Greetings! :)
[Sent to debian-x because I do not know the proper package against which
to submit a bug report. Branden, please advise for general X bug
reports.]
This is the second sig11 I have seen lately. I have also seen
cut'n'paste fail miserably for the last few days. (Well, the cut seems
fi
Greetings! :)
[Sent to debian-x because I do not know the proper package against which
to submit a bug report. Branden, please advise for general X bug
reports.]
This is the second sig11 I have seen lately. I have also seen
cut'n'paste fail miserably for the last few days. (Well, the cut seems
f
Greetings folks! [Apologies for not returning after winter break; my
senior project is taking too much of time.]
I am trying to compile plex86 on my Debian unstable system with XFree86
4.0.2-7, kernel 2.4.2 SMP (on dual celerons), glibc 2.2.2-1. I get an
error message saying it cannot find libX11
Greetings folks! [Apologies for not returning after winter break; my
senior project is taking too much of time.]
I am trying to compile plex86 on my Debian unstable system with XFree86
4.0.2-7, kernel 2.4.2 SMP (on dual celerons), glibc 2.2.2-1. I get an
error message saying it cannot find libX11
[this email is almost entirely useless.]
I am off for winter break in a very short time. Once the debian web
servers are back online, I am going to unsubscribe from debian-x -- best
of luck to the regulars covering the myriad questions people manage to
ask. :) I figured a heads-up was in order
[this email is almost entirely useless.]
I am off for winter break in a very short time. Once the debian web
servers are back online, I am going to unsubscribe from debian-x -- best
of luck to the regulars covering the myriad questions people manage to
ask. :) I figured a heads-up was in order...
God, I would love to know how the rest of the four billion people on the
planet cope with their own character set. It would be nice to help him
out, but someone else is going to have to do it. :(
* Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [001214 08:51]:
> I don't really know much about un-American ke
God, I would love to know how the rest of the four billion people on the
planet cope with their own character set. It would be nice to help him
out, but someone else is going to have to do it. :(
* Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [001214 08:51]:
> I don't really know much about un-American k
* Christian T. Steigies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [001214 03:23]:
> We don't _need_ to compile it on m68k, since it does not even work yet. But
> I still have some hope that one or more of the zillions of m68k users step
> forward to pick up the pieces and make X work (btw no reply yet from the X
> guy,
* Christian T. Steigies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [001214 03:23]:
> We don't _need_ to compile it on m68k, since it does not even work yet. But
> I still have some hope that one or more of the zillions of m68k users step
> forward to pick up the pieces and make X work (btw no reply yet from the X
> guy,
* Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [001213 22:43]:
> Let me know if this works out, and I will babysit XFree86 builds for m68k
> myself, using the recently-donated G3.
Well, I wasn't thinking of emulating one of those old machines -- I was
thinking of setting up gcc to know about the processor
[No need to mail Branden directly; debian-user or debian-x are probably
the better forums anyway.]
* Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [001213 20:46]:
> - Forwarded message from Dale Scheetz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
> When working in X, I am often switching back to a console VC, and then
>
Rene (sorry, no idea how to get the nifty ' atop the 'e'. :) --
I haven't got a clue what you mean. :)
It isn't so obvious to me, nor likely obvious to anyone else, that the
3.3.6 X server is in the package labeled 4.0.1-11. :) Sometimes, it is
the obvious things that need to be pointed out -- si
* Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [001213 22:43]:
> Let me know if this works out, and I will babysit XFree86 builds for m68k
> myself, using the recently-donated G3.
Well, I wasn't thinking of emulating one of those old machines -- I was
thinking of setting up gcc to know about the processo
[No need to mail Branden directly; debian-user or debian-x are probably
the better forums anyway.]
* Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [001213 20:46]:
> - Forwarded message from Dale Scheetz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
> When working in X, I am often switching back to a console VC, and then
Rene (sorry, no idea how to get the nifty ' atop the 'e'. :) --
I haven't got a clue what you mean. :)
It isn't so obvious to me, nor likely obvious to anyone else, that the
3.3.6 X server is in the package labeled 4.0.1-11. :) Sometimes, it is
the obvious things that need to be pointed out -- s
* Christian T. Steigies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [001213 15:37]:
> Just for reference: Build needed 18:30:59 (so that Branden knows how long I
> need _at least_ to get a new MANIFEST).
Could a cross-compile environment bring this down? Is there any *need*
to compile these things on an m68k? I imagine t
John, I *think* xhost needs to be used more like: xhost +blah -- no
space. ObQuestion: Have you restarted X since removing the -nolisten tcp
bit? :)
* John K. Stevenson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [001213 14:43]:
> Seth:
> Oops, I am unclear again:
> I did use "xhost + blah", and it still refuses.
> Also
* Norbert Veber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [001213 13:28]:
> I while back during one of my upgrades, I read something about a new
> default -- X no longer listens on port 6000 for connections. I didnt
> pay much attention at the time, but now it turns out that I need to have
> remote X clients connect
[Error messages from John]
[Branden -- will the Xwrapper.config 'console' or 'root' option prevent
client connections from other hosts? Or does this effect only who can
run X locally, as I hope it does? :]
Bummer about not being able to use ssh. (Though I am surprised the
firewall would let X con
* Christian T. Steigies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [001213 15:37]:
> Just for reference: Build needed 18:30:59 (so that Branden knows how long I
> need _at least_ to get a new MANIFEST).
Could a cross-compile environment bring this down? Is there any *need*
to compile these things on an m68k? I imagine
John, I *think* xhost needs to be used more like: xhost +blah -- no
space. ObQuestion: Have you restarted X since removing the -nolisten tcp
bit? :)
* John K. Stevenson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [001213 14:43]:
> Seth:
> Oops, I am unclear again:
> I did use "xhost + blah", and it still refuses.
> Als
* Norbert Veber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [001213 13:28]:
> I while back during one of my upgrades, I read something about a new
> default -- X no longer listens on port 6000 for connections. I didnt
> pay much attention at the time, but now it turns out that I need to have
> remote X clients connec
[Error messages from John]
[Branden -- will the Xwrapper.config 'console' or 'root' option prevent
client connections from other hosts? Or does this effect only who can
run X locally, as I hope it does? :]
Bummer about not being able to use ssh. (Though I am surprised the
firewall would let X co
John, I am going to guess at what you are trying to say; cutting and
pasting error messages, complete with examples of what you are trying to
execture (say, how script(1) would perform) would help immensely,
particularly with this description.
There, that said, my guess says you are trying to run
* Marcelo E. Magallon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [001213 00:21]:
> But the question still remains: why should a user put packages on
> hold before an upgrade? He's got a working configuration, and AFAICS
> it's possible to keep it.
Using the -u flag with apt would have saved him as much as using = in
John, I am going to guess at what you are trying to say; cutting and
pasting error messages, complete with examples of what you are trying to
execture (say, how script(1) would perform) would help immensely,
particularly with this description.
There, that said, my guess says you are trying to run
* Marcelo E. Magallon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [001213 00:21]:
> But the question still remains: why should a user put packages on
> hold before an upgrade? He's got a working configuration, and AFAICS
> it's possible to keep it.
Using the -u flag with apt would have saved him as much as using = i
* Drew Parsons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [001212 18:18]:
> > That's dpkg-reconfigure, actually...
>
> "dpkg-reconfigure xfree86-common" doesn't seem to do anything for me. It
> runs, exits, and Xwrapper.config is exactly the same as it was before.
This would probably mean you set your debconf severity
* Marcelo E. Magallon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [001212 16:39]:
> [...] and Utah's has some advantages for some people.
And the one person who has seemed to be effected thus far did not take
the time and effort to put his packages on hold. :-P
> > Whether it is better or worse, I am not prepared to m
* Drew Parsons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [001212 18:18]:
> > That's dpkg-reconfigure, actually...
