I'm too. Every try acess to my laptop, when a folder start with big letter tha
happeined.
Subject: Bug in NautilusFrom: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Tue, 17 Jun
2008 13:56:00 +0200
Ciao a tutti, ho un problema nell'accesso ad una condivisione samba.Quanto
tento di montarla in na
As for epiphany, you should turn off (using gconf-editor)
apps/epiphany/general/managed_network. I'm not sure, but I beleive it
was allready mentioned on the list( I saw it somewhere). It was
annoying for me to.
I do not use Evolution much, but I can see
apps/evolution/shell/start_offline in gcon
2008/5/31 Peer Schaefer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Package: unknown
> Version: NN
>
> I am connected to the Internet via an Intel PRO/Wireless 3945ABG
> (iwl3945 module). Epiphany and Evolution work fine, but always start in
> "offline mode". To connect to any site resp. receive/send e-mail, I have
>
NN_il_Confusionario on 14/04/08 11:55, wrote:
On Mon, Apr 14, 2008 at 10:27:02AM +0100, Adam Hardy wrote:
NN_il_Confusionario on 13/04/08 17:11, wrote:
On Sun, Apr 13, 2008 at 01:16:37PM +0100, Adam Hardy wrote:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=464402
Tags: moreinfo;
I don't
On Mon, Apr 14, 2008 at 10:27:02AM +0100, Adam Hardy wrote:
> NN_il_Confusionario on 13/04/08 17:11, wrote:
> >On Sun, Apr 13, 2008 at 01:16:37PM +0100, Adam Hardy wrote:
> >>http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=464402
> > Tags: moreinfo;
> I don't see how you know this person is the m
Sven Joachim on 14/04/08 10:51, wrote:
On 2008-04-14 11:19 +0200, Adam Hardy wrote:
Paul Johnson on 13/04/08 18:43, wrote:
On Sunday 13 April 2008 05:16:37 am Adam Hardy wrote:
How do I do that - where do I look?
Email [EMAIL PROTECTED]
That gives me the following reply:
<[EMAIL PROTEC
On 2008-04-14 11:19 +0200, Adam Hardy wrote:
> Paul Johnson on 13/04/08 18:43, wrote:
>> On Sunday 13 April 2008 05:16:37 am Adam Hardy wrote:
>>
>>> How do I do that - where do I look?
>>
>> Email [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>
> That gives me the following reply:
>
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> SMTP error
NN_il_Confusionario on 13/04/08 17:11, wrote:
On Sun, Apr 13, 2008 at 01:16:37PM +0100, Adam Hardy wrote:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=464402
From that page:
Tags: moreinfo;
[snip]
Works for me.
[snip]
Of course, if we *do* find out which package is at fault w
Paul Johnson on 13/04/08 18:43, wrote:
On Sunday 13 April 2008 05:16:37 am Adam Hardy wrote:
How do I do that - where do I look?
Email [EMAIL PROTECTED]
That gives me the following reply:
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
SMTP error from remote server after RCPT command:
host bugs.debian.org[140.211
On Sunday 13 April 2008 05:16:37 am Adam Hardy wrote:
> How do I do that - where do I look?
Email [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Paul Johnson
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Adam Hardy wrote:
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=464402
>
> I can do bugreport emails, but I really would like to find out more about
> this bug in openoffice, mainly whether it's fixed.
>
> How do I do that - where do I look?
Look at the picture on the right hand side which
On Sun, Apr 13, 2008 at 01:16:37PM +0100, Adam Hardy wrote:
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=464402
>From that page:
Tags: moreinfo;
[snip]
Works for me.
[snip]
Of course, if we *do* find out which package is at fault we should fix
OOos dependencies, but...
Which m
On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 19:40:56 -0500, Rick Thomas wrote:
> It looks like the xterm package needs to depend on the xauth package --
> or at least recommend it.
>
No, this has nothing to do with xterm. openssh-server already suggests
xauth (or actually xbase-clients), and documents why in README
"updating the .zsync to reflect the new
location".
If zsync can't and won't follow http redirects, we might as well stop
generating them since they are indeed useless.
