Bug#686814: unblock: swift/1.4.8-2

pay for security, so I think it's worth it. -- Julien Danjou /* Free Software hacker & freelance http://julien.danjou.info */ pgp7iptEfAfTF.pgp Description: PGP signature

Bug#683079: unblock: awesome/3.4.13-1

Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Please unblock package awesome This is a new release upstream with only a short list of bug fix. The main important one is to fix an important usability regression (see #681364). unblock a

unblock weathermap4rrd

Greetings, Please unblock weathermap4rrd 1.1.999+1.2rc3-2 which fixes #506719. Diff is attached. Cheers, -- Julien Danjou .''`. Debian Developer : :' : http://julien.danjou.info `. `' http://people.debian.org/~acid `- 9A0D 5FD9 EB42 22F6 8974 C95C A462 B5

Re: Bug#468793: tokyocabinet - FTBFS: pthread_mutex_lock.c:71: __pthread_mutex_lock: Assertion `mutex->__data.__owner == 0' failed.

ch I understand. Adding that tokyocabinet thread support is not used by any Debian application, the fact that the tests fail is not critical to us. Therefore, I suggest to make a decision and to tag this bug lenny-ignore. Cheers, -- Julien Danjou .''`. Debian Developer : :&#

Unblock request for apt-build/0.12.37

12.36..v0.12.37 debian/changelog |6 ++ debian/{ => po}/tr.po |0 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) I think it can be unblocked. Cheers, -- Julien Danjou .''`. Debian Developer : :' : http://julien.danjou.info `. `' http://people.debian.org

Re: Bug#493599: removing udns from lenny?

At 1220098364 time_t, Thomas Viehmann wrote: > I filed #497164 for libapache2-mod-defensible. And it has been fixed in 1.4-3, that should probably be unblocked. Cheers, -- Julien Danjou .''`. Debian Developer : :' : http://julien.danjou.info `. `' http://people.debia

Re: Let varmon/1.2.1-1 enter testing

e 2004, applying only fixes). Cheers, -- Julien Danjou .''`. Debian Developer : :' : http://julien.danjou.info `. `' http://people.debian.org/~acid `- 9A0D 5FD9 EB42 22F6 8974 C95C A462 B51E C2FE E5CD signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Let varmon/1.2.1-1 enter testing

usable again. Therefore I think you, my dear RMs, should allow varmon to enter testing after a period of days you will decided, based on your willing and deep experience of release management. :-) Your faithful, Cheers, -- Julien Danjou .''`. Debian Developer : :' : http://jul

Re: unblock splitvt 1.6.6-7

when package is owned by QA. Cheers, -- Julien Danjou .''`. Debian Developer : :' : http://julien.danjou.info `. `' http://people.debian.org/~acid `- 9A0D 5FD9 EB42 22F6 8974 C95C A462 B51E C2FE E5CD signature.asc Description: Digital signature

unblock steam 2.2.31-4.3

Hi, steam 2.2.31-4.3 has been uploaded to unstable fixing #489664 for the /bin/sh release goal and #483733 for swedish translation, and therefore should be unblocked. debdiff attached. Cheers, -- Julien Danjou .''`. Debian Developer : :' : http://julien.danjou.i

unblock splitvt 1.6.6-7

Hi, splitvt 1.6.6-7 has been uploaded to unstable fixing #489663 for the /bin/sh release goal and therefore should be unblocked. debdiff attached. Cheers, -- Julien Danjou .''`. Debian Developer : :' : http://julien.danjou.info `. `' http://people.debian.org/~acid `-

Re: awesome debian package bug

ked fine after installing libcairo2 from experimental (1.5.8). Well this version has been miscompiled on amd64. A binNMU would be enough, anyone kind enough to trigger that? Cheers, -- Julien Danjou .''`. Debian Developer : :' : http://julien.danjou.info `. `' http://people.deb

Re: Candidate for etch_r2? Potential for upgrade problems with LVM (#422963)

At 1190331738 time_t, Steve McIntyre wrote: > CC: to debian-release for SRM opinions - should this go into etch_r2? IMHO, yes. Cheers, -- Julien Danjou .''`. Debian Developer : :' : http://julien.danjou.info `. `' http://people.debian.org/~acid `- 9A0D 5FD9 EB42 22