>
> "dpkg-reconfigure xfree86-common" doesn't seem to do anything for me. It
> runs, exits, and Xwrapper.config is exactly the same as it was before.
This would probably mean you set your debconf severit
Ernst, I *think* the end problem is, XF86 uses a different set of locale
names than FSF's glibc uses. I don't know the answer. Branden and (ben?)
have exchanged a few emails in debian-x about possible solutions/sources
of the problem. The debian-x archives may be interesting reading. Until
somethin
Branden, could you change the error message (sorry, only root is allowed
to run X) to state that the answer lies in Xwrapper.config, or
dpkg-reconfigure ?
Thanks :)
--
``Oh Lord; Ooh you are so big; So absolutely huge; Gosh we're all
really impressed down here, I can tell you.''
* Marcelo E. Magallon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [001212 14:40]:
> DRI's implementation is orders of magnitude cleaner and it *is* a
> better option for some people (most of the people, probably), but
> brushing Utah as a thing "in the past" is, at best, cluelessness. If
> *you* had trouble setting u
* Marcelo E. Magallon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [001212 16:39]:
> [...] and Utah's has some advantages for some people.
And the one person who has seemed to be effected thus far did not take
the time and effort to put his packages on hold. :-P
> > Whether it is better or worse, I am not prepared to
Lukas, I think there are several things going on at once. xhost allows
individual hosts to connect to X -- by default, X doesn't listen to tcp
sockets (the -nolisten tcp bit in one of the /etc/X11/ files) so remote
hosts will not be able to connect, with or without xhost authorization.
Also, ssh d
Ernst, I *think* the end problem is, XF86 uses a different set of locale
names than FSF's glibc uses. I don't know the answer. Branden and (ben?)
have exchanged a few emails in debian-x about possible solutions/sources
of the problem. The debian-x archives may be interesting reading. Until
somethi
Branden, could you change the error message (sorry, only root is allowed
to run X) to state that the answer lies in Xwrapper.config, or
dpkg-reconfigure ?
Thanks :)
--
``Oh Lord; Ooh you are so big; So absolutely huge; Gosh we're all
really impressed down here, I can tell you.''
--
To UNSUB
* Terry 'Mongoose' Hendrix II <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [001212 01:32]:
>
> > The thing is, no one is weeding anything out. Users can still run 3.3.x.
>
> You can't install 3.3.6-18 anymore, so I think it is cutting users out.
Perhaps it is cutting out users who join the project with woody's
original
* Marcelo E. Magallon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [001212 14:40]:
> DRI's implementation is orders of magnitude cleaner and it *is* a
> better option for some people (most of the people, probably), but
> brushing Utah as a thing "in the past" is, at best, cluelessness. If
> *you* had trouble setting
Lukas, I think there are several things going on at once. xhost allows
individual hosts to connect to X -- by default, X doesn't listen to tcp
sockets (the -nolisten tcp bit in one of the /etc/X11/ files) so remote
hosts will not be able to connect, with or without xhost authorization.
Also, ssh
* Terry 'Mongoose' Hendrix II <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [001212 01:32]:
>
> > The thing is, no one is weeding anything out. Users can still run 3.3.x.
>
> You can't install 3.3.6-18 anymore, so I think it is cutting users out.
Perhaps it is cutting out users who join the project with woody's
origina
[note: I've cut nothing from the body of Terry's original email, only
interspersed my comments in his email.]
* Terry 'Mongoose' Hendrix II <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [001212 00:52]:
> Seth Arnold wrote:
>
>
> > Please reconsider this statement. Who forces y
* Terry 'Mongoose' Hendrix II <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [001212 00:14]:
> You're forcing people to give up performance, correctness, and
> hardware GL accelration altogether in some cases.
Aha!