/Mattias Wadenstein
==reply to bug # 469919 by Robert Lemmen
From: [EMAIL PR
On Sun, Feb 24, 2008 at 11:44:34PM -0800, Hadi Nejati wrote:
> Newly I understand Our Sarge servers doesn't allow user connect via
> ssh except root. After inspecting the problem I found something
> strange. In /etc/nologin (I didn't create this file) there is
> something like that "System bootup
On Wed, Feb 20, 2008 at 09:44:47AM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
> On Tue, 19 Feb 2008, Tyler MacDonald wrote:
>
>> No such luck :-(
>
> A (hopefully final) fix for the problem was tested yesterday by
> Fabrice Lorrain <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> successfully. The
> packages versioned 0.826 just hit incomin
On Tue, 19 Feb 2008, Tyler MacDonald wrote:
No such luck :-(
A (hopefully final) fix for the problem was tested yesterday by
Fabrice Lorrain <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> successfully. The
packages versioned 0.826 just hit incoming and should be propagated
to unstable soon.
Sorry for the inconvience a
T o n g:
>Package: util-linux
>Version: 2.13-8
>Severity: normal
>Hi,
>I seem to have found a bug of getopt from the util-linux
>package. Please correct me if I'm wrong.
>I believe that the suggested way to call getopt is
> eval set -- `getopt -o -- "$@"`
>But I found that it can't handle
Version: 1:6.7.194-1
Nick Hastings wrote:
> I installed this too and it also returns the function of the
> brightness hot keys. So it seems whatever problems were introduced
> with the 6.7.193 driver have now been fixed.
>
Good to know, marking as fixed in 6.7.194 then.
Brice
--
To UNSUBS
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
[redirect to debian-user-german. Request for asking smart questions.]
Ralph Rupprich wrote:
> Hallo liebe Leute,
Hallo Ralph,
wir haben auf der englischsprachigen Debian-user-Mailingliste deinen
Eintrag gefunden, der sich dort nicht zuordnen lässt,
Tong Sun <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> So having a keyboard command 'x' or something can allows me,
...
> I don't know if this is possible.
Less normally allows you to change command-line options from within a
less session (just type "-" followed by the option...).
However, they seem to have int
On Fri, Jun 08, 2007 at 10:50:16AM -0400, Thane Poore wrote:
> Have just upgraded from Ubuntu 6.06 to Ubuntu 7.04 as instructed
> on their pages via installing Ubuntu 6.10 first. All seems well except
> for a shutdown problem. I had Sylpheed Claws GTK2 running with ClamAV
[snip description
Joey Hess wrote:
Peter Hillier-Brook wrote:
I've hit a bug in the code that handles character mode traffic and I'd be
grateful if someone could confirm the correct element under which to file
said bug. 'Console' is not recognised in the bug reporting system
kernels prior to 2.6.18-x-686. i.e
Peter Hillier-Brook wrote:
> I've hit a bug in the code that handles character mode traffic and I'd be
> grateful if someone could confirm the correct element under which to file
> said bug. 'Console' is not recognised in the bug reporting system
> kernels prior to 2.6.18-x-686. i.e. 2.6.17-2-68
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
piter_p_92 escribió:
> Hello!
> I've had some problem with testing ver. of debian: he don't founding hdd. I
> heard that some people have this problem too. I don't know is anybody who
> reported about this bug so i'm writing.
> Thx
Hey, whick is you
piter_p_92 wrote in Article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted
to gmane.linux.debian.user:
> I've had some problem with testing ver. of debian: he don't founding hdd.
> I heard that some people have this problem too. I don't know is anybody
> who reported about this bug so i'm writing. Thx
Is it a bug, o
On Wed, 2007-05-16 at 14:00 +0200, piter_p_92 wrote:
> Wiadomość Oryginalna
> Od: Greg Folkert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Do: DebianUser List
> Kopia do: piter_p_92 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Data: 16 maja 2007 7:47
> Temat: Re: Bug???
>
> > On Wed, 2007
On Wed, May 16, 2007 at 07:14:34AM +0200, piter_p_92 wrote:
> Hello!
