Thijs Kinkhorst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello Walter,
>
> > reopen 370295
>
> > > Please do not reopen this bug again.
> >
> > This bug has not been resolved. So I have reopened it. Please do not
> > close it until it has been resolved. Getting an answer to the
> > questions I posted wil
Hello Walter,
> reopen 370295
> > Please do not reopen this bug again.
>
> This bug has not been resolved. So I have reopened it. Please do not
> close it until it has been resolved. Getting an answer to the
> questions I posted will resolve this bug.
I'm looking through the RC-buglist for e
reopen 370295
retitle 370295 sun-java must not provide java2-runtime
thanks
Jeroen van Wolffelaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 28, 2006 at 03:54:26PM -0700, Walter Landry wrote:
> > This bug is about whether the Debian package should provide
> > java2-runtime. This is the most appropr
reopen 370295
thanks
Tom Marble <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> All:
>
> Distribution of Java SE with Linux or OpenSolaris is governed by the
> DLJ; however, these FAQ's are offered to explain and illustrate some
> of the language in the license. Sun's goals are to make the
> software widely usa
reopen 370295
thanks
Jeroen van Wolffelaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 10, 2006 at 12:15:10AM -0700, Josh Triplett wrote:
> > Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
> > > On Sun, Jun 04, 2006 at 02:37:45PM -0700, Josh Triplett wrote
> I think the main reason this is not a issue is the following
Tom Marble <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Walter Landry wrote:
> > [...]
> > All of the examples given above are good, but libgetenv-java is about
> > as clear as you can get. It only depends on java2-runtime and libc,
> > and it serves as a replacement for java.lang.System.getenv. It
> > creates a
Walter Landry wrote:
> [...]
> All of the examples given above are good, but libgetenv-java is about
> as clear as you can get. It only depends on java2-runtime and libc,
> and it serves as a replacement for java.lang.System.getenv. It
> creates a hybrid implementation.
>
> If you want to argue
reopen 370295
thanks
Jeroen van Wolffelaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 04, 2006 at 08:16:24AM -0700, Walter Landry wrote:
> > In the Distributor License for Java, there is the clause
> >
> > (c) you do not combine, configure or distribute the Software to
> > run in conjunctio
Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 05, 2006 at 01:46:29AM -0700, Walter Landry wrote:
>> Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> On Sun, Jun 04, 2006 at 08:16:24AM -0700, Walter Landry wrote:
This can be fixed by making Jython conflict with sun-java, although I
suspect that there m
On Mon, Jun 05, 2006 at 01:46:29AM -0700, Walter Landry wrote:
> Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Sun, Jun 04, 2006 at 08:16:24AM -0700, Walter Landry wrote:
> > > This can be fixed by making Jython conflict with sun-java, although I
> > > suspect that there may be other packages th
Walter:
I have just posted a notice to debian-legal about the
availability of new DLJ FAQ [1] which further clarifies
our intent. It is not the intent of the DLJ to
prevent running Jython.
Please see the new FAQ #13 #14 and #15 [2].
If Sun wanted to discourage innovations like Jython and
JRuby
Walter Landry schrieb:
> 3) There are only two clarifications I know of. One is in the
>non-binding DLJ FAQ, and the other is from Tom Marble [1]. Neither
>of these clarifications limit the restrictions to Java
>implementations. For example, in Tom's clarification he says [2]
>
>
Walter Landry schrieb:
> Package: sun-java5-jre
> Version: 1.5.0-06-1
> Severity: serious
>
> In the Distributor License for Java, there is the clause
>
> (c) you do not combine, configure or distribute the Software to
> run in conjunction with any additional software that implements
>
Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 04, 2006 at 08:16:24AM -0700, Walter Landry wrote:
> > This can be fixed by making Jython conflict with sun-java, although I
> > suspect that there may be other packages that also cause problems.
Another fix for this particular problem is to
On Sun, Jun 04, 2006 at 08:16:24AM -0700, Walter Landry wrote:
> Package: sun-java5-jre
> Version: 1.5.0-06-1
> Severity: serious
> In the Distributor License for Java, there is the clause
> (c) you do not combine, configure or distribute the Software to
> run in conjunction with any addi
Package: sun-java5-jre
Version: 1.5.0-06-1
Severity: serious
In the Distributor License for Java, there is the clause
(c) you do not combine, configure or distribute the Software to
run in conjunction with any additional software that implements
the same or similar functionality or AP
16 matches
Mail list logo
