>Why is this doubled? Is this intentional?
Copy and paste slip. In the config file they are not doubled.
On Sat, 4 Oct 2003, Marcin Owsiany wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 03, 2003 at 04:40:51PM -0400, Dan MacNeil wrote:
> >
> > AllowOverride None
> > Options IncludesNOEXEC ExecCGI
>
On Fri, Oct 03, 2003 at 04:40:51PM -0400, Dan MacNeil wrote:
>
> AllowOverride None
> Options IncludesNOEXEC ExecCGI
>
[...]
>
> DirectoryIndex index.html
> AllowOverride None
> Options IncludesNOEXEC ExecCGI
>
Why is this doubled? Is this in
> Can I ask, how many Virtual Hosts are you handling on one computer? I think
> it can't be very efective (see my previous mail).
We're doing about 50 virtual hosts that are very lightly used.
> This solution is nice, but it's using PerChild module - I think.
As far as
I don't see any SuexecUserGroup directive :o)
This solution is nice, but it's using PerChild module - I think.
Can I ask, how many Virtual Hosts are you handling on one computer? I think
it can't be very efective (see my previous mail).
Dan MacNeil writes:
has documenta
I know this module, but I think, it can't work efective with many Virtual
Hosts - it must either call fork() for every HTTP request or keep running
mass of processes...
Markus Benning writes:
Hi,
i just updated to 2.0 and read somthing about a worker module
which can run child proc
as and virtualdocumentroot delimiter.
> eg, /var/webhosting/%0/docroot/
>
> Cheers,
>
>
> Scott
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Antonin Karasek" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Friday, October 03, 2003 1:38 PM
>
Hi,
i just updated to 2.0 and read somthing about a worker module
which can run child processes with different uids for
for different servers.
Heres the link to the documentation of Apache MPM perchild:
http://httpd.apache.org/docs-2.0/mod/perchild.html
I think its still not fully functional but
You probably want to run suexec which runs cgi as a specific user.
Our project docs --including links to the real docs are here:
http://www.communitysoftwarelab.org/sys/project.d/suexec.d/
It is easy if you have not changed DocumentRoot from /var/www
On Fri, 3 Oct 2003, Antonin Kar
ing mass virtual
hosting with %0 as a virtualscriptalias and virtualdocumentroot delimiter.
eg, /var/webhosting/%0/docroot/
Cheers,
Scott
- Original Message -
From: "Antonin Karasek" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, October 03, 2003 1:38 PM
Subjec
>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, October 03, 2003 1:38 PM
Subject: CGI and Virtual Hosts
> Hi,
> I want to enable CGI on my web-hosting server, but I can't find out a good
> security model (permitions of files). I don't want files to be readable
for
> others and
Hi,
I want to enable CGI on my web-hosting server, but I can't find out a good
security model (permitions of files). I don't want files to be readable for
others and don't want CGI to run apache's group. The main problem is, that
the files must belong to the same group as CGI is run.
The best
Alexander Reelsen wrote:
On Wed, Mar 19, 2003 at 04:31:09PM +0100, Domainbox, Tim Abenath wrote:
http://httpd.apache.org/docs-2.0/mod/perchild.html
I tried that one, but the child-processes directly died. As it says, work is
ongoing to make it functional.
Is there any possibility to combine mod_vh
Alexander Reelsen wrote:
On Wed, Mar 19, 2003 at 04:31:09PM +0100, Domainbox, Tim Abenath wrote:
http://httpd.apache.org/docs-2.0/mod/perchild.html
I tried that one, but the child-processes directly died. As it says, work is
ongoing to make it functional.
Is there any possibility to combine mod_
On Wed, Mar 19, 2003 at 04:31:09PM +0100, Domainbox, Tim Abenath wrote:
> <
> Jep, the perchild MPM. http://httpd.apache.org/docs-2.0/mod/perchild.html
> I tried that one, but the child-processes directly died. As it says, work is
> ongoing to make it functional.
Is there any possibility to comb
http://httpd.apache.org/docs-2.0/mod/perchild.html
I tried that one, but the child-processes directly died. As it says, work is
ongoing to make it functional.
On Wed, Mar 19, 2003 at 04:31:09PM +0100, Domainbox, Tim Abenath wrote:
> <
> Jep, the perchild MPM. http://httpd.apache.org/docs-2.0/mod/perchild.html
> I tried that one, but the child-processes directly died. As it says, work is
> ongoing to make it functional.
