Hi to Everyone,
My old Debian Stretch having crashed after last update, I installed
Bullseye. Most things operate OK after re-installing,
except so far: 'gphoto2' and my Epson Scanner Perfection v500.
I have re-installed the scanner using :
epsonscan2_6.7.43.0-1_amd64.deb and
epso
On Wednesday, January 11, 2023 11:11:04 AM daven...@tuxfamily.org wrote:
> Isn't ndiswrapper specific to networking/wireless network drivers?
> I don't think it just works for any kind of drivers. AS far as I can
> tell, it was designed specifically for WiFi cards.
I used it for Ethernet (not WiFi
Hello
On 2023-01-11 15:39, David Wright wrote:
On Wed 11 Jan 2023 at 14:25:39 (+), Ottavio Caruso wrote:
Local charity shop sells a desktop scanner for next to nothing. I
could buy it and try it but it's very bulky and it's a long walk. So
I'd like to have a clue bef
On Wed 11 Jan 2023 at 17:11:04 (+0100), daven...@tuxfamily.org wrote:
> On 2023-01-11 15:39, David Wright wrote:
> > On Wed 11 Jan 2023 at 14:25:39 (+), Ottavio Caruso wrote:
> > > Local charity shop sells a desktop scanner for next to nothing. I
> > > could buy
On 1/11/23 16:25, Ottavio Caruso wrote:
Local charity shop sells a desktop scanner for next to nothing. I could
buy it and try it but it's very bulky and it's a long walk. So I'd like
to have a clue beforehand if it's supported.
The item is a Packard Bell Slimline PB 6142
Ottavio Caruso wrote:
> Local charity shop sells a desktop scanner for next to nothing. I could buy
> it and try it but it's very bulky and it's a long walk. So I'd like to have
> a clue beforehand if it's supported.
>
> The item is a Packard Bell Slimline PB 6
On Wed 11 Jan 2023 at 14:25:39 (+), Ottavio Caruso wrote:
> Local charity shop sells a desktop scanner for next to nothing. I
> could buy it and try it but it's very bulky and it's a long walk. So
> I'd like to have a clue beforehand if it's supported.
>
>
On 1/11/23 09:26, Ottavio Caruso wrote:
Local charity shop sells a desktop scanner for next to nothing. I could
buy it and try it but it's very bulky and it's a long walk. So I'd like
to have a clue beforehand if it's supported.
The item is a Packard Bell Slimline PB 6142
On Thu, Apr 28, 2022 at 09:59:54PM +0200, diverses wrote:
> Hallo,
> mein USB Drucker ist kaputt gegangen. Da hatte ich z.B. ein Script
> geschrieben wo ich nach jeder Seite eine Taste gedrückt haben, dann wurde
> die nächste gescannt. Und zum Schluss eine Taste dann wurde daraus ein pdf
> gemacht
Hallo,
mein USB Drucker ist kaputt gegangen. Da hatte ich z.B. ein Script
geschrieben wo ich nach jeder Seite eine Taste gedrückt haben, dann
wurde die nächste gescannt. Und zum Schluss eine Taste dann wurde daraus
ein pdf gemacht und per Email versandt.
Auf die Schnelle habe ich nun ein HP EN
Hallo,
mein USB Drucker ist kaputt gegangen. Da hatte ich z.B. ein Script
geschrieben wo ich nach jeder Seite eine Taste gedrückt haben, dann
wurde die nächste gescannt. Und zum Schluss eine Taste dann wurde daraus
ein pdf gemacht und per Email versandt.
Auf die Schnelle habe ich nun ein HP EN
Hallo,
mein USB Drucker ist kaputt gegangen. Da hatte ich z.B. ein Script
geschrieben wo ich nach jeder Seite eine Taste gedrückt haben, dann
wurde die nächste gescannt. Und zum Schluss eine Taste dann wurde daraus
ein pdf gemacht und per Email versandt.
Auf die Schnelle habe ich nun ein HP EN
eting cards, etc.
> And also to occasionally satisfy the demand of a company or other
> institution, for some business-related or legal matter.
