Hello,
i want to do accounting of email transfer volume with qmail. (min.
transferred bytes)
Is there a way to solve this problem with qmail directly?
I don't want to use firewall rules to measure the traffic.
thanks,
thalunil
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject
From: Alex Bihlmaier [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, October 25, 2004 12:29 PM
Hello,
i want to do accounting of email transfer volume with qmail. (min.
transferred bytes)
Is there a way to solve this problem with qmail directly?
I don't want to use firewall rules to measure the traffic.
Check
Hi !
In february of this year, I've asked here what kind of mailling list manager I
should use for Qmail. This was to use it inside my software that controls many
programs for hosting already. Since then, DTC has evolved a lot (now it supports
Postfix, Courier and Dovecot, as it was supporting
, that's the job of whatever POP daemon you're using.
Yep, sure, thanks for correction.
I'm using courier IMAP [+POP].
I only posted the message to give a support to assumption, that the
problem is in O/OE rather then elsewhere (e.g. in Qmail)...
David
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED
dunno. large messages obviously aren't the ONLY factor, it's a combination of
factors - one of which is that the message is large.
I have a similar (sometimes, large messages, dialup) problem with OE +
Postfix.
David
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe.
On Mon, Jul 26, 2004 at 06:05:33PM +0200, David Zejda wrote:
dunno. large messages obviously aren't the ONLY factor, it's a combination
of factors - one of which is that the message is large.
I have a similar (sometimes, large messages, dialup) problem with OE +
Postfix.
postfix doesn't do
Kris Deugau wrote:
Anil Gupte wrote:
I am having a problem with one of my customers who is using Outlook
2000 SP-3 to connect to our Qmail server. When downloading messages
from his POP account, Outlook will hang. It is most likely a
corrupted message, since he can delete the messages
Hi,
i remember that one of our custormers had the same problem. he couldnt
connect
his outlook to our qmail server, when the message was large.
it happens with any MTA and any POP daemon. that's because the problem is
not
in the message, the MTA or the POP daemon. it's in outlook
.
Peter Klavins
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: John Gonzalez/netMDC admin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, 23 July 2004 7:32 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Outlook and Qmail
Do me a quick favor
Craig Sanders wrote:
the problem is that outlook is broken. it's broken in many ways but
this specific problem is due to the fact that outlook locks up when
downloading large messages. it doesn't have to be an attachment,
if the message is too large, then outlook will hang. i don't recall
On Friday 23 July 2004 17:12, Kris Deugau wrote:
Craig Sanders wrote:
the problem is that outlook is broken. it's broken in many ways but
this specific problem is due to the fact that outlook locks up when
downloading large messages. it doesn't have to be an attachment,
if the message
Somone wrote:
I am having a problem with one of my customers who is using Outlook 2000
SP-3 to connect to our Qmail server. When downloading messages from his
POP account, Outlook will hang. It is most likely a corrupted message,
The only concrete case I've tracked down was Outlook choking
On Fri, Jul 23, 2004 at 11:12:06AM -0400, Kris Deugau wrote:
Craig Sanders wrote:
the problem is that outlook is broken. it's broken in many ways but
this specific problem is due to the fact that outlook locks up when
downloading large messages. it doesn't have to be an attachment,
if
I have the same problem with redhat sendmail and
qpopper did you ever find a solution?
Any help would be greatly appreciated
I am having a problem with one of my customers who is using Outlook
2000SP-3 to connect to our Qmail server. When downloading messages
from his POPaccount, Outlook
-0400, Brian Franco wrote:
I have the same problem with redhat sendmail and qpopper did you ever find a
solution?
Any help would be greatly appreciated
I am having a problem with one of my customers who is using Outlook 2000
SP-3 to connect to our Qmail server. When downloading messages from
Howdy,
I noticed that qmail-scanner-queue refuses to run after the last debian
perl update. I tried to install the latest qmail-scanner, but
unfortunately the ./configure fails reporting:
snip
Testing suid nature of /usr/bin/suidperl...
