-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hi,
On 3/6/19 5:40 am, Martin T wrote:
> What could be the most elegant workaround in this situation? Create
> a /usr/sbin/sendmail wrapper script which processes the
> "/usr/sbin/sendmail -oi -t" command called by apt_listchanges.py
> and sends th
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 3/6/19 7:40 pm, Jérôme BATAILLE wrote:
> Hi dear debian users.
>
> Does someone knows if paste.debian.net is discontinued ?
It's back so it must have been a temp issue.
Cheers
A.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
iHUEAREIAB0WIQTJAoMHtC6YydLf
n though they won't be able to do successfully due to up to
date patch status.
[1] This Showdan query needs a login:
https://www.shodan.io/search?query=product%3Aexim+-4.92
[2]
https://www.bleepingcomputer.com/news/security/millions-of-exim-mail-ser
vers-exposed-to-local-remote-attacks/
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 20/6/19 11:57 pm, Brian wrote:
> On Thu 20 Jun 2019 at 23:26:08 +1000, Andrew McGlashan wrote:
>
>> # dpkg-query -l|grep \ exim|awk '{print $2,$3}'|column -t exim4
>> 4.89-2+deb9u4 exim4-base 4.89-2+d
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 20/6/19 11:45 pm, Reco wrote:
> Hi.
>
> On Thu, Jun 20, 2019 at 11:26:08PM +1000, Andrew McGlashan wrote:
>> Is there a way to provide version of "4.92" easily or some other
>> text to stop the likelihood of o
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hi,
On 21/6/19 4:49 am, Reco wrote:
>> Thank you, I've changed the banner for now let's hope that
>> lessens the problem.
>
> Please share the results if possible.
>
> On this particular MTA I've counted whopping 4 attempts to exploit
> CVE-2
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hi,
On 20/6/19 4:28 pm, Reco wrote:
> Hi.
>
> On Thu, Jun 20, 2019 at 01:03:50AM +0200, Matthew Crews wrote:
>> On 6/19/19 3:30 PM, Lazar Tadić wrote:
>>> Don't worry Mathew, 32-bit arch is currently 2nd most popular
>>> arch on Debian. There's no
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 21/6/19 4:08 pm, Reco wrote:
> What I'm most interested is here is the time distribution. I.e. has
> the number of exploitation attempts lowered after the Exim banner
> change? Stayed the same?
Not a single one since, so far.
Although I di
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 21/6/19 11:44 pm, Felix Miata wrote:
> Andrew McGlashan composed on 2019-06-21 20:03 (UTC+1000):
>
>> Most, if not all 32 bit arch machines are probably going to
>> consume far more energy than newer machines of far gre
level yet.
- --
Kind Regards
AndrewM
Andrew McGlashan
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
iHUEAREIAB0WIQTJAoMHtC6YydLfjUOoFmvLt+/i+wUCXQ3XpwAKCRCoFmvLt+/i
+1m2AQC3UI8NrRBM/Z1zoRWA4i6zQbyLbt0dGRsILlPHTTQp+wEAjN4S3rSewR3G
BdfMh0Uzir8r4IRtMuLKPAQ42mAEAHc=
=T3vu
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hi,
On 22/6/19 6:24 pm, john doe wrote:
>> I've blacklisted quite a number of IP addresses and CIDR blocks
>> from delivering email to my server with entries in the
>> /etc/exim4/local_host_blacklist file.
>>
>> Is there any config file that I can
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Slightly improved shell script, uses iprange once and conflates both
lists together.
#!/bin/bash
declare -a tcp25_set tcp465_set tcp_25_465_set
banned_ports_list=25,465,993,995
logwatch_file=/var/log/exim4/logwatch-email-20190622a.eml
# NB ipr
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
The script needs more work it is not exim4-exploiters, it is for
repeated failed logins.
As it is now, it will treat any single failure as one to ban and that
is only going to cause trouble. Although users should be logged in
normally and will
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hi,
On 24/6/19 12:14 am, The Wanderer wrote:
> The short version of this is that I think I need to clear out a
> lot of irrelevant keys / signatures, et cetera, from my gnupg
> configuration - but I don't want to do anything which risks losing
> m
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hi,
> On 24/6/19 12:14 am, The Wanderer wrote:
>> The short version of this is that I think I need to clear out a
>> lot of irrelevant keys / signatures, et cetera, from my gnupg
>> configuration - but I don't want to do anything which risks losing
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hi,
On 8/8/19 2:27 pm, Shahryar Afifi wrote:
> Very well said. If debian free is not using amd64 microcode, so
> what kernel module runs my cpu as 64bit?
