Processed: reassign 805852 to src:ipe, retitle 805852 to depends on libjpeg8, forcibly merging 805852 814873

2016-04-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > reassign 805852 src:ipe ipe/7.1.10-1 Bug #805852 [libipe7.1.10] libipe7.1.10: dependency on libjpeg8 Bug reassigned from package 'libipe7.1.10' to 'src:ipe'. No longer marked as found in versions ipe/7.1.10-1. Ignoring request to alter fixed versi

Processed: Re: Bug#822383: gringo: FTBFS: error: 'pow' is not a member of 'std'

2016-04-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > forwarded 822383 https://sourceforge.net/p/potassco/bugs/118/ Bug #822383 [gringo] gringo: FTBFS: error: 'pow' is not a member of 'std' Set Bug forwarded-to-address to 'https://sourceforge.net/p/potassco/bugs/118/'. > End of message, stopping proc

Bug#816101: marked as done (FTBFS on mipsel/powerpc - broken openmpi breaks petsc build)

2016-04-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 25 Apr 2016 06:49:31 + with message-id and subject line Bug#816101: fixed in petsc 3.6.3.dfsg2-5 has caused the Debian Bug report #816101, regarding FTBFS on mipsel/powerpc - broken openmpi breaks petsc build to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the pro

gmsh is marked for autoremoval from testing

2016-04-24 Thread Debian testing autoremoval watch
gmsh 2.12.0+dfsg1-1 is marked for autoremoval from testing on 2016-05-22 It is affected by these RC bugs: 816563: libjava-gmsh2: fails to upgrade from 'jessie' - trying to overwrite /usr/lib/i386-linux-gnu/libjava-gmsh.so -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@li

CHERS LAURÉAT Veuillez recevoir notre sincère félicitation!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

2016-04-24 Thread FACEBOOK LOTERIE BOARD
Dans le cadre de l'expansion de son activité commerciale, le réseau social FACEBOOK Internationale en étroite collaboration avec les directions de jeux et loteries de l’Afrique de l’ouest, La FMI, UEMOA et avec les importantes structures de

Bug#820815: marked as done (freefem++: please make the build reproducible (fileordering,timestamps))

2016-04-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 24 Apr 2016 23:25:11 + with message-id and subject line Bug#820815: fixed in freefem++ 3.46+dfsg1-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #820815, regarding freefem++: please make the build reproducible (fileordering,timestamps) to be marked as done. This means that you cl

freefem++_3.46+dfsg1-1_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

2016-04-24 Thread Debian FTP Masters
Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.8 Date: Sun, 24 Apr 2016 15:01:02 +0300 Source: freefem++ Binary: freefem++ libfreefem++ libfreefem++-dev freefem++-doc Architecture: source amd64 all Version: 3.46+dfsg1-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Debia

Processing of freefem++_3.46+dfsg1-1_amd64.changes

2016-04-24 Thread Debian FTP Masters
freefem++_3.46+dfsg1-1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: freefem++_3.46+dfsg1-1.dsc freefem++_3.46+dfsg1.orig.tar.gz freefem++_3.46+dfsg1-1.debian.tar.xz freefem++-dbgsym_3.46+dfsg1-1_amd64.deb freefem++-doc_3.46+dfsg1-1_all.deb freefem++_3.46+dfsg1-

Bug#798164: vtk: do not ship in stretch

2016-04-24 Thread Kai-Martin Knaak
On Sun, 6 Sep 2015 13:05:07 +0200 Julien Cristau wrote: > The mix of vtk 5.x and vtk 6.x in the archive was bad enough in jessie, > we shouldn't ship that again for stretch. However, there is a reason to keep both: vtk6 is qt5 based only. This leaves applications which are still on qt4 in the dar

Bug#822483: opencv-doc contains no documentation

2016-04-24 Thread Yuri D'Elia
Package: opencv-doc Version: 2.4.9.1+dfsg-1.5 Severity: normal I expected to find the actual documentation/reference in opencv-doc (as found on docs.opencv.org), but it currently only contains the examples. -- System Information: Debian Release: stretch/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (90

Bug#757163: marked as done (jhdf: fails to build on kfreebsd)

2016-04-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 24 Apr 2016 23:34:06 +0200 with message-id <571d3bce.9040...@debian.org> and subject line Re: jhdf: fails to build on kfreebsd has caused the Debian Bug report #757163, regarding jhdf: fails to build on kfreebsd to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the probl

Bug#559975: marked as done (FTBFS [hppa]: cannot find JDK header files!)

2016-04-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 24 Apr 2016 23:20:55 +0200 with message-id <571d38b7.3050...@pustule.org> and subject line Re: FTBFS [hppa]: cannot find JDK header files! has caused the Debian Bug report #559975, regarding FTBFS [hppa]: cannot find JDK header files! to be marked as done. This means that y

Bug#822469: asl: FTBFS: error: expected unqualified-id before 'sizeof'

2016-04-24 Thread Martin Michlmayr
Package: asl Version: 0.1.6-1 Severity: serious This package fails to build in unstable: > sbuild (Debian sbuild) 0.68.0 (15 Jan 2016) on dl580gen9-02.hlinux ... > [ 27%] Building CXX object > src/acl/CMakeFiles/aslacl.dir/Operators/aclGenericAtomicFunction.cxx.o > cd /<>/obj-x86_64-linux-gnu/sr

Processed: found 822120 in 1:0.99.0-final.1-1, tagging 822120, tagging 822182, tagging 822435 ...