Re: [SRM] Removal of iceweasel-l10n-roa-es-val

At 1189151756 time_t, Daniel Baumann wrote: > For your convenience, the debdiff is attached. Please review and permit > the upload to stable. Sorry I don't see a good reason to remove this package. Maybe it's useless, but what else? Cheers, -- Julien Danjou .''`. De

Re: [SRM] Candidate patches to d-i for Etch r2

those candidate patches: I'd like to say yes, but none of this seems to be RC severity, and they don't all have a bug report open. I suggest you to reask with a smaller list with only serious/grave/critical bugs. Cheers, -- Julien Danjou .''`. Debian Developer : :'

Re: Bug severity for not handling nostrip option (policy 10.1)

Hi silent RMs, At 1186422734 time_t, Julien Danjou wrote: > I'm currently reporting bugs about packages not handling the nostrip > options in DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS and providing stripped binaries. > > Which severity is the correct one for you? I'm sure you've read my mai

Bug severity for not handling nostrip option (policy 10.1)

Hi RMs, I'm currently reporting bugs about packages not handling the nostrip options in DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS and providing stripped binaries. Which severity is the correct one for you? Currently answers on IRC variats from wishlist to important. Cheers, -- Julien Danjou .''`. D

Re: [SRM] Please review apache2 2.2.3-4+etch1 for s-p-u

Hi Stefan, At 1182110747 time_t, Stefan Fritsch wrote: > I have prepared an apache2 update for etch r1. It fixes two RC bugs > and adds some missing documentation. Here is the changelog: Ok for upload. Cheers, -- Julien Danjou .''`. Debian Developer : :' : http

Re: Permission to mozilla-traybiff upload to stable-proposed-updates

it to stable. The diff is minimal, nothing depends > on mozilla-traybiff, and it would close the two RC bugs that have been > filed about the issue (#428779, #428767). Sending a diff is always a good point. However, go ahead and upload. Cheers, -- Julien Danjou .''

Re: etch and kernels2.4

At 1181737357 time_t, Mike Hommey wrote: > IANASRM, but IMHO, it would be too late to do this in a point release. IAASRM and usual argument is: you cannot expect people to upgrade to point release before upgrading to new release. Cheers, -- Julien Danjou .''`. Debian Develope

Re: STABLE: Please review madwifi_0.9.2+r1842.20061207-2etch1

At 1181466754 time_t, Loïc Minier wrote: > Hey, > > I've uploaded madwifi_0.9.2+r1842.20061207-2etch1 prepared by Kel > Modderman with the attached interdiff; it contains security fixes. > Please review and accept. Why is this not handled by security team? Cheer

Re: SRM: ViewCVS update for etch?

update no matter if > I do an NMU or not so we may as well ask for permission now. As I understand it, it makes it unusable with cvs repo created and used with etch? In that case, I think that makes an NMU worth it. Cheers, -- Julien Danjou .''`. Debian Developer :

Re: [SRM] Request approval for a Trac package upload

At 1181131884 time_t, Otavio Salvador wrote: > It makes Trac unusable for high volume project since it cannot handle > concurrent svn commits nicely. And it happens more frequently that we > would like. Ok, go ahead. -- Julien Danjou .''`. Debian Developer : :' : h

Re: read-edid

At 1180950380 time_t, Holger Levsen wrote: > SRMs, whats your opinion on this? I just agree. Cheers, -- Julien Danjou .''`. Debian Developer : :' : http://julien.danjou.info `. `' http://people.debian.org/~acid `- 9A0D 5FD9 EB42 22F6 8974 C95C A462 B51E C2

Re: [SRM] Request approval for a Trac package upload

his. I don't know trac and I can evaluate myself the severity of this bug. Could you please elaborate? Cheers, -- Julien Danjou .''`. Debian Developer : :' : http://julien.danjou.info `. `' http://people.debian.org/~acid `- 9A0D 5FD9 EB42 22F6 8974 C95C A462 B51E C2FE E5CD signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: permission to upload debram to stable-proposed-updates