Whoa - broken perl install found.
Cannot even run a simple
El lun, 19-04-2004 a las 19:58, David Wilk escribió:
Howdy,
I noticed that qmail-scanner-queue refuses to run after the last debian
perl update. I tried to install the latest qmail-scanner, but
unfortunately the ./configure fails reporting:
snip
Testing suid nature of /usr/bin/suidperl
escribi?:
Howdy,
I noticed that qmail-scanner-queue refuses to run after the last debian
perl update. I tried to install the latest qmail-scanner, but
unfortunately the ./configure fails reporting:
snip
Testing suid nature of /usr/bin/suidperl...
Whoa - broken perl install found
Howdy,
I noticed that qmail-scanner-queue refuses to run after the last debian
perl update. I tried to install the latest qmail-scanner, but
unfortunately the ./configure fails reporting:
snip
Testing suid nature of /usr/bin/suidperl...
Whoa - broken perl install found.
Cannot even run a simple
El lun, 19-04-2004 a las 19:58, David Wilk escribió:
Howdy,
I noticed that qmail-scanner-queue refuses to run after the last debian
perl update. I tried to install the latest qmail-scanner, but
unfortunately the ./configure fails reporting:
snip
Testing suid nature of /usr/bin/suidperl
escribi?:
Howdy,
I noticed that qmail-scanner-queue refuses to run after the last debian
perl update. I tried to install the latest qmail-scanner, but
unfortunately the ./configure fails reporting:
snip
Testing suid nature of /usr/bin/suidperl...
Whoa - broken perl install found
On Tue, 6 Apr 2004 13:04, Anil Gupte [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am having a problem with one of my customers who is using Outlook 2000
SP-3 to connect to our Qmail server. When downloading messages from his
Last time I checked the Qmail POP server would append a blank line to the end
of each
On Tue, 6 Apr 2004 13:04, Anil Gupte [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am having a problem with one of my customers who is using Outlook 2000
SP-3 to connect to our Qmail server. When downloading messages from his
Last time I checked the Qmail POP server would append a blank line to the end
of each
Anil Gupte wrote:
I am having a problem with one of my customers who is using Outlook
2000 SP-3 to connect to our Qmail server. When downloading messages
from his POP account, Outlook will hang. It is most likely a
corrupted message, since he can delete the messages using a webmail
Anil Gupte wrote:
I am having a problem with one of my customers who is using Outlook
2000 SP-3 to connect to our Qmail server. When downloading messages
from his POP account, Outlook will hang. It is most likely a
corrupted message, since he can delete the messages using a webmail
I am having a problem with one of my customers who is using Outlook 2000
SP-3 to connect to our Qmail server. When downloading messages from his POP
account, Outlook will hang. It is most likely a corrupted message, since he
can delete the messages using a webmail interface, and then continue
I am having a problem with one of my customers who is using Outlook 2000
SP-3 to connect to our Qmail server. When downloading messages from his POP
account, Outlook will hang. It is most likely a corrupted message, since he
can delete the messages using a webmail interface, and then continue
hi,
I must change the machine of a mx. The first one is with qmail and the
second with exim.
Before the dns propagation, i would like that all the mail who still
arrive on the qmail machine will be redirected to the new one. But i
don't know qmail...
Is it enough to remove the domain from /var
William Dode [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I must change the machine of a mx. The first one is with qmail and the
second with exim.
Before the dns propagation, i would like that all the mail who still
arrive on the qmail machine will be redirected to the new one. But i
don't know qmail
Richard Zuidhof [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
William Dode [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I must change the machine of a mx. The first one is with qmail and the
second with exim.
Before the dns propagation, i would like that all the mail who still
arrive on the qmail machine will be redirected to the new
hi,
I must change the machine of a mx. The first one is with qmail and the
second with exim.
Before the dns propagation, i would like that all the mail who still
arrive on the qmail machine will be redirected to the new one. But i
don't know qmail...