>
> After some thought, I am leaning toward just getting another
> stationary flatbed scanner only, rather than a multi-function device
> or
On Thu, Apr 22, 2021 at 10:27 AM Russell wrote:
>
> Brian wrote:
>
> > As with all of these asking for recommendations type questions, there
> > is little detail provided. For example, do you want a standalone scanner
> > or would an MFD suit?
> >
> >
Brian wrote:
> As with all of these asking for recommendations type questions, there
> is little detail provided. For example, do you want a standalone scanner
> or would an MFD suit?
>
> sane-airscan supports all modern MFDs. Shopping online would allow you
> to submit you
vid-19 or its mutations.
>
> Decisions, decisions . . .
As with all of these asking for recommendations type questions, there
is little detail provided. For example, do you want a standalone scanner
or would an MFD suit?
sane-airscan supports all modern MFDs. Shopping online would allow
On Mon, Apr 19, 2021, 09:12 Jonathan Dowland
wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 19, 2021 at 08:48:12AM +0200, john doe wrote:
> >You could choose a scanner that is 'complete'ly supported from the Sane
> >(1) project
> >
> >1) www.sane-project.org/sane-mfgs.html#SCANNERS
On Mon, Apr 19, 2021 at 08:48:12AM +0200, john doe wrote:
You could choose a scanner that is 'complete'ly supported from the Sane
(1) project
1) www.sane-project.org/sane-mfgs.html#SCANNERS
Excellent advice. For this reason I recently bought a 2nd-hand Canon
LiDE 25 and I'm
on the machine but you cannot use them.
>
> I tried to use xsane but that does not know the scanner.
My advice would be to read here:
https://github.com/alexpevzner/sane-airscan
sane-airscan is shipped on bullseye and in backports on buster. ipp-usb
is the default on bullseye (see its R
On 4/18/21 9:57 PM, Default User wrote:
Hi!
It may be time for a new scanner.
For years I have used a Visioneer OneTouch 7100 usb flatbed scanner on
various x86 computers running various versions of Debian and
simple-scan.
Currently:
Debian Unstable (updated, of course)
Linux 5.10.0-6-amd64
Gregory Seidman wrote:
> It's a cheap workhorse. I haven't tried it with Linux but it doesn't
> require any special software or drivers on macOS, which makes me think it
> is entirely open standard.
and how do you operate it on mac? and why you are posting when you are not
sure it works under lin
On 4/18/2021 9:57 PM, Default User wrote:
Hi!
It may be time for a new scanner.
For years I have used a Visioneer OneTouch 7100 usb flatbed scanner on
various x86 computers running various versions of Debian and
simple-scan.
Currently:
Debian Unstable (updated, of course)
Linux 5.10.0-6-amd64
https://www.usa.canon.com/internet/portal/us/home/products/details/scanners/photo-scanner/canoscan-lide-110
It's a cheap workhorse. I haven't tried it with Linux but it doesn't
require any special software or drivers on macOS, which makes me think it
is entirely open standard.
--
Hi!
It may be time for a new scanner.
For years I have used a Visioneer OneTouch 7100 usb flatbed scanner on
various x86 computers running various versions of Debian and
simple-scan.
Currently:
Debian Unstable (updated, of course)
Linux 5.10.0-6-amd64 #1 SMP Debian 5.10.28-1 (2021-04-09) x86_64
> I tried a freshly-formatted 16GB stick, and the document scanned
> successfully. The PDF is just shy of 40MB for 360 pages. The
Most likely the document is first scanned to a set of separate
uncompressed pages (maybe kept in separate files) and only converted to
a PDF at the end, hence the nee
sed. Would you be able
> to try an external hard drive connected via a USB adapter?
I tried a freshly-formatted 16GB stick, and the document scanned
successfully. The PDF is just shy of 40MB for 360 pages. The
scanner was hiccuping a lot toward the end, though - I suspect
that its algorithms
On Sat 03 Apr 2021 at 10:00:53 -0700, Charlie Gibbs wrote:
[...]
