On Fri, 18 May 2001, Krzysztof Mazurczyk wrote:
> And third problem may be with dependencies of packets. Kernel suggests use
> 2.4.x
> of modutils, modutils depends on libc6 2.2.x and newer libc6 depends on
> libdb2 2.7.7
> or similar.
> But when I listalled libdb2 taken form woody lastly, syslo
On Fri, 18 May 2001, Krzysztof Mazurczyk wrote:
> And third problem may be with dependencies of packets. Kernel suggests use
> 2.4.x
> of modutils, modutils depends on libc6 2.2.x and newer libc6 depends on
> libdb2 2.7.7
> or similar.
> But when I listalled libdb2 taken form woody lastly, sysl
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
i want to write a little tool for my school with apache/squid in perl.
the squid writes it's access to /var/log/squid/access.log and this perl-scipt
should go and collect these informations.
the /etc/cron.daily/squid - script rotates the logs so if t
> I'd like to try with kernel 2.4.x + ResierFS, but I worry a little about
> it's maturity. Is it really stable now ?
>
> Can anyone here write about his/her experiences with 2.4.x ?
>
I have been running a 2.4.{1,2,3} series kernel at my home for a couple of
months.
Dual 1Ghz PIII's. I got 4 45
Adaptec... Ignore Linux.. nah, just ask them, the 2100S RAID card runs
just fine under linux. They have drivers for Linux right on their
website.. for "version 6.0". Uhhh... linux version 6.0???
to all vendors out there:
"Redhat" does not equal "linux"
"Redhat" is a member of "the set of d
- Original Message -
From: "Przemyslaw Wegrzyn" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Friday, May 18, 2001 1:01 PM
Subject: Kernels 2.4.x for ISP ?
>
> I'm just setting up new box - large mail server,
> dual Pentium, STL2 motherboard, Mylex AccleRAID.
>
> I'd like to try with kernel 2.4.x + Res
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
i want to write a little tool for my school with apache/squid in perl.
the squid writes it's access to /var/log/squid/access.log and this perl-scipt
should go and collect these informations.
the /etc/cron.daily/squid - script rotates the logs so if
> I'd like to try with kernel 2.4.x + ResierFS, but I worry a little about
> it's maturity. Is it really stable now ?
>
> Can anyone here write about his/her experiences with 2.4.x ?
>
I have been running a 2.4.{1,2,3} series kernel at my home for a couple of months.
Dual 1Ghz PIII's. I got 4 45
Adaptec... Ignore Linux.. nah, just ask them, the 2100S RAID card runs
just fine under linux. They have drivers for Linux right on their
website.. for "version 6.0". Uhhh... linux version 6.0???
to all vendors out there:
"Redhat" does not equal "linux"
"Redhat" is a member of "the set of
- Original Message -
From: "Przemyslaw Wegrzyn" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, May 18, 2001 1:01 PM
Subject: Kernels 2.4.x for ISP ?
>
> I'm just setting up new box - large mail server,
> dual Pentium, STL2 motherboard, Mylex AccleRAID.
>
> I'd like to try wit
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2001.05.18 06:05]:
> I'm just setting up new box - large mail server,
> dual Pentium, STL2 motherboard, Mylex AccleRAID.
>
> I'd like to try with kernel 2.4.x + ResierFS, but I worry a little about
> it's maturity. Is it really stable now ?
>
> Can anyone here write about hi
On Fri, 18 May 2001, Tech Support wrote:
> > What patch ? Isn't DAC960 module already included in kernel ?
> Yes Mylex DAC960 support is in the kernel but this isn't the
> controller that these machines used. Dell uses (or at least in these
> machines) a controller made by Adaptec which is alt
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2001.05.18 06:05]:
> I'm just setting up new box - large mail server,
> dual Pentium, STL2 motherboard, Mylex AccleRAID.
>
> I'd like to try with kernel 2.4.x + ResierFS, but I worry a little about
> it's maturity. Is it really stable now ?
>
> Can anyone here write about h
> What patch ? Isn't DAC960 module already included in kernel ?
Yes Mylex DAC960 support is in the kernel but this isn't the
controller that these machines used. Dell uses (or at least in these
machines) a controller made by Adaptec which is alternately called
PercRAID and aacRAID. The patch and
On Fri, 18 May 2001, Tech Support wrote:
> Przemyslaw Wegrzyn wrote:
> > What configuration ?
