On Thu, Jan 17, 2002 at 09:22:35PM +, Stephen Stafford wrote:
> This looks like it is no longer the case. Perhaps this bug should be
> closed? (I will not close it myself as I don't use zope at all, so
> perhaps there are issues here I don't understand)
The conflict in zope was, as I under
This looks like it is no longer the case. Perhaps this bug should be
closed? (I will not close it myself as I don't use zope at all, so
perhaps there are issues here I don't understand)
stephen:~$ sudo apt-get install zope-pythonmethod
Reading Package Lists... Done
Building Dependency Tree...
Your message dated Thu, 17 Jan 2002 15:06:16 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#27273: fixed in psptools 1.2.2-7
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
Your message dated Thu, 17 Jan 2002 15:06:16 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#128669: fixed in psptools 1.2.2-7
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
Your message dated Thu, 17 Jan 2002 15:06:16 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#128669: fixed in psptools 1.2.2-7
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
Your message dated Thu, 17 Jan 2002 15:06:16 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#128669: fixed in psptools 1.2.2-7
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
Your message dated Thu, 17 Jan 2002 15:06:16 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#128669: fixed in psptools 1.2.2-7
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
Your message dated Thu, 17 Jan 2002 15:06:16 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#129461: fixed in psptools 1.2.2-7
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
Your message dated Thu, 17 Jan 2002 15:06:16 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#129461: fixed in psptools 1.2.2-7
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
Installing:
psptools_1.2.2-7.diff.gz
to pool/main/p/psptools/psptools_1.2.2-7.diff.gz
psptools_1.2.2-7.dsc
to pool/main/p/psptools/psptools_1.2.2-7.dsc
psptools_1.2.2-7_all.deb
to pool/main/p/psptools/psptools_1.2.2-7_all.deb
Announcing to debian-devel-changes@lists.debian.org
Closing bugs:
On Wed, Jan 16, 2002 at 04:17:25PM -0500, Thomas Smith wrote:
> I had released a new version with an almost-correct fix for the buffer
> overflow problem last night, and just looked at your mail to the bug
> this afternoon. My fix was almost the same as yours; it used
> CGI_ERRMSG_MAX-1 instead of
11 matches
Mail list logo