> I realize that this has turned into a review of the
> scanner, but I've gotten so far into it that I might
> as well see it through to the end. For now, connection
> to a computer is merely something it would
On 2021-04-03 1:00 p.m., Charlie Gibbs wrote:
On 2021-04-02 10:56 a.m., Charlie Gibbs wrote:
the error message. I forget the exact wording, but it
was pretty specific about the USB device being full,
as opposed to some sort of internal memory overflow.
Charlie,
It is also a possibility that y
On 2021-04-02 10:56 a.m., Charlie Gibbs wrote:
Emboldened by this, I went into the advanced options
and turned on "Continuous scan", then dropped in the
first part of a 300-page manual. Once the sheets
were scanned, the scanner asked me whether I had
more; I put in the next bundle
On Wed 31 Mar 2021 at 17:05:57 -0400, Stefan Monnier wrote:
[...]
> The option I favor is that the scan is controlled by your own computer,
> but you can trigger new scans by hitting buttons on the scanner
> (i.e. the button-presses get sent to your computer who then decides
> wh
-user. Have you
> > > seen all the replies to your post that await you there?
> >
> > Yes, I have. I just haven't had time to act on them. I did download
> > a driver from the Brother site but it had no effect. I suspect there's
> > something I'll
I did download
a driver from the Brother site but it had no effect. I suspect there's
something I'll have to do with xsane to get it to find the scanner.
I've poked that driver a bit and it looks like only USB-connection is
well supported, and there is no "Scan from your Computer
ut it had no effect. I suspect there's
something I'll have to do with xsane to get it to find the scanner.
(And then I'll have to go through it again with my wife's Macbook.)
Meanwhile I tried setting it up to use sftp, but I haven't managed
to get the authentication worked
On 2021-03-31 22:05, Stefan Monnier wrote:
Scanning the output to a server just seems plain obvious to me.
What's the downside?
It has its advantages, indeed. On the downsides:
- the scanner usually has a very limited UI, making it
difficult/inconvenient (if at all possible) to contro
On Tue, 30 Mar 2021 19:24:36 -0700
Charlie Gibbs wrote:
> I just got a Brother ADS-2700W sheet-fed scanner and am trying
> to access it from xsane. I've done a lot of flatbed scanning,
> first with an HP 3970, and lately with an Epson WF-2650 all-in-one,
> but I have a lot of o
> Scanning the output to a server just seems plain obvious to me.
> What's the downside?
It has its advantages, indeed. On the downsides:
- the scanner usually has a very limited UI, making it
difficult/inconvenient (if at all possible) to control and select the
scanning option
On Wed 31 Mar 2021 at 07:18:14 (-0400), Dan Ritter wrote:
> Charlie Gibbs wrote:
> > The one way I did manage to get the scanner to work was to a
> > USB flash drive. It quickly sucked in a handful of sheets,
> > scanned both sides, and wrote them to a file on the stick.
>
ere is an entry for
> your scanner. In my case with a brother scanner I had to manually add it, as
> the brother packages installation is missing this.
Yeah. I had a similar problem getting xsane to recognize my Fujitsu ScanSnap
1300. I searched the web on model number and found a deta
Am Mittwoch, 31. März 2021, 14:23:31 CEST schrieb Eduardo M
KALINOWSKI:
Hi,
please check in /lib/udev/rules.d/*-libsane1.rules if there is an entry for
your scanner. In my case with a brother scanner I had to manually add
it, as the brother packages installation is missing this.
Good luck
On Wed 31 Mar 2021 at 09:23:31 -0300, Eduardo M KALINOWSKI wrote:
> On 30/03/2021 23:24, Charlie Gibbs wrote:
> > The one way I did manage to get the scanner to work was to a
> > USB flash drive. It quickly sucked in a handful of sheets,
> > scanned both sides, and wrote
On 30/03/2021 23:24, Charlie Gibbs wrote:
The one way I did manage to get the scanner to work was to a
USB flash drive. It quickly sucked in a handful of sheets,
scanned both sides, and wrote them to a file on the stick.
If all else fails, I can work with it that way. But I'd
really li
ither") xsane?
In office environments, with shared resources, this is often
preferable. Having the scanner drop everything into a
samba-shared filesystem, for example...
