On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 03:07:53PM -0400, Tomasz Maluszycki wrote:
> I would like to compile packages for my laptop by myself, and I'm
> tired of changing options in makefile by hand. Maybe is there way to
> add them by these configure scripts? If I remember correctly packages
> are built against i
On 2010-06-28 21:32 +0200, Sven Joachim wrote:
> On 2010-06-28 21:07 +0200, Tomasz Maluszycki wrote:
> > (for me -O3 is stable... I didn't had any problem with it)
>
> Depends on the program, I think. In general, -O3 produces bigger
> binaries (than -O2) that may or may not run faster. Mozilla
2010/6/28 Sven Joachim :
> On 2010-06-28 21:07 +0200, Tomasz Maluszycki wrote:
>
>> I would like to compile packages for my laptop by myself, and I'm
>> tired of changing options in makefile by hand. Maybe is there way to
>> add them by these configure scripts? If I remember correctly packages
>> a
On 2010-06-28 21:07 +0200, Tomasz Maluszycki wrote:
> I would like to compile packages for my laptop by myself, and I'm
> tired of changing options in makefile by hand. Maybe is there way to
> add them by these configure scripts? If I remember correctly packages
> are built against i386 architectu
I would like to compile packages for my laptop by myself, and I'm
tired of changing options in makefile by hand. Maybe is there way to
add them by these configure scripts? If I remember correctly packages
are built against i386 architecture, and for me it is waste of my CPU
capabilities;
for examp
5 matches
Mail list logo