Guillem Jover writes ("Re: [DEP 8] About "XS-Testsuite: autopkgtest": time to
remove "XS-" ?"):
> On Fri, 2014-01-03 at 19:40:54 +0100, Jakub Wilk wrote:
> > No, it just means that I gave up.
>
> Oh, ok. :/ Personally I see it has similar drawback
On Fri, 2014-01-03 at 19:40:54 +0100, Jakub Wilk wrote:
> * Guillem Jover , 2014-01-03, 13:13:
> >Given that you (at least) seemed to show opposition to the field
> >(AFAIR), and that you've done an independent implementation of the
> >runner; does 692704 mean that you changed mind?
>
> No, it jus
* Guillem Jover , 2014-01-03, 13:13:
Given that you (at least) seemed to show opposition to the field
(AFAIR), and that you've done an independent implementation of the
runner; does 692704 mean that you changed mind?
No, it just means that I gave up.
--
Jakub Wilk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email t
[ adding autopkgtest-devel to Cc: ]
On Fri, Jan 03, 2014 at 12:36:38PM +, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > FWIW, an old MBF about absent "Testsuite: autopkgtest" is at [1] and
> > looks halfway through completion. Some of the already resolved issues
> > were initially marked wontfix, but have then been
Stefano Zacchiroli writes ("Re: [DEP 8] About "XS-Testsuite: autopkgtest": time
to remove "XS-" ?"):
> To save others the time of doing this, in attachment the results of
> checking for debian/tests/control with apt-file and of grep-dctrl'ing
> Sources
Hi Jakub!
On Fri, 2013-12-27 at 17:35:28 +0100, Guillem Jover wrote:
> On Fri, 2013-12-27 at 17:41:26 +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
> > the use of autopkgtest as documented in DEP 8 is taking momentum.
> >
> > How about allowing a "Testsuite" field to replace the "XS-Testsuite" field?
>
> Last ti
On Fri, Dec 27, 2013 at 06:09:51PM +0100, Niels Thykier wrote:
> On 2013-12-27 17:35, Guillem Jover wrote:
> > Do you know how many packages are there with autopkgtest support,
> > and how many do not declare the field?
>
> For the former, apt-file search -a source debian/tests/control should
> do
On 2013-12-27 17:35, Guillem Jover wrote:
> Hi!
>
> On Fri, 2013-12-27 at 17:41:26 +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
>> the use of autopkgtest as documented in DEP 8 is taking momentum.
>>
>> How about allowing a "Testsuite" field to replace the "XS-Testsuite" field?
>
> Last time this came up here, i
On 27 December 2013 16:35, Guillem Jover wrote:
> Hi!
>
> On Fri, 2013-12-27 at 17:41:26 +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
>> the use of autopkgtest as documented in DEP 8 is taking momentum.
>>
>> How about allowing a "Testsuite" field to replace the "XS-Testsuite" field?
>
> Last time this came up he
Hi!
On Fri, 2013-12-27 at 17:41:26 +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
> the use of autopkgtest as documented in DEP 8 is taking momentum.
>
> How about allowing a "Testsuite" field to replace the "XS-Testsuite" field?
Last time this came up here, it didn't look like we got consensus on
whether the fie
Hello everybody,
the use of autopkgtest as documented in DEP 8 is taking momentum.
How about allowing a "Testsuite" field to replace the "XS-Testsuite" field?
If people like the idea, I can send a patch to dpkg if needed.
Have a nice day,
--
Charles Plessy
Illkirch-Graffenstaden, France
--
11 matches
Mail list logo