-dsr-
On 31.03.2021 07:24, Charlie Gibbs wrote:
If anyone has gotten one of these newfangled machines to work
as a slave, rather than a master, please share your secrets.
aTdHvAaNnKcSe...
Have you tried to install a sane backend driver coming as a .deb package
from Brother website?
https://support
I just got a Brother ADS-2700W sheet-fed scanner and am trying
to access it from xsane. I've done a lot of flatbed scanning,
first with an HP 3970, and lately with an Epson WF-2650 all-in-one,
but I have a lot of old manuals I want to scan and upload to
Bitsavers, and a sheet feeder will
John Boxall wrote:
> On 2021-03-07 12:47 p.m., Brad Rogers wrote:
> > On Sun, 7 Mar 2021 17:34:59 +
> > Brian wrote:
> >
> > Hello Brian,
> >
> > > put it there because I tend to forget changes I make in /etc! In this
> >
> > You're using a computer; you don't /need/ to remember those chan
On Sun, 7 Mar 2021 13:11:26 -0500
John Boxall wrote:
Hello John,
>Brad, I agree 100%..unfortunately, like my memory, I use selective
>action.sometimes I create one and other times :-)
Sadly, Me too. :-(
--
Regards _
/ ) "The blindingly obvious is
/
gt;
> An Epson Perfection 2480 Photo.
An oldie! What you have done is the only way to to export this scanner
to the network. Hats off to the SANE project.
> So, having read a little further, maybe I could have used the Epson offering
> for a driver. I didn't because, well, I hadn'
On 2021-03-07 12:47 p.m., Brad Rogers wrote:
On Sun, 7 Mar 2021 17:34:59 +
Brian wrote:
Hello Brian,
put it there because I tend to forget changes I make in /etc! In this
You're using a computer; you don't /need/ to remember those changes.
Use the computer to do it for you.
IOW, create
. I didn't because, well, I hadn't read further and
because "it just worked" under Bullseye.
I haven't rebuilt the specific system in question to Buster yet, but on
my test system with the scanner attached the bug report fix worked fine.
--
Regards,
John Boxall
On Sun, 7 Mar 2021 17:34:59 +
Brian wrote:
Hello Brian,
>put it there because I tend to forget changes I make in /etc! In this
You're using a computer; you don't /need/ to remember those changes.
Use the computer to do it for you.
IOW, create a text file documenting those system additions
On Sun 07 Mar 2021 at 17:34:59 +, Brian wrote:
John,
I forgot to ask before - and forgot again! What device are you using?
--
Brian.
On Sun 07 Mar 2021 at 12:07:30 -0500, John Boxall wrote:
> On 2021-03-05 12:04 p.m., Brian wrote:
> >
> > Thank you, too. In the light of your issue, the Troubleshooting section
> > now has a link to the bug report. Hopefully, this will help users.
> >
>
> Brian, in the reference to the bug rep
On 2021-03-05 12:04 p.m., Brian wrote:
Thank you, too. In the light of your issue, the Troubleshooting section
now has a link to the bug report. Hopefully, this will help users.
Brian, in the reference to the bug report, were you referring to the file:
/etc/udev/rules.d/65-libsane.rules
Con
On Fri 05 Mar 2021 at 10:28:27 -0500, John Boxall wrote:
> On 2021-03-05 6:05 a.m., Brian wrote:
>
> > > [1}
> > > https://wiki.debian.org/SaneOverNetwork#Sharing_a_USB_Connected_Scanner:_the_Basics
> >
> > The note on Bug #918358 towards the end of
> &g
On 2021-03-05 6:05 a.m., Brian wrote:
[1}
https://wiki.debian.org/SaneOverNetwork#Sharing_a_USB_Connected_Scanner:_the_Basics
The note on Bug #918358 towards the end of
https://wiki.debian.org/Scanner#perms
could help with a solution.
Once I looked at the bug report it most certainly
On 2021-03-05 4:50 a.m., David Pottage wrote:
David,
Thank you for the detailed instructions.
I hope this solves your problem. I struggled with that exact issue a
couple of months ago, and I know how frustrating it can be.