>
> I've had some problem with testing ver. of debian: he don't
> founding hdd. I heard that some people have this problem too. I don't
> know is anybody who reported about this bug so i'm writing. Thx
>
> PS sorry for my engl
On Wed, 2007-05-16 at 07:14 +0200, piter_p_92 wrote:
> Hello!
> I've had some problem with testing ver. of debian: he don't founding
> hdd. I heard that some people have this problem too. I don't know is
> anybody who reported about this bug so i'm writing.
> Thx
>
> PS sorry for my english:P
Eng
On Mar 15, 2007, at 1:12 PM, Frans Pop wrote:
On Thursday 15 March 2007 17:44, Colin Watson wrote:
Personally I also feel that all possible solutions effectively make
/etc/fstab unreadable and unmaintainable.
The approach we took in Ubuntu was to put comments above each UUID
entry in /etc/fs
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 03/14/07 14:03, Joe Hart wrote:
> Ron Johnson wrote:
>> On 03/14/07 10:34, Joe Hart wrote:
>>> Celejar wrote:
>> [snip]
>>> I agree, yet I get when I point out that Debian does not
>>> support acroread because it is proprietary to Adobe. Go figure
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Florian Kulzer wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 14, 2007 at 16:34:36 +0100, Joe Hart wrote:
>
> [...]
>
>> I agree, yet I get berated when I point out that Debian does not support
>> acroread because it is proprietary to Adobe. Go figure.
>
> It is probably no
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Greg Folkert wrote:
> On Wed, 2007-03-14 at 10:16 -0500, John Hasler wrote:
>> Celejar wrote:
>>> So acroread uses about 10 times as much space as xpdf (and I haven't even
>>> looked closely at acroread's dependencies vs. those of xpdf).
>> Isn't Acror
On Wed, Mar 14, 2007 at 16:34:36 +0100, Joe Hart wrote:
[...]
> I agree, yet I get berated when I point out that Debian does not support
> acroread because it is proprietary to Adobe. Go figure.
It is probably not worth to harp on this much longer, but as far as I
remember it you received some
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ron Johnson wrote:
> On 03/14/07 10:34, Joe Hart wrote:
>> Celejar wrote:
>
> [snip]
>> I agree, yet I get when I point out that Debian does not
>> support acroread because it is proprietary to Adobe. Go figure.
>
> Can you post a link (from the ar
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 03/14/07 10:34, Joe Hart wrote:
> Celejar wrote:
>
[snip]
>
> I agree, yet I get berated when I point out that Debian does not
> support acroread because it is proprietary to Adobe. Go figure.
Can you post a link (from the archives) to the post
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Greg Folkert wrote:
> On Wed, 2007-03-14 at 04:35 -0600, Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote:
> [snip]
>> I agree. There is a tendency on the list to chastise topical questions
>> with "google for it" while OT threads go on for ever. BTW the list's
>> track record
On Wed, 2007-03-14 at 10:16 -0500, John Hasler wrote:
> Celejar wrote:
> > So acroread uses about 10 times as much space as xpdf (and I haven't even
> > looked closely at acroread's dependencies vs. those of xpdf).
>
> Isn't Acroread statically linked?
Yes, and as a rule, Debian frowns heavily on
On Wed, 2007-03-14 at 04:35 -0600, Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote:
[snip]
> I agree. There is a tendency on the list to chastise topical questions
> with "google for it" while OT threads go on for ever. BTW the list's
> track record in actually answering and solving *topical* questions, in
> my opinion,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Celejar wrote:
>> Ah the hidden dependencies. xpdf is a dummy package, that pulls in
>> xpdf-reader and xpdf-utils and xpdf-common. Adding those up comes quite
>> close to what acroread uses, so I guess my comparison is pretty useless.
>
> Um, no.
Celejar wrote:
> So acroread uses about 10 times as much space as xpdf (and I haven't even
> looked closely at acroread's dependencies vs. those of xpdf).
Isn't Acroread statically linked?