We have found the root of the problem. :)
Please reconsider this statement. Who forces you to do anything? D
* Terry 'Mongoose' Hendrix II <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [001211 23:29]:
> I told the X people months ago not to force out utah - that's why I'm
> pissed off. An overnight upgrade of gtk shouldn't break my x server. I
> also think hiding behind the debian stand-by "it's not even supposed to
> work" is w
[note: I've cut nothing from the body of Terry's original email, only
interspersed my comments in his email.]
* Terry 'Mongoose' Hendrix II <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [001212 00:52]:
> Seth Arnold wrote:
>
>
> > Please reconsider this statement. Who forces y
* Terry 'Mongoose' Hendrix II <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [001212 00:14]:
> You're forcing people to give up performance, correctness, and
> hardware GL accelration altogether in some cases.
Aha!
We have found the root of the problem. :)
Please reconsider this statement. Who forces you to do anything?
* Terry 'Mongoose' Hendrix II <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [001211 23:29]:
> I told the X people months ago not to force out utah - that's why I'm
> pissed off. An overnight upgrade of gtk shouldn't break my x server. I
> also think hiding behind the debian stand-by "it's not even supposed to
> work" is
Would the /etc/X11/Xwrapper.config file affect gdm or kdm?
* Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [001211 19:46]:
> Not sure what the problem is here; I don't know what would make the X
> server become a zombie process.
>
> - Forwarded message from Harald Dunkel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
>
>
Romain, /etc/X11/Xwrapper.config.
Details in the debian-x archive -- I am tired of typing them. :)
* Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [001211 19:46]:
> - Forwarded message from Romain Bossart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
>
> From: Romain Bossart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
Terry, a few quick comments -- first, Utah-glx is in the past. While
their work may have been nifty at one point, and for people running
3.3.x perhaps necessary, XF 4.0.1 has a *much* easier GL system.
Second, I'm not sure what you mean by ``I have a g400, not a v3'' --
last time I ran the dexter
Would the /etc/X11/Xwrapper.config file affect gdm or kdm?
* Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [001211 19:46]:
> Not sure what the problem is here; I don't know what would make the X
> server become a zombie process.
>
> - Forwarded message from Harald Dunkel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
>
Romain, /etc/X11/Xwrapper.config.
Details in the debian-x archive -- I am tired of typing them. :)
* Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [001211 19:46]:
> - Forwarded message from Romain Bossart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
>
> From: Romain Bossart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Terry, a few quick comments -- first, Utah-glx is in the past. While
their work may have been nifty at one point, and for people running
3.3.x perhaps necessary, XF 4.0.1 has a *much* easier GL system.
Second, I'm not sure what you mean by ``I have a g400, not a v3'' --
last time I ran the dexter
If the Makefile was written well, it will be simple. Open the Makefile
with your favorite editor (vim is mine! :) and look for lines similar to
-DSOMETHING. Add the -DKERNEL_2_3 bit to this line.
Or, if there isn't something that looks right, see if there is a CCFLAGS
line -- and add the -DKERNEL_
If the Makefile was written well, it will be simple. Open the Makefile
with your favorite editor (vim is mine! :) and look for lines similar to
-DSOMETHING. Add the -DKERNEL_2_3 bit to this line.
Or, if there isn't something that looks right, see if there is a CCFLAGS
line -- and add the -DKERNEL
* Juliusz Chroboczek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [001211 10:30]:
> First of all, I'd like to know whether building Branden's packages on
> a Potato system yields a usable version of XFree86.
Thanks for the note about not needing CC:s. I never know when I see
posts from new people. :)
You can indeed build
* Juliusz Chroboczek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [001211 10:30]:
> First of all, I'd like to know whether building Branden's packages on
> a Potato system yields a usable version of XFree86.
Thanks for the note about not needing CC:s. I never know when I see
posts from new people. :)
You can indeed buil
rwarded message from Bill Darrow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
Envelope-to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivery-date: Sun, 10 Dec 2000 16:56:47 -0800
Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2000 19:54:47 -0500
From: Bill Darrow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.72 [en] (Win98; U)
X-Accept-Language: en
To: Se
Ok, this situation is less than fun.
