Aleksey Midenkov writes:
> On Tuesday 15 September 2009 17:34:18 Raphael Hertzog wrote:
>> On Tue, 15 Sep 2009, Aleksey Midenkov wrote:
>> > Guys! Placing some hints on dpkg about packages that may be
>> > broken is wrong. Imagine that count of such packages is infinity,
>> > so you will be keep
On Tuesday 15 September 2009 17:34:18 Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> On Tue, 15 Sep 2009, Aleksey Midenkov wrote:
> > Guys! Placing some hints on dpkg about packages that may be
> > broken is wrong. Imagine that count of such packages is infinity,
> > so you will be keep putting all them inside dpkg cont
On Tue, 15 Sep 2009, Aleksey Midenkov wrote:
> Guys! Placing some hints on dpkg about packages that may be broken is
> wrong. Imagine that count of such packages is infinity, so you will
> be keep putting all them inside dpkg control info? This is an
> abstraction and the next is reality. You fi
Guys! Placing some hints on dpkg about packages that may be broken is
wrong. Imagine that count of such packages is infinity, so you will
be keep putting all them inside dpkg control info? This is an
abstraction and the next is reality. You fixed a lot of good bugs but
made an requirement of sw
4 matches
Mail list logo