Re: m68k (was Re: C++ transitions status report

2005-12-06 Thread Goswin von Brederlow
Nathanael Nerode <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >>> And the following library packages haven't built in c2 versions on >>> all architectures, and therefore prevent other packages from >>> transitioning: >> >>> pdfkit.framework -- m68k (blocks viewpdf.app, gworkspace.app) >> >>m68k should just be igno

Re: m68k (was Re: C++ transitions status report

2005-12-02 Thread Steve Langasek
On Fri, Dec 02, 2005 at 01:23:34PM -0500, Nathanael Nerode wrote: > >> And the following library packages haven't built in c2 versions on > >> all architectures, and therefore prevent other packages from > >> transitioning: > >> pdfkit.framework -- m68k (blocks viewpdf.app, gworkspace.app) > >m68

m68k (was Re: C++ transitions status report

2005-12-02 Thread Nathanael Nerode
>> And the following library packages haven't built in c2 versions on >> all architectures, and therefore prevent other packages from >> transitioning: > >> pdfkit.framework -- m68k (blocks viewpdf.app, gworkspace.app) > >m68k should just be ignored for these purposes; the arch is doing much >bette

Re: C++ transitions status report

2005-12-02 Thread Steve Langasek
On Fri, Dec 02, 2005 at 12:23:37PM +0100, Domenico Andreoli wrote: > On 12/2/05, Nathanael Nerode <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > ... > > *** > > The following library packages have been renamed for the C++ > > allocator change but haven't built on all architectures yet. The > > ones near the top

Re: C++ transitions status report

2005-12-02 Thread Domenico Andreoli
On 12/2/05, Nathanael Nerode <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > ... > > *** > The following library packages have been renamed for the C++ > allocator change but haven't built on all architectures yet. The > ones near the top have other problems which must be addressed too. > > boost -- FTBFS on hppa,

Re: C++ transitions status report

2005-12-02 Thread Steve Langasek
On Fri, Dec 02, 2005 at 12:43:26AM -0500, Nathanael Nerode wrote: > It's going pretty well, really. :-) > > > The following packages are still linked with g++ 2.95 (!): > > The following library packages still need renaming for the C++ ABI change > (see http://people.debian.org/~djpi

C++ transitions status report

2005-12-01 Thread Nathanael Nerode
It's going pretty well, really. :-) The following packages are still linked with g++ 2.95 (!): flashplugin-nonfree (presumably unavoidable) queue -- bug 321184. Package not in sarge or etch, lots of unfixed bugs, security upload for woody newer than version in unstable,