On Mon, 20 Jul 2015 10:13:25 -0300 Felipe Sateler wrote:
> >> I'm afraid 2 is really an upstream issue and not an integration issue.
> >> Could you please file that bug upstream?
> >
> > Maybe... I will give it a try tonight. However I am sceptical regarding
> > "productive" communication with up
Package: systemd
Version: 222-1
Severity: normal
Hello systemd maintainers,
foreword for systemd hatters:
I want this problem to be fixed IN systemd and not by removing systemd.
Move along, those are not the droids you are looking for.
There is a thing in systemd that bothers me (and has for a w
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
Hi Eduard,
On 18 July 2015 at 05:24, Eduard Bloch wrote:
> Package: systemd
> Version: 222-1
> Severity: normal
>
> Hello systemd maintainers,
>
> foreword for systemd hatters:
> I want this problem to be fixed IN systemd and not by removing systemd.
> Move along, those
Hallo,
* Felipe Sateler [Sun, Jul 19 2015, 03:14:11PM]:
> Control: tags -1 moreinfo
>
> Hi Eduard,
>
> On 18 July 2015 at 05:24, Eduard Bloch wrote:
> > Package: systemd
> > Version: 222-1
> > Severity: normal
> >
> > Hello systemd maintainers,
> >
> > foreword for systemd hatters:
> > I want th
On 20 July 2015 at 03:48, Eduard Bloch wrote:
> Hallo,
> * Felipe Sateler [Sun, Jul 19 2015, 03:14:11PM]:
>> So, we have 2 issues:
>>
>> 1. Your system is not shutting down
>> 2. Systemd is not telling you enough to discover what is wrong.
>>
>> I'm afraid 2 is really an upstream issue and not an
Control: close -1
On Mon, 27 Jul 2015 21:27:23 +0200 Eduard Bloch wrote:
> On Mon, 20 Jul 2015 10:13:25 -0300 Felipe Sateler
wrote:
>
> > >> I'm afraid 2 is really an upstream issue and not an integration
issue.
> > >> Could you please file that bug upstream?
> > >
> > > Maybe... I will give it
6 matches
Mail list logo
