>Is it correct that if the filter file has
>
>subject 1contains
>body 1contains
>
>and the global.cfg file has ...\filter.txt x 1 0
>
>That the total of a failed test would be 3
>
>In other words each test section failed in the filter.txt file will
Is it correct that if the filter file has
subject 1contains
body 1contains
and the global.cfg file has ...\filter.txt x 1 0
That the total of a failed test would be 3
In other words each test section failed in the filter.txt file will count
tow
At 04:36 PM 8/12/2002, Tom wrote:
> I liked this idea so much (of
a downloadable spam domain file)
> that I wrote a small utility that automatically downloaded the
> full list, incorporated it into my own list and wrote out a
> combined list. Anyone who wants to use it is welcome:
>
http://www.n
> I liked this idea so much (of a downloadable spam domain file)
> that I wrote a small utility that automatically downloaded the
> full list, incorporated it into my own list and wrote out a
> combined list. Anyone who wants to use it is welcome:
> http://www.nerosoft.com/Files/KillListGenIn
> Here is one to add to your kill list.
>
> --
> @forum.dk ID-20020812-000319
> --
Although I can not read the web site language, it appears
to be a legitimate Mail Servi
http://www.declude.com/tools/header.php
John Tolmachoff
IT Manager, Network Engineer
RelianceSoft, Inc.
Fullerton, CA 92835
www.reliancesoft.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Stic.Net
Sent: Monday, August 12, 2002 12:21 PM
To: [EMAI
> >Note that there is no Date: or Message-ID: header (I removed the headers
> >that were added by Declude and IMail). The lack of a Date: header breaks
> >RFC-compliancy (and causes much of the E-mail to get lost). The missing
> >Message-ID: header is legal, but only allowed under certain circu
>Note that there is no Date: or Message-ID: header (I removed the headers
>that were added by Declude and IMail). The lack of a Date: header breaks
>RFC-compliancy (and causes much of the E-mail to get lost). The missing
>Message-ID: header is legal, but only allowed under certain circumstan
>Messages originating from a mailto script from one of our webservers are
>failing the spamheaders and badheaders tests.
That's fairly common -- huge numbers of web scripts are out there that
don't follow the standard SMTP rules.
>Here's the full header info from the message (with the email a
Messages originating from a mailto script from one of our webservers are failing the
spamheaders and badheaders tests.
Here's what I get from Declude's site:
Code: c020020c. The E-mail failed the BADHEADERS and SPAMHEADERS tests.
This E-mail has a bogus Date: header.
Here's the full header inf
>From what I have read, in Win2k terminal services cannot connect to the
console session, however the next release of server will include this
capability, so will have "remote control" rather than a mere terminal. Many
programs have the same issue since the default action for a service that
intere
I just got an idea, I will try it and report.
John Tolmachoff
IT Manager, Network Engineer
RelianceSoft, Inc.
Fullerton, CA 92835
www.reliancesoft.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of R. Scott Perry
Sent: Monday, August 12, 2002 10:36 A
>Request to be able to view the console via terminal services.
As soon as we find out why Microsoft won't display the console via terminal
services, we'll do our best to take care of that request. :)
The problem is that there doesn't seem to be any logical reason why it does
not display.
Request to be able to view the console via terminal services.
John Tolmachoff
IT Manager, Network Engineer
RelianceSoft, Inc.
Fullerton, CA 92835
www.reliancesoft.com
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.Jun
>I've been curious about how messages show up in the Declude Console as
>they stream through.
>In the top third of the console window messages are labeled as I, O, IS,
>OS, IV, or OV (I assume these standing for incoming/outgoing, SPAM, and
>Virus).
That is correct.
>Here's my question:
>If
I've been curious about how messages show up in the Declude Console as they stream
through.
In the top third of the console window messages are labeled as I, O, IS, OS, IV, or OV
(I assume these standing for incoming/outgoing, SPAM, and Virus).
Here's my question:
If a message shows up as IS o
>It's in the sender blacklist...
Is the sender blacklist set up properly (are other blacklisted
domains/addresses working properly)? What does the line look like in your
sender blacklist file?
> and it's is not in my whitelist.
Do you have any whitelist entries? Often, mistakes are made s
Thanks for the Utility Scott MacLean !!, I set it up this AM… Works great.
Ed McNichols, MCP
Archiventure, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.archiventure.net
Tel. 570.253.1986
Fax. 570.253.4343
-Original Message-
It's in the sender blacklist... and it's is not in my whitelist.
greg
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of R. Scott Perry
Sent: Monday, August 12, 2002 10:04 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] How did this one get through
>I have this email address blocked
>
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>Yet it is still getting passed my Declude Scanner. Can anyone help with this?
Where is it blocked? In a sender blacklist ("fromfile")? Are other
blocked E-mail addresses getting blocked?
Do you have any whitelists that would allow th
---
Steven Cmajdalka [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The Graphics Group
2800 Taylor St
Dallas, TX 75226
---
Here is one to add to your kill list.
--
@forum.dk ID-20020812
I have this email address blocked
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Yet it is still getting passed my Declude Scanner. Can anyone help with this?
Received: from postoffice.inreach.com [209.142.2.45] by mail.nfti.com with ESMTP
(SMTPD32-6.06) id A3B91450046; Sun, 11 Aug 2002 02:27:05 -0400
Received: from Dq
22 matches
Mail list logo