Is there any possibility to comb
On Wed, Mar 19, 2003 at 02:35:53PM +0100, Ralf Dreibrodt wrote:
> Paul Hampson wrote:
> >
> > You can effectively chroot php files with:
> > php_admin_value open_basedir /directory/where/files/are
> > in the Apache virtual host config. Then:
> > a) php4 won't let files outside that directory be ac
http://httpd.apache.org/docs-2.0/mod/perchild.html
I tried that one, but the child-processes directly died. As it says, work is
ongoing to make it functional.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Paul Hampson wrote:
>
> You can effectively chroot php files with:
> php_admin_value open_basedir /directory/where/files/are
> in the Apache virtual host config. Then:
> a) php4 won't let files outside that directory be accessed;
No:
- Hard links
- Commands executed with "system" can access files
On Tue, Feb 25, 2003 at 10:15:15AM +0100, debian-isp wrote:
> I am just asking myself how to secure our webserver with a couple of virtual
> hosts.
> Currently we have a large installation of typo3 running. It has a feature
> called
> fileadmin with which you can easily upload
On Wed, Mar 19, 2003 at 02:35:53PM +0100, Ralf Dreibrodt wrote:
> Paul Hampson wrote:
> >
> > You can effectively chroot php files with:
> > php_admin_value open_basedir /directory/where/files/are
> > in the Apache virtual host config. Then:
> > a) php4 won't let files outside that directory be ac
Paul Hampson wrote:
>
> You can effectively chroot php files with:
> php_admin_value open_basedir /directory/where/files/are
> in the Apache virtual host config. Then:
> a) php4 won't let files outside that directory be accessed;
No:
- Hard links
- Commands executed with "system" can access files
On Tue, Feb 25, 2003 at 10:15:15AM +0100, debian-isp wrote:
> I am just asking myself how to secure our webserver with a couple of virtual hosts.
> Currently we have a large installation of typo3 running. It has a feature called
> fileadmin with which you can easily upload files. As it i
tation/sysadmin/php_installation.html
Just my two cents
Victor
On Tuesday 25 February 2003 10:15, debian-isp wrote:
> Hi all !
>
> I am just asking myself how to secure our webserver with a couple of
> virtual hosts. Currently we have a large installation of typo3 running. It
> has a
rote:
>> Hi all !
>>
>> I am just asking myself how to secure our webserver with a couple of
>> virtual hosts.
>> Currently we have a large installation of typo3 running. It
>has a feature called fileadmin with which you can easily
>upload files. As it is thereby p
Hello
On Tue, Feb 25, 2003 at 10:15:15AM +0100, debian-isp wrote:
> - chrooting virtual hosts in apache ?
We had great success with a tiny tool called sbox. All CGI/PHP requests
are rewritten to "/cgi-bin/sbox?..." This sbox then looks
to the files owner and changes it's uid t
tation/sysadmin/php_installation.html
Just my two cents
Victor
On Tuesday 25 February 2003 10:15, debian-isp wrote:
> Hi all !
>
> I am just asking myself how to secure our webserver with a couple of
> virtual hosts. Currently we have a large installation of typo3 running. It
> has a
Hi all !
I am just asking myself how to secure our webserver with a couple of virtual
hosts.
Currently we have a large installation of typo3 running. It has a feature
called fileadmin with which you can easily upload files. As it is thereby
possible to upload php scripts and execute via the
rote:
>> Hi all !
>>
>> I am just asking myself how to secure our webserver with a couple of
>> virtual hosts.
>> Currently we have a large installation of typo3 running. It
>has a feature called fileadmin with which you can easily
>upload files. As it is thereby p
Hello
On Tue, Feb 25, 2003 at 10:15:15AM +0100, debian-isp wrote:
> - chrooting virtual hosts in apache ?
We had great success with a tiny tool called sbox. All CGI/PHP requests
are rewritten to "/cgi-bin/sbox?..." This sbox then looks
to the files owner and changes it's uid t
Hi all !
I am just asking myself how to secure our webserver with a couple of virtual hosts.
Currently we have a large installation of typo3 running. It has a feature called
fileadmin with which you can easily upload files. As it is thereby possible to upload
php scripts and execute via the
Hi Jasper,
Try this out :
http://www.snert.com/Software/mod_throttle/index.shtml
It sounds like it will do what you wish to accomplish.
Cheers, Fred.
