Re: w3af (Re: pysvn: RC fix #678559 as new upstream release)

2012-08-01 Thread Hideki Yamane
Hi, On Sat, 28 Jul 2012 11:03:38 +0200 Julien Cristau wrote: > Adding the w3af maintainer to recipients. Thanks. Today, I've put pysvn and svn-workbench to unstable. I'll stay it for 1 or 2 weeks. > >

Re: w3af (Re: pysvn: RC fix #678559 as new upstream release)

2012-07-28 Thread Julien Cristau
Adding the w3af maintainer to recipients. On Sat, Jul 28, 2012 at 09:55:50 +0900, Hideki Yamane wrote: > Hi, > > > > Have you tested the reverse dependencies with the new > > > version (seems to be svn-workbench, svn-load, , ibid, > > There's no reply from w3af maintainer so I've investig

w3af (Re: pysvn: RC fix #678559 as new upstream release)

2012-07-27 Thread Hideki Yamane
Hi, > > Have you tested the reverse dependencies with the new > > version (seems to be svn-workbench, svn-load, , ibid, There's no reply from w3af maintainer so I've investigated it and there is not a problem with updating pysvn. w3af uses pysvn for update only, and its feature should

Re: pysvn: RC fix #678559 as new upstream release

2012-07-18 Thread Julien Cristau
On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 04:14:43 +0900, Hideki Yamane wrote: > > Have you tested the reverse dependencies with the new > > version (seems to be svn-workbench, svn-load, , ibid, > > w3af-console)? > > Not yet, honestly. > > So, I should ask others to help this migration with upgraded py

Re: pysvn: RC fix #678559 as new upstream release

2012-07-18 Thread Hideki Yamane
Hi, On Wed, 18 Jul 2012 20:57:39 +0200 Julien Cristau wrote: > OK, ignoring the tests and pycxx changes the diff looks relatively > reasonable. Thanks to check, it's really help. > Have you tested the reverse dependencies with the new > version (seems to be svn-workbench, svn-load, ,

Re: pysvn: RC fix #678559 as new upstream release

2012-07-18 Thread Julien Cristau
On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 08:14:56 +0900, Hideki Yamane wrote: > Hi, > > I've fixed RC bug #678559 as introducing new upstream release. > This debdiff is huge, however, most of the code is able to be ignored. > > - Some of them are for Win32 and MacOSX, we can ignore it. > - Rest of them are