Hi,
In DebConf12, I talked about xz compression for Debian packages(*).
Now I'll talk about next step, suggestion for use xz with with result
from some experiment.
*) http://penta.debconf.org/dc12_schedule/events/930.en.html
--
Christoph Anton Mitterer writes:
> On Mon, 2012-08-27 at 09:02 -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
>> This switch therefore means that attached scripts have to be saved and
>> opened separately rather than viewed directly inline in the mail
>> client, which is occasionally quite awkward. Or, alternately,
On Mon, 2012-08-27 at 09:02 -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
> There are a fair number
> of email clients out there that, rightly or wrongly, will not display
> inline attachments of type application/*, but will do so for text/*.
Not only MUAs, unfortunately.
> This
> switch therefore means that attache
On Mon, 2012-08-27 at 11:03 +0200, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> On 2012-08-26 19:55:49 +0200, Christoph Anton Mitterer wrote:
> > Now obviously there's a small border; I guess IETF's idea is:
> > "Can it be exectued/interpreted directly or by some interpreter? Then
> > application/*"
>
> Or compiled &
Hey Ondřej.
On Mon, 2012-08-27 at 09:15 +0200, Ondřej Surý wrote:
> Well, we had at least two bugreports for that. So your argument "I
> have never seen..." says nothing.
Ok,... that point goes to you ;)
> > So honestly, I'd simply drop support for that, and add perhaps a note to
> > NEWS.
> I d
On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 07:21:22PM +0200, Andrew Shadura wrote:
> > 3) "Embed jimtcl using the internal copy"
> > This means taking the upstream tarball as is.
> > Pros: small standalone -dispatcher binary.
> > Cons: code duplication, potential security issues with
> > out-of-date jimt
Hello,
On Tue, 18 Oct 2011 10:59:36 -0400
Mathieu Trudel-Lapierre wrote:
> It also doesn't solve a second case we're trying to cover: the fact
> that usb-modeswitch would be the only package in the boot path on
> *Ubuntu* that would rely on Tcl. That's another reason why a compiled
> language wa
Hello,
(As a Tcler I have to comment on this.)
On Tue, 18 Oct 2011 13:36:43 +0200
Didier Raboud wrote:
> 1) "Forget about jimtcl, rely on existing tcl interpreters"
> This is mostly "repacking to avoid the embedded jimtcl copy", "no
> packaging of it, go on as is done currently; by rel
Vincent Lefevre writes:
> On 2012-08-26 19:55:49 +0200, Christoph Anton Mitterer wrote:
>> Now obviously there's a small border; I guess IETF's idea is: "Can it
>> be exectued/interpreted directly or by some interpreter? Then
>> application/*"
> Or compiled & executed, I suppose.
> But what if
On 2012-08-26 19:55:49 +0200, Christoph Anton Mitterer wrote:
> Now obviously there's a small border; I guess IETF's idea is:
> "Can it be exectued/interpreted directly or by some interpreter? Then
> application/*"
Or compiled & executed, I suppose.
But what if the intent is to display the source
Hi.
Charles Plessy writes:
> Le Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 05:31:35PM +0200, Olivier Berger a écrit :
>>
>> Again, in case you'd doubt it, RDF is just a model, which can be written
>> in a number of different formats (not only XML), but the key here is the
>> embedded identification of the reference
On Sun, Aug 26, 2012 at 7:49 PM, Christoph Anton Mitterer
wrote:
> I've never seen anyone using that.
Well, we had at least two bugreports for that. So your argument "I
have never seen..." says nothing.
> So honestly, I'd simply drop support for that, and add perhaps a note to
> NEWS.
I don't t
12 matches
Mail list logo