Here's part of the problem.
The CPU has it's own microcode, when you buy it; the motherbo
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 8/8/19 11:06 pm, Shahryar Afifi wrote:
> Thank you for this acknowledgment. Currently I have X61 with
> Middleton BIOS that claims to be free. Is that also not the case?
You can have a free BIOS, "Core boot, or similar?" ... but the CPU
itself
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hi,
On 9/8/19 6:59 am, John Hasler wrote:
> Shahryar Afifi wrote:
>> Currently I have X61 with Middleton BIOS that claims to be free.
>> Is that also not the case?
>
> We are talking about the microcode that is stored inside the cpu,
> not the BIOS
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hi,
On 10/8/19 1:32 pm, David wrote:
> I don't know the answer, but you might find some clues here:
> https://codesearch.debian.net/search?q=history.db&literal=1 Note
> the list of package names at the top of the page.
Why is it not accessible vi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hi,
I have DKIM setup, however, it only signs messages that are being
delivered via SMTP to another server.
Why is it not valid to sign to the same domain name and/or other
domain names served by the same mail server and NOT having to make an
SMTP
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hi,
On 22/8/19 7:52 pm, Reco wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 22, 2019 at 07:27:23PM +1000, Andrew McGlashan wrote: >> I have
> DKIM setup, however, it only signs messages that are being >>
delivered via SMTP to another server. >
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hi,
On 24/8/19 7:24 pm, Reco wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 24, 2019 at 03:27:09PM +1000, Andrew McGlashan wrote:
>> Okay, I've changed the the DKIM_SIGN_HEADERS ... let's see if
>> this is good, thanks
>
> This e-mail passed
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 24/8/19 7:51 pm, Andrew McGlashan wrote:
> but most already email users won't have a clue.
... but most *ordinary* email users ...
And an Enigmail setting gives me the confirmation before sending (not
TB itself).
A.
-B
Hi,
On 25/4/20 6:40 am, 0...@caiway.net wrote:
> On my debian stable firefox 75 the sound stopped working.
Personally, I always use direct downloads for browsers.
I've also started to use apulse with Firefox and other browsers with alsa sound
only.
/usr/bin/apulse /home/andrewm/firefox
On 2/11/14 8:58 am, Elimar Riesebieter wrote:
> * David Baron [2014-11-01 19:13 +0200]:
>
>> On Friday 31 October 2014 13:08:27 Elimar Riesebieter wrote:
>
> [...]
>
>>> It's your decision. MODULES=most should be okay. BUSYBOX=y is
>>> essential.
>>
>> This is what the install gave me. I hav
Hi,
On 8/7/20 2:11 am, Michael Stone wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 07, 2020 at 10:45:17AM -0500, David Wright wrote:
>> On Wed 08 Jul 2020 at 00:41:12 (+1000), Andrew McGlashan wrote:
>>> On 2/11/14 8:58 am, Elimar Riesebieter wrote:
>>> > * David Baron [2014-11-01 19:
On 8/7/20 3:35 pm, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> On Mi, 08 iul 20, 02:35:09, Andrew McGlashan wrote:
>> On 8/7/20 2:11 am, Michael Stone wrote:
>>>
>>> The short answer is that there simply isn't a good reason to do this
>>> on a modern system, and the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hi,
On 22/8/20 3:46 am, local10 wrote:
> What would be a reasonably secure and simple way to encrypt files on Linux
> and then send them to a non-technical Windows user so she would be able
> decrypt and read them?
>
> Any ideas? Thanks
Lots of
Hi,
On 15/07/18 14:54, Octopus Octopus wrote:
> I'm having this confusing bug where I launch thunderbird and it instead
> launches 2 copies of it, I originally had an extra .desktop file for the
> thunderbird-beta deleting it had no effect.
No, it's not launching two copies; it is doing what Fire
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 25/07/18 04:31, john doe wrote:
> Also verifying signature using gnupg and checksum is a must
> (sha512).
