> On Thu, 9 Jul 1998, Jeff Schreiber wrote:
>
> > >I'm with you. I think a larger subset of folks will screw this up. I'm sure
> > >it's an attempt to save a bit of bandwidth, but . . .
> >
> > Personally I think it's cool.
>
> i agree. just cut and paste the line into an xterm window or c
On Thu, 9 Jul 1998, Jeff Schreiber wrote:
> >I'm with you. I think a larger subset of folks will screw this up. I'm sure
> >it's an attempt to save a bit of bandwidth, but . . .
>
> Personally I think it's cool.
i agree. just cut and paste the line into an xterm window or console.
what cou
On Thu, Jul 09, 1998 at 01:50:13AM -0400, Daniel Martin at cush wrote:
>
>>> Unsubscribe? mail -s unsubscribe [EMAIL PROTECTED] <
/dev/null
>
>> Does this message strike anyone as significantly less helpful than the
>> former "mail a message with the subject "unsubscribe" to
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Pann McCuaig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> Does this message strike anyone as significantly less helpful than the
>> former "mail a message with the subject "unsubscribe" to
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]" message? I'll grant you that
>> people screwed that up too, but this seems to be asking for people
On Wed, Jul 08, 1998 at 11:22:47PM -0700, Pann McCuaig wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 09, 1998 at 01:50:13AM -0400, Daniel Martin at cush wrote:
>
> >> Unsubscribe? mail -s unsubscribe [EMAIL PROTECTED] < /dev/null
>
> > Does this message strike anyone as significantly less helpful than the
> > former "ma
On Thu, Jul 09, 1998 at 01:50:13AM -0400, Daniel Martin at cush wrote:
>> Unsubscribe? mail -s unsubscribe [EMAIL PROTECTED] < /dev/null
> Does this message strike anyone as significantly less helpful than the
> former "mail a message with the subject "unsubscribe" to
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]" messag
6 matches
Mail list logo
