Sorry, please ignore.
--
MuMlutlitithtrhreeaadededd s siigngnatatuurere
D.A.Bishop
On Thursday 24 April 2003 04:33 pm, Tarragon Allen wrote:
> On Fri, 25 Apr 2003 07:43 am, David Bishop wrote:
> > I have a user that really like to create files. Then, they don't clean
> > them up. We have already put a quota* on them, but unfortunetly, their
> >
I have a user that really like to create files. Then, they don't clean them
up. We have already put a quota* on them, but unfortunetly, their directory
is so large and convaluted, that they can't even figure out where all the
disk space has gone. Is there a sane way to generate a report showi
Thanks for your suggestions and the two people who replied off list. This
will probably work well without too much time invested :-)
On Wednesday 19 March 2003 12:32 am, Marcin Sochacki wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 18, 2003 at 11:13:50AM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > As a favor to a friend, I'm t
Thanks for your suggestions and the two people who replied off list. This
will probably work well without too much time invested :-)
On Wednesday 19 March 2003 12:32 am, Marcin Sochacki wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 18, 2003 at 11:13:50AM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > As a favor to a friend, I'm t
On Friday 10 January 2003 10:11 am, Adrian 'Dagurashibanipal' von Bidder
wrote:
> On Fri, 2003-01-10 at 12:58, Fred Clausen wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > > server I can try this in. Unfortunately, I don't quite know how to
> > > force a Debian server to stay in runlevel 1 during the boot process.
> >
> >
> non-critical server I can try this in. Unfortunately, I don't quite know
> how to force a Debian server to stay in runlevel 1 during the boot process.
from the lilo prompt: 'linux (or whatever image name here) single'
--
D.A.Bishop
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subjec
I'd also recommend squirrelmail, as I tried using imho and it was very
crashy, I've also had painful experiences with imp, and none of the
other ones seemed as nice. squirrelmail "just works", with any given
imap server you have.
Good luck, and have fun!
D.A.Bishop
On Sun, Jun 16, 2002 at 11
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Friday 05 April 2002 6:48 am, Russell Coker wrote:
> On Fri, 5 Apr 2002 15:09, Bart-Jan Vrielink wrote:
> > > According to these headers contained in the message received from the
> > > list, SpamAssassin has correctly tagged it as Spam. So why was
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Howdy! As you can tell from my subject line, I am interested today in making
sure that I can always surf por^W^Wserve webpages. My business (consulting &
small-time webhosting) is dependent on my always having an internet
connection. Currently,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
That was pointed out to me off list :-) So far, I've got one person saying
"it worked mostly, but got a couple false positives". The example he cited
was a subject consisting soley of "ICQ" from a friend.
Just FYI, in case someone else was int
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
This reminds me, has anyone implemented a mail filter that will trash
anything with all caps in the subject? If so, what's the false positive
rate? I can't remember the last "legit" email I got with all caps, but I
don't really want to take the s
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thursday 10 January 2002 04:14 pm, martin f krafft wrote:
> also sprach David Bishop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002.01.10.1634 +0100]:
> > I'm running a server that's hot to the net, and running some insecure
> > service
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thursday 10 January 2002 04:14 pm, martin f krafft wrote:
> also sprach David Bishop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002.01.10.1634 +0100]:
> > I'm running a server that's hot to the net, and running some insecure
> > service
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I'm running a server that's hot to the net, and running some insecure
services (by necessity), like nfs. Of course, I used iptables to block all
those ports, using nmap and netstat to double check all my open ports.
However, what nmap reports back
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I'm running a server that's hot to the net, and running some insecure
services (by necessity), like nfs. Of course, I used iptables to block all
those ports, using nmap and netstat to double check all my open ports.
However, what nmap reports bac
33992 Jun 2 19:15
> /lib/modules/2.4.5/kernel/drivers/scsi/st.o
>
> - jsw
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: David Bishop [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, November 07, 2001 5:41 PM
> To: debian-isp@lists.debian.org
> Subject: tape drives
>
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I just installed a scsi tape drive (Compaq EOD003) and was wondering how I
can tell whether or not it is recognized. I have never used tape drives
before (at least, that weren't already setup) and I don't know even the first
thing about them. Sear
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thursday 18 October 2001 08:56 am, Noel Koethe wrote:
> On Don, 18 Okt 2001, Richard A Nelson wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> > Whatever, if you stick with sendmail, I'll be happy to help - and in
> > this case, going to at least testing buys you *ALOT* with
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thursday 18 October 2001 08:05 am, Richard A Nelson wrote:
> On Thu, 18 Oct 2001, David Bishop wrote:
> > Currently:
> > Using sendmail with webmin and the webmin control module
> > Using webmail based off of the webmin contro
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I have a relatively new box hosting several websites with their own domain
names. It also runs dns and email for the same domains. So far, my
"solution" to the Email Problem (tm) has been to simply not allow each of
them to have "generic" accounts
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thursday 18 October 2001 08:56 am, Noel Koethe wrote:
> On Don, 18 Okt 2001, Richard A Nelson wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> > Whatever, if you stick with sendmail, I'll be happy to help - and in
> > this case, going to at least testing buys you *ALOT* with
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thursday 18 October 2001 08:05 am, Richard A Nelson wrote:
> On Thu, 18 Oct 2001, David Bishop wrote:
> > Currently:
> > Using sendmail with webmin and the webmin control module
> > Using webmail based off of the webmin contro
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I have a relatively new box hosting several websites with their own domain
names. It also runs dns and email for the same domains. So far, my
"solution" to the Email Problem (tm) has been to simply not allow each of
them to have "generic" account
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
This is probably fairly simple, but I'll admit to only slight knowledge
concerning sendmail (not my choice :-).