My first thought -- pretty much guaranteed to work -- download/buy/use
the latest release of potato, and reinstall. Not much fun, but I bet X
will work.
Second thought -- try dpkg -l | grep 4.0.1 and apt-get remove all these
packages. Check your /var/cache/apt
rwarded message from Bill Darrow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
Envelope-to: sarnold@localhost
Delivery-date: Sun, 10 Dec 2000 16:56:47 -0800
Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2000 19:54:47 -0500
From: Bill Darrow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.72 [en] (Win98; U)
X-Accept-Language: en
To: Se
Ok, this situation is less than fun.
My first thought -- pretty much guaranteed to work -- download/buy/use
the latest release of potato, and reinstall. Not much fun, but I bet X
will work.
Second thought -- try dpkg -l | grep 4.0.1 and apt-get remove all these
packages. Check your /var/cache/ap
Temporarily gone. Explanation cut; i'm tired of typing it. (archives
full explanation.)
- Forwarded message from Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
Envelope-to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivery-date: Fri, 08 Dec 2000 09:28:26 -0800
Resent-Date: Fri, 8 Dec 2000 09:24:50 -0800 (PST)
X-Envelop
Temporarily gone. Explanation cut; i'm tired of typing it. (archives
full explanation.)
- Forwarded message from Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
Envelope-to: sarnold@localhost
Delivery-date: Fri, 08 Dec 2000 09:28:26 -0800
Resent-Date: Fri, 8 Dec 2000 09:24:50 -0800 (PST)
X-Envelo
[branden, you *need* to change the maintainer address to debian-x --
this is getting nuts. :]
Walter: the /etc/X11/Xwrapper.config file needs to be updated. Change
`root' to read `console' or `everyone' (or `everybody'?).
* Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [001207 20:20]:
> - Forwarded me
[branden, you *need* to change the maintainer address to debian-x --
this is getting nuts. :]
Walter: the /etc/X11/Xwrapper.config file needs to be updated. Change
`root' to read `console' or `everyone' (or `everybody'?).
* Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [001207 20:20]:
> - Forwarded m
Branden, could you add a comment line to the Xwrapper.config file to the
effect of, ``Valid values are: root, console, everybody'' -- I wasn't
sure when this one hit me, so I guessed (and got it right, but
self-documenting config files are nice :).
Thanks :)
--
``Oh Lord; Ooh you are so big; So
* Michel D?nzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [001207 15:55]:
> > Yes I have tried 800x600 and 640x480 and those modes were ok it was only my
> > default 1024x756 which was the problem.
> Ahem, I was asking about other _depths_ actually, but thanks anyway :)
Joining the conversation late ... err .. is 1024x
Sure there is Branden;
Emmanuel, 4.0.1 is *not* for potato. If you want to run 4.0.1 on potato,
please search for Charl P. Botha's packages built for potato. If things
break, recognize that is because 4.0.1 was *never meant* for potato. If
it works, then it is magic. If it breaks, that is to be ex
Branden, could you add a comment line to the Xwrapper.config file to the
effect of, ``Valid values are: root, console, everybody'' -- I wasn't
sure when this one hit me, so I guessed (and got it right, but
self-documenting config files are nice :).
Thanks :)
--
``Oh Lord; Ooh you are so big; So
* Michel D?nzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [001207 15:55]:
> > Yes I have tried 800x600 and 640x480 and those modes were ok it was only my
> > default 1024x756 which was the problem.
> Ahem, I was asking about other _depths_ actually, but thanks anyway :)
Joining the conversation late ... err .. is 1024
Sure there is Branden;
Emmanuel, 4.0.1 is *not* for potato. If you want to run 4.0.1 on potato,
please search for Charl P. Botha's packages built for potato. If things
break, recognize that is because 4.0.1 was *never meant* for potato. If
it works, then it is magic. If it breaks, that is to be e
* Christian T. Steigies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [001207 12:02]:
> I have no PCI bus, I don't see PCI mentioned in the config file, is there a
> way to stop loading that?