--
John Hasler
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? C
On Wed, 14 Mar 2007 04:35:07 -0600
Hugo Vanwoerkom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[snip]
> I agree. There is a tendency on the list to chastise topical questions
> with "google for it" while OT threads go on for ever. BTW the list's
> track record in actually answering and solving *topical* questio
On Wed, 14 Mar 2007 09:11:36 -0400
Juergen Fiedler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 13, 2007 at 04:30:52PM -0400, Celejar wrote:
> > On Tue, 13 Mar 2007 16:12:39 -0400
> > Juergen Fiedler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > [snip]
> >
> > > For documents on the web I have this inelegant a
On Tue, 13 Mar 2007 16:58:49 +0100
Joe Hart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Celejar wrote:
> > On Tue, 13 Mar 2007 11:23:27 +0100
> > Joe Hart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > [snip]
> >
> >> As for acroread goes, it has turned into a huge pack
On Tue, Mar 13, 2007 at 04:30:52PM -0400, Celejar wrote:
> On Tue, 13 Mar 2007 16:12:39 -0400
> Juergen Fiedler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> [snip]
>
> > For documents on the web I have this inelegant and heinous trick: I
> > google for them. If a doc is in PDF format, Google will give you the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote:
> Mike McCarty wrote:
>> Joe Hart wrote:
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>>
I doubt that this is specific to debian, but has anyone noticed
this bug in acroread? I've noticed that if I print pages in reverse, I
Mike McCarty wrote:
Joe Hart wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I doubt that this is specific to debian, but has anyone noticed
this bug in acroread? I've noticed that if I print pages in reverse, I
can't print in the forward direction until I quit the program and
restart it.
What happens
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Celejar wrote:
> On Tue, 13 Mar 2007 16:12:39 -0400
> Juergen Fiedler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> [snip]
>
>> For documents on the web I have this inelegant and heinous trick: I
>> google for them. If a doc is in PDF format, Google will give you t
On Tue, 13 Mar 2007 16:12:39 -0400
Juergen Fiedler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[snip]
> For documents on the web I have this inelegant and heinous trick: I
> google for them. If a doc is in PDF format, Google will give you the
> option to view it as HTML. The converted version is not always pretty
On Tue, Mar 13, 2007 at 07:39:09PM +0100, Joe Hart wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Mike McCarty wrote:
> > Joe Hart wrote:
> >
> > [snip]
> >>
> >> Noone is forcing you to use pdf files
> >>
> >> I disagree about it being forced on us. Many documents on the web ar
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Mike McCarty wrote:
> Joe Hart wrote:
>
> [snip]
>>
>> Noone is forcing you to use pdf files
>>
>> I disagree about it being forced on us. Many documents on the web are
>> PDF format. Most hardware comes without manuals and the documents are
>> p
Ron Johnson wrote:
> On 03/13/07 01:16, Joe Hart wrote:
> [snip]
>> Since you know so much about PDF files, let me ask you another
>> question. Does PDF have DRM capabilities built in?
>
> They can be password encrypted. Don't know about anything else.
Arguably the worst feature, however, may be
Joe Hart wrote:
[snip]
I disagree about it being forced on us. Many documents on the web are
PDF format. Most hardware comes without manuals and the documents are
pdf files.
You have an odd definition for the word "force".
We should thank Adobe that --despite the limitations-- their forma
Joe Hart wrote:
> Is postscript so bad that everyone needs pdf? No. The fact that PDF
> files are hard to edit is what makes them so popular in the business
> world.
>
pdf files are searchable. I cannot figure out how to search a .ps file under
gv. The search functionality is tremendously usef
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi, all,
>
> I doubt that this is specific to debian, but has anyone noticed
> this bug in acroread? I've noticed that if I print pages in reverse, I
> can't print in the forward direction until I quit the program and
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Celejar wrote:
> On Tue, 13 Mar 2007 11:23:27 +0100
> Joe Hart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> [snip]
>
>> As for acroread goes, it has turned into a huge package. The version in
>> my apt-cache shows 7.0.9, which is not the newest version, and it's
Gregory Seidman writes:
> ...PDF is just a page definition language.
It was. They keep adding to it...
