gnome 2 gnucash into unstable

2006-05-14 Thread Thomas Bushnell BSG
I have just uploaded gnucash 1.9.6, the first beta release of the new gnome 2 gnucash. Since this is now in beta, I judged it opportune to upload it to unstable. The final 2.0 release is expected in a short number of weeks. Many thanks to the fabulous upstream gnucash team! Is there any partic

Re: gnome 2 gnucash into unstable

2006-05-15 Thread Bastian Blank
On Sun, May 14, 2006 at 11:11:16PM -0700, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote: > I have just uploaded gnucash 1.9.6, And you should've used pbuilder to check if it is buildable. > Is there any particular thing I should do to have the series in the > experimental distribution deleted? Ideally, they should

Re: gnome 2 gnucash into unstable

2006-05-15 Thread Thomas Bushnell BSG
Bastian Blank <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Sun, May 14, 2006 at 11:11:16PM -0700, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote: >> I have just uploaded gnucash 1.9.6, > > And you should've used pbuilder to check if it is buildable. Sorry, but I don't have the resources to use pbuilder for every single upload of

Re: gnome 2 gnucash into unstable

2006-05-15 Thread Eric Dorland
* Thomas Bushnell BSG ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > > I have just uploaded gnucash 1.9.6, the first beta release of the new > gnome 2 gnucash. Since this is now in beta, I judged it opportune to > upload it to unstable. The final 2.0 release is expected in a short > number of weeks. Many thanks

Re: gnome 2 gnucash into unstable

2006-05-15 Thread Thomas Bushnell BSG
Eric Dorland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > * Thomas Bushnell BSG ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: >> >> I have just uploaded gnucash 1.9.6, the first beta release of the new >> gnome 2 gnucash. Since this is now in beta, I judged it opportune to >> upload it to unstable. The final 2.0 release is expe

Re: gnome 2 gnucash into unstable

2006-05-15 Thread David Goodenough
On Monday 15 May 2006 07:11, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote: > I have just uploaded gnucash 1.9.6, the first beta release of the new > gnome 2 gnucash. Since this is now in beta, I judged it opportune to > upload it to unstable. The final 2.0 release is expected in a short > number of weeks. Many tha

Re: gnome 2 gnucash into unstable

2006-05-15 Thread Michael Alan Dorman
David Goodenough <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > So are we getting close to the point where you will build gnucash-sql? The SQL backend is known to suffer from neglect, it's probably not a good thing to start encouraging people to use at this time. I gather that the gnucash developers intend to add

Re: gnome 2 gnucash into unstable

2006-05-16 Thread Thomas Bushnell BSG
David Goodenough <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > So are we getting close to the point where you will build gnucash-sql? I think so. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: gnome 2 gnucash into unstable

2006-05-16 Thread David Goodenough
On Tuesday 16 May 2006 09:08, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote: > David Goodenough <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > So are we getting close to the point where you will build gnucash-sql? > > I think so. Great. If you want someone to test the builds please let me know when they are ready and where I can d

Re: gnome 2 gnucash into unstable

2006-05-16 Thread Thomas Bushnell BSG
David Goodenough <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Tuesday 16 May 2006 09:08, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote: >> David Goodenough <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> > So are we getting close to the point where you will build gnucash-sql? >> >> I think so. > Great. If you want someone to test the builds ple

Re: gnome 2 gnucash into unstable

2006-05-16 Thread Thomas Bushnell BSG
Bastian Blank <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Sun, May 14, 2006 at 11:11:16PM -0700, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote: >> I have just uploaded gnucash 1.9.6, > > And you should've used pbuilder to check if it is buildable. So I would love to use pbuilder on my fancy fast computer. It runs sarge. So w

Re: gnome 2 gnucash into unstable

2006-05-16 Thread Frank Küster
Thomas Bushnell BSG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Pardon me if I've missed something obvious or misunderstood > something. No solution to the bug, but an easy workaround: Create a sarge chroot tar.gz on your sarge machine, change pbuilderrc to point to sid (I have copies for each distribution), an

