On Fri, 12 Jan 2001, Wichert Akkerman wrote:
Previously Ben Collins wrote:
My only concern now is, does 1.7.2 work if I recompile it against the
current libc6-dev. If it does, then the thing to do is start checking
the diff between these two versions for possible alignment issues.
Run
On Fri, Jan 12, 2001 at 01:36:23AM -0600, Adam Heath wrote:
On Fri, 12 Jan 2001, Wichert Akkerman wrote:
Previously Ben Collins wrote:
My only concern now is, does 1.7.2 work if I recompile it against the
current libc6-dev. If it does, then the thing to do is start checking
the diff
On Thu, Jan 11, 2001 at 10:59:03PM -0500, Ben Collins wrote:
On Thu, Jan 11, 2001 at 10:24:52PM +0100, Tomas Berndtsson wrote:
Ben Collins [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I originally thought it was a kernel issue from a user. Then when it
happened to be, I thought it was a kernel issue.
Ok, I've narrowed down the offending code to this 40k patch. Note, it
has nothing to do with the zlib using code, since I already tried
compiling --without-zlib, and it still gives a sigbus. If I take this
patch and do a -R with it on a 1.8.0 tree, and compile, I get no sigbus.
I've spent way too
damnit, here's the patch.
--
---===-=-==-=---==-=--
/ Ben Collins -- ...on that fantastic voyage... -- Debian GNU/Linux \
` [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] '
Ben Collins [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Ok, I've narrowed down the offending code to this 40k patch. Note, it
has nothing to do with the zlib using code, since I already tried
compiling --without-zlib, and it still gives a sigbus. If I take this
patch and do a -R with it on a 1.8.0 tree, and
The following patch(taking from suggestions in bug#74259) is the culprit(as
verified by Ben).
Index: lib/nfmalloc.c
===
RCS file: /cvs/dpkg/dpkg/lib/nfmalloc.c,v
retrieving revision 1.1
retrieving revision 1.2
diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2
---
On Fri, Jan 12, 2001 at 08:39:49PM +0100, Tomas Berndtsson wrote:
Ben Collins [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Ok, I've narrowed down the offending code to this 40k patch. Note, it
has nothing to do with the zlib using code, since I already tried
compiling --without-zlib, and it still gives a
On Fri, Jan 12, 2001 at 01:47:14PM -0600, Adam Heath wrote:
I am not sure if he did my suggestion of moving the long l to the last field
in the union, to see if that helps it.
Actually, it doesn't help. Union ordering isn't really significant, it's
just that the long double apprently sets
Previously Ben Collins wrote:
Sparc users, keep your old dpkg on hold, don't upgrade it.
No, do upgrade it and try to figure out where exactly it goes wrong.
Wichert.
--
/ Generally uninteresting signature - ignore at your
Ben Collins [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I originally thought it was a kernel issue from a user. Then when it
happened to be, I thought it was a kernel issue. After trying out an
older kernel, known to work well, I thought it was libc6, then I find
out that dpkg 1.7.2 works perfectly well. So
On Thu, 11 Jan 2001, Wichert Akkerman wrote:
Previously Ben Collins wrote:
Sparc users, keep your old dpkg on hold, don't upgrade it.
No, do upgrade it and try to figure out where exactly it goes wrong.
Btw, I'll look at this when I get home later tonight. This isn't saying I
know what is
Wichert Akkerman [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Previously Ben Collins wrote:
Sparc users, keep your old dpkg on hold, don't upgrade it.
No, do upgrade it and try to figure out where exactly it goes wrong.
See my original mail to debian-devel and debian-sparc for a piece of
the dpkg -D
On Thu, Jan 11, 2001 at 10:13:24PM +0100, Wichert Akkerman wrote:
Previously Ben Collins wrote:
Sparc users, keep your old dpkg on hold, don't upgrade it.
No, do upgrade it and try to figure out where exactly it goes wrong.
No, I don't want them to, because I will. I almost crapped up the
On Thu, Jan 11, 2001 at 10:24:52PM +0100, Tomas Berndtsson wrote:
Ben Collins [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I originally thought it was a kernel issue from a user. Then when it
happened to be, I thought it was a kernel issue. After trying out an
older kernel, known to work well, I thought it
15 matches
Mail list logo
