tags 393567 +patch
thanks
Hi,
I've created a patch for this issue. Since I had it ready anyway and
it's release critical, I've uploaded to DELAYED-4 so it will enter
unstable when the bug is 7 days old.
The fix is simple: installing the Debian changelog is also being done by
dh_installchangelogs
Hi Martin,
I think the problem is actually from jikes-gij (#384613) and was fixed
with version 1:1.22-5.1 (now in testing).
I did not reproduce the FTBFS in a clean pbuilder environment today.
Can you confirm that the jikes-gij you used was prior 1:1.22-5.1 and
that you can't reproduce tod
Your message dated Thu, 19 Oct 2006 05:18:18 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#393672: fixed in clamav 0.88.5-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
Your message dated Thu, 19 Oct 2006 09:24:09 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#393910: (no subject)
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsib
Package: libapache2-mod-auth-pam
Version: 1.1.1-6.1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Since the auth mechanisms were changed in Apache 2.1 this module does
not work any more. It probably should be replaced by mod_authn_pam
available at http://mod-auth.sourceforge.net/docs/mod
Your message dated Thu, 19 Oct 2006 04:02:13 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#392543: fixed in xmms-jess 2.9.1-8.1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is no
* Alessio Gaeta wrote:
> Hi, thanks for quick reply.
> The problems has disappeared re-upgrading Compiz from 0.0.13 to 0.2.0 (I
> was following up my own post and I found yours...): don't ask me why,
> I'm wondering what's happened.
> Anyway now, when I launch 'compiz --replace', gtk-window-decor
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 393550 +pending
Bug#393550: cdpr: no copyright and no changelog
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Deb
Your message dated Thu, 19 Oct 2006 04:18:44 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#390169: fixed in ncurses 5.5-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
tags 393550 +pending
thanks
Hi,
> Yes, I am sure, but I have made my check on amd64. The copyright and
> changelog files seems to be present only on i386.
The problem was that dh_install{docs,changelogs} was only called in the
binary-indep target. This target is not called when building on buil
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 392649 grave
Bug#392649: rtsigio does not work on alpha
Severity set to `grave' from `important'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bug
tags 393568 +patch
thanks
Hi,
I've created a patch for this issue. Since I had it ready anyway and
it's release critical, I've uploaded to DELAYED-4 so it will enter
unstable when the bug is 7 days old.
The fix is simple: installing the changelog in all packages is
necessary, therefore remove th
Package: libc6
Severity: grave
Version: 2.5-0exp2
Tags: experimental
Hi,
libc6/ldconfig is broken on plain i486 and i586 platforms.
It is due to
* sysdeps/i386.mk: ship the Xen flavour of ldconfig in libc6.
It should be a few percent slower on plain i386, but a lot faster on Xen
i386.
Your message dated Thu, 19 Oct 2006 03:02:30 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#393811: fixed in coco-cs 20060919-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
On Wed, Oct 18, 2006 at 10:02:34PM +0200, Bas Zoetekouw wrote:
> > > I just uploaded an NMU of joe, to fix #392077. A diff is attached.
> >
> > Didn't you notice that I was discussing it with the patch submitter?
> > I realize it's NMU season, but there's also that little thing called
> > politen
Package: mozilla-browser
Version: 2:1.7.13-0.3
Severity: grave
I had to remove my mozilla, and tried to reinstall it.
However
apt-get install mozilla-browser
gives me
pt-get install mozilla-browser
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree... Done
Package mozilla-browser
Your message dated Thu, 19 Oct 2006 03:47:43 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#391779: fixed in libapache2-mod-encoding 20040616-4.2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not
Your message dated Thu, 19 Oct 2006 01:19:27 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#393014: fixed in libgtk-trayicon-ruby 0.1.0-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 393027 patch
Bug#393027: FTBFS: expected declaration specifiers or '...' before '_llseek'
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch
> stop
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrat
Hey Adam,
Adam C Powell IV wrote:
> FWIW, one more data point: same crash with libgl1-mesa-glx, but
> libgl1-mesa-glide3 on this old machine with 3dfx Voodoo3 works fine.
Thanks for the feedback!
--
·''`. If I can't dance to it, it's not my revolution
: :' :
Your message dated Thu, 19 Oct 2006 11:20:27 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Processed: Raising severity to keep out of Etch
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case i
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.22
> severity 393708 important
Bug#393708: writer crashes randomly
Severity set to `important' from `grave'
> reassign 393708 openoffice.org
Bug#393708: writer crashes randomly
Bug reassi
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 393568 +patch
Bug#393568: libsocksd-dev: no changelog file
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bug
Your message dated Thu, 19 Oct 2006 03:17:15 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#393972: fixed in quota 3.14-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
tags 393027 patch
stop
I have attached a patch that fixes the FTBFS. I have _not_ tested
anything beyond that the package builds, but it should be safe.