At 1179860014 time_t, Thaddeus H. Black wrote: > It is a data-only update. > Permission to upload to stable-proposed-updates is > requested. Why don't you use volatile for that kind of update? Cheers, -- Julien Danjou .''`. Debian Developer : :' : http://j

Re: update of stable for gv for non-critical #393454 ?

t; is a regression from sarge. Not RC, not accepted. cheers, -- Julien Danjou .''`. Debian Developer : :' : http://julien.danjou.info `. `' http://people.debian.org/~acid `- 9A0D 5FD9 EB42 22F6 8974 C95C A462 B51E C2FE E5CD signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: Is it possible to get a fix for libc6 and nfs-kernel-server into etch r1?

ug report. > > The nfs-kernel-server also leaks memory in two functions. The fix is a one > line fix in both cases. The fixes have also been applied to the version in > testing (1.0.12) and unstable. I agree, and the patches are small and simple, so no objection from my POV. Cheers,

Re: SRMs: xlockmore?

ich was in etch and the new proposed one. Martin, what do you think ? [0] That my sounds subjective but I don't use it anyway. Cheers, -- Julien Danjou .''`. Debian Developer : :' : http://julien.danjou.info `. `' http://people.debian.org/~acid `- 9A0D 5FD9 EB42 22F6 8974 C95C A462 B51E C2FE E5CD signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: SRMs: Possible to get a fix for viewcvs in Etch so it works with Etch cvs?

patch it's hard to tell right now. Cheers, -- Julien Danjou .''`. Debian Developer : :' : http://julien.danjou.info `. `' http://people.debian.org/~acid `- 9A0D 5FD9 EB42 22F6 8974 C95C A462 B51E C2FE E5CD signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: Permission to update lifelines in the next stable point release (4.0r1)

updates? Or should I so something > different? You've sent a mail to ask so the first step is completed. Now, you've my agreement, so go ahead. > BTW, is it also ok if I fix a translation in that upload? Should be if not intrusive. Cheers, -- Julien Danjou .'

Re: Bug#417739: Please fix this RC bug

At 1178185730 time_t, Piotr Roszatycki wrote: > Oops, sorry, the gmail removed my message. > > I would ask if the Bug#417739 meets the criteria to be included to the > stable release of Debian. Thanks. Yes, since it's serious. Cheers, -- Julien Danjou .''`. D

Re: orage: stable update needed perhaps?

. So go ahead and upload it please. Cheers, -- Julien Danjou .''`. Debian Developer : :' : http://julien.danjou.info `. `' http://people.debian.org/~acid `- 9A0D 5FD9 EB42 22F6 8974 C95C A462 B51E C2FE E5CD signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: rdesktop update needed in etch

n IRC, already uploaded, check: http://ftp-master.debian.org/proposed-updates.html Cheers, -- Julien Danjou .''`. Debian Developer : :' : http://julien.danjou.info `. `' http://people.debian.org/~acid `- 9A0D 5FD9 EB42 22F6 8974 C95C A462 B51E C2FE E5CD signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: Bug#403977: gnome-games: Doesn't load .svg images.

in to be upgraded, by adding a "Conflict: libgtk2.0-bin > (<< 2.8)" in libgtk2.0-0. > > Stable release team, what do you think? Ok from my side, go ahead. Cheers, -- Julien Danjou .''`. Debian Developer : :' : http://julien.danjou.info `. `' http:/

Re: [etch r1] glibc 2.3.6.ds1-13etch1

ad it? Yes, go ahead. Cheers, -- Julien Danjou .''`. Debian Developer : :' : http://julien.danjou.info `. `' http://people.debian.org/~acid `- 9A0D 5FD9 EB42 22F6 8974 C95C A462 B51E C2FE E5CD signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: mutt/1.5.13-3 for etch r1?

ng enough to warrant disturbing the release, > but I think it is annoying enough for a stable update. Ok, seeing the changelog, that'd be ok, the package is quite old indeed. Go ahead and upload, and I'll double check after that. :) Cheers, -- Julien Danjou .'&#x

Re: gcc plans for the lenny cycle

fs-gcc-4.3;[EMAIL > PROTECTED] I'd like to begin a NMU campaign to help to fix this bugs. Does it seems ok to NMU to delay/7 ? Cheers, -- Julien Danjou .''`. Debian Developer : :' : http://julien.danjou.info `. `' http://people.debian.org/~acid `- 9A0D 5FD