2016-04-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > found 822120 1:0.99.0-final.1-1 Bug #822120 [feel++] Boost 1.55 to be removed; your attention required There is no source info for the package 'feel++' at version '1:0.99.0-final.1-1' with architecture '' Unable to make a source version for versi

Bug#816101: petsc: FTBFS on mipsel - broken openmpi breaks petsc build

2016-04-24 Thread Drew Parsons
On Fri, 22 Apr 2016 18:25:41 +0200 Graham Inggs wrote: >  > Your luck ran out, the build failed on powerpc [1]. Well dang. I've prepared a patch (test_mpi_conditional) to skip the 2 MPI test. I'm making it conditional to skip only on mipsel and powerpc, on the grounds that it's useful feedback

libvigraimpex 1.10.0+git20160211.167be93+dfsg-2 MIGRATED to testing

2016-04-24 Thread Debian testing watch
FYI: The status of the libvigraimpex source package in Debian's testing distribution has changed. Previous version: 1.10.0+git20160211.167be93+dfsg-1 Current version: 1.10.0+git20160211.167be93+dfsg-2 -- This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of new packages

polyml 5.6-5 MIGRATED to testing

2016-04-24 Thread Debian testing watch
FYI: The status of the polyml source package in Debian's testing distribution has changed. Previous version: 5.6-3 Current version: 5.6-5 -- This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you will receive late

sympy_1.0-1_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

2016-04-24 Thread Debian FTP Masters
Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Sun, 24 Apr 2016 15:40:40 +0200 Source: sympy Binary: isympy python-sympy python3-sympy python-sympy-doc Architecture: source all Version: 1.0-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Debian Science Maintain

Bug#822266: paraview: diff for NMU version 5.0.1+dfsg1-5.1

2016-04-24 Thread Tobias Frost
Control: tags 822266 + patch Control: tags 822266 + pending Dear maintainer, I've prepared an NMU for paraview (versioned as 5.0.1+dfsg1-5.1) and uploaded it to DELAYED/5. Please feel free to tell me if I should delay it longer. Regards. diff -Nru paraview-5.0.1+dfsg1/debian/changelog paraview-

Processed: paraview: diff for NMU version 5.0.1+dfsg1-5.1

2016-04-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tags 822266 + patch Bug #822266 [src:paraview] paraview: FTBFS on kfreebsd-* but previously did: dilib.c:5462:18: error: storage size of 'mytime' isn't known Added tag(s) patch. > tags 822266 + pending Bug #822266 [src:paraview] paraview: FTBFS on kfreebsd-* but pre

Processing of paraview_5.0.1+dfsg1-5.1_source.changes

2016-04-24 Thread Debian FTP Masters
paraview_5.0.1+dfsg1-5.1_source.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: paraview_5.0.1+dfsg1-5.1.dsc paraview_5.0.1+dfsg1-5.1.debian.tar.xz Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org) -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list deb

Processing of sympy_1.0-1_amd64.changes

2016-04-24 Thread Debian FTP Masters
sympy_1.0-1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: sympy_1.0-1.dsc sympy_1.0.orig.tar.gz sympy_1.0-1.debian.tar.xz isympy_1.0-1_all.deb python-sympy-doc_1.0-1_all.deb python-sympy_1.0-1_all.deb python3-sympy_1.0-1_all.deb Greetings, Your Debia

Bug#822435: python-extractor, python-sfepy: error when trying to install together

2016-04-24 Thread Andreas Beckmann
Package: python-extractor,python-sfepy Severity: serious User: trei...@debian.org Usertags: edos-file-overwrite Control: found -1 1:0.6-4 Control: found -1 2016.1-1 Hi, automatic installation tests of packages that share a file and at the same time do not conflict by their package dependency rela

Processed: python-extractor,python-sfepy: error when trying to install together

2016-04-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > found -1 1:0.6-4 Bug #822435 [python-extractor,python-sfepy] python-extractor,python-sfepy: error when trying to install together There is no source info for the package 'python-sfepy' at version '1:0.6-4' with architecture '' Marked as found in versions libextract

Bug#822266: paraview: FTBFS on kfreebsd-* but previously did: dilib.c:5462:18: error: storage size of 'mytime' isn't known

2016-04-24 Thread Tobias Frost
On Sat, 23 Apr 2016 13:37:30 +0200 Tobias Frost wrote: > Package: src:paraview > Followup-For: Bug #822266 >  > The package builds on the porterboxes... > So, I will do an binary-only upload directly from there to decruft stuff. strike that, I was fooled by the porterbox (did pull in old source)

Bug#741196: License incompatibility below RC threshold

2016-04-24 Thread Niels Thykier
Francesco Poli: > On Sat, 23 Apr 2016 15:34:44 + Niels Thykier wrote: > >> Francesco Poli: >>> [...] >> >> Hi, > > Hello Niels, > thanks for your prompt reply. > >> >> AFAICT, the FTP masters are the authoritative source on dealing with >> license issues and they have not yet made a ruling.