Re: buildd maintainers stuck?

Goswin von Brederlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Thomas Bushnell BSG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> How about making porters responsible for running the buildds for their >> arch? > > I consider anyone who runs a buildd for an arch a porter already so > that is already there. If they are unwi

Re: Don't requeue eris yet

On Thu, Dec 08, 2005 at 03:58:09PM -0500, Nathanael Nerode wrote: > Erm, I just realized that if requeued eris will build against the misnamed > version of atlas-cpp. Should wait for a fixed source version of atlas-cpp. Which isn't RC; so I'm going to go ahead and requeue eris after all. -- Ste

Re: buildd maintainers stuck?

Thomas Bushnell BSG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > How about making porters responsible for running the buildds for their > arch? I consider anyone who runs a buildd for an arch a porter already so that is already there. MfG Goswin -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a s

Re: Sponsor for c++ transitioning upload?

Nathanael Nerode wrote: > Perhaps, since this is a matter of library transitioning, some Debian > developer on this list would take pity on him and sponsor it? > The C++ transition is very nearly complete for libraries, so I'm hoping > we can finish off the last four. Did you ask Florian Ragwitz a

Sponsor for c++ transitioning upload?

Fathi Boudra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> is trying to adopt log4cpp, and has an upload prepared which will make this library undergo the C++ transition. He's been waiting for a sponsor since late October. See bug 303794 Perhaps, since this is a matter of library transitioning, some Debian developer on th

Don't requeue eris yet

Erm, I just realized that if requeued eris will build against the misnamed version of atlas-cpp. Should wait for a fixed source version of atlas-cpp. -- Nathanael Nerode <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> "(Instead, we front-load the flamewars and grudges in the interest of efficiency.)" --Steve Lanagasek, h

Please requeue eris for rebuilds

Eris built against the busted version of libwfmath. It needs to be requeued everywhere. -- Nathanael Nerode <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [Insert famous quote here] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: buildd maintainers stuck?

Goswin von Brederlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Thomas Bushnell BSG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> >>> No, buildd admins are responsible for fixing buildd problems. *Porters* are >>> responsible for *ensuring their port is a viable release candid

Please trigger a rebuild of gav on all arches

Hi, The gav package I maintain requires a rebuild on all architectures, since it currently depends on libstdc++5. No source changes are required to bring it up to date with g++ 4.0. Thanks, Ari Pollak -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contac

Re: buildd maintainers stuck?

Thomas Bushnell BSG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> No, buildd admins are responsible for fixing buildd problems. *Porters* are >> responsible for *ensuring their port is a viable release candidate*. Given >> that one of the release criteria is "keep