Austin Godber [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I am interested in getting the solaris/SunOS emulation working on my SS5. I
have downloaded the solemul package. I am running the 2.2.5 kernel but don't
get an option to include solaris binary compatability. Is there a kernel
patch I need to apply or
Ben == Ben Collins [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Ben So for the record, right now libc6 2.1.1-2 is broken for all
Ben sun4m arch's in the unstable dist, so please don't upgrade to
Ben it, if you have sun4m. Sun4[udc] are known to work perfectly
Ben fine.
Unless running your
Tobias Bengtsson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I just got a Sparc Server 5 with no CD-ROM and no floppy, any
clues/documents you people got out there that can point me in the right
direction?
I am planning on installing Debian 2.1
Yes, um, the 2.1 install manual. See
So, um, how do we interface to the new autobuilding wanna-build on
kachina's machine. Theoretically, I should be able to (a) get a list
from the server or problem builds, (b) check out the pacakge for
manual compilation, and ... all that.
Is it ready for that yet?
If so, what are the relevant
Steve Dunham wrote:
Slink proposed-updates already has 2.2.5. Let's stick with that, it's
known to be good. Do you need me to make an image? If so, I just
gotta find the kernel config files used for 2.2.1 somewhere...
Oh yes, could you build them then post them somewhere I can download
On Thu, May 06, 1999 at 02:31:47AM -0400, Adam Di Carlo wrote:
So, um, how do we interface to the new autobuilding wanna-build on
kachina's machine. Theoretically, I should be able to (a) get a list
from the server or problem builds, (b) check out the pacakge for
manual compilation, and ...
Ben Collins [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
a) I already said the wanna-build db was on a seperate machine and gave
the URL for viewing the stats of builds and list of failed builds
Ah, missed that before.
Wanna-Build
http://marcus.seva.net/~buildd/
Interesting -- everything at
On Thu, May 06, 1999 at 09:34:40AM -0400, Adam Di Carlo wrote:
Ben Collins [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
a) I already said the wanna-build db was on a seperate machine and gave
the URL for viewing the stats of builds and list of failed builds
Ah, missed that before.
Wanna-Build
On Thu, May 06, 1999 at 09:34:40AM -0400, Adam Di Carlo wrote:
Interesting -- everything at
URL:http://marcus.seva.net/~buildd/unstable-stats/ is empty except
'needs-build.txt'
Oh, nm, that's the way it is supposed to be since the buildd is not
running yet.
I had the same problem with ypbind, it works perfectly if i use
broadcast (ie, i've server and clients in the same subnetwork), but if i
specify a server on a different subnet throught ypserver, it hangs
badly. i tried several version of yptools with no luck, so i think it's
a libc problem. As i
Juziel == juziel [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Juziel Eh? I tried building and running my own 2.2.7 both stock and
Juziel from CVS on my SS10... and under both Debian 2.1 and RH 6.0
Juziel ... none of those cases would boot 2.2.7 for me.
So, the question now is: has anyone be able to boot a SS10
Samuel Tardieu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So, the question now is: has anyone be able to boot a SS10 using
kernel 2.2.7?
I'm a newcomer to sparc-Debian but an old Debian user. I installed
my first sparc Linux box (SS20, 2CPUs, 288MB memory) on Sunday
evening.
After playing with it a bit, I
Just as a reference for those interested, I am sucessfulyl running 2.2.7
stock on an LX, so the problem is not with _all_ of the 4m machines, so
it would seem...
--Adam
On Thu, 6 May 1999, Heikki Vatiainen wrote:
Samuel Tardieu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So, the question now is: has anyone
Yeah... it seems as though the LX is the un-4m... :)
I've heard of people having audio working on the LX (with DBRI,
same as the 10 and 20, but I don't hear a peep outa my SS10).
A coworker also told me that X runs nicely in RH 6.0 on his LX,
while it croaks within 5 minutes on my SS10. (I'm
Gergely Madarasz wrote:
On Tue, 4 May 1999, Gergely Madarasz wrote:
It seems more wants to execute the environment, it does some really
strange things, then gets a segfault... here is the output:
Got it... while compiling it complained about some incompatible pointer
types with
Adam Di Carlo wrote:
Eric Delaunay [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
BTW, how should I commit my patches ?
Changes you want in the slink boot-floppies should be committed to a
local repository which is on the adam-boot-floppies_2-1_branch
branch.
Either I completely missed the point about
On Thu, May 06, 1999 at 07:22:54PM +0200, Eric Delaunay wrote:
Gergely Madarasz wrote:
On Tue, 4 May 1999, Gergely Madarasz wrote:
It seems more wants to execute the environment, it does some really
strange things, then gets a segfault... here is the output:
Got it... while
On Thu, May 06, 1999 at 01:19:41PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yeah... it seems as though the LX is the un-4m... :)
I've heard of people having audio working on the LX (with DBRI,
same as the 10 and 20, but I don't hear a peep outa my SS10).
A coworker also told me that X runs nicely in
18 matches
Mail list logo