--
John Hasler
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, 13 Mar 2007 11:23:27 +0100
Joe Hart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[snip]
> As for acroread goes, it has turned into a huge package. The version in
> my apt-cache shows 7.0.9, which is not the newest version, and it's a
> whopping 22911748 bytes. I imagine that 8.0 is even bigger.
>
> Whil
On Tue, Mar 13, 2007 at 01:02:17PM +0100, Florian Kulzer wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 13, 2007 at 12:51:09 +0100, Joe Hart wrote:
[...]
> > Is postscript so bad that everyone needs pdf? No. The fact that PDF
> > files are hard to edit is what makes them so popular in the business world.
>
> I think it w
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Florian Kulzer wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 13, 2007 at 12:51:09 +0100, Joe Hart wrote:
>
> [...]
>
>> Can you point me to a link where I can get the source for PDF? The DRM
>> information and all? IMO, Arcoread is just a marketing tool for Adobe
>> so tha
On Tue, Mar 13, 2007 at 12:51:09 +0100, Joe Hart wrote:
[...]
> Can you point me to a link where I can get the source for PDF? The DRM
> information and all? IMO, Arcoread is just a marketing tool for Adobe
> so that people will buy Acrobat. Very similar to Wordpad (until
> recently) being abl
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Johannes Wiedersich wrote:
>
> The concept behind pdf is a different one. The aim is not to have every
> thing printed to the margins on different paper sizes. The concept is
> that the printout, including line and page breaks, should be the same no
>
On Tue, 13 Mar 2007 02:33:04 -0500
Ron Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello Ron,
> > Since you know so much about PDF files, let me ask you another
> > question. Does PDF have DRM capabilities built in?
> They can be password encrypted. Don't know about anything else.
Printing can be disabl
On Tue, Mar 13, 2007 at 11:31:29 +0100, Johannes Wiedersich wrote:
> Joe Hart wrote:
> > As for acroread goes, it has turned into a huge package. The version in
> > my apt-cache shows 7.0.9, which is not the newest version, and it's a
> > whopping 22911748 bytes. I imagine that 8.0 is even bigger
Joe Hart wrote:
> My position comes from the fact that companies try to push their
> proprietary formats down our throats. PDF is a perfect example of a
> file type that I have disliked since I moved to Europe where the paper
> format is different than the US. With PDF files, one cannot change th
Florian Kulzer wrote:
> It is furthermore possible to write custom plug-ins which impose
> additional restrictions. For example, we once got a reprint-PDF for an
> article that we had published in a scientific journal. This PDF required
> a plug-in so that it could contact the publisher's server to
Joe Hart wrote:
> As for acroread goes, it has turned into a huge package. The version in
> my apt-cache shows 7.0.9, which is not the newest version, and it's a
> whopping 22911748 bytes. I imagine that 8.0 is even bigger.
>
> While KPDF may not be as feature rich, it does the job, and weighs i
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Florian Kulzer wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 13, 2007 at 02:33:04 -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> On 03/13/07 01:16, Joe Hart wrote:
>> [snip]
>>> Since you know so much about PDF files, let me ask you another
On Tue, Mar 13, 2007 at 02:33:04 -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 03/13/07 01:16, Joe Hart wrote:
> [snip]
> >
> > Since you know so much about PDF files, let me ask you another
> > question. Does PDF have DRM capabilities built in?
>
> They can
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 03/13/07 01:16, Joe Hart wrote:
[snip]
>
> Since you know so much about PDF files, let me ask you another
> question. Does PDF have DRM capabilities built in?
They can be password encrypted. Don't know about anything else.
>
> Joe
>
-BEGIN
Joe Hart wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Mike McCarty wrote:
[snip]
This is a limitation of the tools, not the file format.
There is no such problem with other files. Unfortunately, PDF has
become a standard. Luckily there are gpl tools that can handle them,
but I d
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Mike McCarty wrote:
> Joe Hart wrote:
>>
>> My position comes from the fact that companies try to push their
>> proprietary formats down our throats. PDF is a perfect example of a
>> file type that I have disliked since I moved to Europe where the pap
Joe Hart wrote:
My position comes from the fact that companies try to push their
proprietary formats down our throats. PDF is a perfect example of a
file type that I have disliked since I moved to Europe where the paper
format is different than the US. With PDF files, one cannot change the
pap
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Mike McCarty wrote:
>>> Amazing. OT threads covering abortion, religion, politics etc. ad
>>> nauseum persist for weeks with hardly a complaint, and this guy asks a
>>> question which is actually more or less on topic, and he gets chastized.