Such verification is suspect, anyone can create gpg keys for anyone
(so trust in the keys used is essential, but more difficult to attain)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 25/07/18 12:17, Rick Thomas wrote:
> On Jul 24, 2018, at 2:41 PM, Matthew Crews
> wrote:
>> Personally, I have a low degree of trust for Mega.nz, so caveat
>> emptor.
> Why do you say that? (serious question!) Have there been reports
> of pro
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hi,
On 25/07/18 07:41, Matthew Crews wrote:
> In addition to this, be sure not to break Debian:
>
> https://wiki.debian.org/DontBreakDebian
> https://wiki.debian.org/DebianSoftware#Footnotes
"Broken" many of us strongly believe that once the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 25/07/18 23:52, Darac Marjal wrote:
>> I'm not sure you understand how Debian works, then. Debian is a
>> political animal as much as it is technical. There was a
>> technical requirement for a better init system, so there was a
>> political pr
On 20/08/18 05:40, Gene Heskett wrote:
> Whats the recommended way to do these mounts so I can maintain as much
> continuity as possible?
Those other areas, are they logical volumes perhaps? lvms.
Cheers
A.
Hi,
On 11/09/18 22:48, Matthew Crews wrote:
> My recommendation is to use a separate /boot partition and make it EXT2.
Why not at least ext3? I don't baulk at ext4 btw for /boot -- I can
never understand why ext2 is recommended when ext4 gives no trouble and
has other advantages, even ext3 has j
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 15/09/18 16:48, Pascal Hambourg wrote:
> Le 15/09/2018 à 00:45, Matthew Crews a écrit :
>> On Friday, September 14, 2018 10:58 AM, Pascal Hambourg
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Actually you can have / including /boot on LUKS with GRUB. It
>>> is just not
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hi,
On 18/09/18 04:15, deloptes wrote:
> I wanted to have a look at this link, that someone mentioned:
> https://hamy.io/post/0009/how-to-install-luks-encrypted-ubuntu-18.04.x
- -server-and-enable-remote-unlocking/
>
>
It seems to address the ques
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 09/19/2018 02:57 AM, Andy Smith wrote:
> For sophisticated attackers who could do the clever thing, and had
> physical access to the server for enough time, it would be simpler
> to get a key for an encrypted file system by using hardware memory
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 27/09/18 03:17, Jonathan Dowland wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 26, 2018 at 06:14:42PM +0200, deloptes wrote:
>> so how can we do it with initram and without some external key
>> server? Imagine I have only boot not encrypted on the server. I
>> want to b
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hi,
On 30/09/18 16:44, deloptes wrote:
> Celejar wrote:
>
>> But grub itself and its configuration can't be encrypted, so an
>> attacker could still compromise that code / data. IIUC, your
>> solution basically just implies moving some of the logi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 30/09/18 11:06, Dennis Wicks wrote:
> What has happened to xfce.org? It seems to have disappeared and
> left no tracks.
# whois xfce.org
Domain Name: XFCE.ORG
Registry Domain ID: D2054147-LROR
Registrar WHOIS Server: whois.networksolutions.com
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 30/09/18 11:06, Dennis Wicks wrote:
> What has happened to xfce.org? It seems to have disappeared and
> left no tracks.
If there is something you need from archive, you might find it here:
https://web.archive.org/web/*/https://xfce.org
Cheers
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hi,
On 11/10/18 00:17, Mariusz Gronczewski wrote:
> On previous releases, and on our CentOS systems I could change
> password of user by just sudo-ing to root and typing "passwd
> testuser"
>
> In current Debian release, doing that asks me to speci
Hi,
On 15/10/18 09:06, Long Wind wrote:
> given two directories, the program can print files that are in both
> directories
>
> to make it easy, if file name and size are same, then they are same
>
> i've to admit my memory is poor, if good, who need such program?
>
> i'm about to write it in j
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hi,
On 20/10/18 11:16, arne wrote:
> While browsing on stock updated Debian stretch I get several times
> a day:
>
> Secure Connection Failed
>
> The connection to www.google.com was interrupted while the page was
> loading.
>
> The page you are
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hi,
On 21/10/18 06:05, Brian wrote:
> On Sat 20 Oct 2018 at 07:19:50 -0500, Richard Owlett wrote:
>> Had never heard of 'zenity'. I browsed the text of the page. To
>> read it as intended I'll have to use an alternate profile -- it
>> expects "featu
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 13/11/18 12:49 am, Alan Taylor wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> I have an ssh problem - one user can use it successfully, another
> cannot. I have checked and rechecked permissions until I am blue in
> the face … At the moment just trying to ssh into t
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Okay, show us the user's home directory permissions and that of their
own .ssh directory please.