Jasper Metselaar wrote:
Hi,
I would like to limit the amount of data traffic that is generated by the virtual hosts on my server:
Let's
Hi,
I would like to limit the amount of data traffic that is generated by the virtual
hosts on my server:
Let's say I want to allow most domains 1 GB of traffic per month and I would like to
generate a warning when they reach 900 MB and shut the site down when it reaches 1 GB
(unle
2002-01-03 at 11:38, KOZMAN Balint wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > Sorry if offtopic, but is it possible to give back
> > different 404 error messages via apache based on virtual
> > hosts?
> >
> > Thanks in advance.
> >
> > Regards,
>
Ya just throw a:
ErrorDocument 404 /path-to-error-document
inside of the virtualhost
On Thu, 2002-01-03 at 11:38, KOZMAN Balint wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Sorry if offtopic, but is it possible to give back different 404 error
> messages via apache based on virtual hosts?
>
&
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] (KOZMAN Balint) [2002.01.03 10:41]:
> Sorry if offtopic, but is it possible to give back different 404 error
> messages via apache based on virtual hosts?
...
ErrorDocument 404 /path/to/error/doc.html
--
Cameron Moore
Hi,
Sorry if offtopic, but is it possible to give back different 404 error
messages via apache based on virtual hosts?
Thanks in advance.
Regards,
Balint
2002-01-03 at 11:38, KOZMAN Balint wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > Sorry if offtopic, but is it possible to give back
> > different 404 error messages via apache based on virtual
> > hosts?
> >
> > Thanks in advance.
> >
> > Regards,
>
Ya just throw a:
ErrorDocument 404 /path-to-error-document
inside of the virtualhost
On Thu, 2002-01-03 at 11:38, KOZMAN Balint wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Sorry if offtopic, but is it possible to give back different 404 error
> messages via apache based on virtual hosts?
>
&
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] (KOZMAN Balint) [2002.01.03 10:41]:
> Sorry if offtopic, but is it possible to give back different 404 error
> messages via apache based on virtual hosts?
...
ErrorDocument 404 /path/to/error/doc.html
--
Cameron Moore
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PRO
Hi,
Sorry if offtopic, but is it possible to give back different 404 error
messages via apache based on virtual hosts?
Thanks in advance.
Regards,
Balint
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, 13 Jul 2001, Waldemar Brodkorb wrote:
> probably a stupid beginner question, but how RR-records for
> bind are defined correctly, for virtual hosts.
> I have an A and PTR record for every new virtual domain.
> What's the normal way?
Waldemar,
In that case, when you&#
Hello Debianfriends,
probably a stupid beginner question, but how RR-records for
bind are defined correctly, for virtual hosts.
I have an A and PTR record for every new virtual domain.
What's the normal way?
thanks in advance
Waldemar
--
It's naive to assume that just installing
> "Y2KNET" == Y2KNET <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Y2KNET> No, I have not and here it looks the problem,
Y2KNET> but in Debian 2.2r2 there is a networking file
Y2KNET> in /etc/init.d, instead of network file where
Y2KNET> ifconfig was added. I am trying to find where can I look
Y2KNET> these
ot; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc:
Sent: Thursday, April 05, 2001 2:44 PM
Subject: Re: Virtual Hosts
> No, I have not and here it looks the problem,
> but in Debian 2.2r2 there is a networking file
> in /etc/init.d, instead of network file where
> ifconfig was added. I am trying to
Umair
Tim Kent wrote:
> Have you ifconfig'd the additional addresses you are going to use?
>
> Tim.
> - Original Message -
> From: "Y2KNET" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To:
> Sent: Thursday, April 05, 2001 1:40 PM
> Subject: Virtual Hosts
>
>
Here is the real world.
I have primary and secondry servers ns1 and ns2.
The zone file on ns1 includes the following zones:
zone "y2knet.net" {
type master;
file "y2knet.db";
};
zone "jennswing.com" {
type master;
file "jennswing.db";
};
y2knet.db includes:
---
Have you ifconfig'd the additional addresses you are going to use?
Tim.
- Original Message -
From: "Y2KNET" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Thursday, April 05, 2001 1:40 PM
Subject: Virtual Hosts
> When I remotely or internally telnet www.xyz.net,
> it does not
On Wed, 4 Apr 2001, Y2KNET wrote:
> Any idea please!
This thread continues and continues ...
Please give us the real hostnames. We may be able to see the problem from
outside.
Make sure the DNS works before even starting with the Apache config. (If
not, you may cause more troubleshooting than yo
When I remotely or internally telnet www.xyz.net,
it does not connect and give the error
"unable to connect remote host: no route to host"
but when I tried to connect www.abc.net
it connected. It looks like it is not connetcting
to www.xyz.net.