> > I want to run it on dual processor machine.
> Our web servers are single processor Pentium III on a Asus
> motherboard. I also run 2.4.2 with SMP on a couple of Dell Poweredge
> duel 1Ghz processo
Przemyslaw Wegrzyn wrote:
> What configuration ?
> I want to run it on dual processor machine.
Our web servers are single processor Pentium III on a Asus
motherboard. I also run 2.4.2 with SMP on a couple of Dell Poweredge
duel 1Ghz processor, 2Gb memory with aacRAID for a client. These servers
a
On Fri, 18 May 2001, Tech Support wrote:
> I can't comment on the ResierFS or AcceleRAID support but I can
> comment on the stability of the 2.4.2 kernel.
> We have been running 2.4.2 on our Web servers which also do DNS, mail,
> mysql and FTP for 50 days now, without a problem. The 2.4.x ke
> I'm just setting up new box - large mail server,
> dual Pentium, STL2 motherboard, Mylex AccleRAID.
>
> I'd like to try with kernel 2.4.x + ResierFS, but I worry a little about
> it's maturity. Is it really stable now ?
>
> Can anyone here write about his/her experiences with 2.4.x ?
>
> Does
On Fri, 18 May 2001, Tech Support wrote:
> > What patch ? Isn't DAC960 module already included in kernel ?
> Yes Mylex DAC960 support is in the kernel but this isn't the
> controller that these machines used. Dell uses (or at least in these
> machines) a controller made by Adaptec which is al
Michelle Konzack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 18 May 2001, at 12:12:
> Hello Marcel,
>
> I love your pwdadin ;-))
>
> Unfortuately I can not program php and I have a question about some
> changes. I run Apache with a couple of virtualhosts like
>
> /data/michelle-is.com/dir1
> dir2
>
Michelle Konzack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 18 May 2001, at 12:12:
> Hello Marcel,
[...]
> Curently I am looking for a php book in german language
> because my english sucks but I like to learn from you.
I'd really recommend
PHP4 - Grundlagen und Profiwissen
Jörg Krause
Carl Hanser Verlag, November 2000
Title: RE: Kernels 2.4.x for ISP ?
Hi,
I recommend you to wait until Debian releases woody. If you read the linux-kernel mailing list, you can see how unstable 2.4 kernel series are.so they still have to work hard.
Regards.
Javier.
-Mensaje origi
Hi,
I'm interested in knowing as well.
We run a bunch of webhosting and dedicated servers using kernel 2.2.19 .
Most boxen are Intel PentiumIII or AMD Athlon or Durons.
Will there be much of a performance boost from using the new 2.4 kernels,
or are there many compatibility issues?
Anyway, I kn
I'm just setting up new box - large mail server,
dual Pentium, STL2 motherboard, Mylex AccleRAID.
I'd like to try with kernel 2.4.x + ResierFS, but I worry a little about
it's maturity. Is it really stable now ?
Can anyone here write about his/her experiences with 2.4.x ?
Does 2.4.x kernels su
> What patch ? Isn't DAC960 module already included in kernel ?
Yes Mylex DAC960 support is in the kernel but this isn't the
controller that these machines used. Dell uses (or at least in these
machines) a controller made by Adaptec which is alternately called
PercRAID and aacRAID. The patch and
Hello Marcel,
I love your pwdadin ;-))
Unfortuately I can not program php and I have a question about some changes.
I run Apache with a couple of virtualhosts like
/data/michelle-is.com/dir1
dir2
dir3
and now I like to give some users access to seper
On Fri, 18 May 2001, Tech Support wrote:
> Przemyslaw Wegrzyn wrote:
> > What configuration ?
> > I want to run it on dual processor machine.
> Our web servers are single processor Pentium III on a Asus
> motherboard. I also run 2.4.2 with SMP on a couple of Dell Poweredge
> duel 1Ghz process
Przemyslaw Wegrzyn wrote:
> What configuration ?
> I want to run it on dual processor machine.
Our web servers are single processor Pentium III on a Asus
motherboard. I also run 2.4.2 with SMP on a couple of Dell Poweredge
duel 1Ghz processor, 2Gb memory with aacRAID for a client. These servers
On Fri, 18 May 2001, Tech Support wrote:
> I can't comment on the ResierFS or AcceleRAID support but I can
> comment on the stability of the 2.4.2 kernel.
