Re: ITH (Intent To Hijack) pilot-manager

On Wed, May 02, 2001 at 05:22:57PM -0700, Chris Waters wrote: > On Wed, May 02, 2001 at 02:07:29PM -0700, Darren/Torin/Who Ever... wrote: ^ > Hi, Darren, glad to know you're still around and in one piece. I was > starting to get a lit

Re: ITH (Intent To Hijack) pilot-manager

Am 2.05.01 um 13:50:38 schrieb Chris Waters: > But maybe that's just me. If you guys really think I'm stepping over > the line here, then I'll retract my ITH and just do massive patching > as an NMU. You should go ahead. I can't see how you could possibly have done any better than you did. Only

Re: ITH (Intent To Hijack) pilot-manager

On Wed, May 02, 2001 at 02:07:29PM -0700, Darren/Torin/Who Ever... wrote: > Feel free to adopt the pilot-manager package... Cool, then I guess it doesn't count as hijacking any more. Hi, Darren, glad to know you're still around and in one piece. I was starting to get a little worried. cheers

Re: ITH (Intent To Hijack) pilot-manager

>Just wanted to let people know that I'm going to hijack the >pilot-manager package. The current maintainer seems to be completely >MIA; he hasn't uploaded a version in over a year. I emailed him and Feel free to adopt the pilot-manager package... Darren -- <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Re: ITH (Intent To Hijack) pilot-manager

On Wed, May 02, 2001 at 12:36:45PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote: > On Wed, 2 May 2001, Chris Waters wrote: > > Just wanted to let people know that I'm going to hijack the > > pilot-manager package. The current maintainer seems to be completely > > MIA; he hasn't uploaded a version in over a year. I

Re: ITH (Intent To Hijack) pilot-manager

On Wed, 2 May 2001 06:57:50 -0500, Martin Michlmayr wrote: > ... and that's exactly why I've created mia-history > (pandora:/org/qa.debian.org/mia) 79 summary files... Hmh. Regards, Alexander -- UNIX is easy to use. UNIX is not necessarily easy to learn. Learn the difference. Alexander Koch - <

Re: ITH (Intent To Hijack) pilot-manager

Michael Piefel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >Am 2.05.01 um 12:36:45 schrieb Adrian Bunk: >> Martin usually marks packages of MIA maintainers as orphaned. I think it's >> better if a few persons take care of this instead of many more people >> sending ITHs. > >Though I'm not absolutely sure about his

Re: ITH (Intent To Hijack) pilot-manager

* Michael Piefel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010502 13:52]: > Though I'm not absolutely sure about his criteria. Mailing the previous > maintainer once or twice should be part of the process; this makes it > quite a lot of work and bookkeeping. ... and that's exactly why I've created mia-history (pandora

Re: ITH (Intent To Hijack) pilot-manager

Am 2.05.01 um 12:36:45 schrieb Adrian Bunk: > Martin usually marks packages of MIA maintainers as orphaned. I think it's > better if a few persons take care of this instead of many more people > sending ITHs. Though I'm not absolutely sure about his criteria. Mailing the previous maintainer once

Re: ITH (Intent To Hijack) pilot-manager

On Wed, 2 May 2001, Chris Waters wrote: > Just wanted to let people know that I'm going to hijack the > pilot-manager package. The current maintainer seems to be completely > MIA; he hasn't uploaded a version in over a year. I emailed him and He seems to be MIA: How often did you try to contact

Re: ITH (Intent To Hijack) pilot-manager & Linux for Pilot

Hi, There's not so much activity on this list. Is there a Debian or other Linux for the Palm pilot? Gabor

ITH (Intent To Hijack) pilot-manager

Just wanted to let people know that I'm going to hijack the pilot-manager package. The current maintainer seems to be completely MIA; he hasn't uploaded a version in over a year. I emailed him and got no response. I use the package, and I did the most recent NMU. I'm cc'ing him this message -- D