I have the entry for zone xyz.net in named.conf file
> "Y2KNET" == Y2KNET <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Y2KNET> No, I have not and here it looks the problem,
Y2KNET> but in Debian 2.2r2 there is a networking file
Y2KNET> in /etc/init.d, instead of network file where
Y2KNET> ifconfig was added. I am trying to find where can I look
Y2KNET> these
ot; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, April 05, 2001 2:44 PM
Subject: Re: Virtual Hosts
> No, I have not and here it looks the problem,
> but in Debian 2.2r2 there is a networking file
> in /etc/init.d, instead of network file where
> ifconfig was a
Umair
Tim Kent wrote:
> Have you ifconfig'd the additional addresses you are going to use?
>
> Tim.
> - Original Message -
> From: "Y2KNET" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Thursday, April 05, 2001 1:40 PM
> Subject
Here is the real world.
I have primary and secondry servers ns1 and ns2.
The zone file on ns1 includes the following zones:
zone "y2knet.net" {
type master;
file "y2knet.db";
};
zone "jennswing.com" {
type master;
file "jennswing.db";
};
y2knet.db includes:
---
Have you ifconfig'd the additional addresses you are going to use?
Tim.
- Original Message -
From: "Y2KNET" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, April 05, 2001 1:40 PM
Subject: Virtual Hosts
> When I remotely or internally tel
On Wed, 4 Apr 2001, Y2KNET wrote:
> Any idea please!
This thread continues and continues ...
Please give us the real hostnames. We may be able to see the problem from
outside.
Make sure the DNS works before even starting with the Apache config. (If
not, you may cause more troubleshooting than y
When I remotely or internally telnet www.xyz.net,
it does not connect and give the error
"unable to connect remote host: no route to host"
but when I tried to connect www.abc.net
it connected. It looks like it is not connetcting
to www.xyz.net.
I have the entry for zone xyz.net in named.conf file
S entry no request would reach your server.
>
> Cheers, Marcel
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Y2KNET [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Tuesday, April 03, 2001 9:43 AM
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; debian-isp@lists.debian.org
> > Subject: R
S entry no request would reach your server.
>
> Cheers, Marcel
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Y2KNET [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Tuesday, April 03, 2001 9:43 AM
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: R
The original question was about IP based virtual
hosts. These are the settings for name based
virtual host.
Correct, though.
Still I prefer to have the IP in the virtual
host directive. Reduces DNS traffic somewhat
and is more reliable as far as I can tell.
Apache by default responds to *all
2001 9:43 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; debian-isp@lists.debian.org
> Subject: Re: Virtual Hosts
>
>
> I have used the same configuration:
>
>
> ServerAdmin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> DocumentRoot /groups/smallco/www
> ServerName www.smallco.com
> ErrorL
Note the difference between
and
The first is the setting for name based
virtual hosts, i.e. various virtual hosts
sharing one IP (make sure you have one or
many "NameVirtualHost 10.0.0.1" as well)
- in contrast to ip based virtual host
where each virtual host has it's own IP.
The original question was about IP based virtual
hosts. These are the settings for name based
virtual host.
Correct, though.
Still I prefer to have the IP in the virtual
host directive. Reduces DNS traffic somewhat
and is more reliable as far as I can tell.
Apache by default responds to *all
l 03, 2001 9:43 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Virtual Hosts
>
>
> I have used the same configuration:
>
>
> ServerAdmin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> DocumentRoot /groups/smallco/www
> ServerName www.smallco.com
> ErrorLog /grou
Note the difference between
and
The first is the setting for name based
virtual hosts, i.e. various virtual hosts
sharing one IP (make sure you have one or
many "NameVirtualHost 10.0.0.1" as well)
- in contrast to ip based virtual host
where each virtual host has it's
On Tue, Apr 03, 2001 at 01:24:36PM -0400, Peter Billson wrote:
> > I have installed Debian 2.2r2 and now trying to put
> > more IP based virtual hosts. I have used
> > the VirtualHost directives, and gave the IP number
> > to each site. But when I tried to look on the V
; From: Marcel Hicking <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To:
> Sent: Tuesday, April 03, 2001 8:44 AM
> Subject: Re: Virtual Hosts
>
> > http://httpd.apache.org/docs/vhosts/index.html
> > esp.