-Ted
diff -ru fdclone-2.06c/Configur fdclone-2.06c-new/Configur
--- fdclone-2.06c/Configur 2006-10-17 20:02:00.0 +1000
+++ fdclone-2.06c
Torsdag 19 oktober 2006 08:38, skrev Jim Watson:
> On 19/10/2006, at 5:30 AM, David Miller wrote:
> > Are you sure you're enabling ATYFB video support in your kernel?
> > That's a common error when folks build their own kernels.
>
> Success! I used the later patch [0] and the config file from debia
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 393567 +patch
Bug#393567: gscanbus: no changelog file
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs dat
Rationale: this is a bug in all current versions of unison. It applies
to a specific use case, one in which one of the media is likely to
disappear during backup. By all means add a big fat warning until the
bug is fixed, but please don't prevent us getting the up-to-date
version of unison.
T
Your message dated Thu, 19 Oct 2006 09:24:09 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#393910: (no subject)
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsib
On Wed, 2006-10-18 at 23:49 +0200, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> Hi Michel,
> while fixing #391468 the question was raised, whether gatos has been
> merged into X.org 7 and could be dropped.
Some parts of it have been merged, basically TV-in AFAIK. But I don't
have any first hand experience with thi
Your message dated Thu, 19 Oct 2006 09:24:09 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#393910: (no subject)
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsib
Package: xkb-dataVersion: 0.9-3Severity: graveJustification: renders package unusable*** Please type your report below this line ***Yet again xkb has been broken. The latest set of data updated this morning renders the package completely unusable. Keyboard switching through the Gnome applet is brok
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 393366 serious
Bug#393366: Source package contains non-free IETF RFC/I-D's
Severity set to `serious' from `serious'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(admini
Package: xkb-dataVersion: 0.9-3Severity: graveJustification: renders package unusable*** Please type your report below this line ***As a follow-up to my previous message, I can see what you have done. You changed the name of all the directories to include _vndr for the keyboard architecture! What a
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.21
> tags 389579 sid
Bug#389579: libapache-mod-auth-mysql: FTBFS against apache 2.2
Tags were: patch
Tags added: sid
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you
Your message dated Thu, 19 Oct 2006 09:24:09 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#393910: (no subject)
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsib
severity 393659 important
thanks
Hi,
I agree that this is a bad bug, but - I don't consider it serious. Of
course, the bug should still be fixed ASAP (and please still feel free
to NMU it).
Cheers,
Andi
--
http://home.arcor.de/andreas-barth/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
w
* Wesley J. Landaker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-10-18 19:28]:
> If there are any IA64 users who are interested in this package, I could use
> some help. Otherwise, I'd rather drop IA64 support and get this in etch than
You could mail debian-ia64 and ask for help.
--
Martin Michlmayr
http://www.c
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 393659 important
Bug#393659: Cannot be built twice
Severity set to `important' from `serious'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs d
Your message dated Thu, 19 Oct 2006 09:33:09 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line (no subject)
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reo
On Thu, 2006-10-19 at 00:45 +0200, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
> Hi!
>
> > Just for record, gecko-sharp should not enter testing.
> > gecko-sharp2 is the replacement for it which is in testing and uses
> > xulrunner instead of obsolete mozilla.
>
> Shouldn't you be filing a removal bug then, to get th
* Wesley J. Landaker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-10-18 20:17]:
> Hmmm... I'll see if upstream can help with this, but it can almost guarantee
> it won't be in time for etch. (It's doubtful upstream has an IA64 to test
> on).
In this case I suggest you get the ia64 binary removed and downgrade
this
Package: gaphor
Version: 0.8.1-4
Severity: serious
Hello,
There was a problem while autobuilding your package:
> Automatic build of gaphor_0.8.1-4 on avidan by sbuild/i386 98
> Build started at 2006101
On 19/10/2006, at 5:30 AM, David Miller wrote:
Are you sure you're enabling ATYFB video support in your kernel?
That's a common error when folks build their own kernels.
Success! I used the later patch [0] and the config file from debian
2.6.18-1-sparc64 as mentioned by Jurij[1]
which inclu
Your message dated Thu, 19 Oct 2006 00:17:52 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#392960: fixed in gcc-m68hc1x 1:3.3.6+3.1+dfsg-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the ca
Frank Küster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Unfortunately, I do not know how to fix this. The best long-term
> solution would probably be to enhance updmap to be able to generate
> dvipdfmx.cfg and ttf2pk.cfg from updmap.cfg, but this won't happen for
> etch. So we need a workaround.
I have che
46 matches
Mail list logo