Is it enough to remove the domain from /var
William Dode [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I must change the machine of a mx. The first one is with qmail and the
second with exim.
Before the dns propagation, i would like that all the mail who still
arrive on the qmail machine will be redirected to the new one. But i
don't know qmail
Richard Zuidhof [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
William Dode [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I must change the machine of a mx. The first one is with qmail and the
second with exim.
Before the dns propagation, i would like that all the mail who still
arrive on the qmail machine will be redirected to the new
Title: Message
I saw your post on
setting up qmail over drbd. I would love to see how you did
it.
I'd like to create a
how-to on setting up a hybrid cluster (open-mosix and drbd) for
qmail.
I'd love to know how
you setup your cluster.
What do your
drbd.conf, ha.cf, haresources files
El vie, 05-03-2004 a las 12:56, Lucius Junevicus escribió:
I saw your post on setting up qmail over drbd. I would love to see
how you did it.
I'd like to create a how-to on setting up a hybrid cluster (open-mosix
and drbd) for qmail.
Open Mosix? Isnt that like, autobalanced cluster
Title: Message
I saw your post on
setting up qmail over drbd. I would love to see how you did
it.
I'd like to create a
how-to on setting up a hybrid cluster (open-mosix and drbd) for
qmail.
I'd love to know how
you setup your cluster.
What do your
drbd.conf, ha.cf, haresources files
El vie, 05-03-2004 a las 12:56, Lucius Junevicus escribió:
I saw your post on setting up qmail over drbd. I would love to see
how you did it.
I'd like to create a how-to on setting up a hybrid cluster (open-mosix
and drbd) for qmail.
Open Mosix? Isnt that like, autobalanced cluster
Thomas GOIRAND wrote:
Cool ! Don't forget to post here when it's done ! :)
I've started a WikiLearn page:
http://twiki.org/cgi-bin/view/Wikilearn/EmailVirtualDomains
Look it over, see what's wrong, misleading, or missing, and fix it. ;-)
(It is, after all, a wiki.)
regards,
Randy Kramer
--
- Original Message -
From: Ruth A. Kramer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, February 28, 2004 6:48 AM
Subject: Re: qmail or postfix? (was: RE: What is the best mailling list
manager for qmail and Domain Tech. Control ?)
I'd like to try to help (to write an easy
Can someone write here an easy understandable configuration for
Postfix with virtual domains ? After some call for help here, none of
you that know Posfix did it...
there is an easy understandable VIRTUAL_README in postfix docs yet (at least
in woody version), so it's not necessary to
On Tue, Feb 24, 2004 at 03:29:04PM +0100, Thomas GOIRAND wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Craig Sanders [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, Feb 19, 2004 at 09:34:52PM +0100, Bj?rnar Bj?rgum Larsen wrote:
4. the configuration is truly bizarre.bernstein has his own
non-standard
- Original Message -
From: Craig Sanders [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Bj?rnar Bj?rgum Larsen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, February 19, 2004 11:13 PM
Subject: Re: qmail or postfix? (was: RE: What is the best mailling list
manager for qmail and Domain Tech. Control
be said about this document is that the author doesn't
know what he is talking about.
I guess the document was written years ago, when postfix did indeed lack
*some* of the features people did expect (one of them being the ability to
reject mail instead of bounce it ;-)
actually, it is qmail
of them being the ability
to reject mail instead of bounce it ;-)
actually, it is qmail and not postfix that can't 5xx reject mail. qmail
has to accept and bounce it.postfix has always been able to reject
unwanted mail during the SMTP session (although the relay_recipient_maps
option
On Thu, Feb 19, 2004 at 09:34:52PM +0100, Bj?rnar Bj?rgum Larsen wrote:
I am in the process of choosing between postfix and qmail for our mail relays. I've
not decided yet. However, I am surprised by the fact that many people who prefer
postfix, also enjoy posting unqualified[0] statements[1
Bjørnar Bjørgum Larsen wrote:
I am in the process of choosing between postfix and qmail for our
mail relays. I've not decided yet. However, I am surprised by the
fact that many people who prefer postfix, also enjoy posting
unqualified[0] statements[1][2][3] about qmail.