> > http://httpd.apache.org/docs/vhosts/ip-based.html
> >
> > basica
> I have installed Debian 2.2r2 and now trying to put
> more IP based virtual hosts. I have used
> the VirtualHost directives, and gave the IP number
> to each site. But when I tried to look on the Virtual host
> site, it brings the primary site.
>
> I will appreciate, if I
ww
>ServerName www.smallco.com
>ErrorLog /groups/smallco/logs/error_log
>TransferLog /groups/smallco/logs/access_log
>
>
>But still it loads the primary site.
>
>- Original Message -
>From: Marcel Hicking <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To:
>Sent: Tu
Dont you still have to add DNS entries?
-Original Message-
From: Y2KNET [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, April 03, 2001 9:43 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; debian-isp@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Virtual Hosts
I have used the same configuration:
ServerAdmin [EMAIL PROTECTED
-
From: Marcel Hicking <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Tuesday, April 03, 2001 8:44 AM
Subject: Re: Virtual Hosts
> http://httpd.apache.org/docs/vhosts/index.html
> esp.
> http://httpd.apache.org/docs/vhosts/ip-based.html
>
> basically use something like
>
>
On Tue, Apr 03, 2001 at 01:24:36PM -0400, Peter Billson wrote:
> > I have installed Debian 2.2r2 and now trying to put
> > more IP based virtual hosts. I have used
> > the VirtualHost directives, and gave the IP number
> > to each site. But when I tried to look on the V
; From: Marcel Hicking <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Tuesday, April 03, 2001 8:44 AM
> Subject: Re: Virtual Hosts
>
> > http://httpd.apache.org/docs/vhosts/index.html
> > esp.
> > http://httpd.apache.org/docs/vhosts/ip-based.html
>
> I have installed Debian 2.2r2 and now trying to put
> more IP based virtual hosts. I have used
> the VirtualHost directives, and gave the IP number
> to each site. But when I tried to look on the Virtual host
> site, it brings the primary site.
>
> I will appreciate, if I
TED]>
>Sent: Tuesday, April 03, 2001 8:44 AM
>Subject: Re: Virtual Hosts
>
>
>> http://httpd.apache.org/docs/vhosts/index.html
>> esp.
>> http://httpd.apache.org/docs/vhosts/ip-based.html
>>
>> basically use something like
>>
>>
Dont you still have to add DNS entries?
-Original Message-
From: Y2KNET [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, April 03, 2001 9:43 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Virtual Hosts
I have used the same configuration:
ServerAdmin [EMAIL PROTECTED
t; I have installed Debian 2.2r2 and now trying to put
> more IP based virtual hosts. I have used
> the VirtualHost directives, and gave the IP number
> to each site. But when I tried to look on the Virtual host
> site, it brings the primary site.
>
> I will appreciate, if I get inf
Message -
From: Marcel Hicking <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, April 03, 2001 8:44 AM
Subject: Re: Virtual Hosts
> http://httpd.apache.org/docs/vhosts/index.html
> esp.
> http://httpd.apache.org/docs/vhosts/ip-based.html
>
> basically use somethi
I have installed Debian 2.2r2 and now trying to
put
more IP based virtual hosts. I have
used
the VirtualHost directives, and gave the IP
number
to each site. But when I tried to look on the
Virtual host
site, it brings the primary site.
I will appreciate, if I get information about how
t; I have installed Debian 2.2r2 and now trying to put
> more IP based virtual hosts. I have used
> the VirtualHost directives, and gave the IP number
> to each site. But when I tried to look on the Virtual host
> site, it brings the primary site.
>
> I will appreciate, if I get inf
I have installed Debian 2.2r2 and now trying to
put
more IP based virtual hosts. I have
used
the VirtualHost directives, and gave the IP
number
to each site. But when I tried to look on the
Virtual host
site, it brings the primary site.
I will appreciate, if I get information about how
* Jaume Teixi ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [000324 19:29]:
> Whats the nice dynamically configured httpd.conf that could handle the
> following
>
> root.domain.comgoes to /var/www
> domain.com goes to /var/www
> www.domain.com goes to /var/www/domain
> webs.domain.comgoes to /var/www/we
Whats the nice dynamically configured httpd.conf that could handle the
following
root.domain.comgoes to /var/www
domain.com goes to /var/www
www.domain.com goes to /var/www/domain
webs.domain.comgoes to /var/www/webs
www.customer1.com goes to /var/www/webs/www.customer1.com
cu
83 matches
Mail list logo