Re: fix for 418284 for etch

t So small, ok from my point of view. Cheers, -- Julien Danjou .''`. Debian Developer : :' : http://julien.danjou.info `. `' http://people.debian.org/~acid `- 9A0D 5FD9 EB42 22F6 8974 C95C A462 B51E C2FE E5CD signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: mutt/1.5.13-3 for etch r1?

f I think it should be fine, unfortunately, point release are about RC bugs. Not sure annoying bug would be considered as RC.. :-/ Cheers, -- Julien Danjou .''`. Debian Developer : :' : http://julien.danjou.info `. `' http://people.debian.org/~acid `- 9A0D 5FD9 EB42 22F6

Re: Bug#400879: libapache-mod-auth-mysql still missing in etch

Version: 4.3.9-3 At 1176335641 time_t, Michael Loftis wrote: > This package is still MIA in etch 4.0r0... > > I can't seem to find a reason why? I think it's because the bug was not closed in the 4.3.9-3 changelog and nobody looked at. Closing it right now. Cheers

Re: [stable] Backport of gnome-panel bug fix in sarge

p://people.dooz.org/~lool/debian/gnome-panel/2.8.3-2/sarge-pbuilder/>. No objection from my PoV, except that having a Debian bug # would be fine. Cheers, -- Julien Danjou .''`. Debian Developer : :' : http://julien.danjou.info `. `' http://people.debian.org/~acid `- 9A0D 5

Please unblock pisg 0.71-1

nnish: updated by Matti Peltola with help from atheos and Daeron. > + Estonian: fix lastseen1,2 (thanks Hannes Tarien). There was no changes inside the debian/ directory. Cheers, -- Julien Danjou // Λ̊ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://julien.danjou.info // 9A0D 5FD9 EB42 22F6 8974

please unblock apt-build 0.12.27

Hi, Please unblock apt-build 0.12.27. Changelog: 0.12.27: * Update cz translation (Closes: #408606) 0.12.26: * Fix a typo in README (Closes: #389863) Cheers, -- Julien Danjou .''`. Debian Developer : :' : http://julien.danjou.info `. `' http://people.debian.o

Re: /etc/init.d/snmpd restart fails

This bugs does not seems to have a severity, however I really think it's serious. I just hit it on my etch system, and it is very annoying and harmful. I think this package should be hinted or at least uploaded with a fix to t-p-u. Cheers, -- Julien Danjou .''`. Debian Developer

unblock php-sqlite3 0.4-2

Hi RMs, php-sqlite3 0.4-2 fixes #404537 which is RC since the package is not usable with php4 anymore currently in etch without php5 installed. It's currently 4 days old, but even if it fixes an RC bug, it did not migrate. Maybe you missed it. Cheers, -- Julien Danjou .''`. D

Re: Meeting Minutes from the latest SRM meeting

de to check arch. If package is from s.d.o and there's missing arch, status is set to WARN. I'm quite sure there's still some bugs we'll see by checking manually. Anyway, feedback welcome. Cheers, -- Julien Danjou .''`. Debian Developer : :' : http://julien.da

Re: Update of "deal" in sarge (Re: #383625: "deal": segfault at execution)

able - is that > ok? Go ahead. Cheers, -- Julien Danjou .''`. Debian Developer : :' : http://julien.danjou.info `. `' http://people.debian.org/~acid `- 9A0D 5FD9 EB42 22F6 8974 C95C A462 B51E C2FE E5CD signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: Proposing sarge update: MySQL replication crash with multiupdate and subselects?