If anyone have properly
I am in the process of choosing between postfix and qmail for our mail relays. I've
not decided yet. However, I am surprised by the fact that many people who prefer
postfix, also enjoy posting unqualified[0] statements[1][2][3] about qmail.
If anyone have properly grounded views, please share
web site.
I have apt-get install'd postfix so I suspect this is not true. If this is
an error, there may be others.
The biggest complaint I've heard about qmail is that its license requires
you to install binaries according to the taste of the creator. This means
that things are the same on Debian
On Thu, Feb 19, 2004 at 09:34:52PM +0100, Bj?rnar Bj?rgum Larsen wrote:
[3] Craig Sanders wrote:
ps: qmail is a bad idea. postfix is better.
Your conclusion may be right, but the arguments are missing. Would you please
share?
search the archives of this list. MTA comparisons have been
On Thursday 19 February 2004 21.56, Dan MacNeil wrote:
http://homepages.tesco.net/~J.deBoynePollard/Reviews/UnixMTSes/postfix.ht
ml
says at the very bottom:
Postfix is only available in source form,
not as precompiled or prepackaged binaries.
There is a list of FTP sites
On Thu, Feb 19, 2004 at 09:34:52PM +0100, Bj?rnar Bj?rgum Larsen wrote:
For example, I'd like comments on
http://homepages.tesco.net/~J.deBoynePollard/Reviews/UnixMTSes/postfix.html
a collection of lies, half-truths, and mistruths.
the best that can be said about this document is that the
/mirror/pub/LICENSE
Read the IBM public license and take it from there.
Hope this might help clear up any licensing/packaging issues with
postfix.
Sorry, I cannot comment as to the status of qmail, since I have chosen
to use postfix instead.
j
On Mon, Feb 16, 2004 at 09:35:00PM +0100, Joris wrote:
Majordomo is good, but I think you'd like mailman better.
Web interface for both users and administrators, very configurable, etc.
I'd recommend mailman too, but I have to warn for it's archive function.
all list managers suck, but in
On Mon, Feb 16, 2004 at 08:19:20AM -0500, John Keimel wrote:
On Mon, Feb 16, 2004 at 07:17:57AM +0100, Thomas GOIRAND wrote:
I wish to implement mailling list management to my software for all virtual
domains. DTC uses qmail, so it has to be compatible with it. DTC will
generate all config
mailling list management to my software for all virtual
% domains. DTC uses qmail, so it has to be compatible with it. DTC will
% generate all config file for the given mailling list manager.
I love ezmlm, which certainly nestles well with qmail. It should also be
easy to implement the hooks you
Michael, et al --
...and then Michael Loftis said...
%
% I'd highly recommend mailman over majordomo.I'm also disinclined to
% recommend qmail for a number of reasons. First is, unless they've made
Real reasons, or just because you personally prefer something else?
% design changes
On Mon, 16 Feb 2004 21:35:00 +0100,
Joris [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Nate Duehr wrote:
On Feb 15, 2004, at 11:17 PM, Thomas GOIRAND wrote:
I heard majordomo was good, is there something better ? I could
not find it in debian stable, it seems it is a
Title: Converting from Qmail to Postfix
List Members,
I was reading through the advice on mail list managers for Qmail and
It seems like a lot of users are using Postfix as their MTA. Can some
one post a short 3 step process for converting from Qmail to Postfix
please or point to a URL
On Mon, Feb 16, 2004 at 08:19:20AM -0500, John Keimel wrote:
On Mon, Feb 16, 2004 at 07:17:57AM +0100, Thomas GOIRAND wrote:
I wish to implement mailling list management to my software for all virtual
domains. DTC uses qmail, so it has to be compatible with it. DTC will
generate all config
mailling list management to my software for all virtual
% domains. DTC uses qmail, so it has to be compatible with it. DTC will
% generate all config file for the given mailling list manager.