It should. I will try it later today. The frustration was amplified
On 2021-03-05 3:38 a.m., Darac Marjal wrote:
First of all, you might need to give us some hint as to how it doesn't
work?
Agreed...bad form...no excuse.
"scanimage -L" on the client did not show the scanner whereas on the
server it did. I tried from both root and non-root use
On Thu 04 Mar 2021 at 18:38:09 -0500, John Boxall wrote:
> I have been trying for some time to setup a system that will share an
> attached scanner over the network. I had hoped to use Buster as it is still
> the stable instance of Debian. I have followed everything in [1] but I could
&g
On 2021-03-04 23:38, John Boxall wrote:
I have been trying for some time to setup a system that will share an
attached scanner over the network. I had hoped to use Buster as it is
still the stable instance of Debian. I have followed everything in [1]
but I could never get it to work. I then
On 04/03/2021 23:38, John Boxall wrote:
> I have been trying for some time to setup a system that will share an
> attached scanner over the network. I had hoped to use Buster as it is
> still the stable instance of Debian. I have followed everything in [1]
> but I could never get i
I have been trying for some time to setup a system that will share an
attached scanner over the network. I had hoped to use Buster as it is
still the stable instance of Debian. I have followed everything in [1]
but I could never get it to work. I then tried Bullseye and it worked
right away
George Shuklin (12020-08-07):
> > scanimage -d "hpaio:/net/deskjet_3050a_j611_series?ip=10.0.1.155"
> > xsane "hpaio:/net/deskjet_3050a_j611_series?ip=10.0.1.155"
> >
> > Where do I write this URL so that tools find it without having to tell
> > them each time?
> >
> > Thanks.
> >
> I've just ye
is URL so that tools find it without having to tell
them each time?
Thanks.
I've just yesterday got a partial success by just adding this
into /etc/sane.d/saned.conf
tcp 192.168.9.114
After that scanimage just works.
(that was our office scanner). I was able to scan from normal position
but wasn't able to use feeder.
On Wed, Jul 29, 2020 at 07:28:21PM +0100, Brian wrote:
> On Wed 29 Jul 2020 at 12:07:08 +0200, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
> > [...] can read C.
>
> Reviewing a patch for a non-extisting bug? That's above and beyond the
> call of duty :).
Always glad to please ;-P
Perhaps I should temper my offer.
On Wed 29 Jul 2020 at 12:07:08 +0200, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 29, 2020 at 11:11:22AM +0200, Nicolas George wrote:
>
> > If the patch is to be rejected, or just ignored, then my time would be
> > better invested in an external work-around, it would be less effort than
> > forking, an
On Wed, Jul 29, 2020 at 11:11:22AM +0200, Nicolas George wrote:
> Stefan Monnier (12020-07-28):
> > The fact that you sometimes can, seems a clear indication that the
> > underlying design still makes it possible [...]
> "Significant" is a subjective threshold. Probing is less reliable than
> conf
Stefan Monnier (12020-07-28):
> The fact that you sometimes can, seems a clear indication that the
> underlying design still makes it possible: you just need a bit of code
> somewhere in SANE so you can specify this URL in a more central place
> than on the command line. IOW, a trivial new feature
On Mon, 27 Jul, 2020 at 15:38:57 +0200, Nicolas George wrote:
> John Boxall (12020-07-27):
> > I was having the same problem with the same model mfp. I had to go into the
> > HPLIP Toolbox app and setup the printer. Once I did that xsane and simple
> > scan could find the sca
On Tue 28 Jul 2020 at 09:56:20 -0400, Stefan Monnier wrote:
> > And the fact that hpaio relies on CUPS is inexcusable.
>
> I don't see why: first, AFAICT it is still fully functional without
> CUPS, and the fact that it tries to make use of CUPS's config
> information in order to overcome specifi
>> >> The problem is with scanner that are
>> I'm not sure where you found assignment of blame in what I wrote.
> "The problem is" is an assignment of technical blame.
I was just pointing out in which circumstances the problem appears.
No blame was meant an
Stefan Monnier (12020-07-27):
> >> The problem is with scanner that are
> I'm not sure where you found assignment of blame in what I wrote.
