On Wed, 23 Jul 2014, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
> Thank you for the feedback Thorsten. Do you still build openjdk-7 for
> lenny today, or did you migrate to more recent releases?
I still do, we have existing contracts where lenny is the
validation system (in fact, I recently had to install a
fresh one
Le 23/07/2014 10:04, Thorsten Glaser a écrit :
> Maybe the backport was not uploaded… but I built openjdk-7 for
> squeeze and lenny in our company myself, from sid sources, and
> am very glad Matthias still supports older releases like this.
Thank you for the feedback Thorsten. Do you still build
On Wed, 23 Jul 2014, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
> Hi Matthias, I have a question regarding this point, why do you want to
> preserve the support for squeeze? Considering that openjdk-7 hasn't been
> backported to this release, do you think it's worth keeping this
Maybe the backport was not uploaded… b
Le 15/07/2014 17:27, Matthias Klose a écrit :
> Please don't send any patches which drop the build support for squeeze or
> wheezy, or any Ubuntu LTS.
Hi Matthias, I have a question regarding this point, why do you want to
preserve the support for squeeze? Considering that openjdk-7 hasn't been
b
Le 15/07/2014 17:27, Matthias Klose a écrit :
> Even before you did start, I was telling you on irc that I'll keep the
> openjdk-8
> package as one package, and not splitting it up into different source packages
> depending on the hotspot version specific for that architecture. You did
> continue
Am 11.07.2014 22:47, schrieb Emmanuel Bourg:
> Le 11/07/2014 20:09, Matthias Klose a écrit :
>
>> To be clear, there was nothing restarted. It is done the way I recommended
>> Emmanuel before he did start, and which he did ignore.
>
> Matthias again I don't understand what you are referring to.
Le 11/07/2014 20:09, Matthias Klose a écrit :
> To be clear, there was nothing restarted. It is done the way I recommended
> Emmanuel before he did start, and which he did ignore.
Matthias again I don't understand what you are referring to. You
recommended to start from the openjdk-7 package and
On Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 08:09:27PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> Am 11.07.2014 17:47, schrieb Miguel Landaeta:
> > On Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 11:11:29AM +0200, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
>
> >> The repository is on Launchpad:
> >>
> >> http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~openjdk/openjdk/openjdk8/files
>
> Yes
Am 11.07.2014 17:47, schrieb Miguel Landaeta:
> On Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 11:11:29AM +0200, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
>> Matthias has restarted the packaging from the latest version of openjdk-7
>> and merged some of my changes.
To be clear, there was nothing restarted. It is done the way I recommended
Le 11/07/2014 17:47, Miguel Landaeta a écrit :
> Is there an easy way to rebuild what was just uploaded?
Good question, I haven't figured how to build it yet. quilt fails to
apply the patches because debian/patches/series is missing. The file
should be dynamically generated but I don't know what
On Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 11:11:29AM +0200, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
> Matthias has restarted the packaging from the latest version of
> openjdk-7 and merged some of my changes. The repository is on Launchpad:
>
> http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~openjdk/openjdk/openjdk8/files
>
Is there an easy way
Matthias has restarted the packaging from the latest version of
openjdk-7 and merged some of my changes. The repository is on Launchpad:
http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~openjdk/openjdk/openjdk8/files
Now if I could be added to the OpenJDK Team I'd be happy to continue on
this repository, but it'
On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 03:47:32PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
>
> it is not blocked, it is work in progress. Emmanuel did decide to change the
> packaging, and did decide to drop support for most Debian architectures.
> Dropping support for Debian architectures will automatically block this
> p
Le 25/06/2014 15:47, Matthias Klose a écrit :
> it is not blocked, it is work in progress. Emmanuel did decide to change the
> packaging, and did decide to drop support for most Debian architectures.
I'm not sure to understand what you mean here. I haven't been able to
test on other architecture
Le 25/06/2014 14:51, Miguel Landaeta a écrit :
> I have simpler packages than this one waiting for NEW processing for
> weeks so at this point I really wonder if a more complex package
> like openjdk-8 will be accepted in before the freeze.
This is one of my concerns too, but I believe the FTP ma
Am 25.06.2014 14:51, schrieb Miguel Landaeta:
> On Sun, May 25, 2014 at 09:17:09AM +0200, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
>> Le 25/05/2014 03:06, Miguel Landaeta a écrit :
>>> Is there any news on this?
>>
>> No, Matthias told me he was working on it but he hasn't committed
>> anything yet. The package has
On Sun, May 25, 2014 at 09:17:09AM +0200, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
> Le 25/05/2014 03:06, Miguel Landaeta a écrit :
> > Is there any news on this?
>
> No, Matthias told me he was working on it but he hasn't committed
> anything yet. The package has been on hold for 3 weeks now :/
>
It's me again.
Le 25/05/2014 03:06, Miguel Landaeta a écrit :
> Is there any news on this?
No, Matthias told me he was working on it but he hasn't committed
anything yet. The package has been on hold for 3 weeks now :/
I still think the package should be uploaded as is. It may not be
perfect, not build on every
Is there any news on this?
--
Miguel Landaeta, nomadium at debian.org
secure email with PGP 0x6E608B637D8967E9 available at
http://db.debian.org/fetchkey.cgi?fingerprint=4CB7FE1E280ECC90F29A597E6E608B637D8967E9
"Faith means not wanting to know what is true." -- Nietzsche
signature.asc
Descripti
Le 02/05/2014 15:29, Matthias Klose a écrit :
> I didn't say that I won't use his work. And yes, it's a waste of my time to
> start this work within a new vcs which is neither used by upstream or the
> current maintainers.
I'd like to thank you for accepting to pursue the work on Alioth. I
unders
Am 02.05.2014 15:19, schrieb Sylvestre Ledru:
> On 02/05/2014 15:14, Matthias Klose wrote:
>> Am 02.05.2014 12:40, schrieb Emmanuel Bourg:
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> Here we go, I prepared the openjdk-8 package and I'm looking for a
>>> sponsor to upload it. There are several issues pending but the packag
On 02/05/2014 15:14, Matthias Klose wrote:
> Am 02.05.2014 12:40, schrieb Emmanuel Bourg:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Here we go, I prepared the openjdk-8 package and I'm looking for a
>> sponsor to upload it. There are several issues pending but the package
>> is already usable to work on the Java 8 transiti
Am 02.05.2014 12:40, schrieb Emmanuel Bourg:
> Hi all,
>
> Here we go, I prepared the openjdk-8 package and I'm looking for a
> sponsor to upload it. There are several issues pending but the package
> is already usable to work on the Java 8 transition.
Please don't sponsor this package. I'm prep
Hi all,
Here we go, I prepared the openjdk-8 package and I'm looking for a
sponsor to upload it. There are several issues pending but the package
is already usable to work on the Java 8 transition.
Here is the changelog:
* Initial OpenJDK 8 package derived from the OpenJDK 7 package
(Close
24 matches
Mail list logo