Also, the permissions of the authorized_keys file.
And there are no typos in /etc/group for the users allowed by
"AllowUsers" ?
Nothing in the sshd_co
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 14/11/18 8:44 pm, Brian wrote:
> On Tue 13 Nov 2018 at 18:50:35 -0800, pe...@easthope.ca wrote:
>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brute-force_attack
>
> Security is already breached if a password database can be attacked
> in that way. A six cha
On 14/11/18 9:28 pm, Corey Manshack wrote:
> If they have /etc/shadow why would they need to brute force :) I can’t think
> of a vuln that would give that up without them already having root.
A website file uploader tool, apparantly there has been one there for
about 10 years using jquery. On
On 14/11/18 10:25 pm, Corey Manshack wrote:
> So using the file uploader tool we can inject many more dangerous scripts and
> codes to gain higher access than just “reading” /etc/shadow if the uploader
> tool is running as privileged user or we gained privilege escalation another
> way.
Sure
On 14/11/18 11:09 pm, Corey Manshack wrote:
> It may be that the Debian team is more in tune with their users. I’ve caught
> hell trying to convince old timers that their password of mark1 was
> incredibly horrible. People even tried to get me fired over my “strict”
> password policy.
There
On 14/11/18 10:19 pm, Brian wrote:
> There are two situations I can think of which could lead to /etc/shadow
> becoming vulnerable:
>
> 1. The machine's administrator causes it to happen.
> 2. There is a flaw in one the OS's components.
>
> The least said about cause 1, the better. There is no
On 15/11/18 2:51 am, Brian wrote:
> And what is the value to an attacker in having /etc/shadow, assuming it
> can be decrypted in a sensible time frame? Remotely logging in? Surely
> not in these days of ssh keys?
Well re-use of passwords.
We all know that if you have a username (often tim
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hi,
On 15/11/18 2:01 am, Lee wrote:
> What are you using to backup your files to an encrypted usb drive?
In an ideal world:
1. Don't use TrueCrypt any longer, VeraCrypt is the natural
replacement in the Winblows world. TrueCrypt hasn't been consi
On 8/12/18 8:24 pm, Felmon Davis wrote:
> Greets!
>
> I decided to upgrade from Jessie to Stretch last night. it seems to have
> worked though there are some oddities.
High DPI changes perhaps?
A.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hi,
On 10/2/19 10:28 am, chris wrote:
> so relevant https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o_AIw9bGogo
I've seen references to that video and have not yet watched it.
I also understand that people have differing views on what the
presenter concludes or r
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hi,
On 10/2/19 6:44 pm, Andrew McGlashan wrote:
> On 10/2/19 10:28 am, chris wrote:
>> so relevant https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o_AIw9bGogo
>
> I've seen references to that video and have not yet watched it.
>
> I a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hi,
On 10/2/19 11:17 pm, Reco wrote:
>> Okay, I've watched it now. I am not convinced that his idea of
>> "create this or that yourself" is a fair retort.
>
> There are historical precedents. AIX's init inspired Solaris' SMF
> which in turn inspi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hi,
On 11/2/19 4:40 am, Reco wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 11, 2019 at 03:55:04AM +1100, Andrew McGlashan wrote:
> Which, in turn, has xml, central database, socket activation and
> very rudimentary dependency resolution. I don't remember of
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hi,
On 13/2/19 3:14 am, Jonathan Dowland wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 10, 2019 at 09:24:39AM +0100, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
>> On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 01:47:20AM +1000, Andrew McGlashan
>> wrote:
>
> Did I miss 4 years of posts or
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 3/10/19 3:32 am, Brad Rogers wrote:
> On Wed, 2 Oct 2019 10:38:44 -0400 Lee wrote:
>
> Hello Lee,
>
>> Thanks for the link!
>>
>>> But the email program used by Client 0 is unspecified.
>>
>> As is the operating system - or did I miss that?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hi,
On 3/10/19 10:28 am, Keith Bainbridge wrote:
...