>> I as
Joe Hart wrote:
Amazing. OT threads covering abortion, religion, politics etc. ad
nauseum persist for weeks with hardly a complaint, and this guy asks a
question which is actually more or less on topic, and he gets chastized.
In answer, I have not noticed that. Normally, if I select reverse
I
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Mike McCarty wrote:
> Joe Hart wrote:
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>
>>> I doubt that this is specific to debian, but has anyone noticed
>>> this bug in acroread? I've noticed that if I print pages in reverse, I
>>> can't print in the forward dire
Joe Hart wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I doubt that this is specific to debian, but has anyone noticed
this bug in acroread? I've noticed that if I print pages in reverse, I
can't print in the forward direction until I quit the program and
restart it.
What happens when you use ghostvi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I doubt that this is specific to debian, but has anyone noticed
> this bug in acroread? I've noticed that if I print pages in reverse, I
> can't print in the forward direction until I quit the program and
> restart it.
Steve Langasek wrote:
On Fri, Feb 23, 2007 at 06:27:01PM -0600, Reid Priedhorsky wrote:
The following are the packages I upgraded between working and non-working USB:
2007-02-20 21:36:47 status installed libgphoto2-port0 2.2.1-16
2007-02-20 21:36:50 status installed libgphoto2-2 2.2.1-16
On Tue, Jan 30, 2007 at 11:50:00PM EST, Douglas Allan Tutty wrote:
> If you want to comment further, subscribe to the debian-boot list,
> subscribe to this bug, and address comments to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Actually, I didn't even have to subscribe to anything .. presumably
because I was the one wh
On Sat, Feb 10, 2007 at 08:11:06AM EST, Douglas Allan Tutty wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 09, 2007 at 04:30:12PM -0500, cga2000 wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 30, 2007 at 11:50:00PM EST, Douglas Allan Tutty wrote:
> > > On Tue, Jan 30, 2007 at 09:05:56PM -0500, cga2000 wrote:
>
> > > If you want to comment furthe
On Fri, Feb 09, 2007 at 04:30:12PM -0500, cga2000 wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 30, 2007 at 11:50:00PM EST, Douglas Allan Tutty wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 30, 2007 at 09:05:56PM -0500, cga2000 wrote:
> > If you want to comment further, subscribe to the debian-boot list,
> > subscribe to this bug, and address
On Tue, Jan 30, 2007 at 11:50:00PM EST, Douglas Allan Tutty wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 30, 2007 at 09:05:56PM -0500, cga2000 wrote:
> > I reported Bug #352758 almost a year ago and never received any
> > feedback.
> >
> > I am not familiar with the debian bug reports system
> You can track your bug
On 2/5/07, Hugo Vanwoerkom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Noah Dain wrote:
> When I go to http://syscp-forum.org/ and scroll down the page,
> iceweasel segfaults. It does so even with a fresh ~/.mozilla and
> running with "-safe-mode" option. The crash happens immediately and
> is 100% reproducible
Noah Dain wrote:
When I go to http://syscp-forum.org/ and scroll down the page,
iceweasel segfaults. It does so even with a fresh ~/.mozilla and
running with "-safe-mode" option. The crash happens immediately and
is 100% reproducible.
However, if I use env variable "MOZ_DISABLE_PANGO=1", icewe
Noah Dain writes:
> If I'm the only one in the world with the problem, big whoop.
It's still a bug even if no one else on this list is currently affected by
it. Please report it.
--
John Hasler
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [E
On 2/4/07, Michael Pobega <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Noah Dain wrote:
> When I go to http://syscp-forum.org/ and scroll down the page,
> iceweasel segfaults. It does so even with a fresh ~/.mozilla and
> running with "-safe-mode" option. The crash happens immediately and
> is 100% reproducible.
