-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
- --
Debian Security Advisory DSA 645-1 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.debian.org/security/ Martin Schulze
January 19th, 2005
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
- --
Debian Security Advisory DSA 647-1 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.debian.org/security/ Martin Schulze
January 19th, 2005
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
- --
Debian Security Advisory DSA 648-1 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.debian.org/security/ Martin Schulze
January 19th, 2005
Quoting s. keeling ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
The problem here is the nitwit factor.
Yes, well, a bunch of us have been keeping an eye on Linux MUAs and
default mailcap behaviour for 10+ years, to make sure zeal for
simplicity doesn't lead coders or distro assemblers to do something
dumb. Thus my
On Tue, 2005-01-18 at 12:40 +0100, Adrian von Bidder wrote:
Hi,
With web-board passwords and two or three auto-acks being posted to this
list every week: could we think about setting the Reply-To of
I hope that I am not the only one who writes to the auto-ackers and
their postmasters that
On Wednesday 19 January 2005 10.15, Adam Lydick wrote:
Better to bounce or moderate entries from non-subscribers, IMOHO. That
would cut down on the spam quite a lot better than probabilistic filters
as well.
Problem: moderating needs manpower.
Problem: closing the list to non-subscribers would
Rick Moen wrote:
Quoting David Mandelberg ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
Attached.
Save to your GNOME/KDE desktop (like many newbies do) and double click
the new icon. .desktop files (currently) don't need the x bit set to
work, so no chmod'ing is necessary.
I'm sorry, but the question was:
s. keeling wrote:
No, I assume people have half a brain in their heads, look at the
attachment type, maybe save it to a file and inspect it, then maybe
look at it or delete it. Too much work?
Whether it's too much work or not, most non-geeks I know don't bother.
Okay, slap a lot of autoload
* s. keeling:
People who don't use stupid Windows email clients have no trouble with
attachments at all. Attachments are a very useful tool; for instance,
for code listings, they arrive unmangled by line wrap.
Get a better email client, running on a better OS.
You mean the OS whose users
* Rick Moen:
Please advise this mailing list of which specific Linux or BSD MUA (or
specific configuration thereof) is willing to execute a received
binary or script attachment.
mutt and Gnus are, in typical configurations. Most distributions
kindly add all these helpful mailcap entries.
Le Tue, Jan 18, 2005 at 10:41:00AM +0100, Martin Schulze a écrit :
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
- --
Debian Security Advisory DSA 644-1 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, Jan 19, 2005 at 12:49:57PM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote:
* Rick Moen:
Please advise this mailing list of which specific Linux or BSD MUA (or
specific configuration thereof) is willing to execute a received
binary or script attachment.
mutt and Gnus are, in typical
Don Hayward at pomobuli.net
On Wed, 12 Jan 2005, Martin Schulze wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
- --
Debian Security Advisory DSA 636-1 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Florian Weimer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
mutt and Gnus are, in typical configurations. Most distributions
kindly add all these helpful mailcap entries.
Could you point out a mailcap entry that causes the file to be
*executed*?
Because running gqview $file.jpg is very different from running
* Florent Rougon:
Florian Weimer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
mutt and Gnus are, in typical configurations. Most distributions
kindly add all these helpful mailcap entries.
Could you point out a mailcap entry that causes the file to be
*executed*?
For complex file formats, there is no clear
On Wed, Jan 19, 2005 at 04:29:46PM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote:
For complex file formats, there is no clear distinction between
opening a file and executing it.
Sure there is. For some filetypes execution is an intended effect; that
is, you expect arbitrary code to run. For other filetypes there's
Quoting Florian Weimer ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
mutt and Gnus are, in typical configurations. Most distributions
kindly add all these helpful mailcap entries.
Perhaps you need assistance comprehending the word specific (used
twice in my question)? I await with interest your achieving that
Incoming from Florian Weimer:
* s. keeling:
People who don't use stupid Windows email clients have no trouble with
attachments at all. Attachments are a very useful tool; for instance,
for code listings, they arrive unmangled by line wrap.
Get a better email client, running on a
Rick Moen wrote:
Quoting David Mandelberg ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
You also asked a question about something I didn't say (I said that
the person had to open it).
Actually, no, you didn't. (Presumably you intended to, though.)
Your question spoke of opening a particularly-named
Martin Schulze wrote:
For the unstable distribution (sid) these problems have been fixed in
version 1.30.1-5.
A day later and unstable still has 1.30.1-4.2 and I see no 1.30.1-5 in
incoming. Did the upload go missing?
--
see shy jo
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Wed, 19 Jan 2005, Vassilii Khachaturov wrote:
I hope that I am not the only one who writes to the auto-ackers and
their postmasters that they're using stupid MUAs not honoring
Precedence: bulk
or
Precedence: junk
as well as the other list-control fields as a flags to not auto-respond.
I
On Wed, Jan 19, 2005 at 06:52:17AM -0500, David Mandelberg wrote:
I'm just suggesting that it should be harder for them to shoot
themselves in the foot i.e. by making .desktop's have the x bit before
they can be launched.
I strongly agree. No, I STRONGLY agree!
If they are to be marked
Title: Sie suchen Geschäftskontakte in Europa? Wir stellen diese Kontakte für Sie her!
Guten Tag, debian-security@lists.debian.orgDonnerstag, 20. Januar 2005 Unsere Werbeagentur möchte Sie informieren das Sie jetzt die Möglichkeit haben. Kostenloses anmelden in Suchmaschinen,
24 matches
Mail list logo