I love ezmlm, which certainly nestles well with qmail. It should also be
easy to implement the hooks you
Michael, et al --
...and then Michael Loftis said...
%
% I'd highly recommend mailman over majordomo.I'm also disinclined to
% recommend qmail for a number of reasons. First is, unless they've made
Real reasons, or just because you personally prefer something else?
% design changes
On Mon, 16 Feb 2004 21:35:00 +0100,
Joris [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Nate Duehr wrote:
On Feb 15, 2004, at 11:17 PM, Thomas GOIRAND wrote:
I heard majordomo was good, is there something better ? I could
not find it in debian stable, it seems it is a
Title: Converting from Qmail to Postfix
List Members,
I was reading through the advice on mail list managers for Qmail and
It seems like a lot of users are using Postfix as their MTA. Can some
one post a short 3 step process for converting from Qmail to Postfix
please or point to a URL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
El 16/02/2004, a las 8:21, Michael Loftis escribió:
I'd highly recommend mailman over majordomo.I'm also disinclined
to recommend qmail for a number of reasons. First is, unless they've
made design changes, it's trivial to DoS. Second
interface, text, mysql, ldap backends, multilanguage and more. Packaged
for Debian.
I use it with Postfix but Qmail is said to work as well
| use of your preferred SMTP engine,
| e.g. sendmail, qmail or postfix
http://www.sympa.org/features.html
http://www.sympa.org/doc/html/node2.html
information. It
generates backup scripts, statistic calculation scripts, and config files
for bind, Apache, qmail, and proftpd, using a single system UID/GID. With
DTC, you can delegate the task of creating subdomains, email, and FTP
accounts to users for the domain names they own, and monitor bandwidth per
On Feb 15, 2004, at 11:17 PM, Thomas GOIRAND wrote:
I heard majordomo was good, is there something better ? I could not
find it
in debian stable, it seems it is a licence problem... Any sugestions ?
Majordomo is good, but I think you'd like mailman better.
Web interface for both users and
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
El 16/02/2004, a las 8:21, Michael Loftis escribió:
I'd highly recommend mailman over majordomo.I'm also disinclined
to recommend qmail for a number of reasons. First is, unless they've
made design changes, it's trivial to DoS. Second
interface, text, mysql, ldap backends, multilanguage and more. Packaged
for Debian.
I use it with Postfix but Qmail is said to work as well
| use of your preferred SMTP engine,
| e.g. sendmail, qmail or postfix
http://www.sympa.org/features.html
http://www.sympa.org/doc/html/node2.html
On Mon, Feb 16, 2004 at 07:17:57AM +0100, Thomas GOIRAND wrote:
I wish to implement mailling list management to my software for all virtual
domains. DTC uses qmail, so it has to be compatible with it. DTC will
generate all config file for the given mailling list manager.
Ecartis (formerly
On 2/16/04 12:17 AM, Thomas GOIRAND wrote:
Domain Technologie Control (DTC) is a set of PHP scripts and a web interface
that manage a MySQL database that handles all the host information. It
generates backup scripts, statistic calculation scripts, and config files
for bind, Apache, qmail
Nate Duehr wrote:
On Feb 15, 2004, at 11:17 PM, Thomas GOIRAND wrote:
I heard majordomo was good, is there something better ? I could not
find it
in debian stable, it seems it is a licence problem... Any sugestions ?
Majordomo is good, but I think you'd like mailman better.
Web interface for
information. It
generates backup scripts, statistic calculation scripts, and config files
for bind, Apache, qmail, and proftpd, using a single system UID/GID. With
DTC, you can delegate the task of creating subdomains, email, and FTP
accounts to users for the domain names they own, and monitor bandwidth per
On Feb 15, 2004, at 11:17 PM, Thomas GOIRAND wrote:
I heard majordomo was good, is there something better ? I could not
find it
in debian stable, it seems it is a licence problem... Any sugestions ?
