Re: Severity justification

2011-05-12 Thread Steve M. Robbins
severity 625521 normal thanks First: thanks again to all who helped me with this bug. On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 03:50:57PM -0400, Filipus Klutiero wrote: > Hi Steve, > sorry if you already received my last mail, but could you please > justify severity critical for this bug? Thanks to the help of

Bug#626561: RM: libafs-perl/2.6.2-1

2011-05-12 Thread Russ Allbery
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: rm Please remove libafs-perl from testing. Bug#621999 will require substantial work in the openafs package to resolve (building completely different versions of the client libraries than what upstr

Re: Request for update to fix dchroot-dsa bug in stable (#626503)

2011-05-12 Thread Roger Leigh
On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 02:12:09PM +0100, Roger Leigh wrote: > On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 02:09:10PM +0100, Roger Leigh wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I was informed today that dchroot-dsa was non-functional in stable, > > and the same bug is also present in unstable. I filed this as > > #626503. The patch

Re: Request for update to fix dchroot-dsa bug in stable (#626503)

2011-05-12 Thread Roger Leigh
On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 02:09:10PM +0100, Roger Leigh wrote: > Hi, > > I was informed today that dchroot-dsa was non-functional in stable, > and the same bug is also present in unstable. I filed this as > #626503. The patch is a one-liner to fix a regression in the > dchroot.conf conffile loadin

Request for update to fix dchroot-dsa bug in stable (#626503)

2011-05-12 Thread Roger Leigh
Hi, I was informed today that dchroot-dsa was non-functional in stable, and the same bug is also present in unstable. I filed this as #626503. The patch is a one-liner to fix a regression in the dchroot.conf conffile loading (the interface changed incompatibly prior to squeeze being released, an