Hi Jonathan
On Sun, Mar 17, 2013 at 03:19:37PM +, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
> Control: tag -1 + pending
>
> On Sat, Mar 09, 2013 at 04:45:06PM +0100, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> > Hi all
> >
> > I have updated the proposed debdiff with also the patch for reporting
> > problem with NFS moun
Control: tag -1 + pending
On Sat, Mar 09, 2013 at 04:45:06PM +0100, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> Hi all
>
> I have updated the proposed debdiff with also the patch for reporting
> problem with NFS mounts. Julien is this acceptable for a t-p-u upload?
>
> Regards,
> Salvatore
Please go ahead.
Hi all
I have updated the proposed debdiff with also the patch for reporting
problem with NFS mounts. Julien is this acceptable for a t-p-u upload?
Regards,
Salvatore
diff -u quota-4.00/debian/changelog quota-4.00/debian/changelog
--- quota-4.00/debian/changelog
+++ quota-4.00/debian/changelog
@@
Hi,
On Sun, Mar 03, 2013 at 01:58:32PM -0800, Christoph Egger wrote:
> intrigeri writes:
> > Michael Meskes wrote (27 Dec 2012 11:21:56 GMT) :
> >>> > Would it be possible to get *only* the xfs fix in testing instead of the
> >>> > whole new release?
> >
> >> Where does fixing the XFS problem dif
Hi!
intrigeri writes:
> Michael Meskes wrote (27 Dec 2012 11:21:56 GMT) :
>>> > Would it be possible to get *only* the xfs fix in testing instead of the
>>> > whole new release?
>
>> Where does fixing the XFS problem differ from fixing the other bugs
>> in 4.01?
>
> As I understand it (and not be
Hi,
Michael Meskes wrote (27 Dec 2012 11:21:56 GMT) :
>> > Would it be possible to get *only* the xfs fix in testing instead of the
>> > whole new release?
> Where does fixing the XFS problem differ from fixing the other bugs
> in 4.01?
As I understand it (and not being a member of the release t
> Cc'ing Michael (maintainer of quota).
Thanks, I didn't know a freeze exception for quota was asked for.
> > Would it be possible to get *only* the xfs fix in testing instead of the
> > whole new release?
Where does fixing the XFS problem differ from fixing the other bugs in 4.01?
There are not
Hi Julien
On Sat, Dec 01, 2012 at 01:05:29PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
> The changelog diff is weird:
>
> --- quota-4.00/debian/changelog 2012-12-01 12:01:05.0 +
> +++ quota-4.01/debian/changelog 2012-12-01 12:01:06.0 +
> @@ -1,11 +1,11 @@
> -quota (4.00-4) unstable; ur
Hi Julien
Cc'ing Michael (maintainer of quota).
On Sat, Dec 01, 2012 at 01:05:29PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
[...]
> Would it be possible to get *only* the xfs fix in testing instead of the
> whole new release?
I was looking at the bugs for release.debian.org for the wheezy
release and notice
On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 17:21:32 +0200, Tobias Burnus wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: unblock
>
> Please unblock package quota
> http://packages.qa.debian.org/q/quota.html
>
> The new version fixes Debian bug #685
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package quota
http://packages.qa.debian.org/q/quota.html
The new version fixes Debian bug #685356, namely:
repquota: Fix reporting for XFS
Conversion to generic quota
11 matches
Mail list logo