On Thu, Aug 24, 2006 at 09:51:38PM +0200, Christian Hammers wrote: Hi, > Is bug #383165 worth to be fixed by an upload to stable-proposed-updates? Yes, I think so. Cheers, -- Julien Danjou .''`. Debian Developer : :' : http://julien.danjou.info `. `' http://

Re: Intend to fix #282492 (iproute) for stable

kernel from backports.org is used, I guess an iproute from backports.org could be used too, don't you think ? Cheers, -- Julien Danjou .''`. Debian Developer : :' : http://julien.danjou.info `. `' http://people.debian.org/~acid `- 9A0D 5FD9 EB42 22F6 8974 C95C A462 B51E C

Re: Intend to fix #282492 (iproute) for stable

int release. The severity is not actually considered critical, and the fix is quite "ugly". Furthermore, if I understand correctly, it only appears with kernel >= 2.6.8, which is the one furnished by Debian with sarge. So we may consider that this bug does not affect sarge. C

Re: Please accept packages to proposed-updates

On Tue, Jul 25, 2006 at 06:40:25PM -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote: > What about grub? Not checked too. We have a nice backlog. We go as fast as possible, but are currently slowed down because some stuff depends on ftp-master will. Cheers, -- Julien Danjou .''`. Debian Develope

Re: Please accept packages to proposed-updates

rge-pbuilder/ It has not been checked yet. It is still in p-u-new. Cheers, -- Julien Danjou .''`. Debian Developer : :' : http://julien.danjou.info `. `' http://people.debian.org/~acid `- 9A0D 5FD9 EB42 22F6 8974 C95C A462 B51E C2FE E5CD signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: patch and nmu

ld fix #333907. Cheers, -- Julien Danjou .''`. Debian Developer : :' : http://julien.danjou.info `. `' http://people.debian.org/~acid `- 9A0D 5FD9 EB42 22F6 8974 C95C A462 B51E C2FE E5CD signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Update of wzdftpd 0.5.2-1.1sarge1 for 3.1r3

package? Please, keep us in touch, since we plan to point-release ASAP. Cheers, -- Julien Danjou .''`. Debian Developer : :' : http://julien.danjou.info `. `' http://people.debian.org/~acid `- 9A0D 5FD9 EB42 22F6 8974 C95C A462 B51E C2FE E5CD signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: gngeo should be hinted for removal

table even in non-free. Cheers, -- Julien Danjou .''`. Debian Developer : :' : http://julien.danjou.info `. `' http://people.debian.org/~acid `- 9A0D 5FD9 EB42 22F6 8974 C95C A462 B51E C2FE E5CD signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: summarizing arch status

On Wed, Jun 07, 2006 at 03:50:17PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote: > On Sun, Jun 04, 2006 at 11:24:46AM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote: > > - s390: > > - 3.5 developers or so only > > This problem is also fixed. I am curious. How did you fix that ? Cheers, -- Julien Danjou .&

Re: [sarge] Fixing #325971 in gnutls11

3.2sarge1 based on the > security upload 1.0.16-13.2. Patch attached. - Would it be ok for me > to upload this? /me puts his SRMa hat on That's ok, the patch is pretty clean and short. So go ahead. Cheers, -- Julien Danjou .''`. Debian Developer : :' : http://julien.da

Re: Stable update for python-pgsql (#369250; CVE-2006-2314)

On Mon, Jun 05, 2006 at 02:50:16PM +1000, Ben Burton wrote: Hello Ben, [...] > Is this suitable for uploading to proposed-updates? Yes, it is. (And thanks for your explanation.) Cheers, -- Julien Danjou .''`. Debian Developer : :' : http://julien.danjou.info `. `' h

Re: Bug#351269: fragroute needs binNMUs

On Mon, May 29, 2006 at 12:30:59PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote: > Are you going to NMU fragroute too so it uses the new libdumbnet? Only if a binNMU is not sufficient, but I think it should be now, no ? Cheers, -- Julien Danjou .''`. Debian Developer : :' : http://

Re: Bug#351269: fragroute needs binNMUs

On Mon, May 29, 2006 at 09:02:36AM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote: > Reading through the bug (351269) I see that Julien Danjou > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> already did an NMU of this package to DELAYED/5 on > May 16th. That should have hit the archive on the 21st. > > Julien:

libnss-pgsql1: fixing #329467 in next Sarge point release

Hello Wichert, I'd like to see #329467 fixed in the next stable point release, since the fix is pretty trivial. Would you mind upload a new version to proposed-update ? Cheers, -- Julien Danjou // <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://julien.danjou.info // 9A0D 5FD9 EB42 22F6 8974 C95C A46

