Anything new here?
I think the article you've linked to in sysctl.conf
(http://lwn.net/Articles/277146/) can be seen as encouragement to enable
syncookies, or not?
It already says that they're only activated if the system runs into
trouble, and then it's still better to have "limited connections" (
On Thu, Dec 3, 2009 at 11:20 PM, Craig Small wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 03, 2009 at 12:26:50PM +0100, Olaf van der Spek wrote:
>> On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 7:04 PM, Olaf van der Spek
>> wrote:
>> >> I'll have to go searching now for the reasons why it wasnt enabled.
>> >
>> > Hi Craig,
>> >
>> > Found a
On Thu, Dec 03, 2009 at 12:26:50PM +0100, Olaf van der Spek wrote:
> On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 7:04 PM, Olaf van der Spek
> wrote:
> >> I'll have to go searching now for the reasons why it wasnt enabled.
> >
> > Hi Craig,
> >
> > Found any?
>
> Anybody home?
yes and the answer is no.
>
>
>
--
On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 7:04 PM, Olaf van der Spek wrote:
>> I'll have to go searching now for the reasons why it wasnt enabled.
>
> Hi Craig,
>
> Found any?
Anybody home?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact l
Craig Small wrote:
On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 09:32:10PM +0200, Christoph Anton Mitterer wrote:
I think the best way would be if you (or someone else) could start a new
discussion on this,.. either on lkml, or debian-devel,... perhaps there
are some experts who can give a definite answer aboute the
On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 09:32:10PM +0200, Christoph Anton Mitterer wrote:
> I think the best way would be if you (or someone else) could start a new
> discussion on this,.. either on lkml, or debian-devel,... perhaps there
> are some experts who can give a definite answer aboute the "best"
> settin
Christoph Anton Mitterer wrote:
On Tue, 2009-08-25 at 19:36 +0200, Olaf van der Spek wrote:
No, and I didn't receive your email either. :(
What do you mean? I haven't put you on CC before...
Maybe that's why.
I think the best way would be if you (or someone else) could start a new
discussio
On Tue, 2009-08-25 at 15:15 +1000, Craig Small wrote:
> If there is no real sway the other way (ie to enable the syncookies) I
> will close this bug.
Maybe starting an experts-discussion on this (as suggested just before)
could help.
Anway,.. as I wrote you in my last email,... a more detailed
con
On Tue, 2009-08-25 at 19:36 +0200, Olaf van der Spek wrote:
> No, and I didn't receive your email either. :(
What do you mean? I haven't put you on CC before...
> My previous argument still holds:
> > AFAIK syn cookies only get send when the half-open TCP connection
> queue is full. So stuff li
> tw: Olaf, have you read http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/2/5/167 ?
No, and I didn't receive your email either. :(
My previous argument still holds:
> AFAIK syn cookies only get send when the half-open TCP connection
queue is full. So stuff like window scaling should work fine in normal
situations.
On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 11:56:02PM +0200, Christoph Anton Mitterer wrote:
> Anything new here?
>
> btw: Olaf, have you read http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/2/5/167 ?
That thread is arguing for syncookies to be turned off, not on (or
rather the patch not be included).
While there seems to be little cons
HI.
Anything new here?
btw: Olaf, have you read http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/2/5/167 ?
Chris.
This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 7:00 AM, Craig Small wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 21, 2009 at 08:08:40PM +0100, Olaf van der Spek wrote:
>> Could syn cookies be enabled by default?
>>
>> AFAIK syn cookies only get send when the half-open TCP connection queue is
>> full. So stuff like window scaling should work f
On Sat, Mar 21, 2009 at 08:08:40PM +0100, Olaf van der Spek wrote:
> Could syn cookies be enabled by default?
>
> AFAIK syn cookies only get send when the half-open TCP connection queue is
> full. So stuff like window scaling should work fine in normal situations.
I thought there was a reason why
Package: procps
Version: 1:3.2.7-11
Severity: wishlist
Hi,
Could syn cookies be enabled by default?
AFAIK syn cookies only get send when the half-open TCP connection queue is
full. So stuff like window scaling should work fine in normal situations.
Greetings,
Olaf
# Uncomment the next line t
15 matches
Mail list logo