Well, given the fact that too many emails these days are HTML type;
ala web based they are suspect to email programs running
javascript and/or other scripting languages due to default setting
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hi,
On 4/10/19 6:17 am, Joe wrote:
> On Thu, 3 Oct 2019 20:54:10 +0100 Brian
> wrote:
>
>
>>
>> Opening an email causes no problem to the system on Debian. We
>> would be in deep trouble if it did.
>
> That has been my experience, but I did bri
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hi,
On 13/10/19 2:34 am, steef wrote:
> Is HPDeskjet 3762 a good (simple) replacement? Is somebody out
> there who has some experience with HP-printers??
Not listed here [1], but it could be out of date:
Also not listed here [2], again, it could b
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hi,
I have DMARC with DKIM and SPF setup for my domain name.
When I sent emails to Debian lists, I tend to get a bunch of DMARC
reports as a result. The reports of concern are ones that show a
sending IP for my domain that is the IP of the Debian
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hi,
Thanks Reco.
On 13/10/19 9:59 pm, Reco wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 13, 2019 at 04:20:17PM +1100, Andrew McGlashan wrote:
>> Is this due to email forwarding by Debian servers or is it for
>> some other reason? How
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hi,
On 14/10/19 9:42 pm, 황병희 wrote:
> Andrew McGlashan writes:
>> I have DMARC with DKIM and SPF setup for my domain name.
>
> There was related discussion: it's very seriosus...
> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugrepo
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hi,
On 21/10/19 2:36 am, Berkhan Berkdemir wrote:
> Yesterday I was looking away to install Flash Player for Firefox on
> Debian Buster and followed a Debian Wiki page [0]; however, I
> didn't make Flash Player work. I also found this script [1], wh
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hi,
On 25/10/19 1:22 am, Boyan Penkov wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Ulrich Drepper's piece on on-chip memory architectures is a
> fantastic read, and I recently had the chance to revisit it --
> https://people.freebsd.org/~lstewart/articles/cpumemory.pdf
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hi,
On 31/10/19 5:58 am, Nicolas George wrote:
> Is there somewhere in Debian a KISS version of GnuPG or something
> compatible?
>
> The current default version of GnuPG, since 2015, necessarily uses
> a client-server agent to access the private k
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hi,
On 1/11/19 2:21 am, Nicolas George wrote:
> Andrew McGlashan (12019-11-01):
>> If I understand correctly, the agent is getting in your way.
>>
>> Killing the agent /might/ be your answer:
>
> Unfortunately no: u
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 1/11/19 2:22 am, The Wanderer wrote:
> On 2019-10-31 at 11:18, Greg Wooledge wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Nov 01, 2019 at 02:12:54AM +1100, Andrew McGlashan
>> wrote:
>>
>>> If you kill all agents to stop them interfer
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 1/11/19 2:26 am, Nicolas George wrote:
> Andrew McGlashan (12019-11-01):
>> So, perhaps the agent is restarted by systemd -- perhaps you can
>> disable it using systemctl commands to stop it restarting ...
>> then the age
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 1/11/19 2:26 am, Nicolas George wrote:
> Andrew McGlashan (12019-11-01):
>> So, perhaps the agent is restarted by systemd -- perhaps you can
>> disable it using systemctl commands to stop it restarting ...
>> then the age
On 1/11/19 2:34 am, Nicolas George wrote:
> At the very least, to trust gpg with its agent, I would require options
> to explicitly set the path of the agent's socket and to print the path
> of the socket that was used.
reply-list works perfectly this end, forget what's in the headers for
reply-t
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 1/11/19 2:36 am, Nicolas George wrote:
> Andrew McGlashan (12019-11-01):
>> btw doesn't "reply list" work for you? I get all list messages
>> okay.
>
> If you do not want to be on copy, use the standard r
On 1/11/19 2:51 am, Nicolas George wrote:
> Andrew McGlashan (12019-11-01):
>> reply-list works perfectly this end
>
> reply-list requires paying attention to whether it is a list or a
> private e-mail. That would be acceptable, but since there is a solution
> that does n
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 1/11/19 3:10 am, Nicolas George wrote:
> Possible with Mutt:
>
> send-hook . "unmy_hdr Reply-To:" send-hook
> ~cdebian-u...@lists.debian.org my_hdr "Reply-To:
> debian-user@lists.debian.org"
Do you also have "ignore list-post:" in your muttrc
On 15/12/19 7:53 am, ghe wrote:
>> On Fri, Dec 13, 2019, 17:12 Britton Kerin wrote:
>>
>>> I see from below vote that we're working on dumping other init systems
>>> now as expected. Luckily I've given up on debian since systemd in the
>>> first place and am in long process of finding a replace
scponlyc -- the chroot version, that allows winscp.