> We have been running 2.4.2 on our Web servers which also do DNS, mail,
> mysql and FTP for 50 days now, without a problem. The 2.4.x k
> I'm just setting up new box - large mail server,
> dual Pentium, STL2 motherboard, Mylex AccleRAID.
>
> I'd like to try with kernel 2.4.x + ResierFS, but I worry a little about
> it's maturity. Is it really stable now ?
>
> Can anyone here write about his/her experiences with 2.4.x ?
>
> Does
I've put the code into a tarball
See http://hichac.de/pwdadmin/
Feel free to use it "under GPL".
Cheers, Marcel
Martin WHEELER <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 17 May 2001, at 14:30:
> On Thu, 17 May 2001, Simon Gray wrote:
>
> > Is it possible to get/have a look at the source code for that page?
>
> Me t
Try to talk to me ;-)
I've put the code into a tarball
See http://hichac.de/pwdadmin/
Please consider the code "proof of concept"
quality, so set flames>/dev/null ;-)
Apart from that, any improvements welcome.
Cheers, Marcel
Nathan Ridge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 18 May 2001, at 10:53:
> does anyone
Michelle Konzack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 18 May 2001, at 12:12:
> Hello Marcel,
>
> I love your pwdadin ;-))
>
> Unfortuately I can not program php and I have a question about some
> changes. I run Apache with a couple of virtualhosts like
>
> /data/michelle-is.com/dir1
> dir2
>
Michelle Konzack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 18 May 2001, at 12:12:
> Hello Marcel,
[...]
> Curently I am looking for a php book in german language
> because my english sucks but I like to learn from you.
I'd really recommend
PHP4 - Grundlagen und Profiwissen
Jörg Krause
Carl Hanser Verlag, November 200
Title: RE: Kernels 2.4.x for ISP ?
Hi,
I recommend you to wait until Debian releases woody. If you read the linux-kernel mailing list, you can see how unstable 2.4 kernel series are.so they still have to work hard.
Regards.
Javier.
-Mensaje origi
Hi,
I'm interested in knowing as well.
We run a bunch of webhosting and dedicated servers using kernel 2.2.19 .
Most boxen are Intel PentiumIII or AMD Athlon or Durons.
Will there be much of a performance boost from using the new 2.4 kernels,
or are there many compatibility issues?
Anyway, I k
I'm just setting up new box - large mail server,
dual Pentium, STL2 motherboard, Mylex AccleRAID.
I'd like to try with kernel 2.4.x + ResierFS, but I worry a little about
it's maturity. Is it really stable now ?
Can anyone here write about his/her experiences with 2.4.x ?
Does 2.4.x kernels s
Hi,
is the a pssibility to sign, not crypting, all outgoing mail on my
mailserver with an key that is only on that server?
A private encryption shoul be possible to, i don't see any problems there.
It would be fine to have all email from my company sigen by the company.
(s.th. lika e digital sig
Hello Marcel,
I love your pwdadin ;-))
Unfortuately I can not program php and I have a question about some changes.
I run Apache with a couple of virtualhosts like
/data/michelle-is.com/dir1
dir2
dir3
and now I like to give some users access to sepe
I've put the code into a tarball
See http://hichac.de/pwdadmin/
Feel free to use it "under GPL".
Cheers, Marcel
Martin WHEELER <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 17 May 2001, at 14:30:
> On Thu, 17 May 2001, Simon Gray wrote:
>
> > Is it possible to get/have a look at the source code for that page?
>
> Me
Try to talk to me ;-)
I've put the code into a tarball
See http://hichac.de/pwdadmin/
Please consider the code "proof of concept"
quality, so set flames>/dev/null ;-)
Apart from that, any improvements welcome.
Cheers, Marcel
Nathan Ridge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 18 May 2001, at 10:53:
> does anyon
Hi,
is the a pssibility to sign, not crypting, all outgoing mail on my
mailserver with an key that is only on that server?
A private encryption shoul be possible to, i don't see any problems there.
It would be fine to have all email from my company sigen by the company.
(s.th. lika e digital si
42 matches
Mail list logo