In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Thomas Hood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>"Miquel van Smoorenburg" wrote in part:
>> A thought just hit me.
>> What if we added a "update-rc.d enable|disable" command?
>
>This has already been wished for. See sysv-rc wish #214757
No, that's not what I mean. That i
On Sat, 2004-01-31 at 22:10, I wrote:
> Note that the expectation of the System V init system is
> that every service have either an S or a K symlink in each
> runlevel. If there is no symlink for a service in a particular
> runlevel then the behavior of sysv's invoke-rc.d is undefined
> for that
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Thomas Hood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Note that the expectation of the System V init system is
>that every service have either an S or a K symlink in each
>runlevel. If there is no symlink for a service in a particular
>runlevel then the behavior of sysv's invoke
Note that the expectation of the System V init system is
that every service have either an S or a K symlink in each
runlevel. If there is no symlink for a service in a particular
runlevel then the behavior of sysv's invoke-rc.d is undefined
for that service in that runlevel. Methods of shutting o
Thanks for all your replies. You've cleared this up for me.
Mike
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> -Original Message-
> From: Adam Aube [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, January 30, 2004 1:51 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: /etc/init.d/ - add/remove services
>
>
> On Friday 30 January 2004 04:36 pm, Ben Yau wrote:
> > I don'
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> What is the preferred way to add or remove a /etc/init.d/ service
> from certain runlevels?
'ln -s' and 'rm', respectively.
> The Debian Policy Manual and man pages suggest I should use
> update-rc.d rather than manipulate the symlinks directly.
They suggest that *De
On Friday 30 January 2004 04:36 pm, Ben Yau wrote:
> I don't know if there is a preferred way. There are many ways and
> choose the one you like. The convention I use is to rename the
> file/link with a "no" in front.
That reminds me of another way - rename the capital S or K to a lower
case. S
> -Original Message-
> From: s. keeling [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, January 30, 2004 12:39 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: /etc/init.d/ - add/remove services
>
>
> Incoming from Adam Aube:
> > On Friday 30 January 2004 03:15 pm, [EMAI
Incoming from Adam Aube:
> On Friday 30 January 2004 03:15 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > What is the preferred way to add or remove a /etc/init.d/ service from
> > certain runlevels?
>
> For adding, use the update-rc.d script. To remove, just manually delete
> the symlink. You can use update-r
On Friday 30 January 2004 03:15 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> What is the preferred way to add or remove a /etc/init.d/ service from
> certain runlevels?
For adding, use the update-rc.d script. To remove, just manually delete
the symlink. You can use update-rc.d to remove, but you would need to
What is the preferred way to add or remove a /etc/init.d/ service from certain
runlevels?
The Debian Policy Manual and man pages suggest I should use update-rc.d rather
than manipulate the symlinks directly. The man page for update-rc.d says,
"If any files /etc/rcrunlevel.d/[SK]??name alrea
12 matches
Mail list logo