Here's the situation: we have a collection of unix machines that are all
configured to send mail to a mailhub. That works. Then, if t
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Not to be rude, but you might try starting by emailing a list dedicated to
Windows, instead of one for *Debian* *Linux*.
HTH.
On Tuesday 14 August 2001 01:05 pm, etalent wrote:
> How do I set up/configure Windows 2000 Advanced server as ISP host
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Friday 10 August 2001 05:48 am, Jordi S . Bunster wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 10, 2001 at 10:42:45PM +1000, Toby Thain wrote:
> > I had a lot of trouble with RT8139B under Debian 2.2 (Intel, on AMD-K6)
> > - same diagnostics, corrupted transfers - with th
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thursday 09 August 2001 08:09 am, Peter Billson wrote:
> I'm sure you have already tried all this but:
> > echo > /proc/sys/net/ipv4/tcp_syncookies
>
> That should be echo "1" > /proc/sys/net/ipv4/tcp_syncookies
>
> > However, after fruitlessly
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Just recently, I rebooted a machine and iptables hasn't worked since. I
hadn't upgraded the kernel, or touched anything else (that I can remember).
The particular error is this:
/etc/iptables.cfg: /proc/sys/net/ipv4/tcp_syncookies: No such file o
I have a problem, wherein I have a group of computers that are somewhat
seperate from the rest of the computers around here, running various
beta-level internal services but have the same @hostname.com email address.
So, in my exim.conf, I have
qualify_domain = foo.com
and life is good (I can
ATA100 != 100Mhz pci bus. All that's doing is reporting the pci bus (to
which the ide controller is attached). Nothing more, nothing less. All
cards/controllers attached to your pci bus will run at that same speed.
HTH.
On Tuesday 03 July 2001 03:49 pm, R K wrote:
> Does the following mean
ATA100 != 100Mhz pci bus. All that's doing is reporting the pci bus (to
which the ide controller is attached). Nothing more, nothing less. All
cards/controllers attached to your pci bus will run at that same speed.
HTH.
On Tuesday 03 July 2001 03:49 pm, R K wrote:
> Does the following mean
And on an Ultra-60 running Solaris 7 w/UFS:
bash-2.04$ time /bin/ls | wc
63975 63975 1971245
real0m2.213s
user0m1.160s
sys 0m0.890s
bash-2.04$ time ls | wc
63975 63975 1971253
real2m19.965s
user0m1.490s
sys 0m16.340s
bash-2.04$
Sped it up "just a little bit"
And on an Ultra-60 running Solaris 7 w/UFS:
bash-2.04$ time /bin/ls | wc
63975 63975 1971245
real0m2.213s
user0m1.160s
sys 0m0.890s
bash-2.04$ time ls | wc
63975 63975 1971253
real2m19.965s
user0m1.490s
sys 0m16.340s
bash-2.04$
Sped it up "just a little bit
On Wednesday 20 June 2001 07:10, Teun Vink wrote:
> On Wed, 20 Jun 2001, Craig wrote:
> > Hi ladies and fellas
> >
> > Is there a way of selecting packages and storing them in a flat text
> > file, that
> > debian uses to reference in the installation procedure.
> >
> > Thanks
> > Craig
>
> dpkg --
On Wednesday 20 June 2001 07:10, Teun Vink wrote:
> On Wed, 20 Jun 2001, Craig wrote:
> > Hi ladies and fellas
> >
> > Is there a way of selecting packages and storing them in a flat text
> > file, that
> > debian uses to reference in the installation procedure.
> >
> > Thanks
> > Craig
>
> dpkg -
He even spammed debian-arm, for heaven's sake. Is *nothing* sacred?? :-P
On Friday 01 June 2001 13:35, Jesse Goerz wrote:
> On Friday 01 June 2001 13:28, Peter Billson wrote:
> > "L@@K dont throw away!" wrote:
> > > I've created an online community called "Have you been hacked by f*ck
> > > Poiz
He even spammed debian-arm, for heaven's sake. Is *nothing* sacred?? :-P
On Friday 01 June 2001 13:35, Jesse Goerz wrote:
> On Friday 01 June 2001 13:28, Peter Billson wrote:
> > "L@@K dont throw away!" wrote:
> > > I've created an online community called "Have you been hacked by f*ck
> > > Poi
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "David Bishop" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To:
> Sent: Monday, March 12, 2001 6:56 PM
> Subject: Re: long hang time for ftp
>
>
> > To follow up my own email, proftp has the exact same
To follow up my own email, proftp has the exact same problem. Any other
ideas?