Majordomo is good, but I think you'd like mailman better.
Web interface for both users and
I'd highly recommend mailman over majordomo.I'm also disinclined to
recommend qmail for a number of reasons. First is, unless they've made
design changes, it's trivial to DoS. Second, it doesn't scale so well, but
unless you're talking upwards of about 3-5k/msgs/hr you might not run
pop/imap...courier or Cyrus ???
I'm curious about this one. I've been postponing installing one of these
'till someone with knowledge about both can give some info about the
choice. Any other imap/pop servers that are an option?
tinus
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
for me, I never consider Cyrus.
Someone is about to claim that Cyrus delivers huge performance. I've run
250,000 users per mail store using Maildir format, Courier and Qmail, given a
choice I'd do it all the same apart from using Postfix instead of Qmail. The
hardware was Dell 2U servers
On Thu, 2003-12-04 at 13:05, Paulo Ricardo wrote:
What is the best tools to work w/ exim ?
smtp...exim
anti-virus.clamav
spam...spamassassin or ???
scanner??
I would recommend the exiscan-acl patch for Exim, which lets you run
content checks at
On Thu, 2003-12-04 at 12:05, Paulo Ricardo wrote:
Hi guys
We have been using:
*snip*
We're using something very similar here.
qmail/sqwebmail/qmailadmin/vpopmail.
We have to be able to do
smtp, smtp auth, pop, imap at the very least.
Question:
What is the best tools to work w/ exim
On Thu, Dec 04, 2003 at 11:44:54PM +1100, Russell Coker wrote:
I've run 250,000 users per mail store using Maildir format, Courier
and Qmail, given a choice I'd do it all the same apart from using
Postfix instead of Qmail.
Does Postfix yet have the ability to handle LDAP users on multiple
On Fri, 5 Dec 2003 00:37, Paul Dwerryhouse [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Dec 04, 2003 at 11:44:54PM +1100, Russell Coker wrote:
I've run 250,000 users per mail store using Maildir format, Courier
and Qmail, given a choice I'd do it all the same apart from using
Postfix instead of Qmail
On Thu, Dec 04, 2003 at 13:52:02 +0100, Erik Grinaker wrote:
I would recommend the exiscan-acl patch for Exim,
It is included in the exim4-daemon-heavy package.
Ray (a happy exim4 and exim4 backports user)
--
sendmail.cf does not resemble line noise. It resembles the result of
somebody
Hi guys
We have been using:
smtp..qmail
anti-virusclamav
scanner...qmail-scanner
webmail...sqwebmail
GUI...vqadmin+qmailadmin
virtual domains...vpopmail
pop/imap..courier-imap
list..ezmlm
as a mail solution for ours clients who
i'm happily using postfix (virtual domains, maildirs, sasl..), courier
imap/pop/sasl, openwebmail, pam.. are there any reasonable advanteges with
www.xmailserver.org? Any experiences?
Thanks
David
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
Hi guys
We have been using:
smtp..qmail
anti-virusclamav
scanner...qmail-scanner
webmail...sqwebmail
GUI...vqadmin+qmailadmin
virtual domains...vpopmail
pop/imap..courier-imap
list..ezmlm
as a mail solution for ours clients who
for me, I never consider Cyrus.
Someone is about to claim that Cyrus delivers huge performance. I've run
250,000 users per mail store using Maildir format, Courier and Qmail, given a
choice I'd do it all the same apart from using Postfix instead of Qmail. The
hardware was Dell 2U servers
On Thu, 2003-12-04 at 13:05, Paulo Ricardo wrote:
What is the best tools to work w/ exim ?
smtp...exim
anti-virus.clamav
spam...spamassassin or ???
scanner??
