Re: glib-version 2.0 1.2.6 ?

2003-02-12 Thread Kai Wassermann
Hallo Uwe, Hast Du mal nachgeschaut, wie das configure nach der glib sucht. Mein Verdacht ist, dass er die Ausgabe von glib-config --version parsen will. Hab mal nachgeschaut (in configure), hab da auch was gefunden, was ich aber nicht deuten kann. (Sollte mich wohl mehr mit C/C++

Re: glib-version 2.0 1.2.6 ?

2003-02-12 Thread Kai Wassermann
Hallo Adrian, in config.log findest du die genaue Fehlermeldung. Eine wirkliche Fehlermeldung hab ich nicht gefunden. Die letzte Zeile lautet: configure: exit 1 Und als ich nach '$? = 1' gesucht habe, hab ich diverse Fehlermeldungen vom gcc gesehen. Du hast libglib1.2 aus testing oder

glib-version 2.0 1.2.6 ?

2003-02-11 Thread Kai Wassermann
Hallo Liste, ich wollte mir gerade sylpheed selbst kompilieren, damit auch gpg etc. unterstützt wird, und siehe da, eine Fehlermeldung, die ich nicht verstehe, weil ich bis jetzt (fast) alles an Abhängigkeiten mit deselect oder aptitude aufgelöst habe. Hier die Fehlermeldung: checking for GLIB

Re: glib-version 2.0 1.2.6 ?

2003-02-11 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Tue, Feb 11, 2003 at 03:21:30PM +0100, Kai Wassermann wrote: Hallo Liste, Hallo Kai, ich wollte mir gerade sylpheed selbst kompilieren, damit auch gpg etc. unterstützt wird, und siehe da, eine Fehlermeldung, die ich nicht verstehe, weil ich bis jetzt (fast) alles an Abhängigkeiten mit

Re: glib-version 2.0 1.2.6 ?

2003-02-11 Thread Uwe Zeisberger
Kai Wassermann wrote: Hallo Liste, ich wollte mir gerade sylpheed selbst kompilieren, damit auch gpg etc. unterstützt wird, und siehe da, eine Fehlermeldung, die ich nicht verstehe, weil ich bis jetzt (fast) alles an Abhängigkeiten mit deselect oder aptitude aufgelöst habe. Hier die

Linux Today - LinuxPR: New Libranet GNU/Linux Version 2.0 Released

2002-02-08 Thread Larry Shields
No I do not work for Libranet, but thought all of you who are on the debian list, might want to check it out...I myself have been using Libranets CD's since they first came out...An easy install, plus a full year of on-line help, and libranets user list at [EMAIL PROTECTED], for those that

Version 2.0 to 2.1 upgrade

1999-03-14 Thread Simon Martin
Hi All I just updated from 2.0 to 2.1. Everything went smoothly except for the sendmail installation. Sendmail found my existing install and asked me whether I wanted to keep it or not, I said keep. Unfortunately there seem to be a few side effects with this. 1) sendmail.cf has been moved from

Re: Version 2.0 to 2.1 upgrade

1999-03-14 Thread thomas lakofski
On Sun, 14 Mar 1999, Simon Martin wrote: 1) sendmail.cf has been moved from /etc to /etc/mail, but the script /etc/init.d/sendmail checks for the existence if the /etc/sendmail.cf command before it executes anything. There should be a file /etc/init.d/sendmail.dpkg-new -- you might want to

RE: Version 2.0 to 2.1 upgrade

1999-03-14 Thread Simon Martin
Thanks Thomas, Works like a dream and it even makes sense! -Original Message- From: thomas lakofski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 14 March 1999 11:19 To: Simon Martin Cc: Debian-user list Subject: Re: Version 2.0 to 2.1 upgrade On Sun, 14 Mar 1999, Simon Martin wrote: 1

Is ssh version 2.0.x going to be added to Debian ?

1998-12-04 Thread Geoffrey L. Brimhall
I noticed that a version 2.0.x of the SSH has been released, which looked pretty cool (it has a secure ftp, for instance !). Is this going to be put into Debian at some time ? If not, what are the issue (not enough free time to do it, not-freeware-enough-license, etc) ? Thanks ! Geoff Brimhall

Re: Is ssh version 2.0.x going to be added to Debian ?

1998-12-04 Thread J.H.M. Dassen \(Ray\)
On Wed, Dec 09, 1998 at 14:14:18 -0800, Geoffrey L. Brimhall wrote: Is this going to be put into Debian at some time ? Perhaps. If someone volunteers to package it. If not, what are the issue (not enough free time to do it, not-freeware-enough-license, etc) ? SSH2's license defines

Version 2.0

1996-09-18 Thread Ricardo Kleemann
Hi, Some are saying that 2.0.20 may be the final 2.0 version... Does debian already have 2.0.20 in its stable tree? If I buy a Debian CD, will it come with 2.0.20? Thx. Ricardo

Re: Version 2.0

1996-09-18 Thread Bruce Perens
If you buy a Debian CD, it may not come with 2.0.20 . However, you will be able to download a package from our FTP site and upgrade your system to 2.0.20 . It should be about 2MB for the binary kernel package, 5MB for the full kernel source. Installing a package takes a one-line shell command.

Version 2.0

1996-09-18 Thread Randy Gobbel
On Tue, 17 Sep 1996 13:04:18 -0700, Ricardo Kleemann [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: Some are saying that 2.0.20 may be the final 2.0 version... Does debian already have 2.0.20 in its stable tree? I hope that's not the case, because there are bugs in the Adaptec drivers (aic7xxx) in 2.0.20 that were

Re: Version 2.0

1996-09-18 Thread Paul Christenson \[N3EOP\]
Bruce Perens wrote: However, you will be able to download a package from our FTP site and upgrade your system to 2.0.20 . Installing a package takes a one-line shell command. So, when will the kernel-package appear on the CD-ROM distributions? I had to recompile the kernel before I could