On 12 Mar 2001 16:50:13 MST, David Bishop said:
>
> I'm getting it right now. I don't really care about which one works, just
> that one *does*... :-)
>
> On Mon, 12 Mar 2001 18:37:
ever
> figured it out. Proftpd does all I ever needed.
>
> Haim.
>
> David Bishop wrote:
> >
> > I just installed wu_ftp, and it's doing the infamous "hang for a minute,
> then
> > let you lo
2001 at 03:37:16PM -0700, David Bishop wrote:
> > I just installed wu_ftp, and it's doing the infamous "hang for a minute,
> then
> > let you login normally" trick. I'm also using xinetd (for security
> reasons,
> > was told it was better) s
I just installed wu_ftp, and it's doing the infamous "hang for a minute, then
let you login normally" trick. I'm also using xinetd (for security reasons,
was told it was better) so it isn't a default install. How do I get rid of
this "hang-time" before the login prompt appears? I've searched fr
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "David Bishop" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Monday, March 12, 2001 6:56 PM
> Subject: Re: long hang time for ftp
>
>
> > To follow up my own email, proftp has the
To follow up my own email, proftp has the exact same problem. Any other
ideas?
On 12 Mar 2001 16:50:13 MST, David Bishop said:
>
> I'm getting it right now. I don't really care about which one works, just
> that one *does*... :-)
>
> On Mon, 12 Mar 2001 18:37:
nd never
> figured it out. Proftpd does all I ever needed.
>
> Haim.
>
> David Bishop wrote:
> >
> > I just installed wu_ftp, and it's doing the infamous "hang for a minute, then
> > let you login normally" trick. I'm also using xinetd
2, 2001 at 03:37:16PM -0700, David Bishop wrote:
> > I just installed wu_ftp, and it's doing the infamous "hang for a minute, then
> > let you login normally" trick. I'm also using xinetd (for security reasons,
> > was told it was better) so it isn'
I just installed wu_ftp, and it's doing the infamous "hang for a minute, then
let you login normally" trick. I'm also using xinetd (for security reasons,
was told it was better) so it isn't a default install. How do I get rid of
this "hang-time" before the login prompt appears? I've searched f
es up fine
>
> Regards
>
> G.Brits
> Linux Systems Engineer
> Technology Concepts
> Tel +27 11 803 2169
> Fax +27 11 803 2189
>
> -Original Message-
> From: David Bishop [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 02 March 2001 01:21
> To: debia
es up fine
>
> Regards
>
> G.Brits
> Linux Systems Engineer
> Technology Concepts
> Tel +27 11 803 2169
> Fax +27 11 803 2189
>
> -Original Message-
> From: David Bishop [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: 02 March 2001 01:21
> To: [E
So, I trying to convert a machine that has been dual-booting NT and Debian
for awhile, mainly because I just noticed that I haven't booted into NT in
over two months :-) I want to reclaim that lost disk space that is currently
an NTFS partition, and that's where I'm stuck. The current layout of t
So, I trying to convert a machine that has been dual-booting NT and Debian
for awhile, mainly because I just noticed that I haven't booted into NT in
over two months :-) I want to reclaim that lost disk space that is currently
an NTFS partition, and that's where I'm stuck. The current layout of
On Mon, 19 Feb 2001 17:46:10 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> On Mon, Feb 19, 2001 at 02:37:29PM -0700, David Bishop wrote:
> > [from /var/log/messages]
> > Feb 19 15:29:56 server1 login: FAILED LOGIN 1 FROM masquerade.micron.com
> FOR
> > db, Authentication fail
[from /var/log/messages]
Feb 19 15:29:56 server1 login: FAILED LOGIN 1 FROM masquerade.micron.com FOR
db, Authentication failure
Feb 19 15:29:58 server1 login: FAILED LOGIN SESSION FROM
masquerade.micron.com FOR (null), Conversation error
This just started happening. Any normal user will recieve
On Mon, 19 Feb 2001 17:46:10 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> On Mon, Feb 19, 2001 at 02:37:29PM -0700, David Bishop wrote:
> > [from /var/log/messages]
> > Feb 19 15:29:56 server1 login: FAILED LOGIN 1 FROM masquerade.micron.com FOR
> > db, Authentication failure
[from /var/log/messages]
Feb 19 15:29:56 server1 login: FAILED LOGIN 1 FROM masquerade.micron.com FOR
db, Authentication failure
Feb 19 15:29:58 server1 login: FAILED LOGIN SESSION FROM
masquerade.micron.com FOR (null), Conversation error
This just started happening. Any normal user will recieve
I'm trying to make backups to CD, and of course, have 800-900 megs worth of
data, compressed. What is the best way to split up large tar or cpio files,
that will allow them to easily be put back together, booting off of a rescue
floppy or the like? I don't need any scripts or direct-to-the-burner
I'm trying to make backups to CD, and of course, have 800-900 megs worth of
data, compressed. What is the best way to split up large tar or cpio files,
that will allow them to easily be put back together, booting off of a rescue
floppy or the like? I don't need any scripts or direct-to-the-burne
58 matches
Mail list logo