Cheers
AndrewM
Andrew McGlashan
Broadband Solutions now including VoIP
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
pe is a
risk, full stop.
Kind Regards
AndrewM
Andrew McGlashan
Broadband Solutions now including VoIP
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Kind Regards
AndrewM
Andrew McGlashan
Broadband Solutions now including VoIP
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
n't have to drag
it to trash first, I have enough double handling without the extra bad
behaviours of gmail to contend with.
Kind Regads
AndrewM
Andrew McGlashan
Broadband Solutions now including VoIP
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of
ne, wasn't sure if it
would be worth updating to Lenny.
How much memory do you have on the old Dell? Does everything run fine after
the startup slowness?
Kind Regards
AndrewM
Andrew McGlashan
Broadband Solutions now including VoIP
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.deb
cf -)' | tar xf -
Kind Regards
AndrewM
Andrew McGlashan
Broadband Solutions now including VoIP
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
AndrewM
Andrew McGlashan
Broadband Solutions now including VoIP
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
understanding that DX chips become SX chips
(perhaps only 486 ones) when the math co-processor failed to function
properly, the co-pro was disabled. Otherwise the faulty chips would be
junk, selling them as SX made them still worth something.
Kind Regards
AndrewM
Andrew McGlashan
Broadband Solutions now
having mail
there and I could use the linux mail program and view system sent
mail, but other than than I'm kinda clueless.
Have you got this directory?
/var/log/exim4/
If so, check logs there.
Kind Regafds
AndrewM
Andrew McGlashan
Broadband Solutions now including VoIP
--
To UNSUBS
Andrew McGlashan
Broadband Solutions now including VoIP
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
t takes quite a while before it opens, but it
does open.
The real test will be passing ssh tunnel traffic through it when I need to
at some stage on the road from my trusted IPs.
Kind Regards
AndrewM
Andrew McGlashan
Broadband Solutions now including VoIP
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to d
sting with spamassassin to pretty good effect.
Kind Regards
AndrewM
Andrew McGlashan
Broadband Solutions now including VoIP
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
uot;forever" to decrypt by
cracking the keys (all of them). ;)
Kind Regards
AndrewM
Andrew McGlashan
Broadband Solutions now including VoIP
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Hi,
Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
You probably have an existing spam collection (your spam folder at
gmail). As for ham: your other folders.
Only if he let's it collect or he captures and keeps it over time.
Kind Regards
AndrewM
Andrew McGlashan
Broadband Solutions now including VoIP
Hi,
Aneurin Price wrote:
On Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 12:36 PM, Andrew McGlashan
wrote:
Aneurin Price wrote:
Maybe this would suit you:
http://www.geekpage.jp/en/programming/linux-network/get-ipaddr.php
(Changing eth0 to ppp0 obviously)
Okay.
NB. To get that example to work I had to change the
ant to find some more gems like this... you have inspired me.
Kind Regards
AndrewM
Andrew McGlashan
Broadband Solutions now including VoIP
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
one.
Begin: Assembling all MD arrays ... mdadm: No devices listed in conf file
were found.
Failure: failed to assemble all arrays.
done.
Inside the initramfs file system, the /etc/mdadm/mdadm.conf file looks
fine -- it includes the correct details including the UUID of each mirror.
Kind Regards
hould on the 'bad' machine when the
processes are exactly the same and work fine on the 'good' machine.
> Hope this helps,
Thanks.
Kind Regards
AndrewM
Andrew McGlashan
Broadband Solutions now including VoIP
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.deb
ed by root, so the
login failed. I fixed this and made sure his group could write to the
directory, but it is now owned by root.
Kind Regards
AndrewM
Andrew McGlashan
Broadband Solutions now including VoIP
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "
Hi,
Andrew McGlashan wrote:
The problem was that the chroot home directory wasn't owned by root,
so the login failed. I fixed this and made sure his group could
write to the directory, but it is now owned by root.
One little problem I had to remove the group write permissions.
1 - 100 of 611 matches
Mail list logo