I would recommend the exiscan-acl patch for Exim, which lets you run
content checks at
On Thu, 2003-12-04 at 12:05, Paulo Ricardo wrote:
Hi guys
We have been using:
*snip*
We're using something very similar here.
qmail/sqwebmail/qmailadmin/vpopmail.
We have to be able to do
smtp, smtp auth, pop, imap at the very least.
Question:
What is the best tools to work w/ exim
On Thu, Dec 04, 2003 at 11:44:54PM +1100, Russell Coker wrote:
I've run 250,000 users per mail store using Maildir format, Courier
and Qmail, given a choice I'd do it all the same apart from using
Postfix instead of Qmail.
Does Postfix yet have the ability to handle LDAP users on multiple
On Fri, 5 Dec 2003 00:37, Paul Dwerryhouse [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Dec 04, 2003 at 11:44:54PM +1100, Russell Coker wrote:
I've run 250,000 users per mail store using Maildir format, Courier
and Qmail, given a choice I'd do it all the same apart from using
Postfix instead of Qmail
On Thu, Dec 04, 2003 at 13:52:02 +0100, Erik Grinaker wrote:
I would recommend the exiscan-acl patch for Exim,
It is included in the exim4-daemon-heavy package.
Ray (a happy exim4 and exim4 backports user)
--
sendmail.cf does not resemble line noise. It resembles the result of
somebody
i'm happily using postfix (virtual domains, maildirs, sasl..), courier
imap/pop/sasl, openwebmail, pam.. are there any reasonable advanteges with
www.xmailserver.org? Any experiences?
Thanks
David
Arnt Karlsen wrote:
..and after a journal death, and fsck, the raid set will be able
to re-establish itself, no? Or does the journal do both/all disks
in a raid set?
The FS doesn't know or care about RAID-anything, as far as I know.
Doesn't the FS just tell /dev/hda1, /dev/sda1, or
On Sat, 13 Sep 2003 02:01, Rich Puhek wrote:
Ted will know a lot more about this than I do, but I'd think that if the
first two superblocks are corrupt, the likelihood of superblock number 3
or whatever being good is pretty low compared to the odds that the
drive/parition is shot. Perhaps
On Sat, 13 Sep 2003 03:54:07 +1000,
Russell Coker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Sat, 13 Sep 2003 02:01, Rich Puhek wrote:
Ted will know a lot more about this than I do, but I'd think that if
the first two superblocks are corrupt, the likelihood of superblock
Cameron Moore wrote:
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Russell Coker) [2003.09.10 20:16]:
Also you can't have a ReiserFS file system mounted read-only while fsck'ing
it. Which makes recovering errors on the root FS very interesting to say the
least.
What I hate about ext3 is that it doesn't poorly handles
On Thu, Sep 11, 2003 at 02:04:19AM +0200, Arnt Karlsen wrote:
..I still believe in raid-1, but, ext3fs???
..how does xfs, jfs and Reiserfs compare?
If you have random disk corruptions happening as often as you are, no
filesystem is going to be able to help you. The only question is how
On Thu, 11 Sep 2003 14:03:17 -0400,
Theodore Ts'o [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Thu, Sep 11, 2003 at 02:04:19AM +0200, Arnt Karlsen wrote:
..I still believe in raid-1, but, ext3fs???
..how does xfs, jfs and Reiserfs compare?
If you have random disk
On Wed, Sep 10, 2003 at 01:36:32AM +0200, Arnt Karlsen wrote:
But for an unattended server, most of the time it's probably better to
force the system to reboot so you can restore service ASAP.
..even for raid-1 disks??? _Is_ there a combination of raid-1 and
journalling fs'es for linux
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Russell Coker) [2003.09.10 20:16]:
On Thu, 11 Sep 2003 10:04, Arnt Karlsen wrote:
..I still believe in raid-1, but, ext3fs???
..how does xfs, jfs and Reiserfs compare?
ReiserFS has many situations where file system corruption can make operations
such as find /
1 - 100 of 303 matches
Mail list logo