Re: gnome 2 gnucash into unstable

2006-05-16 Thread Thomas Bushnell BSG
David Goodenough <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > So are we getting close to the point where you will build gnucash-sql? Upstream reports that the SQL subsystem is known not to work. So that means that until it gets to working, I certainly won't be building it for Debian. Thomas -- To UNSUBSC

Re: gnome 2 gnucash into unstable

2006-05-16 Thread Thomas Bushnell BSG
Frank Küster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > No solution to the bug, but an easy workaround: Create a sarge chroot > tar.gz on your sarge machine, change pbuilderrc to point to sid (I have > copies for each distribution), and then update the tar.gz to sid, like > this: > > /usr/sbin/pbuilder update

Re: gnome 2 gnucash into unstable

2006-05-16 Thread Thomas Bushnell BSG
Frank Küster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > /usr/sbin/pbuilder update --override-config --configfile /etc/pbuilderrc.sid Ok, this gets me a good sid chroot. But I can't build with it. When I try to build, using, say, pbuilder build gnucash_1.9.6-3.dsc, I get seemingly normal pbuilder output, lot

Re: gnome 2 gnucash into unstable

2006-05-16 Thread Frank Küster
Thomas Bushnell BSG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Presumably the problem is that the packages cannot be authenticated. > Presumably that's because the key inside the chroot is the old 2005 > one? How do I fix that? $ grep apt.config /etc/pbuilderrc.sid APTCONFDIR="/etc/pbuilder/apt.config/" $ cat

Re: gnome 2 gnucash into unstable

2006-05-16 Thread Thomas Bushnell BSG
Frank Küster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Thomas Bushnell BSG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Presumably the problem is that the packages cannot be authenticated. >> Presumably that's because the key inside the chroot is the old 2005 >> one? How do I fix that? > > $ grep apt.config /etc/pbuilder

Re: gnome 2 gnucash into unstable

2006-05-16 Thread Thomas Bushnell BSG
Frank Küster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Thomas Bushnell BSG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Presumably the problem is that the packages cannot be authenticated. >> Presumably that's because the key inside the chroot is the old 2005 >> one? How do I fix that? > > $ grep apt.config /etc/pbuilder

Re: gnome 2 gnucash into unstable

2006-05-16 Thread Thomas Bushnell BSG
Thomas Bushnell BSG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Doesn't work for me. > > # grep apt.config /etc/pbuilderrc > APTCONFDIR="/etc/pbuilder/apt.config/" > # cat /etc/pbuilder/apt.config/apt.conf.d/allow-unauthenticated > APT::Get::AllowUnauthenticated 1; > > but the same errors persist. Apparently

Re: gnome 2 gnucash into unstable

2006-05-16 Thread David Goodenough
On Tuesday 16 May 2006 19:24, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote: > David Goodenough <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > So are we getting close to the point where you will build gnucash-sql? > > Upstream reports that the SQL subsystem is known not to work. So that > means that until it gets to working, I cert

Re: gnome 2 gnucash into unstable

2006-05-16 Thread Thomas Bushnell BSG
David Goodenough <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Tuesday 16 May 2006 19:24, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote: >> David Goodenough <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> > So are we getting close to the point where you will build gnucash-sql? >> >> Upstream reports that the SQL subsystem is known not to work. S

Re: gnome 2 gnucash into unstable

2006-05-17 Thread Henning Glawe
On Tue, May 16, 2006 at 12:12:30PM -0700, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote: > Frank Küster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > /usr/sbin/pbuilder update --override-config --configfile /etc/pbuilderrc.sid > > Ok, this gets me a good sid chroot. But I can't build with it. When > I try to build, using, say

Re: gnome 2 gnucash into unstable

2006-05-17 Thread Ondrej Sury
On Tue, 2006-05-16 at 12:12 -0700, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote: > WARNING: The following packages cannot be authenticated! > > and then apt doesn't run, and instead prints: > > E: There are problems and -y was used without --force-yes pbuilder login --save-after-login [...] # apt-get install gnupg