On Fri, 27 Oct 2017 20:37:22 +0200
"Thomas Schmitt" wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Phil Dobbin wrote:
> > Kingsley Amis on his loss of libido when he turned fifty
>
> Not a problem any more in our times of digital wonders.
> In case of loss, simply re-install
> https://packages.debian.org/stretch/libido3-0
Done that, Phil, but can't see any change on my boot-up speed, nor in my
response time.
What else can you suggest?
Feeling down,
Saki
On 27 October 2017 at 21:03, Phil Dobbin wrote:
> On 27/10/17 19:37, Thomas Schmitt wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > Phil Dobbin wrote:
> >> Kingsley Amis on his loss
On 27/10/17 19:37, Thomas Schmitt wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Phil Dobbin wrote:
>> Kingsley Amis on his loss of libido when he turned fifty
>
> Not a problem any more in our times of digital wonders.
> In case of loss, simply re-install
> https://packages.debian.org/stretch/libido3-0.1-0
:-)
Cheers,
On 2017-10-27 16:41, John Hasler wrote:
Ric writes:
I wouldn't demean the Linux Counter effort calling it "Utterly
useless".
It's a simple statement of fact. The Linux Counter data is utterly
useless for the purpose of estimating the number of Linux users.
:%s/Linux/active Linux/g
Ric writes:
> I wouldn't demean the Linux Counter effort calling it "Utterly
> useless".
It's a simple statement of fact. The Linux Counter data is utterly
useless for the purpose of estimating the number of Linux users.
--
John Hasler
jhas...@newsguy.com
Elmwood, WI USA
Hi,
Phil Dobbin wrote:
> Kingsley Amis on his loss of libido when he turned fifty
Not a problem any more in our times of digital wonders.
In case of loss, simply re-install
https://packages.debian.org/stretch/libido3-0.1-0
Have a nice day :)
Thomas
On 27/10/17 17:27, Ric Moore wrote:
> On 10/26/2017 11:21 PM, John Hasler wrote:
>> Celejar writes:
>>> https://www.linuxcounter.net/
>>> I don't know how meaningful its data are.
>>
>> Utterly useless.
>
> I wouldn't demean the Linux Counter effort calling it "Utterly useless".
> Those folks hav
On 2017-10-27 14:27, Ric Moore wrote:
On 10/26/2017 11:21 PM, John Hasler wrote:
Celejar writes:
https://www.linuxcounter.net/
I don't know how meaningful its data are.
Utterly useless.
I wouldn't demean the Linux Counter effort calling it "Utterly
useless". Those folks have maintained the
On 10/26/2017 11:21 PM, John Hasler wrote:
Celejar writes:
https://www.linuxcounter.net/
I don't know how meaningful its data are.
Utterly useless.
I wouldn't demean the Linux Counter effort calling it "Utterly useless".
Those folks have maintained the site since 1999 or so. It is what it
On Fri 27/Oct/2017 05:21:48 +0200 John Hasler wrote:
> Celejar writes:
>> https://www.linuxcounter.net/
>> I don't know how meaningful its data are.
>
> Utterly useless.
Er... why was the OP looking for that data?
Ale
--
On 10/26/2017 09:38 PM, Karen Lewellen wrote:
Hi all,
Any place where this number exists? I would include those companies
and web professionals, using Linux servers as apart of their craft?
This isn't an easy question to answer, or probably even a meaningful
one, especially because it's easy
Celejar writes:
> https://www.linuxcounter.net/
> I don't know how meaningful its data are.
Utterly useless.
--
John Hasler
jhas...@newsguy.com
Elmwood, WI USA
On Thu, 26 Oct 2017 21:38:15 -0400 (EDT)
Karen Lewellen wrote:
> Hi all,
> Any place where this number exists? I would include those companies and
> web professionals, using Linux servers as apart of their craft?
https://www.linuxcounter.net/
I don't know how meaningful its data are.
> Thank
13 matches
Mail list logo