Re: "has RC bugs" bogusly

t > apply to the version in unstable. > > It is unreasonable, I think, for bugs reported only against the > experimental version to keep packages out of testing. This bug should have been tagged 'experimental', I guess, and so will would have been ignored. I tagged it. Che

Re: bug in tar 1.14-2.1

nment variable set correctly. Finally, I solved it this way: diff -u tar-1.14/debian/rules tar-1.14/debian/rules --- tar-1.14/debian/rules +++ tar-1.14/debian/rules @@ -16,7 +16,7 @@ build-stamp: dh_testdir - $(MAKE) + RSH="/usr/bin/rsh" CFLAGS="-O2 -g -Wall&

Problem with latest security version of tar (1.14-2.1)

for now. Have you any plan, idea or whatever, about how to fix this? Regards, -- Julien Danjou .''`. Debian Developer : :' : http://julien.danjou.info `. `' http://people.debian.org/~acid `- 9A0D 5FD9 EB42 22F6 8974 C95C A462 B51E C2FE E5CD signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: Proposed change to ekg

e strange, was taken directly > from libjpeg manual as recommended.) > > Do you think it would be a good idea to upload such changes to > stable-proposed-updates? I don't think this is suitable for a sarge update. This kind of update (IM protocol changes) should go to volatile

Re: Cyrus 2.1 in stable update

idn't screw up the upload. Yes, I checked it, it's perfect. I updated the wiki. Cheers, -- Julien Danjou .''`. Debian Developer : :' : http://julien.danjou.info `. `' http://people.debian.org/~acid `- 9A0D 5FD9 EB42 22F6 8974 C95C A462 B51E C2FE E5CD signature.asc Description: Digital signature

timezone (glibc) update for sarge

its daylight saving time this year. This seems to be a valid candidate, if nobody disagrees I could tell us to upload to s-p-u. [1] http://wiki.debian.org/DebianReleases/PointReleases [2] http://people.debian.org/~lmamane/glibc/glibc_22-sarge0.diff Cheers, -- Julien Danjou .''

About libchipcard 0.9.1-7sarge0

it means since according to the buildd log[2], it was built. [1] http://wiki.debian.org/DebianReleases/PointReleases [2] http://buildd.debian.org/build.php?&pkg=libchipcard&ver=0.9.1-7sarge0&arch=arm&file=log Cheers, -- Julien Danjou .''`. Debian Developer : :' :

Please allow mp32ogg 0.11-4 (Fix RC bug)

17:38:40.555832410 +0200 @@ -1,3 +1,9 @@ +mp32ogg (0.11-4) unstable; urgency=high + + * Fix problem with UTF-8 char (Closes: #310265) + + -- Julien Danjou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mon, 23 May 2005 17:38:21 +0200 + mp32ogg (0.11-3) unstable; urgency=low * Add support for selectable Ogg/

apt-build 0.11.10 into sarge

Hello, apt-build 0.11.10 only contains a vietnamese template translation add (closing #308608). Please, allow it to reach Sarge. Cheers, -- Julien Danjou // <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://julien.danjou.info // 9A0D 5FD9 EB42 22F6 8974 C95C A462 B51E C2FE E5CD signature.asc Descr

Re: svnmailer in sarge

use it would definately be useful. Yes, I think it is, I'mc Cc-ing this to debian-release. Regards, -- Julien Danjou .''`. Debian Developer : :' : http://julien.danjou.info `. `' http://people.debian.org/~acid `- 9A0D 5FD9 EB42 22F6 8974 C95C A462 B51E C2FE E5CD

Re: apt-build 0.11.9 into sarge

On Fri, May 06, 2005 at 12:47:24PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: > Hi Julien, Hi Steve, > On Thu, May 05, 2005 at 03:28:30PM +0200, Julien Danjou wrote: > > apt-build 0.11.9 only contains an italian template translation update. > > Please push it to Sarge. > > --- /

apt-build 0.11.9 into sarge

Hello, apt-build 0.11.9 only contains an italian template translation update. Please push it to Sarge. Cheers, -- Julien Danjou .''`. Debian Developer : :' : http://julien.danjou.info `. `' http://people.debian.org/~acid `- 9A0D 5FD9 EB42 22F6 8974 C95C