Bug#803214: gcl ftbfs on amd64 and i386 with binutils from experimental

2015-10-30 Thread Camm Maguire
Greetings! Matthias Klose writes: >> dd-schroot-cmd: error: no such option: -t >> >> Anyway to install this on one of the official development machines? > > no, you can't install experimental packages on developer machines. no > chance for a chroot on your own machine? > Chased this down locall

Bug#803214: gcl ftbfs on amd64 and i386 with binutils from experimental

2015-10-28 Thread Matthias Klose
On 28.10.2015 18:17, Camm Maguire wrote: Greetings! Apparently not: camm@barriere:~$ schroot-list-sessions jessie_amd64-dchroot-3b0c1b6c-f97e-4cfc-ab16-160e0ca9868b:camm:2015-10-27T150247.261116 sid_amd64-dchroot-83b4cc78-8615-469b-ba6d-5ffdaed5251e:camm:2015-10-15T180645.203985 experimental_am

Bug#803214: gcl ftbfs on amd64 and i386 with binutils from experimental

2015-10-28 Thread Camm Maguire
Greetings! Apparently not: camm@barriere:~$ schroot-list-sessions jessie_amd64-dchroot-3b0c1b6c-f97e-4cfc-ab16-160e0ca9868b:camm:2015-10-27T150247.261116 sid_amd64-dchroot-83b4cc78-8615-469b-ba6d-5ffdaed5251e:camm:2015-10-15T180645.203985 experimental_amd64-dchroot-527ec73b-4a39-41ec-a6e0-6e6e67a

Bug#803214: gcl ftbfs on amd64 and i386 with binutils from experimental

2015-10-28 Thread Matthias Klose
On 28.10.2015 15:26, Camm Maguire wrote: Greeings, and thanks for the report! While I cannot reproduce this at first attempt in an experimental chroot on barriere, my guess is that the libc symbol for gprof's mcount routine has changed from '_mcount' to 'mcount'. Could this be? are you using

Bug#803214: gcl ftbfs on amd64 and i386 with binutils from experimental

2015-10-28 Thread Camm Maguire
Greetings! Just a followup -- gcl builds in current Debian experimental. Perhaps something else ubuntu specific? Take care, -- Camm Maguirec...@maguirefamily.org == "The earth is but

Bug#803214: gcl ftbfs on amd64 and i386 with binutils from experimental

2015-10-28 Thread Camm Maguire
Greeings, and thanks for the report! While I cannot reproduce this at first attempt in an experimental chroot on barriere, my guess is that the libc symbol for gprof's mcount routine has changed from '_mcount' to 'mcount'. Could this be? Take care, Matthias Klose writes: > Package: src:gcl >

Bug#803214: gcl ftbfs on amd64 and i386 with binutils from experimental

2015-10-27 Thread H.J. Lu
On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 5:18 PM, Matthias Klose wrote: > Package: src:gcl > Version: 2.6.12-27 > Severity: important > Tags sid stretch > > Hi Camm, > > gcl ftbfs on amd64 and i386 with binutils from experimental. Would you mind > having a look at the build failure? > > OPTIMIZE levels: Safety=1 (

Bug#803214: gcl ftbfs on amd64 and i386 with binutils from experimental

2015-10-27 Thread Matthias Klose
Package: src:gcl Version: 2.6.12-27 Severity: important Tags sid stretch Hi Camm, gcl ftbfs on amd64 and i386 with binutils from experimental. Would you mind having a look at the build failure? OPTIMIZE levels: Safety=1 (No runtime error checking), Space=0, Speed=3 Finished compiling /«PKGBUI