Noah Dain wrote:
When I go to http://syscp-forum.org/ and scroll down the page,
iceweasel segfaults. It does so even with a fresh ~/.mozilla and
running with "-safe-mode" option. The crash happens immediately and
is 100% reproducible.
Shouldn't this be sent to the bug report mailing list rather
On Tue, Jan 30, 2007 at 11:50:00PM EST, Douglas Allan Tutty wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 30, 2007 at 09:05:56PM -0500, cga2000 wrote:
> > I reported Bug #352758 almost a year ago and never received any
> > feedback.
> >
> > I am not familiar with the debian bug reports system and I am beginning
> > to won
On Wed, Jan 31, 2007 at 08:21:04AM EST, Alan Ianson wrote:
> On Tue January 30 2007 20:55, cga2000 wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 30, 2007 at 10:46:27PM EST, Alan Ianson wrote:
> > > On Tue January 30 2007 18:05, cga2000 wrote:
> > > > I reported Bug #352758 almost a year ago and never received any
> > > >
On Tue January 30 2007 20:55, cga2000 wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 30, 2007 at 10:46:27PM EST, Alan Ianson wrote:
> > On Tue January 30 2007 18:05, cga2000 wrote:
> > > I reported Bug #352758 almost a year ago and never received any
> > > feedback.
> > >
> > > I am not familiar with the debian bug reports
On Tue, Jan 30, 2007 at 10:46:27PM EST, Alan Ianson wrote:
> On Tue January 30 2007 18:05, cga2000 wrote:
> > I reported Bug #352758 almost a year ago and never received any
> > feedback.
> >
> > I am not familiar with the debian bug reports system and I am beginning
> > to wonder whether I forgot
On Tue, Jan 30, 2007 at 09:05:56PM -0500, cga2000 wrote:
> I reported Bug #352758 almost a year ago and never received any
> feedback.
>
> I am not familiar with the debian bug reports system and I am beginning
> to wonder whether I forgot something .. opened the bug report with the
> wrong mainta
On Tue January 30 2007 18:05, cga2000 wrote:
> I reported Bug #352758 almost a year ago and never received any
> feedback.
>
> I am not familiar with the debian bug reports system and I am beginning
> to wonder whether I forgot something .. opened the bug report with the
> wrong maintainer group ..
On Wednesday 31 January 2007 03:05, cga2000 wrote:
> Bug #352758
Your bug is sill here:
http://bugs.donarmstrong.com/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?maint=debian-boot%40lists.debian.org
--
Linux is like a tipi: no Windows, no Gate and an Apache inside
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with
Jose Manuel,
Esta lista es para discusiones en ingles. Si prefieres espanol, entoces
debes utilizar la lista [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, Jan 17, 2007 at 05:05:43PM +0100, José Manuel Ruiz wrote:
>
> Es posible que sea una protección del kernel para no reventar un
> sistema, pero creo que esto deb
On Tue, Jan 09, 2007 at 11:25:11PM -0600, Waqar Malik wrote:
> Forgot to add that I'm using using `unstable' repos.
>
> Another observation:
> Using ping adding an http:// in front of the address produces an "unknown
> host"
>
>
> wam:/home/waqar# ping -c 3 http://www.google.com
> ping: unkno
yes,
_many_ thanks! that was it. i thank you a lot! this i would not have found
alone. so no real bug, but pretty an annoyance. ;-)
akraix
> Check if you have the package "zeroconf" installed. It is known to do
> this kind of "helpful" automatic reconfiguration of NICs for an ad-hoc
> network.
On Wed, Nov 22, 2006 at 17:36:37 +0100, akraix wrote:
> hi,
>
> we are running two pcs with debian etch which we keep up to date. both have
> one strange problem: after booting the nics get assigned an apipa address
> instead of the static one from /etc/network/interfaces.
> the strange thing is
On Thu, Nov 02, 2006 at 01:42:11PM -0600, Sergio Cuéllar Valdés wrote:
From: Sergio Cuéllar Valdés <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: debian users
Subject: Re: bug with man ?
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.3 (2005-04-27) on murphy.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.6 re
601 - 700 of 1054 matches
Mail list logo
