block 828618 by 828462
thanks
On Sun, Jun 26, 2016 at 03:15:30PM +0100, Thomas Leonard wrote:
>
> I don't mind. I guess blocks might be better, to remind me to test it
> when the ocaml-ssl bug is fixed.
So I've set that.
On 26 June 2016 at 13:15, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 26, 2016 at 12:20:33PM +0100, Thomas Leonard wrote:
>> On 26 June 2016 at 11:24, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > OpenSSL 1.1.0 is about to released. During a rebuild of all packages using
>> > OpenSSL this package fail to build. A
On Sun, Jun 26, 2016 at 12:20:33PM +0100, Thomas Leonard wrote:
> On 26 June 2016 at 11:24, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > OpenSSL 1.1.0 is about to released. During a rebuild of all packages using
> > OpenSSL this package fail to build. A log of that build can be found at:
> > https://break
On 26 June 2016 at 11:24, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> Hi,
>
> OpenSSL 1.1.0 is about to released. During a rebuild of all packages using
> OpenSSL this package fail to build. A log of that build can be found at:
> https://breakpoint.cc/openssl-1.1-rebuild-2016-05-29/Attempted/zeroinstall-injector_2.10-
Source: zeroinstall-injector
Version: 2.10-2
Severity: important
Control: block 827061 by -1
Hi,
OpenSSL 1.1.0 is about to released. During a rebuild of all packages using
OpenSSL this package fail to build. A log of that build can be found at:
https://breakpoint.cc/openssl-1.1-rebuild-2016-05-
5 matches
Mail list logo