"The problem is" is an assignment of technical blame.
> Apparently not 100% so since it works if you provide the URI explici
I predict that SANE will blame hpaio and hpaio will not care that people
> do not want to run CUPS needlessly.
The assertion is:
libsane-hpaio relies on CUPS to detect networked all-in-one
scanner-printers. That means that if CUPS is not running,
networked devices are usable by spe
On Mon, Jul 27, 2020 at 11:49:59PM +0200, Nicolas George wrote:
[...]
> This is a sadly classic pattern in Libre software: "not my problem, it's
> the other project doing it wrong".
...and of all the rest of humanity, too.
Cheers
-- t
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Nicolas George [2020-07-27 23:49:59] wrote:
> Stefan Monnier (12020-07-27):
>> Indeed. And given SANE's design, there shouldn't be much need for it:
>> it assumes that either the scanner is local (via a hardware-specific
>> driver, hpaio being one of them) or it&#x
Stefan Monnier (12020-07-27):
> Indeed. And given SANE's design, there shouldn't be much need for it:
> it assumes that either the scanner is local (via a hardware-specific
> driver, hpaio being one of them) or it's remotely accessed over the SANE
> protocol, in wh
>> It's definitely possible with SANE. But apparently not with `hpaio`.
> I insist: it is not possible with SANE to specify a list of extra
> scanners.
Indeed. And given SANE's design, there shouldn't be much need for it:
it assumes that either the scanner is loc
On Mon 27 Jul 2020 at 15:09:52 -0400, Gene Heskett wrote:
> At high risk of hyjacking the thread, ...
You have driven a bulldozer through it. Please go away, think about what
you want to say and devise a new post to express your particular issue.
And don't do it again. You should know better and
> https://help.ubuntu.com/community/sane
> >
> > I did, and as expected it does not work, because
> >
> > "hpaio:/net/deskjet_3050a_j611_series?ip=10.0.1.155"
> >
> > looks nothing like the provided examples:
> >
> > 192.168.0.15
>
d it does not work, because
>
> "hpaio:/net/deskjet_3050a_j611_series?ip=10.0.1.155"
>
> looks nothing like the provided examples:
>
> 192.168.0.15
> ::1
> localhost
> scan-server.office.lan
>
> net.conf is for scanner shared with SANE's protocol
On Mon 27 Jul 2020 at 19:12:10 +0200, Nicolas George wrote:
> Brian (12020-07-27):
> > Ok, libsane-hpaio requires libcups.so.2. That's nowhere near requiring
> > CUPS, in particular cups-daemon. The printing system is not involved
> > with scanning.
>
> This is the last time I grace you with a re
Nicolas George:
> Siard (12020-07-27):
> > It looks simple to me, or am I missing something?
>
> Does it add the scanner in Gimp's scanner menu?
Ah, I guess I see what I was missing.
Nicolas George (12020-07-27):
> Well, in between explaining why all the answers I got do not match the
> question, I RTFS, and it seems indeed it is not possible with SANE. What
> stupid design.
>
> As for the hpaio backend, it relies on CUPS to find networked printers,
> but CUPS will not be alwa
Siard (12020-07-27):
> It looks simple to me, or am I missing something?
Does it add the scanner in Gimp's scanner menu?
Regards,
--
Nicolas George
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Mon, 27 Jul 2020 11:58:44 +0200, Nicolas George wrote:
> This may be an obvious thing, but I cannot find the answer.
>
> I can scan with:
>
> scanimage -d "hpaio:/net/deskjet_3050a_j611_series?ip=10.0.1.155"
> xsane "hpaio:/net/deskjet_3050a_j611_series?ip=10.0.1.155"
>
> Where do I write thi
SANE. But apparently not with `hpaio`.
> > libsane-hpaio is a backend that conforms to the SANE standard.
>
> On one end, yes. On the other end it talks the HPAIO "standard".
>
> I was talking about the network protocol. Apparently his scanner is not
> connected to a `s
Brian (12020-07-27):
> Ok, libsane-hpaio requires libcups.so.2. That's nowhere near requiring
> CUPS, in particular cups-daemon. The printing system is not involved
> with scanning.
