Your message dated Mon, 29 May 2023 19:32:29 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1033752: fixed in sniproxy 0.6.0-2+deb11u1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1033752,
regarding sniproxy: CVE-2023-25076
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
Your message dated Mon, 29 May 2023 19:32:23 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1036281: fixed in libraw 0.20.2-1+deb11u1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1036281,
regarding libraw: CVE-2023-1729
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If
Processing control commands:
> severity -1 important
Bug #1036920 [systemd] systemd: please ship a placeholder in
/usr/lib/modules-load.d/
Severity set to 'important' from 'serious'
--
1036920: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1036920
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact
Control: severity -1 important
On Mon, 29 May 2023 14:42:14 +0200 Andreas Beckmann
wrote:
> Package: systemd
> Version: 252.6-1
> Severity: serious
> User: debian...@lists.debian.org
> Usertags: piuparts
Given what was discussed:
- bookworm is in hard freeze
- there is no functional impact
-
Your message dated Mon, 29 May 2023 17:48:55 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1036591: fixed in reaver 1.6.6-0.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1036591,
regarding reaver: segmentation fault
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> notfound 1036163 fcitx5-zhuyin/5.0.11-1
Bug #1036163 {Done: Shengjing Zhu } [fcitx5-zhuyin]
failed.mmap /usr/share/fcitx5/zhuyin/gb_char.bin failed
No longer marked as found in versions fcitx5-zhuyin/5.0.11-1.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> # BTS does not recognize binNMU
> # Circumvent with somehow incorrect version numbers
> # Actually fixed 1036163 fcitx5-zhuyin/5.0.11-1+b1
> notfixed 1036163 fcitx5-zhuyin/5.0.10-1
Bug #1036163 {Done: Shengjing Zhu } [fcitx5-zhuyin]
failed.mmap
Followup-For: Bug #1035543
X-Debbugs-Cc: ty...@mit.edu, bi...@debian.org, hel...@subdivi.de,
jspri...@debian.org, ans...@debian.org, a...@debian.org,
debian.bugrep...@wodny.org
I've been 'approximately' testing this locally on bookworm by:
* Editing the Install.WantedBy in
On Mon, 29 May 2023 15:17:51 +0200 Andreas Beckmann
wrote:
> On 29/05/2023 14.57, Luca Boccassi wrote:
> >> Side question first: does systemd evaluate both
> >> /usr/lib/modules-load.d/* and /lib/modules-load.d/* ?
> >> Otherwise all packages shipping something in /lib/modules-load.d/
are
> >>
On May 29, Luca Boccassi wrote:
> Does it matter that much if the empty directory is removed? Next time
> a package shipping a modules-load config is installed it will be just
> re-added, no? Or are there functional issues?
I do not think that it is a big deal if /usr/lib/modules-load.d/
Hi Andreas,
On Mon, May 29, 2023 at 02:42:14PM +0200, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> during a test with piuparts I noticed your package ships an empty
> directory (/usr/lib/modules-load.d/) which disappears after installation
> and removal of another package (e.g. multipath-tools) in a merged-/usr
>
On 29/05/2023 14.57, Luca Boccassi wrote:
Side question first: does systemd evaluate both
/usr/lib/modules-load.d/* and /lib/modules-load.d/* ?
Otherwise all packages shipping something in /lib/modules-load.d/ are
broken on unmerged-/usr because their config snippets are not being
taken into
On Mon, 29 May 2023 at 14:07, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
>
> On 29/05/2023 14.57, Luca Boccassi wrote:
> > Wouldn't the correct workaround be to list /usr/lib/modules-load.d in
> > systemd.dirs so that dpkg leaves it alone? Seems way too late for
> > Bookworm though?
>
> for dpkg,
On 29/05/2023 14.57, Luca Boccassi wrote:
Wouldn't the correct workaround be to list /usr/lib/modules-load.d in
systemd.dirs so that dpkg leaves it alone? Seems way too late for
Bookworm though?
for dpkg, /usr/lib/modules-load.d is already owned by systemd, dpkg only
accidentally deletes it
On Mon, 29 May 2023 14:42:14 +0200 Andreas Beckmann
wrote:
> Package: systemd
> Version: 252.6-1
> Severity: serious
> User: debian...@lists.debian.org
> Usertags: piuparts
>
> Hi,
>
> during a test with piuparts I noticed your package ships an empty
> directory (/usr/lib/modules-load.d/) which
Hi,
I try to create a deb file using dh_make or cowbuilder and it fail with
the same error:
configure.ac:508: error: possibly undefined macro: AC_MSG_WARN
If this token and others are legitimate, please use m4_pattern_allow.
See the Autoconf documentation.
configure.ac:849: error:
Package: systemd
Version: 252.6-1
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package ships an empty
directory (/usr/lib/modules-load.d/) which disappears after installation
and removal of another package (e.g.
Your message dated Mon, 29 May 2023 12:34:20 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1036096: fixed in jed 1:0.99.20~pre.180+dfsg-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1036096,
regarding jed,xjed: unhandled symlink to directory conversion:
/usr/share/doc/PACKAGE
to be marked as done.
This
Your message dated Mon, 29 May 2023 12:34:20 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1035839: fixed in jed 1:0.99.20~pre.180+dfsg-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1035839,
regarding jed-common: Fails to upgrade: new jed-common package
pre-installation script subprocess returned error exit
Your message dated Mon, 29 May 2023 12:34:20 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1035780: fixed in jed 1:0.99.20~pre.180+dfsg-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1035780,
regarding jed-common: Fails to upgrade: unable to install new version of
'/usr/share/jed/doc/txt/abbrev.txt': No such
Your message dated Mon, 29 May 2023 12:34:20 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1035692: fixed in jed 1:0.99.20~pre.180+dfsg-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1035692,
regarding jed-common: unhandled symlink to directory conversion:
/usr/share/doc/jed-common/txt -> ../../jed/doc/txt
to
Your message dated Mon, 29 May 2023 10:04:33 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1036847: fixed in sofia-sip
1.12.11+20110422.1+1e14eea~dfsg-6
has caused the Debian Bug report #1036847,
regarding sofia-sip: CVE-2023-32307: heap-over-flow and integer-overflow in
stun_parse_attr_error_code
Your message dated Mon, 29 May 2023 07:49:16 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1034943: fixed in liblxqt 1.2.0-8
has caused the Debian Bug report #1034943,
regarding liblxqt1-dev: missing Breaks+Replaces for liblxqt0-dev when upgrading
from bullseye
to be marked as done.
This means
23 matches
Mail list logo