Me, I would try moving the module to some other directory, and see what
happens. :)
--
``Oh Lord; Ooh you are so big; So absolutel
* Christian T. Steigies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [001207 12:02]:
> I have no PCI bus, I don't see PCI mentioned in the config file, is there a
> way to stop loading that?
Me, I would try moving the module to some other directory, and see what
happens. :)
--
``Oh Lord; Ooh you are so big; So absolute
* Joshua Shagam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [001206 15:39]:
> Basically, vertices which are a certain distance from the camera and are
> within the clipping planes seem to get their texture coordinates shoved to
> 0,0. As the camera moves around the broken texture coordinates change
> quite a bit.
Well,
Andrew, it turns out both the missing Cards file *and* the ``bigger
things afoot'' -- are true; Cards was removed because xf86cfg is still
.. a work in progress. Much remains to be done, to prevent it from seg
faulting, etc.
The changelog mentions it is gone temporarily, I believe, though I
haven'
* Frederic Seraphine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [001206 04:23]:
> Is rgb.txt not used anymore ?
While researching this question, I came across this:
$ ls -ld /etc/X11/fs
drwxr-xr-x2 identd telnetd 4096 Nov 1 17:53 /etc/X11/fs
Hmm. More oddities:
$ ls -ld /etc/X11/xinit
drwxr-xr-x2 root
* Joshua Shagam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [001206 15:39]:
> Basically, vertices which are a certain distance from the camera and are
> within the clipping planes seem to get their texture coordinates shoved to
> 0,0. As the camera moves around the broken texture coordinates change
> quite a bit.
Well,
Andrew, it turns out both the missing Cards file *and* the ``bigger
things afoot'' -- are true; Cards was removed because xf86cfg is still
.. a work in progress. Much remains to be done, to prevent it from seg
faulting, etc.
The changelog mentions it is gone temporarily, I believe, though I
haven
* Frederic Seraphine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [001206 04:23]:
> Is rgb.txt not used anymore ?
While researching this question, I came across this:
$ ls -ld /etc/X11/fs
drwxr-xr-x2 identd telnetd 4096 Nov 1 17:53 /etc/X11/fs
Hmm. More oddities:
$ ls -ld /etc/X11/xinit
drwxr-xr-x2 root
* Frederic Seraphine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [001205 15:54]:
> > Depth 16 (not 16 bpp!) is a weird mode indeed. In depth 16, the
> thought it was the same thing. I still must be computer graphic illiterate
> :-).o
I always knew in my heart of hearts that the asymmetric nature of depth
16 was bad new
* Frederic Seraphine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [001205 14:13]:
> The new version of the XFree86 server using the fb driver work better
> than one month ago, the screen is no more wrapped around but it still
> present some annoying glitch: the color of the whole display is wrong,
> it has a general pink h
* Frederic Seraphine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [001205 15:54]:
> > Depth 16 (not 16 bpp!) is a weird mode indeed. In depth 16, the
> thought it was the same thing. I still must be computer graphic illiterate :-).o
I always knew in my heart of hearts that the asymmetric nature of depth
16 was bad news;
* Frederic Seraphine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [001205 14:13]:
> The new version of the XFree86 server using the fb driver work better
> than one month ago, the screen is no more wrapped around but it still
> present some annoying glitch: the color of the whole display is wrong,
> it has a general pink
* Drew Parsons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [001205 05:09]:
> I don't have any locale-gen file, config or executable. Where does it come
> from?
locales
--
``Oh Lord; Ooh you are so big; So absolutely huge; Gosh we're all
really impressed down here, I can tell you.''
* Drew Parsons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [001205 05:09]:
> I don't have any locale-gen file, config or executable. Where does it come
> from?
locales
--
``Oh Lord; Ooh you are so big; So absolutely huge; Gosh we're all
really impressed down here, I can tell you.''
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EM
Aaron, please ensure you have the xutils package installed, per the
suggestion in the xfonts-* package descriptions.
* Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [001204 15:18]:
> Sounds like he is using a really old phase1 or phase2 package.
>
> - Forwarded message from Aaron Brick <[EMAIL PROTECT
Aaron, please ensure you have the xutils package installed, per the
suggestion in the xfonts-* package descriptions.
* Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [001204 15:18]:
> Sounds like he is using a really old phase1 or phase2 package.
>
> - Forwarded message from Aaron Brick <[EMAIL PROTEC
* Morten B. Pedersen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [001204 02:28]:
> When I use locale 'da_DK', xchat, Eterm and licq becomes unstable,
> (xchat segfaults, Eterm hangs, licq segfaults from time to time)
>
> Setting locale to 'C' solve these problems, I believe that this has
> something do with the latest X.
* Morten B. Pedersen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [001204 02:28]:
> When I use locale 'da_DK', xchat, Eterm and licq becomes unstable,
> (xchat segfaults, Eterm hangs, licq segfaults from time to time)
>
> Setting locale to 'C' solve these problems, I believe that this has
> something do with the latest X
[Do you ever have one of those days when it just isn't obvious what
quoting would be best to trim? This is one of those days. :]
* Johannes Zellner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [001203 13:20]:
> Hi,
>
> did anyone manage to run vmware-2 fullscreen with DGA
> on XFree86 4.x ? -- I get the vmware message:
>
Greetings Debian User, you should consider debian-user@lists.debian.org
isntead of debian-x -- this mail list is intended for X developers.
As for your question, something like: dpkg -i kde*deb in the directory
you downloaded all the kde debs ought to do the job.
BTW -- why not just use apt with
[Do you ever have one of those days when it just isn't obvious what
quoting would be best to trim? This is one of those days. :]
* Johannes Zellner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [001203 13:20]:
> Hi,
>
> did anyone manage to run vmware-2 fullscreen with DGA
> on XFree86 4.x ? -- I get the vmware message:
Greetings Debian User, you should consider [EMAIL PROTECTED]
isntead of debian-x -- this mail list is intended for X developers.
As for your question, something like: dpkg -i kde*deb in the directory
you downloaded all the kde debs ought to do the job.
BTW -- why not just use apt with the kde re
* Frederik Vanrenterghem <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [001202 08:46]:
> I've tried recompiling the kernel (a 2.4.0test10), but that didn't work
> out, probably due to my Asus A7V motherboard or Duron 700 CPU or
> something.
uhhh... this should be investigated. Compiling an application is a
fairly straightf
* Frederik Vanrenterghem <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [001202 08:46]:
> I've tried recompiling the kernel (a 2.4.0test10), but that didn't work
> out, probably due to my Asus A7V motherboard or Duron 700 CPU or
> something.
uhhh... this should be investigated. Compiling an application is a
fairly straight
* Otto Wyss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [001201 22:07]:
> Okay, I'm going to send what I've gotten just to you, since it's rather
> much and you might decide what should be sent to debian-x.
Well, I like to see everything, and I imagine anyone else would like to
see everything too. :)
> First my XF86Conf
* Otto Wyss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [001201 22:07]:
> Okay, I'm going to send what I've gotten just to you, since it's rather
> much and you might decide what should be sent to debian-x.
Well, I like to see everything, and I imagine anyone else would like to
see everything too. :)
> First my XF86Con
sight that might be helpful to me.
>
> Anyway, thanks again for your time.
>
> Nathaniel
>
>
> On Thu, 30 Nov 2000, Seth Arnold wrote:
>
> > * Rounds Nathaniel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [001130 16:38]:
> > > I don't know if you have access to the origi
sight that might be helpful to me.
>
> Anyway, thanks again for your time.
>
> Nathaniel
>
>
> On Thu, 30 Nov 2000, Seth Arnold wrote:
>
> > * Rounds Nathaniel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [001130 16:38]:
> > > I don't know if you have access to the o
1 - 100 of 308 matches
Mail list logo
