Frank Gevaerts wrote:
> Bob Proulx wrote:
> > Stable is not up to handling gforge at the moment.
>
> There are packages for stable available though. They seem to work well.
There is a gforge backport for woody? You have my attention. Where
can I find such a beast. I tried backporting this mys
On Sun, Nov 16, 2003 at 11:11:03AM -0700, Bob Proulx wrote:
> Stable is not up to handling gforge at the moment.
There are packages for stable available though. They seem to work well.
Frank
--
"Debugging is twice as hard as writing the code in the first place.
Therefore, if you write the code
David Z Maze wrote:
> Philip Ross writes:
> > I am looking to migrate a few Red Hat boxes to Debian in the next
> > month or two and am currently wondering whether to install woody or
> > sarge.
You did not say but are those servers or desktops?
Desktop users tend to be brutal. They want the lat
"Philip Ross" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I am looking to migrate a few Red Hat boxes to Debian in the next
> month or two and am currently wondering whether to install woody or
> sarge.
If you're new to Debian, I'd strongly suggest starting with the stable
distribution (so, in this case, woody
On Sun, 2003-11-16 at 07:04, Philip Ross wrote:
> Given Red Hat updates will end at the end of the year, I want to get up and
> running with Debian before that. If sarge doesn't become stable until next
> year, would it be better to install woody now and upgrade to sarge in a few
> months, or inst
I am looking to migrate a few Red Hat boxes to Debian in the next month or
two and am currently wondering whether to install woody or sarge.
I've seen posts that suggest sarge will become the stable distribution soon
(http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2003/debian-devel-announce-20
0308
6 matches
Mail list logo
