IM module path bug in scim, based on the
> patch you sent. I used @GTK_BINARY_VERSION@ instead of
> $(GTK_BINARY_VERSION) as your patch did. From my understanding, these
> two should be functionally identical for automake, I am
On Fri, Apr 27, 2007 at 04:28:11PM -0500, minghua wrote:
> I've attached the patch (SVN change r842)
Oops. Really attached this time.
Ming
2007.04.27
Index: debian/patches/10_gtk-immodule-install-dir.dpatch
===
--- debian/patches/10
Hi Loïc,
Thanks for cloning this bug to keep different issued tracked separately.
I've fixed the hardcoding GTK IM module path bug in scim, based on the
patch you sent. I used @GTK_BINARY_VERSION@ instead of
$(GTK_BINARY_VERSION) as your patch did. From my understanding, these
two should be fun
4 matches
Mail list logo