This is the last time I grace you with a reply. As I have told you twice
now, unlike you, I have read the source cod
On Mon 27 Jul 2020 at 18:39:45 +0200, Nicolas George wrote:
> Brian (12020-07-27):
> > libsane-hpaio needs CUPS to deal with scanners? Imagination is a great
> > asset. Sometimes!
>
> If you do not believe me, just RTFS or use ldd and nm to check.
Ok, libsane-hpaio requires libcups.so.2. That's
Brian (12020-07-27):
> libsane-hpaio needs CUPS to deal with scanners? Imagination is a great
> asset. Sometimes!
If you do not believe me, just RTFS or use ldd and nm to check.
Regards,
--
Nicolas George
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
o the SANE standard.
On one end, yes. On the other end it talks the HPAIO "standard".
I was talking about the network protocol. Apparently his scanner is not
connected to a `saned` daemon (that would talk the SANE protocol) but
talks an HPAIO-specific protocol instead.
Discovery
Stefan Monnier (12020-07-27):
> It's definitely possible with SANE. But apparently not with `hpaio`.
I insist: it is not possible with SANE to specify a list of extra
scanners.
And since SANE lies between applications and back-ends, it is the
correct place to implement it.
Regards,
--
Nicol
On Mon 27 Jul 2020 at 12:05:15 -0400, Stefan Monnier wrote:
>
> > Well, in between explaining why all the answers I got do not match the
> > question, I RTFS, and it seems indeed it is not possible with SANE.
>
> It's definitely possible with SANE. But apparently not with `hpaio`.
libsane-hpai
Well, I am pretty sure I know my situation better than you.
>From xsane(1)
xsane accesses image acquisition devices through the SANE (Scanner
Access Now Easy) interface. The list of available devices depends on
installed hardware and configuration. When invoked without an explicit
devicenam
>> That's the kind of reason why I don't like using printer's own network
>> facilities and prefer to connect them over USB to a local GNU/Linux
>> server which can then share them over CUPS&SANE.
> There will be no computer close enough to the printer to do the job.
Indeed, it's not always a conv
Brian (12020-07-27):
> Scanning with xsane or simple-scan only works by specifying a URI? You
> don't think this is an issue, in spite of its not being the experience
> of most users?
Well, I am pretty sure I know my situation better than you.
But if you insist to know: hpaio detects networked sc
On Mon 27 Jul 2020 at 16:15:30 +0200, Nicolas George wrote:
> Brian (12020-07-27):
> > > To summarize: I want to tell SANE URLs for network-connected scanners so
> > > that they can be presented to the users in GUI dialogs.
> >
> > Not much chance of that happeni
Stefan Monnier (12020-07-27):
> That's the kind of reason why I don't like using printer's own network
> facilities and prefer to connect them over USB to a local GNU/Linux
> server which can then share them over CUPS&SANE.
There will be no computer close enough to the printer to do the job.
And
> net.conf is for scanner shared with SANE's protocol. Notice the "hpaio:"
> fake URL protocol.
That's the kind of reason why I don't like using printer's own network
facilities and prefer to connect them over USB to a local GNU/Linux
server which can then sha
nothing like the provided examples:
192.168.0.15
::1
localhost
scan-server.office.lan
net.conf is for scanner shared with SANE's protocol. Notice the "hpaio:"
fake URL protocol.
Regards,
--
Nicolas George
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On 7/27/20 4:32 PM, Nicolas George wrote:
> Georgi Naplatanov (12020-07-27):
>> I'm not sure how you share the scanner(s) - with saned or if those are
>> some kind of network scanners.
>
> I do not share the scanner, the scanner shares itself.
>
> To summari
Brian (12020-07-27):
> > To summarize: I want to tell SANE URLs for network-connected scanners so
> > that they can be presented to the users in GUI dialogs.
>
> Not much chance of that happening if SANE cannot see the scanner.
Well, if I write
scanner "hpaio:/net/deskj
1 - 100 of 1049 matches
Mail list logo
